Research on port ecological suitability evaluation index system and evaluation model

Yaofeng XIE, Xia LV, Ru LIU, Liuyan MAO, Xiaoxi LIU

PDF(98 KB)
PDF(98 KB)
Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. ›› 2015, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (1) : 65-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11709-014-0258-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Research on port ecological suitability evaluation index system and evaluation model

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Along with the rapid development of port building, the negative impacts of port’s construction and operation on the coastline ecosystem are also increasingly strong. Therefore, it’s urgent to establish a scientific and complete system of port ecological suitability evaluation. This paper pointed out the characteristics of port ecological effects and the principles of selecting evaluation index, and used the “pressure-state-response (PSR)” model to analysis the various pressures on the environment caused by port construction and operation, and the system’s response. On this basis, we constructed the port ecological suitability evaluation index. This model used the combination of qualitative and quantitative analytic hierarchy process, to meet the multi-level, multi-objective characteristics of evaluation index system. The evaluation index system and evaluation model can be used to analysis the ecological suitability of port projects comprehensively and have some guiding significance to the port ecological suitability evaluation.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

port / ecological suitability / press-state-response (PSR) model / evaluation index system

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yaofeng XIE, Xia LV, Ru LIU, Liuyan MAO, Xiaoxi LIU. Research on port ecological suitability evaluation index system and evaluation model. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2015, 9(1): 65‒70 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0258-6

References

[1]
Ge Z M, Zhou X, Cheng J M, Chen B L, Wang T H, Wang K Y. Preliminary study on the comprehensive evaluation index system for ecological ports-Shanghai port as the example. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2008, 17(3): 329–335
[2]
Tong C. Review on environmental indicator research. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2000, 13(4): 53–55
[3]
Pourebrahim S, Hadipour M, Bin Mokhtar M. Integration of spatial suitability analysis for land use planning in coastal areas; case of Kuala Langat District, Selangor, Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 101(1): 84–97
[4]
de Paz L, Patrício J, Marques J C, Borja A, Laborda A J. Ecological status assessment in the lower Eo estuary (Spain). The challenge of habitat heterogeneity integration: A benthic perspective. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2008, 56(7): 1275–1283
[5]
McCarthy M. Strategic environmental assessment: The potential for development in South Australia. Project Appraisal, 1996, 11(3): 146–152
[6]
Duman skij. Application of the pressure-state-response framework for the land Quality indicators (LQI) program[EB/OL].
[7]
Gustavson R, Lonergan C, Ruitenbeek H J. Selection and modeling of sustainable development indicators: A case study of the Fraser River Basin, British Columbia. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28(1): 117–132
[8]
Zhang X C, Ma C, Zhan S F, Chen W P. Evaluation and simulation for ecological risk based on emergy analysis and Pressure-State-Response Model in a coastal city, China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 13: 221–231
[9]
Li Z X. Index system for sustainable utilization of regional water resources. Journal of Hehai University, 2007, 35(1): 81–85 (Natural Sciences)
[10]
Guy E, Urli B. Port selection and multicriteria analysis: An application to the Montreal-New York alternative. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2006, 8(2): 169–186
[11]
Vreeker R, Nijkamp P, Terwelle C. Amulticriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans. Transportation Research, 2002, 7(1): 27–47
[12]
Janic M. Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2003, 26(6): 491–512
[13]
Lv R, Lin J G, Xu H L. Index system of environmental impact assessment in harbor plan. Marine Environmental Science, 2005, 25(2): 92–95
[14]
Yao Y, Ju M T, Meng W Q. Discussion of the technical route on EIA for port planning and eco-planning. Marine Science Bulletin, 2008, 1(27): 95–101

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(98 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/