Effects of land use change on hydrological cycle from forest to upland field in a catchment, Japan

Abstract

Understanding the effects of land use change on the hydrological cycle is very important for development of sustainable water resource in an upland field catchment. In this study, soil and hydrological properties in an upland field catchment, which was reclaimed partially from a forest catchment, were compared with another forest catchment. The soil properties of surface and subsurface layers were investigated in the two catchments. The soil was compacted and water-holding capacity of soil in the upland field catchment became smaller after the reclamation from forest to upland field, which decreased infiltration rate and water storage in the soil layers. We found that peak discharge and direct runoff in the upland field catchment increased compared with the forest catchment. Annual evapotranspiration from the upland field catchment tended to be lower due to the change in vegetation type and soil properties. Furthermore, a semi-distributed hydrological model was applied in the upland field catchment to understand the integrated effects of reclamation on the hydrological cycle. The model parameters, which were determined using a nonlinear optimization technique—the Shuffled Complex Evolution method (SCE), were compared between the two catchments. The Nash and Sutcliffe coefficient was used to evaluate the model performance. The simulated results indicated that evapotranspiration was decreased and change in discharge was more obvious in the surface layer. We considered that declined infiltration and water storage and increased peak discharge and direct runoff have a negative impact on water resources in the upland field catchment. This study will provide information for forest managers in planning and making decisions for land and water resource management.

Keywords

land-use change / hydrological processes / upland field catchment / forest catchment / semi-distributed hydrological model

References

[1] Crooks S, Davies H. Assessment of land use change in the Thames catchment and its effect on the flood regime of the river. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2001, 26(7–8): 583–591

[2] Brath A, Montanari A, Moretti G. Assessing the effect on flood frequency of land use change via hydrological simulation (with uncertainty). Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2006, 324(1–4): 141–153

[3] Li Z, Liu W Z, Zhang X C, Zheng F L. Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2009, 377(1–2): 35–42

[4] Wang Y, Takase K, He B. Application of a hydrologic model considering rainwater storage to analyze storm-induced landslides in a forest catchment. Water Resources Management, 2008, 22(2): 191–204

[5] Luo P, Takara K, Apip, He B, Nover D. Palaeoflood simulation of the Kamo River basin using a grid-cell distributed rainfall run-off model. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2013 (in press)

[6] Costa M H, Botta A, Cardille J A. Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Tocantins River, Southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2003, 283(1–4): 206–217

[7] Olchev A, Ibrom A, Priess J, Erasmi S, Leemhuis C, Twele A, Radler K, Kreilein H, Panferov O, Gravenhorst G. Effects of land-use changes on evapotranspiration of tropical rain forest margin area in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia): Modeling study with a regional SVAT model. Ecological Modelling, 2008, 212(1–2): 131–137

[8] Hernandez M, Miller S N, Goodrich D C, Goff B F, Kepner W G, Edmonds C M, Jones K G. Modeling runoff response to land cover and rainfall spatial variability in semi-arid watersheds. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2000, 64(1): 285–298

[9] Ghaffari G, Keesstra S, Ghodousi J, Ahmadi H.SWAT-simulated hydroloigical impact of land-use change in the Zanjanrood Basin, Northwest Iran. Hydrological Processes, 2010, 24(7): 892–903

[10] Nie W M, Yuan Y P, Kepner W, Nash M S, Jackson M, Erickson C. Assessing impacts of landuse and landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2011, 407(1–4): 105–114

[11] Lørup J K, Refsgaard J C, Mazvimavi D. Assessing the effect of land use change on catchment runoff by combined use of statistical tests and hydrological modeling: Case studies from Zimababwe. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1998, 205: 147–163

[12] Niehoff D, Fritshch U, Bronstert A. Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2002, 267(1–2): 80–93

[13] Choi W, Deal B M. Assessing hydrological impact of potential land use change through hydrological and land use change modeling for the Kishwaukee River basin (USA). Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88(4): 1119–1130

[14] Takase K, Sato K. Comparison of evapotranspiration between a reclaimed upland field and a forest catchment. Journal of Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources, 1994, 7(6): 495–502

[15] Hong L, Takase K, Sato K. Properties of peak discharge and retention in a terraced paddy field catchment. Transactions of the Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Reclamation Engineering, 1998, 196: 189–195

[16] Wang Y, He B, Takase K. Effects of temporal resolution on hydrological model parameters and its impact on prediction of river discharge. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2009, 54(5): 886–898

[17] Wang Y, He B, Takase K. Reply to the discussion of “Effects of temporal resolution on hydrological model parameters and its impact on prediction of river discharge” by Littlewood et al. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2011, 56(3): 525–528

[18] Chow, V T. Hydrological determination of waterway areas for the design of drainage structures in small drainage basins. University of Illinois, Engineering Experiment Station, Bulletin 462, 1962

[19] Kadoya M, Fukushima A. Handbook of Rural Engineering. Japan Soc Irrigation, Drainage and Reclamation Engineering, 1989, 164 (in Japanese)

[20] Takeshita S. Takase K, Ihara K. Development of long-term runoff model including infiltration sub-model. Transactions of the Japanese Society of Irrigation. Drainage and Reclamation Engineering, 2001, 212: 71–77

[21] Nash J E, Sutcliffe J V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—A discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1970, 10(3): 282–290

[22] Gupta H J, Sorooshian S, Yapo P O. Status of automatic calibration for hydrological models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 1999, 4(2): 135–143

[23] Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta V. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(4): 1015–1031

[24] Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta V. Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1994, 158(3–4): 265–284

[25] He B, Takase K, Wang Y. Regional groundwater prediction model using automatic parameter calibration SCE method for a coastal plain of Seto Inland Sea. Water Resources Management, 2007, 21(6): 947–959

[26] Wijesekara G N, Gupta A, Valeo C, Hasbani J G, Qiao Y, Delaney P, Marceau D J. Assessing the impact of future land-use changes on hydrological processes in the Elbow River watershed in southern Alberta, Canada. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2012, 412–413: 220–232

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg