Validation of a steel dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB) for seismic resistance: from brace member to one-story one-bay braced frame tests

Abstract

A steel dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB) is an innovative structural member that provides both energy dissipation and self-centering properties to structures, reducing maximum and residual drifts of structures in earthquakes. The axial deformation capacity of the DC-SCB is doubled by a parallel arrangement of two inner cores, one outer box and two sets of tensioning elements. This paper presents cyclic test results of a DC-SCB component and a full-scale one-story, one-bay steel frame with a DC-SCB. The DC-SCB that was near 8 m-long was tested to evaluate its cyclic behavior and durability. The DC-SCB performed well under a total of three increasing cyclic loading tests and 60 low-cycle fatigue loading tests without failure. The maximum axial load of the DC-SCB was near 1700 kN at an interstory drift of 2.5%. Moreover, a three-story dual-core self-centering braced frame (DC-SCBF) with a single-diagonal DC-SCB was designed and its first-story, one-bay DC-SCBF subassembly specimen was tested in multiple earthquake-type loadings. The one-story, one-bay subassembly frame specimen performed well up to an interstory drift of 2% with yielding at the column base and local buckling in the steel beam; no damage of the DC-SCB was found after all tests. The maximum residual drift of the DC-SCBF caused by beam local buckling was 0.5% in 2.0% drift cycles.

Keywords

dual-core self-centering brace (DC-SCB) / braced frame tests / residual deformation

References

[1] Uang C M, Nakashima M. Steel buckling-restrained braced frames. In Earthquake Engineering from Engineering Seismology to Performance-based Engineering (Chapter 16). Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV. (eds), CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL; 16–1–16–37, 2003

[2] Fahnestock L A, Sause R, Ricles J. Analytical and experimental studies on buckling restraint braced composite frames. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Steel and Concrete Composite Construction. Rep. No. NCREE-03–026, Taiwan University, Taiwan, China, 2003

[3] Roeder C W, Lehman D E, Christopulos A. 2006. Seismic performance of special concentrically braced frames with buckling restrained braces. In: Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland California, Paper No. 1503

[4] Tsai K C, Hsiao B C, Wang K J, Weng Y T, Lin M L, Lin K C, Chen C H, Lai J W, Lin S L. Pseudo-dynamic tests of a full scale CFT/BRB frame-Part I: Specimen design, experiment and analysis. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(7): 1081–1098

[5] Chen C, Gong H, Chou C C. Seismic behavior and application of buckling-restrained braces in China and Mainland Taiwan. In: the 14th World Conference on Seismic Isolation, Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration Control of Structures, San Diego, USA, 2015

[6] Chou C C, Chen S Y. Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(8): 2108–2121

[7] Chou C C, Liu J H, Pham D H. Steel buckling-restrained braced frames with single and dual corner gusset connections: seismic tests and analyses. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2012, 41(7): 1137–1156

[8] Chou C C, Chung P T, Cheng Y T. Experimental evaluation of large-scale dual-core self-centering braces and sandwiched buckling-restrained braces. Engineering Structures, 2016, 116: 12–25

[9] AISC. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2010

[10] Christopoulos C, Tremblay R, Kim H J, Lacerte M. Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: development and validation. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2008, 134(1): 96–107

[11] Miller D J, Fahnestock L A, Eatherton M R. Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory self-centering buckling-restrained brace. Engineering Structures, 2012, 40: 288–298

[12] Chou C C, Chen Y C. Development of steel dual-core self-centering braces: quasi-static cyclic tests and finite element analyses. Earthquake Spectra, 2015, 31(1): 247–272

[13] Chou C C, Chen Y C, Pham D H, Truong V M. Steel braced frames with dual-core SCBs and sandwiched BRBs: mechanics, modeling and seismic demands. Engineering Structures, 2014, 72: 26–40

[14] Chou C C, Chung P T. Development of cross-anchored dual-core self-centering braces for seismic resistance. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 101: 19–32

[15] Chou C C, Wu T H, Beato A R O, Chung P T, Chen Y C. Seismic design and tests of a full-scale one-story one-bay steel frame with a dual-core self-centering brace. Engineering Structures, 2016, 111: 435–450

[16] Standard A S C E. Minimum Design Loads for Building and Other Structures. ASCE, 2010

[17] Tsai K-C, Lin B-Z. Development of an object-oriented nonlinear static and dynamic 3D structural analysis program. Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Taiwan University, China, 2003

[18] Chou C C, Lo S W, Liou G S. Internal flange stiffened moment connections with low-damage capability under seismic loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 87: 38–47

[19] Chou C C, Liou G S, Yu J C. Compressive behavior of dual-gusset-plate connections for buckling-restrained braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 76: 54–67

[20] Chou C C, Chen J H. Analytical model validation and influence of column bases for seismic responses of steel post-tensioned self-centering MRF systems. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(9): 2628–2643

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, China for financially supporting this work under Contract No. NSC 100-2625-M-002-012 and 102-2221-E-002-101-MY3.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg