1 Introduction
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) occurs mainly in south-east Asia and the south of China [
1]. According to the latest China’s cancer statistics, there are more than 50 000 new cases and 20 000 deaths of NPC per year. The incidence is the highest in southern China, accounting for 47% of new cases worldwide [
2]. The main treatments of NPC patients include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, and radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the first choice for NPC patients [
3]. However, its therapeutic efficacy is limited in advanced stages. In contrast, early diagnosis can enhance therapeutic effect. Therefore, it becomes urgent to identify appropriate diagnosis indicators and therapeutic targets for improving survival rate of NPC patients. The etiopathogenesis of NPC is intricate, encompassing diverse factors like genetic predisposition, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, environmental elements, and pathogenic agents [
4]. It is worth mentioning that tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs) are one of the important pathogenic factors in NPC. Recent researches showed that tsRNAs may become the novel diagnostic biomarkers for NPC [
5,
6]. Therefore, understanding the targets of tsRNA in NPC is crucial for elucidating the underlying mechanism of tsRNA in NPC and may provide novel therapeutic targets for NPC. That may greatly help with early diagnosis for early-stage disease treatment or even prevent disease onset.
tsRNAs are a newly discovered class of non-coding RNAs. These tsRNAs are derived from mature tRNAs or tRNA precursors. They function through regulating protein translation, RNA transcription, or post-transcriptional regulation [
7]. tsRNAs constitute a newly identified class of small non-coding RNAs that are generated through the cleavage of mature tRNA or tRNA precursors by enzymes, including angiogenin, Dicer, RNase Z, and RNase P [
8]. Precursor tRNAs (pre-tRNAs), each having a 5′ leading sequence and a 3′ tail region, can be transcribed from tRNA genes through the action of RNA polymerase III (RNA Pol III) [
9]. Typically, RNase P removes the 5′ leader sequence [
10], while RNase Z eliminates the 3′ trailing sequence [
11]. The nucleotide transferase then attaches the “CCA” sequence to the 3′ end [
12]. Subsequently, through post-transcriptional modification, this sequence folds into the secondary cloverleaf structure of mature tRNA. Based on their length and sites of cleavage, tsRNAs are mainly divided into two types, tRNA half-molecules (tRNA halves) and tRNA-derived RNA fragments (tRFs) [
13]. tRNA halves, whose length is 29–50 nt, are induced by stress or starvation and produced by specific cleavage at the mature tRNA anticodon loop [
14]. Therefore, tRNA halves can be classified into two subgroups: (1) 5′-half, ranging from the 5′ end to the anticodon loop, 30–35 nt in length; (2) 3′-half, ranging from the anticodon loop to the 3′ end, 40–50 nt in length [
15]. Oxidative stress, hypoxia, and viral infection are related to the main mechanisms of tsRNA halves [
16]. For another type, tRFs, tRFs are generated when cleavage mainly occurs in the anticodon loop of mature tRNA to produce 5′- and 3′-fragments that are 31–40 nt long [
17]. Depending on the sources, tRFs can be divided into tRF-1, tRF-2, tRF-3, tRF-5, and i-tRF [
18]. tRF-1 is derived from the 3′ end of precursor tRNA cleaved by RNase Z or its cytoplasmic homolog ribonuclease Z2 [
19]. tRF-2 is decomposed from the anticodon loop of tRNA, excluding the 5′ end and the 3′ end structures. Specifically, it is induced under hypoxic conditions [
20]. tRF-3, starting at the trinucleotide “CCA” at the 3′ end, originates at the 3′ end and are cleaved by Dicer and angiogenin at the T-loop of mature tRNAs. Moreover, tRF-3 is approximately 18-22 nt in length [
21]. At the 5′ end of mature tRNAs, tRF-5 is cleaved by Dicer at the D-loop, D stem or 5′ anticodon stem half of tRNAs [
22]. i-tRF is derived from the internal region of mature tRNAs and do not reach their 5′ end and 3′ end [
23]. tRFs can bind to RNA binding proteins [
24] and then target mRNA expression to control mRNA stability [
25]. On the other hand, tsRNA influences the translation process by either inhibiting or facilitating protein synthesis [
26].
tsRNA is ubiquitously present in diverse organisms and features high conservation, a stable structure, and tissue-specific expression. Acting as epigenetic regulators, it exerts a crucial influence on biological processes by modulating transcript stability and translation [
27]. For example, the fragment derived from tRNA
Glu induced by aging can impair the biosynthesis of glutamate by targeting the cristae organization dependent on mitochondrial translation [
28], and embryonic EVs containing specific tRFs may regulate preimplantation embryo development [
29]. tsRNA holds potential as a biomarker for disease and a therapeutic target, emerging as a burgeoning area of research in the biomedical field. In particular, tiRNA-Val-CAC-2 can act as promising prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for pancreatic cancer [
30]. tRFdb-3013a/b might serve as novel biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of colon adenocarcinomas [
31], hepatocellular carcinoma [
32], renal cell carcinoma [
33], and gastric cancer [
34]. To date, the evidence regarding tsRNA in NPC remains scanty, and only a limited number of studies have been published in this area. Little is known about the underlying mechanisms of tsRNA biogenesis and regulation in NPC, as well as the role it plays in gene regulation. Whether tsRNA can serve as a novel biomarker for the early screening of NPC requires further exploration.
5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 is a member of the 5′tiRNA family. Research has indicated that it participates in cell senescence [
35], protein synthesis [
36], autophagic activity [
37], metabolism modulation [
38], gene regulation [
39], and epigenetics [
40]. Our small RNA chip screening data in this study has verified that 5′tiRNA constitutes 17.53% of NPC. This novel discovery has drawn significant attention from researchers. To clarify the function of tsRNA in NPC development and verify its feasibility as a marker for NPC screening, therefore, small RNA microarray profiling and array hybridization were used to detect expression spectrums of tsRNAs in serum from primary NPC patient. This study found that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 was highly expressed in the serum of NPC patients, and it was confirmed that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 was valuable for the primary diagnosis of NPC. Moreover, the mechanism investigation revealed that overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 enhanced the proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities of NPC cells, whereas knock down of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 inhibited the growth, clone formation, migration, and invasion of NPC cells. 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 might serve as a novel pathogenic factor, and its latent worth was emphasized as a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of NPC. This research process is depicted in Fig. 1.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Serum samples
From March 2024 to December 2024, serum samples were collected from 120 newly-diagnosed NPC patients and 25 normal individuals who had undergone routine physical examination at Hunan Cancer Hospital. The normal individuals served as the control group, and the NPC patients were the experimental group. The NPC patients were diagnosed clinically, pathologically, and radiologically. Table 1 presents the corresponding clinicopathological information along with the baseline characteristics. In this study, the pathological grade and stage of the NPC patients were determined according to the 8th-edition TNM staging method adopted by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). The inclusion criteria for this study are as follows. (1) Patients are diagnosed with NPC through imaging examination and pathological diagnosis. (2) The age ranges from 18 to 80 years old, with no gender limitation. (3) Patients newly diagnosed with NPC have not received any treatment. (4) Patients with detailed medical records. (5) Patients have fully understood and voluntarily signed a written informed consent form for this study. On the other hand, the exclusion criteria for this study are as follows. (1) Nasopharyngeal cancer patients not meeting the above inclusion criteria. (2) Patients currently undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapies, and other immunotherapies. (3) Patients with other serious and uncontrolled systemic diseases like cardiovascular, liver, and kidney diseases. (4) Individuals who suffer from mental illness, severe cognitive impairment or speech-expression defects and are unable to cooperate. (5) Pregnant or lactating women. (6) Patients with other malignant tumors. This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hunan Cancer Hospital and Institute (No.2024 [
30], Supplementary File 1). The blood samples were collected from each participant using 5 mL vacuum blood collection tubes without anticoagulant or coagulant. After being left at room temperature for 30 min, the blood samples were first centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was pipetted into a new 1.5 mL EP tube. Then samples were centrifuged at 12 000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, again, suck the serum into a new 1.5 mL EP tube. Serum samples were stored at −80 °C for subsequent experiments.
2.2 RNA extraction
According to the manufacturer’s instructions, we isolated total RNA using TRIzol Reagent (15596026CN, Invitrogen, CA, USA). The quantity of each RNA sample was checked using the Ultramicro biodetector (BIODRPOULIFE, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA), and the integrity of RNA was assessed using agarose gel (2%, w/v) electrophoresis. For each sample, a total of 100 ng RNA was subjected to dephosphorylation to form a unified 3-OH end. The RNA with 3-OH ends was then denatured using DMSO and enzymatically labeled with Cy3. Subsequently, the Cy3-labeled small RNAs were hybridized to Arraystar Human Small RNA Arrays in Agilent Hybridization Oven (42 ℃, 12 h).
2.3 RNA labeling
In the Small RNA Microarray profiling (5190, Agilent, USA) assay, 100 ng of total RNA was first dephosphorylated with 3 units of T4 polynucleotide kinase (T4PNK) at 37 °C for 40 min. This process aimed to eliminate both (P) and (cP) chemical groups from the 3′ end of RNA, resulting in the formation of a 3-OH end. The reaction was terminated at 70 °C for 5 min and then cooled immediately to 0 °C. Subsequently, 7 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added and the mixture was heated to 100 °C for 3 min to unfold the RNA, followed by immediate chilling to 0 °C. RNA end labeling was performed by adding ligase buffer, bovine serum albumin (BSA), a final concentration of 50 mmol/L pCp-Cy3, and 15 units of T4 RNA ligase in a total volume of 28 µL, and then the reaction mixture was incubated at 16 °C overnight.
2.4 Array hybridization
Mix 22.5 µL 2× Hybridization buffer (G2445A, Agilent, USA) with the completed labeling reaction solution until the final volume reached 45 µL. Heat the resulting mixture at 100 °C for 5 min, then chill immediately to 0 °C. Next, 45 µL labeled sample mix was hybridized onto a microarray at 55 °C for 20 h. The slides were washed in 6× SSC containing 0.005% Triton X-102 at room temperature for 10 min, then by immersion in 0.1× SSC with 0.005% Triton X-102 for 5 min. After the washing process, the slides were scanned on an Agilent G2539A microarray scanner (5188, Agilent, USA).
2.5 tsRNA data analysis
The scanned microarray images were imported into Agilent Feature Extraction software to extract raw intensity data. The probe signals passing “P” (Present) or “M” (Marginal) QC flags in at least 5 samples were selected for further analysis. Quality normalization was performed using Agilent GeneSpring GX 12.1 software, and the normalized intensities were log2 transformed. After normalization and signal QC flag filtering, the probe signals for the same small RNA biotype were grouped and analyzed correspondingly. We averaged the normalized intensities of multiple probes for the same small RNA and combined them into an RNA level. Then, compare two groups in terms of differential small RNA expression. For each small RNA, the fold change (FC) was calculated. And the statistical significance of the difference (P-value) was also calculated. The default thresholds were set as FC ≥ 1.5 and P < 0.05. Based on these thresholds, differentially expressed small RNAs were annotated with genomic and biological information, and analyzed through scatter plot, volcano plot and hierarchical clustering heatmap.
2.6 Hierarchical clustering heatmaps, scatter plots and volcano plots
The samples were grouped through clustering analysis based on the similarities in small RNA expression and the proximity of their relationships, which were shown in the dendrogram above the heatmaps. The expression levels were depicted using a color gradient and visually presented via color scales. The scatter plots depict the normalized intensities of each small RNA in the two samples being compared or group-averaged normalized intensities in the two groups being compared on the X and Y axes. It can be used to visualize, at the abundance levels (normalized intensities), the differentially expressed small RNAs (data point distances off the diagonal lines). For each small RNA comparison between the two groups (each group must have more than 2 replicates), the Volcano plot was constructed by plotting −log10P as the differential significance on the Y-axis and log2(FC) as the differential magnitude on the X-axis. Thus, small RNAs with large differential significance and large magnitudes (colored in the Volcano plot) were the most likely differentially expressed small RNAs.
To determine the potential target genes of the validated tsRNAs, the database of TargetScan was filtered; then the target genes were predicted by Miranda.
2.7 RT-qPCR
From the differential sequencing results, 9 tsRNAs that were significantly upregulated and met specific primer design requirements were selected for verification. First, the expression of 9 tsRNAs was validated through RT-qPCR in the sera from 20 NPC patients and 5 normal individuals whose sera had been sequenced. Then, the potentially key tsRNAs were screened out and further validated through RT-qPCR in the sera from 100 newly-diagnosed NPC patients compared with 20 normal individuals. Total RNA was extracted from serum as previously described. Based on the manufacturer’s protocols, RNA was synthesized into cDNA using miRNA 1st strand cDNA synthesis kit (Stem-loop) (AG11743, AG, China). U6 was used as an internal control for tsRNA. The primers for U6, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, tRF5-50-GlyGCC-2, i-tRF-4:24-His-GTG-1, i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1, 5′tiRNA-35-GlnTTG-6, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1, tRF5-23-HisGTG-1, 5′tiRNA-34-GlnTTG-6, mt-tRF5-26-Leu-TAA were designed at the website of store.sangon.com/primerDesign and are shown in Table S1. RT-qPCR was performed on the LIGHTCYCLE 96 (Roche, Germany) using 2× Universal Blue SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (G3326-15, Servicebio, China). PCR reaction was performed using a 20 μL volume, which consisted of 2 μL cDNA, 1 μL of forward primer (10 μmol/L), 1 μL of reverse primer (10 μmol/L), 10 μL of 2× Master Mix, and 6 μL of RNase-free water. First, the reaction was denatured at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 45 amplification cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 60 s, and 95 °C for 15 s. After that, the relative expression levels of tsRNA were calculated using the 2-△△Ct method and then normalized to the U6 expression levels. Finally, all the reactions were repeated in triplicate.
2.8 Cell lines and cell culture
Two cell lines, C666-1 with EBV and HNE1 without, were used for transient transfection, followed by experiments. The human NPC cell line C666-1 was purchased from the Abiowell company (AW-CCH168, China), and HNE1 was purchased from the BDBIO company (C6105, China). The STR reports of C666-1 and HNE1 cells were presented in Supplementary File 2 and Supplementary File 3. C666-1 and HNE1 cells were cultivated in RPMI Medium 1640 basic (1X) (6124417, Gibco, USA), which was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (2422322, VivaCell Biosciences, Shanghai, China) and 100 μg/mL of penicillin and streptomycin (01X240627, Abiowell, China), within an environment containing 5% CO2.
2.9 Transient transfection
Between 1 × 106 and 5 × 106 cells were inoculated into 6-well plates containing an appropriate amount of complete culture medium, aiming to achieve a cell density of 50%–60% during transfection. Take two 1.5 mL EP tubes, labeled A tube and B tube, and add 250 μL Opti MEM (Gibco, USA) to each EP tube. Add 10 μL Lipofectamine 3000 (2773051, Invitrogen, USA) to A tube and 100 μmol/L 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 mimics (347RBE03, Accurate Biology, China) or 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 inhibitor (347RBE04, Accurate Biology, China) to B tube. Let the contents in tubes A and B stand for 5 min. Then, vortex and mix tubes A and B. Let the mixture stand for 20 min. Finally, add the AB mixture to 1.5mL serum-free culture medium. Discard the waste liquid from the 6-well plate, and then add 6 mL of the transfection solution to each well. After culturing in a CO2 incubator at 37°C for 4–6 h, replace it with complete medium and continue culturing for 48 h before performing subsequent relevant experiments. The 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 mimics indicates overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, and the 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 inhibitor inhibits the expression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2. The NC group represent control group.
2.10 Cell viability assay
The viability of NPC cells was quantified by employing the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (Bs350A, Biosharp, Anhui, China) in strict accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. First, NPC cells (1 × 104/well) were inoculated into 96-well plates and grown to 60%–75% confluence. Then, 10 μL of Cell Counting Kit-8 reagent was added, and the cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The absorbance was measured with a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, USA) at 450 nm. Thereafter, the optical density (OD) values were measured at 2, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30 h.
2.11 Colony growth assay
NPC cells were plated at a density of 300–500 cells per well in 6-well plates and then cultured in a cell incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 10–14 d. The cells were fixed with methanol for 15 min. Then 0.1% crystal violet dye was added for 1–3 min, followed by a gentle rinse with running water. After being air-dried, the clone formation rate was calculated using the formula: clone formation rate = (number of clones/number of inoculated cells) × 100%.
2.12 Wound healing assay
NPC cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/well and cultured overnight. Scratches were created using a 200-µL pipette tip. Images were acquired at 0, 12, and 24 h using a microscope (Olympus, Japan). Gap distances were measured using ImageJ software.
2.13 Transwell cell migration assay
Cell migration assays were carried out using Transwell chambers according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (02722042, Corning Costar, USA). NPC cells were plated in the upper Transwell chamber at a density of 4 × 104 cells per well, with 200 µL serum-free RPMI 1640 medium in the upper chamber and 800 µL complete culture medium in the lower chamber. The chambers were then incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 for 24, 48, and 72 h. Then, the cells were fixed with 500 µL of 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde solution and stained with 600 µL of 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet solution. Finally, the number of migrating cells was counted.
2.14 Transwell cell invasion assay
Cell invasion assays were performed in 24-well Transwell chambers with matrigel (3061003, Corning, USA). First, diluted matrigel was quickly spread into the upper chamber of the Transwell, and then the upper chamber was placed in a 37 °C incubator. The cell density was adjusted to 1 × 105–10 × 105 cells/mL and inoculated into the upper chambers. After 24, 48, and 72 h of cultivation, the cells were fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde solution for 10 min, and then crystalline violet solution (0.1%, w/v) was added to the cell wells for 1–3 min. Images were acquired using an inverted microscope.
2.15 Statistical analysis
All data analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 (IBM, Ehningen, Germany) and GraphPad Prism 9.5 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States). The results of RT-qPCR were presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Unpaired t-tests were employed to compare the expression levels of each candidate tsRNA between NPC patients and normal individuals. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted in order to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the tsRNA expression in serum. All experiments were repeated at least three times. t-tests were used to analyze differences between two groups, and the one-way ANOVA was utilized to analyze differences among three or more groups. Analysis items with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Small RNA expression profiling of the serum from NPC patients and normal individuals
Serum samples from 20 NPC patients and 5 normal individuals were subjected to tsRNA sequencing [
41–
43]. The sequencing quality data are presented in Table S2. In this study, when comparing NPC patients with the control group, the age and gender of the two groups were basically matched, and this matching principle was applied in data analysis. The baseline characteristics of normal individuals are as follows: Among the 5 normal individuals, there were 4 males and 1 female. Regarding age distribution, 1 individual was aged 30–40 years, 1 individual was aged 41–50 years, 2 individuals were aged 51–60 years, and 1 individual was aged 61–70 years. The baseline characteristics of NPC patients are summarized in Table 1. Among the 20 NPC patients, there were 14 males and 6 females. Regarding age distribution, 2 patients were aged 30–40 years, 6 patients were aged 41–50 years, 8 patients were aged 51–60 years, and 4 patients were aged 61–70 years. The frequency ratios of gender and the individual quantifications of age are matched between the NPC patients and normal individuals mentioned above. In addition, 80% of NPC patients had non-keratinous carcinoma of undifferentiated histology type. In terms of pathological stage, 5 patients were at stage II, 4 patients were at stage III, 11 patients were at stage IV. The elevated expression of Ki-67 in immunohistochemistry serves as a characteristic sign of cancer advancement. The higher the expression level of Ki-67, and the higher the proportion of cells in the division stage [
44], and the faster the tumor growth [
45], and the later the stage [
46], and the higher the probability of gene mutation and drug resistance mutation [
47], and the higher the tumor mutation load [
48,
49]. In NPC patients, Ki-67 levels between 10% and 50% indicate low tumor proliferation, whereas Ki-67 levels > 50%, showing markedly increased proliferation [
50], are an independent risk factor for cancer progression [
51]. In this study, the number of patients with Ki-67 expression levels detected by immunohistochemistry is as follows: 12 patients had expression levels ranging from 10% to 50%, and 8 patients had expression levels > 50%.
To investigate comprehensively small RNA profiles, we analyzed the distribution of various types of small RNAs in serum, such as microRNA (miRNA), pre-miRNA, snoRNA, tRNA, and tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNA, or tRF and tiRNA). The results are shown in Fig. 2. As illustrated in Fig. 2A, the 5 parts of the small RNA biotypes in the sera were not significantly different between NPC patients and normal individuals (P = 0.313 of miRNA, P = 0.736 of pre-miRNA, P = 0.655 of snoRNA, P = 0.635 of tRNA, P = 0.391 of tsRNA). tsRNA accounted for the largest proportion of small RNA, reaching 40.21% in NPC patients (Fig. 2B) and 40.28% in normal individuals (Fig. 2C). A total of 7 types of tsRNAs were identified in 2 groups, including 5′tRF, 3′tRF, tRF-1, 5-Leader, 5′tiRNA, 3′tiRNA, and i-tRF. Fig. 2D and 2E present the percentage of expression with various tsRNA subtypes. Comparing NPC patients and normal individuals, the proportions of 5′tRF are 38.97% and 38.50% respectively; for 5′tiRNA, they are 17.53% and 17.45%; for 3′tRF, 15.52% and 15.81%; for i-tRF, 13.40% and 13.24%; for 5-Leader, 8.24% and 8.45%; for 3′tiRNA, 3.71% and 3.87%; and for tRF-1, 2.63% and 2.68%. 5′tRF is the most abundant tsRNA in the sera, followed by 5′tiRNA, 3′tRF, i-tRF, 5-Leader, 3′tiRNA, and tRF-1 (Fig. 2F). From the above research results, we can conclude that tsRNA is the most highly expressed among the distribution of small RNAs in both NPC patients and normal individuals. To screen for a biomarker for NPC diagnosis, highly-expressed tsRNA was selected for subsequent experiments.
3.2 Expression spectrums of tsRNAs in serum from NPC patients and normal individuals
The RNA sequencing results indicated that a total of 3738 tsRNAs were detected in the array sequencing. Among these, 549 tsRNAs were not included by the MINTbase. There were 132 functional tsRNAs, 670 reliable tsRNAs, and 2936 potential tsRNAs. Specifically, researchers documented the functional tsRNAs with characterized biological functions or disease association; the reliable tsRNAs were recorded in tRFdb or reported in literature but lacked in-deepth research; the potential tsRNAs were computationally predicted by Arraystar based on the lengths of RNA fragments and the cleavage positions in the tRNA. The main types of functional tsRNAs were 5′tiRNA and tRF-1. In the reliable tsRNAs, i-tRF, tRF-1, and 5′tRF were predominantly detected. And within the potential tsRNAs, a large quantity of 5′tRF, 3′tRF, and 5′tiRNA were found (Fig. 3A–3C). The principal component analysis (PCA) plot to visualize the overall expression profile differences of tsRNAs between NPC patients and normal individuals. In Fig. 4A, the normal individuals were distributed in the middle and relatively scattered, indicating significant sample differences in the NC group. In contrast, the NPC group was mainly concentrated in the middle and more densely distributed, indicating small sample differences in the experimental group. Overall, both sets of samples are highly representative and meet the testing criteria. To further analyze the differentially expressed tsRNAs between NPC patients and normal individuals, a hierarchical clustering heat-map was employed to visualize the expression spectrum of tsRNAs in Fig. 4B. Compared with the normal individuals, 42 tsRNAs were upregulated, and 48 tsRNAs were downregulated in NPC patients (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, when P < 0.05, tsRNAs were considered to have significantly differential expressions. From the volcano plot in Fig. 4D, 9 upregulated tsRNAs and 11 downregulated tsRNAs were identified. The 9 upregulated tsRNAs with FC > 1.5, regarded as the most significantly potential tsRNAs, were applied to the subsequent experimental validation.
3.3 Differentially expressed specific tsRNAs in primary diagnosed NPC patients
Based on the criteria of FC > 1.5 and P < 0.05, 9 upregulated tsRNAs were identified as candidate tsRNAs (Table 2). Subsequently, to further investigate these candidate tsRNAs, the expression levels of these candidate tsRNAs were validated in serum samples from two groups using RT-qPCR (20 serum samples from NPC patients and 5 from normal individuals). When compared to the control group, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, tRF5-50-GlyGCC-2, i-tRF-4:24-His-GTG-1, i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1, tRF5-23-HisGTG-1, 5′tiRNA-34-GlnTTG-6, and mt-tRF5-26-LeuTAA were all statistically upregulated in the NPC group. In contrast, 5′tiRNA-35-GlnTTG-6 had not been significantly expressed (Fig. 5). These results are consistent with tsRNA sequencing data. Compared with the control group, the 8 potential tsRNAs were upregulated in patients with newly diagnosed NPC. tRF5-50-GlyGCC-2 was highly expressed with P-value < 0.05. i-tRF-4:24-His-GTG-1, i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1, and mt-tRF5-26-LeuTAA were also highly expressed with P < 0.01. 5′tiRNA-34-GlnTTG-6 was highly expressed with P < 0.001. 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 and tRF5-23-HisGTG-1 were the most significantly expressed with P < 0.0001.
3.4 Potential value of the validated tsRNA in NPC diagnosis
To evaluate the diagnostic value of the 9 tsRNAs, the serum tsRNAs of newly diagnosed NPC patients were assessed using ROC curves. Table 3 and Fig. 6 show the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, tRF5-50-GlyGCC-2, i-tRF-4:24-His-GTG-1, i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1, 5′tiRNA-35-GlnTTG-6, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1, tRF5-23-HisGTG-1, 5′tiRNA-34-GlnTTG-6, and mt-tRF5-26-LeuTAA. tRF5-23-HisGTG-1 (AUC = 1.000, Sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 100%), 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 (AUC = 0.960, Sensitivity = 85%, Specificity = 95%), tRF5-31-HisGTG-1 (AUC = 0.953, Sensitivity = 85%, Specificity = 90%), i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1 (AUC = 0.950, Sensitivity = 95%, Specificity = 100%), and 5′tiRNA-34-GlnTTG-6 (AUC = 0.915, Sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 75%) may serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for initially diagnosed NPC. The AUC values of the remaining 4 tsRNAs are less than 0.900 (tRF5-50-GlyGCC-2, i-tRF-4:24-His-GTG-1, 5′tiRNA-35-GlnTTG-6, and mt-tRF5-26-LeuTAA). The complete statistical analysis is presented in Table S3.
3.5 Specific value of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 in NPC diagnosis
According to the AUC value and previous PCR results, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 was chosen for further investigation. We used RT-qPCR to further validate 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 expression in two groups (100 NPC patients vs. 20 normal individuals) during the testing phases. The results indicated that the level of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 in NPC patients was higher than that in normal individuals (Fig. 7A and 7B, P < 0.05). In the ROC curve, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 demonstrated statistical significance P < 0.001, with an AUC = 0.994, 93% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 95% CI ranging from 0.984 to 1.000 (Fig. 7C). The clinical data along with baseline characteristics of 100 NPC patients are presented in Table S4.
The main gene network relationships of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 are shown in Fig. 8A. Meanwhile, the positions of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 on the cloverleaf secondary structure are shown in Fig. 8B. TargetScan and miRanda were used to construct the tsRNA and target gene network of initially diagnosed NPC. When the context score was ≤ −0.2, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 has 199 candidate target genes. The top 5 genes of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 are presented in Table 4. UGT2B7, SYNPO2, ZNF44, PDHB, and UFM1 associated with 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 have a context score < −0.5 (Fig. 8C). In Table 4, the context score of UGT2B7 is −0.576, with 178 structure score and −27.75 energy score; the context score of SYNPO2 is −0.529, with 162 structure score and −21.16 energy score; the context score of ZNF44 is −0.524, with 167 structure score and −23.78 energy score; the context score of PDHB is −0.513, with 172 structure score and −22.9 energy score; the context score of UFM1 is −0.505, with 167 structure score and −24.82 energy score. UGT2B7, SYNPO2, ZNF44, and UFM1 all promote tumor migration and invasion, while PDHB inhibits tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion.
3.6 regulates the expression of NPC cells with RT-qPCR
To ascertain the role of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 in NPC cells (C666-1 and HNE1), the expression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 was induced using mimics. Then, RT-qPCR was performed to measure 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 expression levels (Fig. 9A). Compared to the NC group, the expression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 in mimics group was markedly higher in the C666-1 (P = 0.0039) and HNE1 (P = 0.0005) cells. Conversely, the expression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 in NPC cells (C666-1 and HNE1) was reduced by the inhibitor. RT-qPCR showed that, compared to the NC group, the expression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 in inhibitor group was significantly lower in the C666-1 (P = 0.0119) and HNE1 (P = 0.0006) cells (Fig. 10A). The results proved that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 was exactly highly expressed in NPC.
3.7 regulates the proliferation of NPC cells with CCK-8 assay and colony growth assay
The viability of both C666-1 and HNE1 cell lines that were transfected with or without 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 mimics was evaluated through the CCK-8 assay. The results indicated that, when compared with the control group, C666-1 and HNE1 cells transfected with the mimics both exhibited high viability levels (Fig. 9B). In C666-1 cells, the mimics group compared with NC group were P = 0.0025 at 2 h, P = 0.0087 at 6 h, P = 0.0144 at 12 h, P = 0.0012 at 18 h, P = 0.0012 at 24 h, P = 0.0397 at 30 h. And in HNE1 cells, the mimics group compared with NC group were P = 0.0179 at 2 h, P = 0.0108 at 6 h, P < 0.0001 at 12 h, P < 0.0001 at 18 h, P < 0.0001 at 24 h, P = 0.0001 at 30 h. On the other hand, when the expression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 was inhibited in C666-1 and HNE1 cells, the viability levels were lower compared to those in the control group cells (Fig. 10B). In C666-1 cells, the P-values for 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 inhibitor group versus NC group were 0.0010 at 2 h, 0.0091 at 6 h, 0.0092 at 12 h, 0.0161 at 18 h, 0.0123 at 24 h, 0.0011 at 30 h; and in HNE1 cells, they were 0.0233 at 2 h, < 0.0001 at 6 h, 0.0002 at 12 h, 0.0412 at 18 h, 0.0002 at 24 h, 0.0117 at 30 h. The results indicated that the inhibition of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 exerted a suppressive effect on the proliferation of NPC cells. Therefore, these findings suggested that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 played a stimulatory role in the proliferation of NPC cells.
In C666-1 cells, the clone formation numbers of NPC cells with the mimics group and NC group were 169.70 and 49.00, respectively (P < 0.0001). And in HNE1 cells, the numbers were 273.3 and 82.33 (P = 0.0006) (Fig. 9C). Conversely, the clone formation numbers of the NPC cells with the inhibitor group versus NC group were 91.67 and 297.30 in C666-1 cells (P = 0.0482), and 93.00 and 256.30 in HNE1 cells (P = 0.0016), respectively (Fig. 10C). These results indicated that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 had a promoting effect on colony-forming ability of NPC cells.
3.8 regulates the migration of NPC cells with scratch assay and Transwell cell migration assay
In addition, the scratch assay demonstrated that overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 enhanced the motility of C666-1 and HNE1 cells (Fig. 9D). Compared with the NC group, the wound areas of the mimics group were smaller in C666-1 cells (P < 0.0001 at 24 h, P = 0.0137 at 48 h) and HNE1 cells (P = 0.0017 at 24 h, P = 0.0332 at 48 h). Moreover, the scratch assay (Fig. 10D) confirmed that inhibition of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 restrained the motility of C666-1 and HNE1 cells. The comparison of the wound areas between the 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 inhibitor group and NC group revealed that in C666-1 cells, P = 0.0181 at 24 h, P < 0.0001 at 48 h; in HNE1 cells, P = 0.0017 at 24 h, P = 0.0002 at 48 h. These results imply that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 promotes the migratory capacity of NPC cells.
The Transwell cell migration assay (Fig. 9E) displayed that overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 increased the migration ability of NPC cells. When comparing the mimics group with the NC group, in C666-1 cells, P = 0.0008 at 24 h, P = 0.0211 at 48 h, and P = 0.0047 at 72 h; and in HNE1 cells, the P = 0.0010 at 24 h, P = 0.0005 at 48 h, and P < 0.0001 at 72 h. On the other hand, the Transwell cell migration assay (Fig. 10E) verified that the inhibition of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 diminished the migratory ability of NPC cells. When comparing the inhibitor group with NC group, in C666-1 cells, the P = 0.0152 at 24 h, P = 0.0006 at 48 h, and P = 0.0077 at 72 h; and in HNE1 cells, the P = 0.0004 at 24 h, P < 0.0001 at 48 h, and P = 0.0062 at 72 h. Therefore, as the above results indicate, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 facilitates the migratory ability of NPC cells.
3.9 regulates the invasion of NPC cells with Transwell cell invasion assay
And the Transwell cell invasion assay (Fig. 9F) revealed that overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 boosted the invasive ability of NPC cells. The comparison of the mimics group with NC group, the P-values were P = 0.0022 at 24 h, P = 0.0006 at 48 h, P = 0.0015 at 72 h in C666-1 cells; and P = 0.0051 at 24 h, P = 0.0035 at 48 h, P < 0.0001 at 72 h in HNE1 cells. Conversely, the Transwell cell invasion assay (Fig. 10F) verified that inhibition of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 reduced the invasive ability of NPC cells. The comparison of the inhibitor group with NC group, the P-values were P = 0.0131 at 24 h, P < 0.0001 at 48 h, P = 0.0002 at 72 h in C666-1 cells; and P = 0.0228 at 24 h, P < 0.0001 at 48 h, P = 0.0003 at 72 h in HNE1 cells. Based on the significant differences in the comparison between the experimental group and NC group, the above results demonstrate that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 promotes the invasion ability of NPC cells.
4 Discussion
To screen an early-diagnosis marker for NPC, significant attention has been paid to small RNAs including miRNA, circRNA, particularly tsRNA. The roles and mechanisms of miRNA [
61–
63], lncRNA [
64–
66] and circRNA [
67–
69] in the development of NPC have been reported previously, yet they have not emerged as effective diagnostic markers. tsRNAs, as a class of small non-coding RNAs derived from tRNAs, are a newly discovered group of small non-coding RNAs generated from mature tRNA or tRNA precursors through cleavage by enzymes such as angiogenin, Dicer, RNase Z, and RNase P [
70]. Through a variety of mechanisms, tsRNAs interact with proteins or mRNA, inhibit translation, and regulate gene expression, the cell cycle, chromatin status, and epigenetic modifications, thereby playing crucial biological roles. During transcription, tsRNAs identify target mRNA and compete to bind with it. They replace the untranslated regions in mRNA, thereby reducing the stability of the transcript and consequently inhibits mRNA expression [
71]. In this article, to explore and estimate whether tsRNA can serve as a diagnostic marker for NPC, we used small RNA microarray profiling and array hybridization to screen for specific tsRNA in NPC serum. As a result, we identified 9 differently upregulated tsRNAs, namely 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, tRF5-50-GlyGCC-2, i-tRF-4:24-His-GTG-1, i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1, 5′tiRNA-35-GlnTTG-6, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1, tRF5-23-HisGTG-1, 5′tiRNA-34-GlnTTG-6, and mt-tRF5-26-LeuTAA, and verified that they have certain value for the primary diagnosis of NPC. Among them, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 has the greatest clinical significance, so this tsRNA was further investigated. The results indicated that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 may be a novel potential biomarker.
To further define the clinical significance of these 9 specific tsRNAs, RT-qPCR was initially employed to validate their expressions in the sera of NPC patients compared with normal individuals. Except that 5′tiRNA-35-GlnTTG-6 showed non-significant upregulation, the remaining 8 candidate tsRNAs were all significantly upregulated in newly diagnosed NPC patients. In ROC analysis of validated tsRNAs, based on the criterion of AUC ≥ 0.950, we considered tRF5-23-HisGTG-1, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1 and i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1 as potential diagnostic biomarkers for newly diagnosed NPC. 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 is a member of cytoplasmic tRNAs and is located chr5q35.3. In line with previous findings, patients with liver cancer exhibited significantly higher levels of tRNA-ValAAC-5 in plasma exosome [
72], which underscores the potential of 5′tRNA-ValAAC as a promising biomarker for NPC diagnosis. Meanwhile, lactic acid dramatically enhances the ratio of 5′tRNAHis and 5′tRNAVal [
73], impairing the EBV-infected B cell lymphoma cells cycle and proliferation, which means that the 5′tRNAHis can also serve as a novel molecular target for NPC diagnosis and treatment. tRF5-23-HisGTG-1 and tRF5-31-HisGTG-1 are members of 5′tRNAHis family, while i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1 belongs to the His tRNAs family. All of the tRF5-23-HisGTG-1, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1 and i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1 are part of HisGTG tRF family. As reported, the HisGTG tRF is enriched in the non-nuclear fraction and highly concentrated in mitochondria, where it regulates mitochondrial function [
74]. tiRNA-HisGTG, exerting a regulatory function with mitochondrial oxidative stress [
75], strongly suggests that tiRNAs, known as stress-induced tRNAs, are derived from mature tRNAs cleaved by ANG at the anticodon ring [
13]. The level of 5′tiRNA-His-GTG is upregulated in NPC sera, which is consistent with the situation in colorectal cancer tissues [
76]. Targeting 5′tiRNA-His-GTG can modulate the response process of the tumor hypoxic microenvironment, thereby inducing cell apoptosis [
76]. Apart from this, 5′tiRNA-His-GTG can also perform the above functions through osthole [
77] and quercetin [
78]. Therefore, 5′tiRNA-His-GTG may serve as a potential therapeutic target for NPC patients. Moreover, 5′tiRNA and tRF5 may exert an important role in the development and progression of NPC.
In addition, both 5′tiRNA and tRF5 belong to 5′-tRFs. Mechanistically, their biological functions are mainly associated with gene silencing, translation regulation, and epigenetic modification regulation [
79]. It has been verified that 5′tiRNA-His-GTG acts as a crucial regulator of retinal neurovascular dysfunction, primarily by modulating arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism through the cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs) pathway [
80]. 5′tiRNA-Gly-GCC modulated the
JAK1/
STAT6 signaling pathway by targeting
SPIB. Poly (β-amino esters) were synthesized to assist the delivery of 5-FU and 5′tiRNA-Gly-GCC inhibitor, which effectively inhibited tumor growth and enhanced the sensitivity of CRC to 5-FU [
81]. Additionally, 5′tiRNA-Gly dysregulated the expression of downstream genes related to inflammatory response, the activation of satellite cells, and the differentiation of myoblasts through the
TGF-
β signaling pathway by targeting
Tgfbr1 [
82]. One finding revealed that 5′-tiRNA-Cys-GCA is a potential regulator of the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathological process via the
STAT4 signaling pathway [
83]. Another finding indicated that 5′-tiRNA-Gln interacts with
EIF4A1 to reduce related mRNA binding through the intramolecular G-quadruplex structure, and this process partially inhibits translation and the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma [
84]. Our research discovered that overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 facilitates the proliferation, migration and invasion ability of NPC cells. Although 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 has not been previously reported, our findings and the latest studies on the 5′tiRNA mechanism imply that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 may be a novel pathogenic factor for NPC. It is possible that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 participates in the development of NPC and plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis.
Using TargetScan and miRanda, we identified the top 5 most relevant genes of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, namely
UGT2B7,
SYNPO2,
ZNF44,
PDHB,
UFM1. Estrogen homeostasis is regulated by
UGT2B7, and it promotes the migration and invasion of breast cancer cells, causing the development of breast cancer metastasis [
52].
SYNPO2 plays a pivotal role in regulating tumor growth, development and progression in bladder urothelial carcinoma [
54] and fibrosarcoma [
55].
ZNF44 can promote neuroblastoma growth and invasion as potential driver mutations [
56]. The overexpression of
PDHB can inhibit the proliferation, migration, and invasion of renal clear cell carcinoma [
57] and cervical cancer [
58]. An elevated level of
UFM1 is associated with the proliferation, migration and invasion of cancer cells [
59,
60].
In summary, we used small RNA microarray profiling and array hybridization to detect the expression spectrums of tsRNAs in the sera of newly diagnosed NPC patients. It was verified that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2, tRF5-23-HisGTG-1, tRF5-31-HisGTG-1, and i-tRF-2:25-His-GTG-1 could serve as potential diagnostic biomarkers for NPC. As a crucial tsRNA for the diagnosis of NPC, 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 holds significant research value and scientific innovation. The most relevant genes of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 are UGT2B7, SYNPO2, ZNF44, PDHB, UFM1. Through the CCK-8 assay and clone formation assay, we discovered that the overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 promotes the proliferation of NPC cells. Furthermore, via wound healing assay and Transwell assay, it was found that the overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 can enhance the migration and invasion capabilities of NPC cells.
5 Conclusions
In this study, the tsRNA spectrums of serum from NPC patients were analyzed. It was verified that 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 is a pathogenic molecule and a potential diagnostic biomarker for NPC. The genes most closely associated with 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 are UGT2B7, SYNPO2, ZNF44, PDHB, UFM1. Overexpression of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 promotes the proliferation, migration, and invasion of NPC cells. On the contrary, inhibition of 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 suppresses the proliferation, migration, and invasion of NPC cells. 5′tiRNA-32-ValAAC-2 may serve as a novel diagnostic biomarker in primary NPC and a therapeutic target molecule.
5.0.0.0.1 Data availability and compliance statement
The authors declare that the acquisition and subsequent use of all data presented in this manuscript fully comply with all relevant local, national, and international laws, regulations, ethical guidelines, and the terms of use associated with the original data sources.
The authors bear full legal responsibility for ensuring the legality of data acquisition and all subsequent uses of the data.
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.