Joint slip investigation based on finite element modelling verified by experimental results on wind turbine lattice towers

Abstract

Slippage corresponds to the relative displacement of a bolted joint subjected to shear loads since the construction clearance between the bolt shank and the bolthole at assembly can cause joint slip. Deflections of towers with joint slippage effects is up to 1.9 times greater than the displacements obtained by linear analytical methods. In this study, 8 different types of joints are modelled and studied in the finite element program, and the results are verified by the experimental results which have been done in the laboratory. Moreover, several types of joints have been modelled and studied and load-deformation curves have also been presented. Finally, joint slip data for different types of angles, bolt diameter and bolt arrangements are generated. Thereupon, damping ratios (z) for different types of connections are reported. The study can be useful to help in designing of wind turbine towers with a higher level of accuracy and safety.

Keywords

Joint slip / cyclic loading / Finite element modelling / Experimental joint behavior / damping ratios (z)

References

[1] Ackermann T, Söder L. Wind energy technology and current status: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2000, 4(4): 315–374

[2] Park J W, Sim S H, Yi J H, Jung H J. Development of temperature-robust damage factor based on sensor fusion for a wind turbine structure. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 42–47

[3] Husson W. Friction connections with slotted holes for wind towers. Lulea tekniska university, 2010

[4] Hansen M O, Sørensen J N, Voutsinas S, Sørensen N, Madsen H A S tate of the art in wind turbine aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2006, 42(4): 285–330

[5] Henriques J, Barros R C. Design of Lattice Wind Towers and Comparison with the Typical Self-Supported Tubular Towers. In: the 4th International Conference on Integrity, Reliability & Failure, Funchal 2013, pp. 23–27

[6] Engström S, Lyrner T, Hassanzadeh M, Stalin T, Johansson J. Tall towers for large wind turbines. Report from Vindforsk project. 2010

[7] Gencturk B, Attar A, Tort C. Optimal design of lattice wind turbine towers. In: the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. 2012, pp. 24–28

[8] Ungkurapinan N, Chandrakeerthy S D, Rajapakse R K, Yue S B. Joint slip in steel electric transmission towers. Engineering Structures, 2003, 25(6): 779–788

[9] Zhan Y, Wu G, Lu Q L. Modeling the Effect of Joint Slip in Lattice Steel Structures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 30(3): 04015059

[10] KRAVITZ RA. SAMUELSON J. Tower Designs for AEP 765-KV Project. Journal of the Power Division, 1969, 95(2): 305–320

[11] Al-Bermani F G, Kitipornchai S. Nonlinear analysis of transmission towers. Engineering Structures, 1992, 14(3): 139–151

[12] Knight G M, Santhakumar A R. Joint effects on behavior of transmission towers. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1993, 119(3): 698–712

[13] Rajmane S P. An investigation on the Behaviour of X and K-bracings of Hot Rolled Single Angles Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai, India), 1992

[14] Ahmed K I, Rajapakse R K, Gadala M S. Influence of bolted-joint slippage on the response of transmission towers subjected to frost-heave. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2009, 12(1): 1–7

[15] He G, Li J. Seismic analysis of wind turbine system including soil-structure interaction. In: the Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Beijing, China 2008

[16] Code C C. CAN/CSA S6-06. Canadian Standards Association, Canada, 2006

[17] Kulak G L, Fisher J W, Struik J H. Guide to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints. Wiley, New York, 1987

[18] Jiang W Q, Wang Z Q, McClure G, Wang G L, Geng J D. Accurate modeling of joint effects in lattice transmission towers. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(5): 1817–1827

[19] Quan C, Wang W, Zhou J, Wang R. Cyclic behavior of stiffened joints between concrete-filled steel tubular column and steel beam with narrow outer diaphragm and partial joint penetration welds. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 333– 344

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2017 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg