Numerical study of the cyclic load behavior of AISI 316L stainless steel shear links for seismic fuse device

Abstract

This paper presents the results of nonlinear finite element analyses conducted on stainless steel shear links. Stainless steels are attractive materials for seismic fuse device especially for corrosion-aware environment such as coastal regions because they are highly corrosion resistant, have good ductility and toughness properties in combination with low maintenance requirements. This paper discusses the promising use of AISI 316L stainless steel for shear links as seismic fuse devices. Hysteresis behaviors of four stainless steel shear link specimens under reversed cyclic loading were examined to assess their ultimate strength, plastic rotation and failure modes. The nonlinear finite element analysis results show that shear links made of AISI 316L stainless steel exhibit a high level of ductility. However, it is also found that because of large over-strength ratio associated with its strain hardening process, mixed shear and flexural failure modes were observed in stainless steel shear links compared with conventional steel shear links with the same length ratio. This raises the issue that proper design requirements such as length ratio, element compactness and stiffener spacing need to be determined to ensure the full development of the overall plastic rotation of the stainless steel shear links.

Keywords

hysteretic damper / eccentrically braced frame / energy dissipation / seismic / stainless steel / shear link

References

[1] Uang C M, Nakashima M, Tsai K C. Research and application of buckling-restrained braced frames. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2004, 4: 301–313

[2] Tsai C, Tsai K. TPEA device as seismic damper for high-rise buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1995, 121(10): 1075–1081

[3] Kasai K, Popov E. General behavior of WF steel shear link beams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1986, 112(2): 362–382

[4] McDaniel C C, Uang C M, Seible F. Cyclic testing of built-up steel shear links for the New Bay Bridge. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 801–809

[5] Baddoo N. AISC Design Guide 27: Structural Stainless Steel. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2013

[6] AISC. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. ANSI/AISC 341–05. Chicago, IL, 2010

[7] Kaufmann E J, Metrovich B R, Pense A W. Characterization of cyclic inelastic strain behavior on properties of A572 Gr. 50 and A913 Gr. 50 rolled sections. ATLSS report, No. 01–13. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University, 2001

[8] Shit J, Dhar S, Acharyya S. Characterization of cyclic plastic behavior of SS 316 stainless steel. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovative Technology (IJESIT), 2013, 2

[9] Rasmussen K J R. Full-range stress–strain curves for stainless steel alloys. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2003, 59(1): 47–61

[10] Gardner L, Nethercot D A. Numerical modeling of stainless steel structural components—a consistent approach. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(10): 1586–1601

[11] Ashraf M, Gardner L, Nethercot D A. Finite element modeling of structural stainless steel cross-sections. Thin-walled Structures, 2006, 44(10): 1048–1062

[12] Chaboche J L. A review of some plasticity and viscoplasticity constitutive theories. International Journal of Plasticity, 2008, 24(10): 1642–1693

[13] Chaboche J L, Rousselier G. On the plastic and viscoplastic constitutive equations—Part I: rules developed with internal variable concept. J. Pressure Vessel Technol, 1983, 105(2): 153–158

[14] Chaboche J L, Rousselier G. On the plastic and viscoplastic constitutive equations—Part II: application of internal variable concepts to the 316 stainless steel. J Pressure Vessel Technol, 1983b, 105(2): 159–164

[23] Okazaki T, Engelhardt M D. Cyclic loading behavior of EBF links constructed of ASTM A992 steel. Journal of Construction Steel Research. 2007, 63: 751–765

[15] Olsson A. Stainless steel plasticity-material modeling and structural applications. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Lulea: Lulea University of Technology, 2001

[16] Hyde C J, Sun W, Leen S B. Cyclic thermo-mechanical material modeling and testing of 316 stainless steel. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2010, 87(6): 365–372

[17] ANSYS. ANSYS Mechanical APDL, version 14.5, ANSYS Academic Teaching Introductory. ANSYS, Inc, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, USA, 2014

[18] Richards P W, Uang C M. Development of testing protocol for short links in eccentrically braced frames. Report No. SSRP–2003/08, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, Calif, 2003

[19] Iwasaki T, Kawashima K, Hasegawa K, Koyama T, Yoshida T. (1987). “Effect of Number of Loading Cycles and Loading Velocity on Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers”. 19th Joint Meeting US-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, UJNR, Tsukuba

[20] ANSYS. ANSYS Mechanical APDL Material Reference. ANSYS, Inc, Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, USA, 2013

[21] Della Corte G, D’Aniello M, Landolfo R. Analytical and numerical study of plastic overstrength of shear links. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 82: 19–32

[22] Park R. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1989, 22(3): 155–166

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg