Simulation of heterogeneous two-phase media using random fields and level sets

Abstract

The accurate and efficient simulation of random heterogeneous media is important in the framework of modeling and design of complex materials across multiple length scales. It is usually assumed that the morphology of a random microstructure can be described as a non-Gaussian random field that is completely defined by its multivariate distribution. A particular kind of non-Gaussian random fields with great practical importance is that of translation fields resulting from a simple memory-less transformation of an underlying Gaussian field with known second-order statistics. This paper provides a critical examination of existing random field models of heterogeneous two-phase media with emphasis on level-cut random fields which are a special case of translation fields. The case of random level sets, often used to represent the geometry of physical systems, is also examined. Two numerical examples are provided to illustrate the basic features of the different approaches.

Keywords

two-phase media / microstructure / random fields / level sets / shape recovery

References

[1] Grigoriu M. Crossings of non-Gaussian translation processes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1984, 110(4): 610–620

[2] Grigoriu M. Random field models for two-phase microstructures. Journal of Applied Physics, 2003, 94(6): 3762–3770

[3] Yeong C L Y, Torquato S. Reconstructing random media. Physical Review E: Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics, 1998, 57(1): 495–506

[4] Patelli E, Schuëller G I. Computational optimization strategies for the simulation of random media and components. Computational Optimization and Applications, 2012, 53(3): 903–931

[5] Koutsourelakis P S, Deodatis G. Simulation of binary random fields with applications to two-phase random media. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 131(4): 397–412

[6] Sethian J. Level set methods and fast marching methods: Evolving interfaces in computational geometry, fluid mechanics, computer vision and materials science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 218–225

[7] Ostoja-Starzewski M. Random field models of heterogeneous materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1998, 35(19): 2429–2455

[8] Gioffrè M, Gusella V. Peak response of a nonlinear beam. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 133(9): 963–969

[9] Arwade S R, Grigoriu M. Probabilistic model for polycrystalline microstructures with application to intergranular fracture. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 130(9): 997–1005

[10] Grigoriu M. Simulation of stationary non-Gaussian translation processes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(2): 121–126

[11] Shields M D, Deodatis G, Bocchini P. A simple and efficient methodology to approximate a general non-Gaussian stationary stochastic process by a translation process. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 26(4): 511–519

[12] Deodatis G, Micaletti R C. Simulation of highly skewed non-Gaussian stochastic processes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 127(12): 1284–1295

[13] Lagaros N D, Stefanou G, Papadrakakis M. An enhanced hybrid method for the simulation of highly skewed non-Gaussian stochastic fields. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 194(45-47): 4824–4844

[14] Shinozuka M, Deodatis G. Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 1991, 44(4): 191–203 (ASME)

[15] Ghanem R, Spanos P D. Stochastic finite elements: A spectral approach. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991

[16] Graham-Brady L, Xu X F. Stochastic morphological modeling of random multiphase materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2008, 75(6): 061001

[17] Feng J W, Li C F, Cen C, Owen D R J. Statistical reconstruction of two-phase random media. Computers & Structures, 2014, 137: 78–92

[18] Ferrante F J, Arwade S R, Graham-Brady L L. A translation model for non-stationary, non-Gaussian random processes. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 20(3): 215–228

[19] Jiao Y, Stillinger F H, Torquato S. A superior descriptor of random textures and its predictive capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009, 106(42): 17634–17639

[20] Savvas D, Stefanou G, Papadrakakis M, Deodatis G. Homogenization of random heterogeneous media with inclusions of arbitrary shape modelled by XFEM. Computional Mechanics, 2014, DOI: 10.1007/s00466-014-1053-x

[21] Debye P, Bueche M. Scattering by an inhomogeneous solid. Journal of Applied Physics, 1949, 20(6): 518–525

[22] Adler P M, Jacquin C G, Quiblier J A. Flow in simulated porous media. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1990, 16(4): 691–712

[23] Stefanou G, Nouy A, Clément A. Identification of random shapes from images through polynomial chaos expansion of random level set functions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2009, 79(2): 127–155

[24] Zhao X, Duddu R, Bordas S P A, Qu J. Effects of elastic strain energy and interfacial stress on the equilibrium morphology of misfit particles in heterogeneous solids. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2013, 61(6): 1433–1445

[25] Sonon B, François B, Massart T J. A unified level set based methodology for fast generation of complex microstructural multi-phase RVEs. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 223–224: 103–122

[26] Hiriyur B, Waisman H, Deodatis G. Uncertainty quantification in homogenization of heterogeneous microstructures modelled by XFEM. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2011, 88(3): 257–278

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg