Factors affecting the seismic behavior of segmental precast bridge columns

Abstract

This manuscript discusses the design parameters that potentially affect the lateral seismic response of segmental precast post-tensioned bridge piers. The piers consist of precast circular cross section segments stacked one on top of the other with concentric tendons passing through ducts made in the segments during casting. The bottommost segments of the piers were encased in steel tubes to enhance ductility and minimize damage. An FE model was used to investigate different design parameters and how they influence the lateral force – displacement response of the piers. Design parameters investigated included the initial post-tensioning stress as a percentage of the tendon yield stress, the applied axial stresses on concrete due to post-tensioning, pier aspect ratios, construction details, steel tube thicknesses, and internal mild steel rebar added as energy dissipaters. Based on the data presented, an initial tendon stress in the range of 40%-60% of its yield stress and initial axial stress on concrete of approximately 20% of the concrete’s characteristic strength is appropriate for most typical designs. These design values will prevent tendon yielding until lateral drift angle reaches approximately 4.5%. Changing the steel tube thickness, height, or a combination of both proved to be an effective parameter that may be used to reach a target performance level at a specific seismic zone.

Keywords

finite element analysis / concrete / precast units / bridges

References

[1] Gee K W. A new way of doing business. Journal of Public Roads, 2003, 67(2): 1–2

[2] Bonzon W S. Thermal gradients in segmentally constructed hollow box bridge piers. Master Thesis. Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 1996

[3] Kalra R, Lam J. Improving Traffic Flow on the West Gate Freeway Through Innovative Structural Design. May 26–29, 7th Austroads Bridge Conference, Auckland, NZ, 2009

[4] Hewes J T. Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. San Diego, La Jolla, California: University of California, 2002

[5] Chang K C, Loh C H, Chiu H S, Hwang J S, Cheng C B, Wang J C. Seismic behavior of precast segmental bridge columns and design methodology for applications in Taiwan, Taiwan Area National Expressway Engineering Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan, China, 2002 (in Chinese)

[6] Ou Y C, Chiewanichakorn M, Aref A J, Lee G C. Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(11): 1636–1647

[7] Marriott D, Pampanin S, Palermo A. Quasi-static and pseudo-dynamic testing of unbonded post-tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2009, 38(3): 331–354

[8] ElGawady M, Booker A, Dawood H M. Seismic behavior of post-tensioned concrete filled fiber tubes. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2010, 14(5): 616–628

[9] ElGawady M A, Sha’lan A. Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 16(3): 328–339

[10] ElGawady M A, Ma Q, Butterworth J W, Ingham J. Effects of interface material on the performance of free rocking blocks. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40(4): 375–392

[11] Dawood H, ElGawady M A, Hewes J. Behavior of segmental precast posttensioned bridge piers under lateral loads. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2012, 17(5): 735–746

[12] ElGawady M A, Dawood H. Finite element analysis of self-centering bridge piers. Engineering Structures, 2012, 38: 142–152

[13] Ichikawa S, Zhang R, Sasaki T, Kawashima K, ElGawady M, Matsuzaki H, and Yamanobe S. Seismic performance of UFC segmental columns. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineering A1, 68(4), 533–542, 2012 (in Japanese)

[14] Dawood H, ElGawady M A. Performance-based seismic design of unbonded precast post-tensioned concrete filled GFRP tube piers. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2013, 44(1): 357–367

[15] Ichikawa S, Nakamura K, Matsuzaki H, ElGawady M, Kanamitsu Y, Yamanobe S, Kawashima K. Enhancement of the seismic performance of bridge columns using ultra high strength fiber reinforced concrete segments. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers A1, 69(4), 2013, ISSN: 2185–4653

[16] ASTM A779 / A779M – 05. Standard Specification for Steel Strand, Seven-Wire, Uncoated, Compacted, Stress-Relieved for Prestressed Concrete

[17] ASTM A569/A569M–98. Standard Specification for Steel, Carbon (0.15 Maximum, Percent), Hot-Rolled Sheet and Strip Commercial

[18] ABAQUS Software and Documentation. Version 6.8–2. © Dassault Systèmes, SIMULIA, 2008

[19] Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1998, 124(8): 892–900

[20] Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E. A plastic-damage model for concrete. Int J Solids Struct, 25(3), 299–326, 1998.

[21] Priestley M J N, Calvi G M, Kowalsky M J. Displacement Based Seismic Design of Structures. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press, 2007, 720

[22] Wang J C, Ou Y C, Chang K C, Lee G C. Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2008, 37(12), 1449–1465

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by Transportation North-west (TransNow) under Project No. 5200. Their assistance is greatly appreciated.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg