Pavement sustainability index for highway infrastructures: A case study of Maryland

Abstract

Pavement deterioration creates conditions that undermine their performances, which gives rise to the need for maintenance and rehabilitation. This paper develops a mathematical multi-linear regression analysis (MLRA) model to determine a pavement sustainability index (PSTI) as dependent variable for flexible pavements in Maryland. Four categories of pavement performance evaluation indicators are subdivided into seven pavement condition indices and analyzed as independent variables for each section of pavement. Data are collected from five different roadways using field evaluations and existing database. Results indicate that coefficient of determination (R²) is correlated and significant, R² = 0.959. Of the seven independent variables, present serviceability index (PSI) is the most significant with a coefficient value of 0.032, present serviceability rating (PSR) coefficient value= 0.028, and international roughness index (IRI) coefficient value= ‒0.001. Increasing each unit value of coefficients for PSI and PSR would increase the value of PSTI; thereby providing a more sustainable pavement infrastructure; which explains the significance of the model and why IRI will most likely impact environmental, economic and social values.

Keywords

pavement indices / sustainability / pavement performance / flexible pavements

References

[1] Obazee-Igbinedion, S O, Jha M K, Owolabi O. Building sustainability index for highway Infrastructures: A case study of flexible pavements. Journal of Biourbanism, 2013(2013): 1–2

[2] Hveem F N, Carmany R M. The Factors Underlying the Rational Design of Pavements Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: Highway Research Board, 1948

[3] Jayawickrama P W, Prasanna R, Senadheera S P. Survey of state practices to control skid resistance on hot-mix asphalt concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1996, 1536, 52–58

[4] Gillespie T D. Everything you always wanted to know about IRI, but were afraid to ask. 1992

[5] Asphalt Institute. Asphalt overlays for highway and street rehabilitation. Manual Series No. 17. 1983

[6] American Association of State Highway Officials. The AASHO road test, pavement research, Report 5. 1960

[7] Graham, J. Internal Traffic Control Plan. Kansas: Midwest Research Institute, 2005

[8] Carvalho R, Stubstad R, Briggs R, Selezneva O, Mustafa E, Raamachandran A. Simplified techniques for evaluation and interpretation of pavement deflections for network-level analysis. Report No. FHWA-HRT-12-023. 2013

[9] Carey, W N, Irick, P E. The pavement serviceability-performance concept, HRB Bulletin 250. 1960

[10] Islam S, Buttlar W G.Effect of pavement roughness on user costs. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, 2285: 47–55

[11] Obazee-Igbinedion S O. Building sustainability index for highway infrastructures: A case study of flexible pavements. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Baltimore: Morgan State University, 2015

[12] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for skid resistance of paved surfaces using a full-scale tire, ASTME 274. 1995

[13] Papagiannakis, A T, Masad E A. Pavement Design and Materials. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2007

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany