1. Institute of Clinical Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Clinical Research Center for Obstetric & Gynecologic Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Common Mechanism Research for Major Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
zhu_julie@vip.sina.com
Show less
History+
Received
Accepted
Published Online
2025-07-09
2025-08-27
2025-11-20
PDF
(3878KB)
Abstract
High recurrence rate in pelvic organ prolapse (POP) seriously increases treatment difficulty and elucidating the mechanisms is critical for developing targeted therapies. However, its underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. Using a single-cell RNA sequencing dataset, we analyzed vaginal fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells and macrophages in recurrent and primary POP. Comparative analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) showed recurrent and primary POP shared fewer DEGs, while exhibiting more subtype-specific DEGs, confirming substantial molecular heterogeneity. Further analysis revealed that shared fibroblast DEGs in both POP subtypes were primarily enriched in collagen fibril organization, while recurrent POP showed uniquely upregulation of genes related to collagen metabolism and leukocyte migration. NKD2+ myofibroblasts were higher in recurrent POP compared to primary POP. In macrophages, shared upregulated DEGs in both groups were enriched in ECM remodeling and TGF-β signaling, highlighting conserved roles of macrophages-fibroblast interaction. Whereas, certain genes, such as fibrotic-related genes, were specifically upregulated in recurrent POP, implicating potential distinct fibrotic mechanisms in recurrence. Furthermore, the proportion of M2-like macrophages in recurrent POP was higher than primary POP. These findings reveal a potential shift toward pro-fibrotic and tissue-remodeling immune microenvironment in recurrent POP, providing novel insights into the cellular and molecular drivers of POP recurrence.
Barber MD, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J2013; 24(11): 1783–1790
[2]
Kinman CL, Lemieux CA, Agrawal A, Gaskins JT, Meriwether KV, Francis SL. The relationship between age and pelvic organ prolapse bother. Int Urogynecol J2017; 28(5): 751–755
[3]
Pang H, Zhang L, Han S, Li Z, Gong J, Liu Q, Liu X, Wang J, Xia Z, Lang J, Xu T, Zhu L. A nationwide population-based survey on the prevalence and risk factors of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in adult women in China—a pelvic organ prolapse quantification system-based study. BJOG2021; 128(8): 1313–1323
[4]
Li Z, Xu T, Li Z, Gong J, Liu Q, Zhu L. An epidemiologic study of pelvic organ prolapse in rural Chinese women: a population-based sample in China. Int Urogynecol J2019; 30(11): 1925–1932
[5]
Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol2014; 123(6): 1201–1206
Wihersaari O, Karjalainen P, Tolppanen AM, Mattsson N, Jalkanen J, Nieminen K. Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the 2015 Finnish Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery Survey Study. Obstet Gynecol2020; 136(6): 1135–1144
[8]
Wu JM, Dieter AA, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Cumulative incidence of a subsequent surgery after stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse procedure. Obstet Gynecol2017; 129(6): 1124–1130
[9]
Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Libr2016; 10(10): CD012376
[10]
Kuittinen T, Mentula M, Tulokas S, Brummer T, Jalkanen J, Tomas E, Mäkinen J, Sjöberg J, Härkki P, Rahkola-Soisalo P. Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy; a 10-year national follow-up study. Arch Gynecol Obstet2024; 310(5): 2705–2715
[11]
Brunes M, Johannesson U, Drca A, Bergman I, Söderberg M, Warnqvist A, Ek M. Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: a nationwide register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand2022; 101(5): 532–541
[12]
Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J2015; 26(11): 1559–1573
[13]
Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Carlin G, Kimberger O, Marschalek J, Koelbl H, Umek W. Clinical risk factors for recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after primary native tissue prolapse repair. Wien Klin Wochenschr2022; 134(1–2): 73–75
[14]
Schulten SFM, Claas-Quax MJ, Weemhoff M, van Eijndhoven HW, van Leijsen SA, Vergeldt TF, IntHout J, Kluivers KB. Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol2022; 227(2): 192–208
[15]
Zhou Q, Lu M, Li GS, Peng GL, Song YF. Identification of potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. Heliyon2023; 9(9): e19440
[16]
Li Y, Zhang QY, Sun BF, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Wang M, Ma C, Shi H, Sun Z, Chen J, Yang YG, Zhu L. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the vaginal wall in women with severe anterior vaginal prolapse. Nat Commun2021; 12(1): 87
[17]
Campagna G, Vacca L, Lombisani A, Panico G, Caramazza D, Mastrovito S, Ercoli A, Scambia G. Recurrent pelvic prolapse after pelvic organ prolapse suspension (POPS): Analysis and treatment of an emerging clinical issue. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2024; 302: 1–6
[18]
Tian Z, Li Q, Wang X, Sun Z. The difference in extracellular matrix metabolism in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG2024; 131(8): 1029–1041
[19]
Wu C, Zhou Z, Yang Y, Li H, Guo Y, Tong X. Bioinformatically deciphering immune cell infiltration and signature genes in pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J2023; 34(5): 1091–1101
[20]
Orlicky DJ, Guess MK, Bales ES, Rascoff LG, Arruda JS, Hutchinson-Colas JA, Johnson J, Connell KA. Using the novel pelvic organ prolapse histologic quantification system to identify phenotypes in uterosacral ligaments in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol2021; 224(1): 67.e1–67.e18
[21]
Chen Y, Ullah A, Chen W, Xuan J, Huang X, Liang S, Shen B, Wu T. Cytokine modulation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: from molecular insights to therapeutic targets. Mol Med2024; 30(1): 214
[22]
Zhang D, Xu D, Huang X, Wei Y, Tang F, Qin X, Liang W, Liang Z, Jin L, Wang H, Wang H. Puerarin-loaded electrospun patches with anti-inflammatory and pro-collagen synthesis properties for pelvic floor reconstruction. Adv Sci (Weinh)2024; 11(21): 2308590
[23]
Duran P, Boscolo Sesillo F, Cook M, Burnett L, Menefee SA, Do E, French S, Zazueta-Damian G, Dzieciatkowska M, Saviola AJ, Shah MM, Sanvictores C, Osborn KG, Hansen KC, Shtrahman M, Christman KL, Alperin M. Proregenerative extracellular matrix hydrogel mitigates pathological alterations of pelvic skeletal muscles after birth injury. Sci Transl Med2023; 15(707): eabj3138
[24]
Hu T, Li C. Convergence between Wnt-β-catenin and EGFR signaling in cancer. Mol Cancer2010; 9(1): 236
[25]
Kuppe C, Ibrahim MM, Kranz J, Zhang X, Ziegler S, Perales-Patón J, Jansen J, Reimer KC, Smith JR, Dobie R, Wilson-Kanamori JR, Halder M, Xu Y, Kabgani N, Kaesler N, Klaus M, Gernhold L, Puelles VG, Huber TB, Boor P, Menzel S, Hoogenboezem RM, Bindels EMJ, Steffens J, Floege J, Schneider RK, Saez-Rodriguez J, Henderson NC, Kramann R. Decoding myofibroblast origins in human kidney fibrosis. Nature2021; 589(7841): 281–286
[26]
Patel M, Post Y, Hill N, Sura A, Ye J, Fisher T, Suen N, Zhang M, Cheng L, Pribluda A, Chen H, Yeh WC, Li Y, Baribault H, Fletcher RB. A WNT mimetic with broad spectrum FZD-specificity decreases fibrosis and improves function in a pulmonary damage model. Respir Res2024; 25(1): 153
[27]
Wang F, Chen L, Kong D, Zhang X, Xia S, Liang B, Li Y, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Shao J, Zheng S, Zhang F. Canonical Wnt signaling promotes HSC glycolysis and liver fibrosis through an LDH-A/HIF-1α transcriptional complex. Hepatology2024; 79(3): 606–623
[28]
Segerer S, Nelson PJ, Schlöndorff D. Chemokines, chemokine receptors, and renal disease: from basic science to pathophysiologic and therapeutic studies. J Am Soc Nephrol2000; 11(1): 152–176
[29]
Li H. Update on the role of chemokines and chemokine receptors in liver fibrosis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis2023; 32(2): 241–256
[30]
Vielhauer V, Berning E, Eis V, Kretzler M, Segerer S, Strutz F, Horuk R, Gröne HJ, Schlöndorff D, Anders HJ. CCR1 blockade reduces interstitial inflammation and fibrosis in mice with glomerulosclerosis and nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int2004; 66(6): 2264–2278
[31]
Seki E, De Minicis S, Gwak GY, Kluwe J, Inokuchi S, Bursill CA, Llovet JM, Brenner DA, Schwabe RF. CCR1 and CCR5 promote hepatic fibrosis in mice. J Clin Invest2009; 119(7): 1858–1870