A high-fidelity TCP trajectory prediction model considering dynamic errors for digital twins of five-axis machine tools

Shuo Liu , Dun Lyu , Luis Norberto López de Lacalle , Jokin Munoa , Gorka Aguirre

ENG. Mech. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) : 100904

PDF (6181KB)
ENG. Mech. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) :100904 DOI: 10.1007/s11465-026-0904-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A high-fidelity TCP trajectory prediction model considering dynamic errors for digital twins of five-axis machine tools
Author information +
History +
PDF (6181KB)

Abstract

In general, the tool center point (TCP) accuracy of machine tools can be enhanced by minimizing geometric error (GE) and tracking error (TE). However, five-axis machining for sculptured surfaces has led to increased dynamic error (DE), driven by vibrations and deformations under the real-time influence of machine dynamics and motion parameters. These characteristics in DE align closely with the core concept of digital twins, which involve real-time interactions between physical objects and their virtual models to map system state changes. Hence, a TCP trajectory prediction model (TTPM) of five-axis machine tools (FAMTs) is proposed to achieve precise trajectory prediction based on a digital twin, integrating DE with GE and TE. Firstly, a TCP dynamic error model (TDEM) is established to estimate DE considering multi-axis coupling and varying structural dynamics in FAMTs. Simultaneously, a forward kinematic model (FKM) is constructed using screw theory to account for GE and TE. Then, by integrating the TDEM and FKM, the proposed TTPM predicts TCP trajectories considering DE, GE, and TE. Finally, the TTPM is verified through the R-test. The results reveal that the proposed model exhibits an average deviation of 3.80 μm and a maximum deviation of 6.53 μm in high-speed and high-acceleration trajectories, resulting in a 14.81% improvement in root mean square error and a 22.13% enhancement in trajectory error prediction accuracy on average. The proposed model achieves high prediction accuracy with low computational cost and can be integrated into digital twin systems.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

dynamic error / TCP trajectory prediction / five-axis machine tools / high-speed machining / digital twin

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shuo Liu, Dun Lyu, Luis Norberto López de Lacalle, Jokin Munoa, Gorka Aguirre. A high-fidelity TCP trajectory prediction model considering dynamic errors for digital twins of five-axis machine tools. ENG. Mech. Eng., 2026, 21 (4) : 100904 DOI:10.1007/s11465-026-0904-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Fu G , Fu J , Xu Y , Chen Z , Lai J . Accuracy enhancement of five-axis machine tool based on differential motion matrix: Geometric error modeling, identification and compensation. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2015, 89: 170–181

[2]

Zhu S , Ding G , Qin S , Lei J , Zhuang L , Yan K . Integrated geometric error modeling, identification and compensation of CNC machine tools. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2012, 52(1): 24–29

[3]

Yang J , Zhang H T , Ding H . Contouring error control of the tool center point function for five-axis machine tools based on model predictive control. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2017, 88: 2909–2919

[4]

Gao W , Ibaraki S , Donmez M A , Kono D , Mayer J R R , Chen Y L , Szipka K , Archenti A , Linares J M , Suzuki N . Machine tool calibration: Measurement, modeling, and compensation of machine tool errors. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2023, 187: 104017

[5]

Altintas Y , Verl A , Brecher C , Uriarte L , Pritschow G . Machine tool feed drives. CIRP Annals, 2011, 60(2): 779–796

[6]

Kono D , Matsubara A , Nagaoka K , Yamazaki K . Analysis method for investigating the influence of mechanical components on dynamic mechanical error of machine tools. Precision Engineering, 2012, 36(3): 477–484

[7]

Uchiyama N . Discrete-time robust adaptive multi-axis control for feed drive systems. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2009, 49(15): 1204–1213

[8]

Thoma S , Weikert S . Compensation strategies for axis coupling effects. Procedia CIRP, 2012, 1: 255–259

[9]

Wang L , Liu H , Yang L , Zhang J , Zhao W , Lu B . The effect of axis coupling on machine tool dynamics determined by tool deviation. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2015, 88: 71–81

[10]

Zhang H , Zhao W , Du C , Liu H , Zhang J . Dynamic modeling and analysis for gantry-type machine tools considering the effect of axis coupling force on the slider–guide joints’ stiffness. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2016, 230(11): 2036–2046

[11]

Lyu D , Liu Q , Luo S , Wang D , Liu H . The influence of dynamic error outside servo-loop on the trajectory error. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 113: 1517–1525

[12]

Lyu D , Liu Q , Liu H , Zhao W . Dynamic error of CNC machine tools: a state-of-the-art review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2020, 106: 1869–1891

[13]

Yang L , Zhang X , Wang L , Zhao W . Dynamic error of multiaxis machine tools considering position dependent structural dynamics and axis coupling inertial forces. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2022, 236(3): 281–295

[14]

Kono D , Weikert S , Matsubara A , Yamazaki K . Estimation of dynamic mechanical error for evaluation of machine tool structures. International Journal of Automation Technology, 2012, 6(2): 147–153

[15]

Ansoategui I , Campa F J . Mechatronic model based overshoot prediction and reduction in servodrives with compliant load. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019, 137: 227–236

[16]

Huang H W , Tsai M S , Huang Y C . Modeling and elastic deformation compensation of flexural feed drive system. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2018, 132: 96–112

[17]

Ding S , Huang X , Yu C , Wang W . Actual inverse kinematics for position-independent and position-dependent geometric error compensation of five-axis machine tools. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2016, 111: 55–62

[18]

Lyu D , Ren Y , Liu S , Chen S . Command correction in time-frequency domain for decreasing tracking error of trajectory with a drastic curvature change. Precision Engineering, 2024, 89: 230–238

[19]

Sun Z , Pritschow G , Zahn P , Lechler A . A novel cascade control principle for feed drives of machine tools. CIRP Annals, 2018, 67(1): 389–392

[20]

ISO 23247-1:2021. Automation systems and integration––Digital twin framework for manufacturing––Part 1: Overview and general principles. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2021

[21]

Armendia M , Cugnon F , Berglind L , Ozturk E , Gil G , Selmi J . Evaluation of machine tool digital twin for machining operations in industrial environment. Procedia CIRP, 2019, 82: 231–236

[22]

Cai Y , Starly B , Cohen P , Lee Y S . Sensor data and information fusion to construct digital-twins virtual machine tools for cyber-physical manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 2017, 10: 1031–1042

[23]

Scaglioni B , Ferretti G . Towards digital twins through object-oriented modelling: a machine tool case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2018, 51(2): 613–618

[24]

Tao F , Zhang H , Liu A , Nee A Y C . Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2019, 15(4): 2405–2415

[25]

Tong X , Liu Q , Pi S , Xiao Y . Real-time machining data application and service based on IMT digital twin. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2020, 31(5): 1113–1132

[26]

Zhuang K , Shi Z , Sun Y , Gao Z , Wang L . Digital twin-driven tool wear monitoring and predicting method for the turning process. Symmetry, 2021, 13(8): 1438

[27]

Wang C P , Erkorkmaz K , McPhee J , Engin S . In-process digital twin estimation for high-performance machine tools with coupled multibody dynamics. CIRP Annals, 2020, 69(1): 321–324

[28]

Erwinski K, Paprocki M, Wawrzak A, Grzesiak L M. Neural network contour error predictor in CNC control systems. In: 2016 21st International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR). Miedzyzdroje: IEEE, 2016, 537–542

[29]

Lin M T , Huang T Y , Tsai M S , Wu S K . Virtual simulation of five-axis machine tool with consideration of CNC interpolation, servo dynamics, friction, and geometric errors. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 2017, 40(7): 626–637

[30]

Lyu D , Liu J , Luo S , Liu S , Cheng Q , Liu H . Digital twin modelling method of five-axis machine tool for predicting continuous trajectory contour error. Processes, 2022, 10(12): 2725

[31]

Yu H , Jiang L , Wang J , Qin S , Ding G . Prediction of machining accuracy based on geometric error estimation of tool rotation profile in five-axis multi-layer flank milling process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2020, 234(11): 2160–2177

[32]

Ji S , Ni H , Hu T , Sun J , Yu H , Jin H . DT-CEPA: A digital twin-driven contour error prediction approach for machine tools based on hybrid modeling and sparse time series. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2024, 88: 102738

[33]

Asgari Pirbalouti M J , Altintas Y , Mayer J R R . Digital mapping of machine tool’s volumetric and tracking errors left on the five axis tool paths. Precision Engineering, 2024, 88: 815–822

[34]

Guan Y , Yang J , Tan S , Ding H . A data-driven rolling optimization method for trajectory tracking error prediction of CNC machine tools. Science China Technological Sciences, 2025, 68(1): 1120301

[35]

Xu Z , Zhang B , Li D , Sze Yip W , To S . Digital-twin-driven intelligent tracking error compensation of ultra-precision machining. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2024, 219: 111630

[36]

Liu Q , Lu H , Yonezawa H , Yonezawa A , Kajiwara I , Jiang T , He J . Geometric and dynamic error compensation of dual-drive machine tool based on mechanism-data hybrid method. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2025, 224: 112041

[37]

Altintas Y , Yang J , Kilic Z M . Virtual prediction and constraint of contour errors induced by cutting force disturbances on multi-axis CNC machine tools. CIRP Annals, 2019, 68(1): 377–380

[38]

Ibaraki S , Oyama C , Otsubo H . Construction of an error map of rotary axes on a five-axis machining center by static R-test. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2011, 51(3): 190–200

[39]

Ardema M D. Analytical Dynamics: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer New York, 2005

[40]

Zaeh M F , Rebelein C , Semm T . Predictive simulation of damping effects in machine tools. CIRP Annals, 2019, 68(1): 393–396

[41]

Rebelein C , Vlacil J , Zaeh M F . Modeling of the dynamic behavior of machine tools: influences of damping, friction, control and motion. Production Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 61–74

[42]

Brecher C , Fey M , Bäumler S . Damping models for machine tool components of linear axes. CIRP Annals, 2013, 62(1): 399–402

[43]

Andolfatto L , Lavernhe S , Mayer J R R . Evaluation of servo, geometric and dynamic error sources on five-axis high-speed machine tool. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2011, 51(10–11): 787–796

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

PDF (6181KB)

350

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/