Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing

Wentao YAN , Stephen LIN , Orion L. KAFKA , Cheng YU , Zeliang LIU , Yanping LIAN , Sarah WOLFF , Jian CAO , Gregory J. WAGNER , Wing Kam LIU

Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 482 -492.

PDF (823KB)
Front. Mech. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 482 -492. DOI: 10.1007/s11465-018-0505-y
REVIEW ARTICLE
REVIEW ARTICLE

Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing

Author information +
History +
PDF (823KB)

Abstract

This paper presents our latest work on comprehensive modeling of process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing (AM) materials, including using data-mining techniques to close the cycle of design-predict-optimize. To illustrate the process-structure relationship, the multi-scale multi-physics process modeling starts from the micro-scale to establish a mechanistic heat source model, to the meso-scale models of individual powder particle evolution, and finally to the macro-scale model to simulate the fabrication process of a complex product. To link structure and properties, a high-efficiency mechanistic model, self-consistent clustering analyses, is developed to capture a variety of material response. The model incorporates factors such as voids, phase composition, inclusions, and grain structures, which are the differentiating features of AM metals. Furthermore, we propose data-mining as an effective solution for novel rapid design and optimization, which is motivated by the numerous influencing factors in the AM process. We believe this paper will provide a roadmap to advance AM fundamental understanding and guide the monitoring and advanced diagnostics of AM processing.

Keywords

additive manufacturing / thermal fluid flow / data mining / material modeling

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wentao YAN, Stephen LIN, Orion L. KAFKA, Cheng YU, Zeliang LIU, Yanping LIAN, Sarah WOLFF, Jian CAO, Gregory J. WAGNER, Wing Kam LIU. Modeling process-structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(4): 482-492 DOI:10.1007/s11465-018-0505-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. ASTM International, 2014

[2]

Smith J, Xiong W, Yan W, Linking process, structure, property, and performance for metal-based additive manufacturing: Computational approaches with experimental support. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 57(4): 583–610

[3]

Yan W, Ge W, Smith J, Multi-scale modeling of electron beam melting of functionally graded materials. Acta Materialia, 2016, 115: 403–412

[4]

Heinl P, Müller L, Körner C, Cellular Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam melting. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4(5): 1536–1544

[5]

Huang R, Riddle M, Graziano D, Energy and emissions saving potential of additive manufacturing: The case of lightweight aircraft components. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 135: 1559–1570

[6]

Yadroitsau I. Selective laser melting: Direct manufacturing of 3D-objects by selective laser melting of metal powders. Lambert Academic Publishing, 2009

[7]

Schoinochoritis B, Chantzis D, Salonitis K. Simulation of metallic powder bed additive manufacturing processes with the finite element method: A critical review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2015, 231(1): 96–117

[8]

Körner C, Bauereiß A, Attar E. Fundamental consolidation mechanisms during selective beam melting of powders. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 21(8): 085011

[9]

Khairallah S A, Anderson A T, Rubenchik A, Laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing: Physics of complex melt flow and formation mechanisms of pores, spatter, and denudation zones. Acta Materialia, 2016, 108: 36–45

[10]

Qiu C, Panwisawas C, Ward M, On the role of melt flow into the surface structure and porosity development during selective laser melting. Acta Materialia, 2015, 96: 72–79

[11]

Hirt C W, Nichols B D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 39(1): 201–225

[12]

Rai A, Markl M, Körner C. A coupled cellular automaton-lattice Boltzmann model for grain structure simulation during additive manufacturing. Computational Materials Science, 2016, 124: 37–48

[13]

Panwisawas C, Qiu C, Anderson M J, Mesoscale modelling of selective laser melting: Thermal fluid dynamics and microstructural evolution. Computational Materials Science, 2017, 126: 479–490

[14]

Leuders S, Vollmer M, Brenne F, Fatigue strength prediction for titanium alloy TiAl6V4 manufactured by selective laser melting. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 2015, 46(9): 3816–3823

[15]

Hedayati R, Hosseini-Toudeshky H, Sadighi M, Computational prediction of the fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous metallic biomaterials. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 84: 67–79

[16]

Yan W, Smith J, Ge W, Multiscale modeling of electron beam and substrate interaction: A new heat source model. Computational Mechanics, 2015, 56(2): 265–276

[17]

Yan W, Ge W, Qian Y, Multi-physics modeling of single/multiple track defect mechanisms in electron beam selective melting. Acta Materialia, 2017, 134: 324–333

[18]

Yan W, Qian Y, Lin S, Meso-scale modeling of multiple-layer fabrication process in selective electron beam melting: Inter-layer/track voids formation. Materials & Design, 2018, 141: 210–219

[19]

Yan W, Ge W, Smith J, Towards high-quality selective beam melting technologies: Modeling and experiments of single track formations. In: Proceedings of 26th Annual International Symposium on Solid Freeform Fabrication. Austin, 2015

[20]

Yan W, Liu W K, Lin F. An effective finite element heat transfer model for electron beam melting process. In: Proceedings of Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies Conference. Madrid, 2015

[21]

Wolff S J, Lin S, Faierson E J, A framework to link localized cooling and properties of directed energy deposition (DED)-processed Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Materialia, 2017, 132: 106–117

[22]

Smith J, Xiong W, Cao J, Thermodynamically consistent microstructure prediction of additively manufactured materials. Computational Mechanics, 2016, 57(3): 359–370

[23]

Liu Z, Moore J A, Aldousari S M, A statistical descriptor based volume-integral micromechanics model of heterogeneous material with arbitrary inclusion shape. Computational Mechanics, 2015, 55(5): 963–981

[24]

Liu Z, Bessa M, Liu W K. Self-consistent clustering analysis: An efficient multi-scale scheme for inelastic heterogeneous materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2016, 306: 319–341

[25]

Liu Z, Moore J A, Liu W K. An extended micromechanics method for probing interphase properties in polymer nanocomposites. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2016, 95: 663–680

[26]

Groeber M A, Jackson M A. DREAM. 3d: A digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 2014, 3(1): 5

[27]

Moore J A, Frankel D, Prasannavenkatesan R, A crystal plasticity-based study of the relationship between microstructure and ultra-high-cycle fatigue life in nickel titanium alloys. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 91(Part 1): 183–194

[28]

Bessa M, Bostanabad R, Liu Z, A framework for data-driven analysis of materials under un-certainty: Countering the curse of dimensionality. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 320: 633–667

[29]

Witten I H, Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. New York: ACM, 2005

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (823KB)

5147

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/