Estimation of relations among hysteretic response measures and design parameters for RC rectangular shear walls

A. ARAB, Ma. R. BANAN, Mo. R. BANAN, S. FARHADI

PDF(3951 KB)
PDF(3951 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 3-15. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-017-0418-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Estimation of relations among hysteretic response measures and design parameters for RC rectangular shear walls

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Seismic design of RC structures requires estimation of structural member behavioral measures as functions of design parameters. In this study, the relations among cyclic behavioral measures and design parameters have been investigated for rectangular RC shear walls using numerical simulations calibrated based on the published laboratory tests. The OpenSEES numerical simulations modeling of plastic hinge hysteretic behavior of RC shear walls and estimation of empirical relations among wall hysteretic indices and design parameters are presented. The principal design parameters considered were wall dimensions, axial force, reinforcement ratios, and end-element design parameters. The estimated hysteretic response measures are wall effective stiffness, yield and ultimate curvatures, plastic moment capacity, yield and ultimate displacements, flexural shear capacity, and dissipated energy. Using results of numerous analyses, the empirical relations among wall cyclic behavioral measures and design parameters are developed and their accuracy is investigated.

Keywords

RC wall hysteretic measures / RC wall design parameters / empirical relations / numerical simulations / RC rectangular wall plastic hinge

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
A. ARAB, Ma. R. BANAN, Mo. R. BANAN, S. FARHADI. Estimation of relations among hysteretic response measures and design parameters for RC rectangular shear walls. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 3‒15 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-017-0418-6

References

[1]
Banan M R. Beyond R-factor: design theory for damage-based seismic design of RC buildings. In: Proceedings of a Turkey–Iran–US seismic workshop, 2010
[2]
ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-11) and commentary. Farmington Hills, MI, USA: American Concrete Institute, 2011
[3]
FEMA-695. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMA, 2009
[4]
Li B. Initial stiffness of reinforced concrete columns and walls. In: World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisborn, 2012
[5]
Sakhayi S. Estimation of Relation Among Cyclic Behavioral Measures and Design Parameters for FRP-Jacketed Reinforced Concrete Columns. Dissertation for M.Sc degree. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Shiraz University, 2013
[6]
AASHTO. AASHTO guide specification for LRFD bridge design. Associated of State Highway and transportation officials, Washington D. C., 2010
[7]
Abazarnejad M. Determination of Data-Based Formula Relating Damage Index and Permanent Set to RC Column Design Parameters Using Cyclic Analysis. Dissertation for M.Sc degree. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Shiraz University, 2013
[8]
Khalifeh Mehrjardi H. Estimation of Relation between Damage Index and Column Design Parameters for Concrete Encased Column. Dissertation for M.Sc degree. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Shiraz University, 2011
[9]
Neuenhofer A, Filippou F C. Geometrically nonlinear flexibility-based frame finite element. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1998, 124(6): 704–711
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Neuenhofer A, Filippou F C. Evaluation of nonlinear frame finite-element models. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1997, 123(7): 958–966
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Mander J B, Priestley M J N, Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114(8): 1804–1826
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Karsan I D, Jirsa J O. Behavior of concrete under compressive loading. Journal of Structural Division, 1969, 95: 2543–2564
[14]
Sharifi A, Banan M R, Banan M R. A strain-consistent approach for determination of bounds of ductility damage index for different performance levels for seismic design of RC frame members. Engineering Structures, 2012, 37: 143–151
[13]
Dhakal R P, Maekawa K. Path-dependent cyclic stress–strain relationship of reinforcing bar including buckling. Engineering Structures, 2002, 14(11): 1383–1396
[15]
Oesterle R G, Fiorato A E, Johal L S, Carpenter J E, Russell H G, Coreley W G. Earthquake resistant structural walls-test of isolated walls. Natinal Science Foundation, 1976
[16]
Pilakoutas K, Elnashai A. Cyclic behaviour of reinforced concrete cantilever walls, Part I: experimental results. ACI Structural Journal, 1995, 92(3): 271–281
[17]
Thomsen J H, Wallace J W. Displacement-based design of reinforced concrete structural walls: an experimental investigation of walls with rectangular and T-shaped cross-section. National Science Foundation, 1995
[18]
Riva P, Meda A, Giuriani E. Cyclic behavior of a full scale RC structural wall. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25(6): 835–845
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Mckenna F, Fenves G L. The open system for earthquake engineering simulation. University of California at berkeley, 2013
[20]
Priestley M J N, Seible F, Calvi G M. Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges. John Wiley, 1996
[21]
Paulay T, Priestley N. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. John Wiley, 1992
[22]
Tjhin T N, Aschheim M A, Wallace J W. Yield displacement estimates for displacement-based seismic design of ductile reinforced concrete structural wall buildings. In: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 2004
[23]
Aaleti S R. Behaviour of Rectangular Concrete Walls Subjected to Simulated Seismic Loading. Dissertation for PhD degree. Iowa State University, 2009

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(3951 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/