Ambient vibration testing and updating of the finite element model of a simply supported beam bridge

Abstract

An ambient vibration test on a concrete bridge constructed in 1971 and calibration of its finite element model are presented. The bridge is characterized by a system of post-tensioned and simply supported beams. The dynamic characteristics of the bridge, i.e. natural frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios were computed from the ambient vibration tests by using the Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA). Then, these characteristics were used to update the finite element model of the bridge by formulating an optimization problem and then using Genetic Algorithms (GA) to solve it. From the results of the ambient vibration test of this type of bridge, it is concluded that two-dimensional mode shapes exist: in the longitudinal and transverse; and these experimentally obtained dynamic characteristics were also achieved in the analytical model through updating. The application of GAs as optimization techniques showed great versatility to optimize any number and type of variables in the model.

Keywords

modal analysis / parameter identification / ambient vibration test / Eigensystem Realization Algorithm (ERA) method / finite element method

References

[1] Cunha Á, Caetano E, Magalhães F, Moutinho C. From input-output to output-only modal identification of civil engineering structures. SAMCO Final Report (FEUP), Portugal, 2006

[2] Ren W, Wael Z, Issam E. Harik. Ambient vibration-based seismic evaluation of a continuous girder bridge. Engineering Structures, 2004, 26(5): 631–640

[3] Gentile C, Gallino N. Ambient vibration testing and structural evaluation of an historic suspension footbridge. Advances in Engineering Software, 2008, 39(4): 356–366

[4] Catbas F N, Ciloglu S K, Hasancebi O, Grimmelsman K, Aktan A E. Limitations in structural identification of large constructed structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2007, 133(8): 1051–1066

[5] Brownjohn J M W, Xia P Q. Dynamic assessment of curved cable stayed bridge by model updating. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2000, 126(2): 252–260

[6] Gentile C, Saisi A. Dynamic-based F.E. Model updating to evaluate damage in masonry towers. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Seminar on Structural analysis of Historical Constructions. Padova, Italy, 2004: 439–449

[7] Douglas B M, Reid W H. Dynamic tests and system identification of bridges. Journal of the Structural Division, 1982, 108(10): 2295–2312

[8] Levin R I, Lieven N A J. Dynamic finite element model updating using simulated annealing and genetic algorithms. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1998, 12(1): 91–120

[9] Levin R I, Lieven N A J. Dynamic finite element model updating using neural networks. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, 210(5): 593–607

[10] Cantieni R. Experimental methods used in system identification of civil engineering structures. 2° Workshop: Problemi di vibrazioni nelle strutture civili e nelle costruzioni meccaniche. Perugia, 2004, 10–112

[11] Juang J N. Applied System Identification. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1994

[12] Friswell P J. Garvey S. A combined genetic eigensensitivity algorithm for the location of damage in structures. Computers & Structures, 1998, 69(5): 547–556

[13] Goldberg D. Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley: Publishinc Company, United States, 1989

[14] Michalewicz Z. Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1994

[15] Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott M H, Fenves G L, Jeremic B. OPENSEES© Command Language Manual. Berkeley, 2004

[16] MATLAB©. Users Manual Version 6.5. The Math Works Inc. Natick, MA, 2002

[17] Koh B H, Dyke S J. Structural health monitoring for flexible bridge structures using correlation and sensitivity of modal data. Computers & Structures, 2007, 85(3-4): 117–130

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg