Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model on determination of optimized pile-type

Abstract

Pile-type selection is a very important stage of foundation design, and there are many field factors influencing the decision of pile-type selection. Since there is a limitation of traditional “major factors method” to satisfy the requirement of modern foundation construction, this study presents an efficient approach, in which analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is employed. AHP is a multiple criteria decision-making tool that has been applied in many fields related to the decision-making, e.g., in the field of economics, marketing, sociology, etc. However, it is rarely reported that AHP is applied in the field of civil engineering for decision making. In this study, AHP combined with fuzzy synthetic evaluation method is employed to select the type of pile used as the foundation of a residential building in Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China. The results show that fuzzy AHP approach is an easy and efficient way for pile-type selection.

Keywords

pile type / fuzzy synthetic evaluation / analytic hierarchy process (AHP) / optimal selection

References

[1] Meng Xiahong, Fang Cong, Luo Jie. Selection of piles type on fuzzy optimization method. Journal of Guangxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 30(3): 207-210 (in Chinese)

[2] Saaty T L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980, 334

[3] Golden B L, Wasil E A, Levy D E. Application of the analytic hierarchy process: A categorized, annotated bibliography. In: Golden B L, , eds. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Application and studies. Heidelberg: Springer, 1989, 37-58

[4] Bottero M, Mondini G. Towards the sustainability in mining wastes management: An application of the analytic herarchy process. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Industrial Minerals and Building Stones. Istanbul2003

[5] Brandon P, Lombardi P, Bentivegna V. Evaluation of the Built Environment for Sustainability. London: Chapman and Hall, 1997

[6] Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H. Multicriteria Evaluation in Physical Planning. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990

[7] Voogd H. Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning. London: Pion, 1983

[8] Lai V, Wong, B K, Cheung, W. Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in the software selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 137(1): 134-144

[9] Chen Shouyu. Fuzzy Decision Theory and Application. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press, 1994, 312 (in Chinese)

[10] Feng Qian. Research on design and optimum-method of supporting structure for deep foundation excavation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2006 (in Chinese)

[11] Cheung A. Expert system for aircraft maintenance services industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2005, 11(4): 348-358

[12] Sun J G, Ge P Q, Liu Z C. Two-grade fuzzy synthetic decision-making system with use of an analytic hierarchy process for performance evaluation of grinding fluids. Tribology International, 2001, 34(10): 683-688

[13] Bascetin A. A decision support using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for the optimal environmental reclamation of an open-pit mine. Environmental Geology, 2007, 52(4): 663-672

[14] Zhang Jinhui, Study of decision-making on the design of pile foundation in soft deposit based on GIS. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2008 (in Chinese)

[15] Zhang Jinhui, Shen Shuilong.Software of decision-making on the selection of pile foundation in soft deposit. The People’s Republic of China State Intellectual Property Office, 2008 (in Chinese)

[16] China Academy of Building Research. Technical Code for Building Pile Foundation of building (JGJ 94-94). 1994, 278 (in Chinese)

[17] China Architecture and Building Press. Technical Code for building foundation (DBJ 13-07-2006), 2006, 185 (in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg