Efficiency of scalar and vector intensity measures for seismic slope displacements

Abstract

Ground motion intensity measures are usually used to predict the earthquake-induced displacements in earth dams, soil slopes and soil structures. In this study, the efficiency of various single ground motion intensity measures (scalar IMs) or a combination of them (vector IMs) are investigated using the PEER-NGA strong motion database and an equivalent-linear sliding-mass model. Although no single intensity measure is efficient enough for all slope conditions, the spectral acceleration at 1.5 times of the initial slope period and Arias intensity of the input motion are found to be the most efficient scalar IMs for flexible slopes and stiff slopes respectively.

Vector IMs can incorporate different characteristics of the ground motion and thus significantly improve the efficiency over a wide range of slope conditions. Among various vector IMs considered, the spectral accelerations at multiple spectral periods achieve high efficiency for a wide range of slope conditions. This study provides useful guidance to the development of more efficient empirical prediction models as well as the ground motion selection criteria for time domain analysis of seismic slope displacements.

Keywords

seismic slope displacements / intensity measures / empirical prediction

References

[1] Newmark N M. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique, 1965, 15(2): 139–160

[2] Ambraseys N N, Menu J M. Earthquake-induced ground displacements. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1988, 16(7): 985–1006

[3] Jibson R W. Regression models for estimating coseismic landslide displacement. Engineering Geology, 2007, 91(2-4): 209–218

[4] Saygili G, Rathje E M. Empirical prediction models for earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(6): 790–803

[5] Jibson R W. Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark’s sliding block analysis. Transportation Research Record, 1993, 1411: 9–17

[6] Romeo R. Seismically induced landslide displacements: a predictive model. Engineering Geology, 2000, 58(3-4): 337–351

[7] Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson N. Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 26(5): 477–482

[8] Rathje E M, Bray J D. Nonlinear coupled seismic sliding analysis of earth structures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000, 126(11): 1002–1014

[9] Bray J D, Travasarou T. Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(4): 381–392

[10] Schnabel P B, Lysmer J, Seed H B. SHAKE—A Computer Program for Earthquake Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Sites, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. UCB/EERC-72/12. University of California, Berkeley, 1972

[11] Chiou B, Darragh R, Gregor N, Silva W. NGA project strong-motion database. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 23–44

[12] Vucetic M, Dobry R. Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1991, 117(1): 89–107

[13] Kramer S L. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, 1996

[14] Arias A. A measure of earthquake intensity. In: Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants, Hansen RJ, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970, 438–483

[15] Kempton J J, Stewart J P. Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near-source effects. Earthquake Spectra, 2006, 22(4): 985–1013

[16] Rathje E M, Abrahamson N A, Bray J D. Simplified frequency content estimate of earthquake ground motions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1998, 124(2): 150–159

[17] Travasarou T, Bray J D. Optimal ground motion intensity measures for assessment of seismic slope displacements. Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2003

[18] Wang G. A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(4): 611–625

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Grants RGC 620311). Support from Li Foundation Heritage Prize is also greatly acknowledged.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg