Multi-objective posture planning for unmanned walking excavators based on nested optimization

Dingxuan Zhao , Zihe Wang , Rui Guo , Tao Ni , Kunpeng Li , Tianci Zhang

ENG. Mech. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) : 100896

PDF (13562KB)
ENG. Mech. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4) :100896 DOI: 10.1007/s11465-026-0896-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Multi-objective posture planning for unmanned walking excavators based on nested optimization
Author information +
History +
PDF (13562KB)

Abstract

Walking excavators are all-terrain multifunctional excavators that are often utilized in operations on complex unstructured terrain. Due to structural complexity and the diversity of the terrain on which these excavators operate, ride comfort is a crucial and challenging factor. To address these issues, this paper proposes a nested posture planning strategy for unmanned walking excavators (UWEs) based on multi-objective optimization. First, a 7-degree-of-freedom kinematic model of the chassis is established based on closed-loop vector equations, and a machinery–terrain coupling dynamical model is established based on the Lagrange method. Subsequently, the radial basis function (RBF) is employed to characterize the motion trajectories of the supporting hydraulic cylinders. Furthermore, a nonlinear trajectory planning model that integrates multiple objectives, multiple constraints, and terrain information is constructed to minimize attitude deviations and energy consumption associated with active adjustments during operation. To accelerate model solving, a two-stage nested optimization strategy is proposed. Finally, a high-fidelity mathematical-physics environment and real-world experiments are constructed to investigate the performance of the proposed method. The results demonstrate that the UWE can successfully traverse challenging terrain with excellent chassis posture in several scenarios.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

unmanned walking excavator / radial basis function / nested optimization / nonlinear trajectory planning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dingxuan Zhao, Zihe Wang, Rui Guo, Tao Ni, Kunpeng Li, Tianci Zhang. Multi-objective posture planning for unmanned walking excavators based on nested optimization. ENG. Mech. Eng., 2026, 21 (4) : 100896 DOI:10.1007/s11465-026-0896-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Jud D , Kerscher S , Wermelinger M , Jelavic E , Egli P , Leemann P , Hottiger G , Hutter M . HEAP-the autonomous walking excavator. Automation in Construction, 2021, 129: 103783

[2]

Rahikainen J , Kiani M , Sopanen J , Jalali P , Mikkola A . Computationally efficient approach for simulation of multibody and hydraulic dynamics. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2018, 130: 435–446

[3]

Babu A, Kirchner F. Terrain adaption controller for a walking excavator robot using deep reinforcement learning. In: 2021 20th International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). Ljubljana: IEEE, 2021, 64–70

[4]

Hutter M, Braungardt T, Grigis F, Hottiger G, Jud D, Katz M, Leemann P, Nemetz P, Peschel J, Preisig J, Sollich N, Voellmy M, Zimmermann M, Zimmermann S. IBEX—A tele-operation and training device for walking excavators. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR). Lausanne: IEEE, 2016, 48–53

[5]

Babu A , Danter L C , Willenbrock P , Natarajan S , Kuehn D , Kirchner F . ARTER: a walking excavator robot for autonomous and remote operations. at-Automatisierungstechnik, 2022, 70(10): 876–887

[6]

Wu B Y , Wang S J , Lin H J , Li S J , Hou L . Fast estimation of loader’s shovel load volume by 3D reconstruction of material piles. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 36(1): 117

[7]

Sorokin A V. . Post-repair testing of the walking excavators’ electrical machines.. Earth Sciences and Subsoil Use, 2020, 43(1): 103–110

[8]

Pizetta I H B, Brandao A S, Sarcinelli-Filho M. Control and obstacle avoidance for an UAV carrying a load in forestalenvironments. In: 2018 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS). Dallas: IEEE, 2018, 62–67

[9]

Pevzner L D , Kiselev N A. . Automatic control system for walking dragline excavator digging.. Mining Science and Technology, 2022, 7(1): 57–65

[10]

Golbasi O , Sahiner S F . Simulation-based optimization of workforce configuration for multi-division maintenance departments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 188: 109880

[11]

Guzmán M V , Valenzuela M A . Integrated mechanical–electrical modeling of an AC electric mining shovel and evaluation of power requirements during a truck loading cycle. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2015, 51(3): 2590–2599

[12]

Wang X Y , Ge L , Li Y H , Quan L . Research on energy efficiency characteristics of mining shovel hoisting and slewing system driven by hydraulic-electric hybrid system. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 36(1): 156

[13]

Fu T , Hu Z G , Zhang T C , Bi Q S , Song X G . Physics-informed neural networks-based online excavation trajectory planning for unmanned excavator. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 37(1): 131

[14]

Xu K , Lu Y Q , Shi L , Li J Y , Wang S K , Lei T . Whole-body stability control with high contact redundancy for wheel-legged hexapod robot driving over rough terrain. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2023, 181: 105199

[15]

Gehring C , Coros S , Hutter M , Bellicoso C D , Heijnen H , Diethelm R , Bloesch M , Fankhauser P , Hwangbo J , Hoepflinger M , Siegwart R . Practice makes perfect: an optimization-based approach to controlling agile motions for a quadruped robot. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2016, 23(1): 34–43

[16]

Agheli M , Nestinger S S . Force-based stability margin for multi-legged robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2016, 83: 138–149

[17]

von Twickel A , Hild M , Siedel T , Patel V , Pasemann F . Neural control of a modular multi-legged walking machine: simulation and hardware. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2012, 60(2): 227–241

[18]

Raibert M , Blankespoor K , Nelson G , Playter R . BigDog, the rough-terrain quadruped robot. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2008, 41(2): 10822–10825

[19]

Seok S, Wang A, Chuah M Y, Otten D, Lang J, Kim S. Design principles for highly efficient quadrupeds and implementation on the MIT Cheetah robot. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Karlsruhe: IEEE, 2013, 3307–3312

[20]

Hutter M , Gehring C , Höpflinger M A , Blösch M , Siegwart R . Toward combining speed, efficiency, versatility, and robustness in an autonomous quadruped. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2014, 30(6): 1427–1440

[21]

Hutter M, Leemann P, Stevsic S, Michel A, Jud D, Hoepflinger M, Siegwart R, Figi R, Caduff C, Loher M, Tagmann S. Towards optimal force distribution for walking excavators. In: 2015 International Conference on Advanced Robotics (ICAR). Istanbul: IEEE, 2015, 295–301

[22]

Hutter M , Leemann P , Hottiger G , Figi R , Tagmann S , Rey G , Small G . Force control for active chassis balancing. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22(2): 613–622

[23]

Zhang T C , Fu T , Song X G , Qu F Z . Multi-objective excavation trajectory optimization for unmanned electric shovels based on pseudospectral method. Automation in Construction, 2022, 136: 104176

[24]

Fu T , Zhang T C , Lv Y L , Song X G , Li G , Yue H F . Digital twin-based excavation trajectory generation of Uncrewed excavators for autonomous mining. Automation in Construction, 2023, 151: 104855

[25]

Zhang T C , Fu T , Ni T , Yue H F , Wang Y P , Song X G . Data-driven excavation trajectory planning for unmanned mining excavator. Automation in Construction, 2024, 162: 105395

[26]

Bjelonic M , Sankar P K , Bellicoso C D , Vallery H , Hutter M . Rolling in the deep–hybrid locomotion for wheeled-legged robots using online trajectory optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 3626–3633

[27]

Sun J Y , You Y W , Zhao X R , Adiwahono A H , Chew C M . Towards more possibilities: motion planning and control for hybrid locomotion of wheeled-legged robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 3723–3730

[28]

Du W Q , Fnadi M , Benamar F . Whole-body motion tracking for a quadruped-on-wheel robot via a compact-form controller with improved prioritized optimization. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2020, 5(2): 516–523

[29]

Jelavic E, Hutter M. Whole-body motion planning for walking excavators. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Macau, China: IEEE, 2019, 2292–2299

[30]

Jelavic E, Berdou Y, Jud D, Kerscher S, Hutter M. Terrain-adaptive planning and control of complex motions for walking excavators. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Las Vegas: IEEE, 2020, 2684–2691

[31]

Jelavic E, Farshidian F, Hutter M. Combined sampling and optimization based planning for legged-wheeled robots. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). Xi’an: IEEE, 2021, 8366–8372

[32]

Aspragathos N A , Dimitros J K . A comparative study of three methods for robot kinematics. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), 1998, 28(2): 135–145

[33]

Trefethen L . Multivariate polynomial approximation in the hypercube. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 2017, 145(11): 4837–4844

[34]

Yaghoobi S , Moghaddam B P , Ivaz K . An efficient cubic spline approximation for variable-order fractional differential equations with time delay. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 87(2): 815–826

[35]

Wang X B , Song X G , Sun W . Surrogate based trajectory planning method for an unmanned electric shovel. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2021, 158: 104230

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

PDF (13562KB)

Supplementary files

Supplementary materials

17

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/