Introduction
By March 29, 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak had caused 634 835 confirmed cases and 29 957 deaths globally, more than caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) (8273 cases, 775 deaths) in 2003 and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) (1139 cases, 431 deaths) in 2013. Currently, there is no confirmed effective therapeutic strategy for COVID-19 because the mechanism and progress of its pathology are poorly understood. The pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is highly pathogenic and transmissible, creating severe challenges for the whole world. The most prevalent COVID-19 symptoms are respiratory system dysfunction, fever, and cough, and most of COVID-19 patients had abnormal computerized tomography chest examinations. Most deaths of COVID-19 patients are associated with dyspnea. Some patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection had fatigue, muscle soreness, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and other symptoms [
1], among which, ARDS is the main reason for the transfer of patients to an intensive care unit [
2].
Recently, it has been noticed that some severely affected COVID-19 patients experience neurological symptoms. The National Health Commission of China issued an updated version of the Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for COVID-19, which includes the pathological findings of multiple organs found from autopsy analysis [
3]. Pathological changes in the lung, spleen, hilar lymph nodes, heart, blood vessels, liver, gallbladder, kidney, adrenal gland, esophagus, stomach, intestines, and brain were described. Such comprehensive multi-organ damage indicates that COVID-19 patients should be treated promptly to limit complications beyond the lungs. In the brain, tissue congestion, and edema were observed. These changes in the brain may underlie the neurological symptoms in some COVID-19 patients. Characterization of 99 COVID-19 patients in Wuhan indicated that neurological complications such as headache (8%), nausea and vomiting (1%) can be observed [
4]. A later retrospective study of 214 COVID-19 patients reported that the incidence of neurological damage caused by SARS-CoV-2 may reach 36.4% [
5]. Specifically, more severe patients were likely to have neurologic symptoms such as cerebrovascular diseases, consciousness impairment, and skeletal muscle symptoms [
5]. These data indicated that the neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV-2 may contribute to the respiratory failure of COVID-19 patients [
6]. However, the research on novel coronavirus is still in its early stages, and there has been no direct evidence to date of SARS-CoV-2 invading the central nervous system (CNS).
SARS-CoV-2 shares a highly homologous sequence with two other human CoVs with lethal potential: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and MERS-CoV [
7]. Both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV can directly cause brain damage in both experimental animals and patients [
6]. Thus, the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 may enter the CNS and cause neurological damage is not negligible. In addition, both SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV invade human cells via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [
8], an important component of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in the brain [
9]. Therefore, we speculate that the ability of SARS-CoV to invade the CNS may also be possessed by SARS-CoV-2.
As a human respiratory coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2 infection causes inflammatory damage to most type II alveolar cells, which may be aggravated by ventilator-induced lung injury following mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment [
1,
10,
11]. Furthermore, damage to the liver, heart, and kidney has been reported [
12,
13]. When we suggest the possibility of the virus invading the brain, it is not that we are ignoring the damage to multiple organs, including the lungs. Conversely, it is the ARDS caused by SARS-CoV-2 that leads to profound systemic hypoxemia and an inflammatory storm, which facilitates the entry of the virus into the brain. In this review, we focus on the potential routes by which SARS-CoV-2 may invade the brain on the basis of previous discoveries for other respiratory viruses with a neuroinvasive propensity and the concurrent neurological symptoms of patients with COVID-19 (Fig. 1).
Peripheral nervous route
With the increasing understanding of the disease, many non-pulmonary symptoms are now also recognized, especially neurological signs, including CNS and peripheral nervous system (PNS) symptoms [
5]. The former include dizziness, headache, nausea, and vomiting, while the latter mainly include three kinds of hypoesthesia (hyposmia, hypogeusia, and hypopsia), indicating that the virus may enter the CNS and then damage certain nuclei or neural circuits. This viewpoint is supported by the neurotropic properties of two other coronaviruses that have caused epidemics or pandemics this century, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV [
14–
18]; both share highly homologous sequences with SARS-CoV-2. In addition, postmortem studies of COVID-19 patients strongly indicate neurological pathology [
3]. Droplet contagion is the main route of SARS-CoV-2 transmission (while close contact is also a significant route of infection); therefore, it is worth clarifying the potential intranasal and oral routes by which SARS-CoV-2 enters the CNS to understand the development of hyposmia, hypogeusia, and hypopsia. In general, there are two anatomical routes for a virus to enter the CNS, a neural pathway and a body fluid (such as blood, lymph, and cerebral spinal fluid). For a neural pathway, the virus must first enter a nerve terminal and replicate, then be retrogradely transported to the soma and invade the CNS (Fig. 2).
How does hyposmia occur in COVID-19? After droplets containing SARS-CoV-2 land in the nasal cavity, most viruses reach the lung through the airway, while some viruses adhere to the mucosa of the nasal cavity, pharynx, cavum larynges or trachea. When SARS-CoV-2 adheres to the nasal mucosa, it may directly infect olfactory sensory neurons in the olfactory epithelium and then be transported into the CNS through the olfactory nerve. This is supported by evidence from animal experiments investigating MERS-CoV [
17] and SARS-CoV [
19]. Alternatively, SARS-CoV-2 adhering to the nasal mucosa may infect the trigeminal nerve (a nasal cavity nociceptor), which has been investigated for drug delivery [
20,
21]. In addition, postmortem analyses of SARS patients from 2003 detected SARS-CoV particles in the brain that showed cellular selectivity, most assembling in neurons rather than glia [
22–
24]. It should also be noted that olfaction is affected by other factors, such as nasal mucosa swelling and allergy.
In humans, the sense of taste is conveyed via three of the 12 cranial nerves, the facial nerve (VII), the glossopharyngeal nerve (IX), and the vagus nerve (X). Once the termini of these nerves are activated, the information first transfers to the nucleus of the solitary tract in the brainstem and then to the thalamus after substitution. Thus, hypogeusia caused by SARS-COV-2 infection could result from injury to any of these three nerves (VII, IX, and X), the nucleus of the solitary tract, or thalamic nuclei (Fig. 2). Similar to hyposmia, the hypogeusia seen in COVID-19 patients may be associated with SARS-CoV-2 CNS infection. For hypopsia, there is limited evidence supporting direct infection of the optic nerve by SARS-CoV-2. Recently, SARS-COV-2 RNA fragments were found in ocular discharge by SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR in one patient with conjunctivitis [
25].
The nucleus of the solitary tract is very close to the respiratory center; therefore, it is possible that SARS-CoV-2 from the nucleus of the solitary tract can infect the respiratory center, resulting in neurogenic refractory dyspnea [
6,
26]. Confirmation of this possibility would be helpful in understanding respiratory symptoms in different patients (Fig. 1). In addition, viruses in neurons “escape from immune surveillance” and can therefore replicate when the immunity of the host is impaired or weakened, which is similar to varicella-zoster virus [
27,
28]. A small group of COVID-19 patients who had recovered from the acute infection were recently tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and shown to still be positive. This may be because of the “escape from immune surveillance,” meaning that a much longer period of treatment and supervision may be needed [
6].
Hematogenous route
For hematogenous invasion, the virus must infect the endothelial cells of the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) or the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB), and then disseminate toward the CNS. Like SARS-CoV, the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into human host cells is mainly mediated by ACE2 [
8], while MERS-CoV binds to dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4) [
29]. ACE2 and DPP4 are located in multiple organs, including lung, kidney, heart, small intestine, testicle, and brain [
30]; therefore, it is necessary to investigate the direct and indirect routes that these coronaviruses use to infect the CNS. In a SARS-CoV-infected transgenic mouse model of human ACE2, the olfactory nerve was the main pathway for the virus to enter the brain; however, there were still a number of infected sites indirectly connected with the olfactory bulb, indicating non-neuronal routes for viral infection, such as the hematogenous route [
19].
Nevertheless, viral entry is a complicated multi-step process, involving virus attachment to the cell surface, receptor engagement, protease processing, and membrane fusion [
31]. Like other CoVs, SARS-CoV-2 encodes spike, a surface glycoprotein that binds to ACE2 and mediates viral entry [
31]. The spike protein is cleaved by nearby proteases and releases a signal peptide to facilitate virus entry into host cells [
32]. SARS-CoV-2 has a higher affinity to ACE2 than SARS-CoV, which explains, in part, why SARS-CoV-2 more easily spreads human-to-human [
33]. In the lungs of SARS-CoV infected mice, the spike protein downregulated ACE2 protein expression, which resulted in increased Ang II peptide levels and vascular permeability [
34]. These animals showed disrupted barrier function and worsened ARDS symptoms. Similarly, SARS-CoV-2 mainly infects type II alveolar epithelial cells, which express high levels of ACE2 [
30]. Therefore, it is not difficult to understand that SARS-CoV-2 binds to the ACE2 receptor on the alveolar epithelial cells, causing endothelial damage and entering the blood circulation. Because of the large surface area of pulmonary alveoli, virus invasion can be very fast and large-scale. The virus not only infects the epithelial cells, but also the resident, infiltrating, and circulating immune cells. The infected circulating immune cells carry the virus to other organs causing the extrapulmonary symptoms, including fever, myalgia, fatigue and kidney dysfunctions [
35], acute myocardial injury [
36], CNS and PNS symptoms [
5] and maybe gastrointestinal symptoms. It is possible that other pathways exist for the virus to infect CNS, such as the viral RNA in the plasma directly infect the endothelial cells of the BBB with an unknown mechanism [
37]. The infection to the cardiorespiratory center in the brain stem may cause central respiratory failure to progress rapidly (Fig. 1). This is why mechanical respiratory support and endotracheal intubation should be applied at the earliest sign of ineffective noninvasive ventilation.
Immunohistochemistry shows that ACE2 is localized in almost all human organs [
38]. Once SARS-CoV-2 is present in the circulation, it can infect leucocytes that spread easily via the circulatory system, and reach remote tissues, causing multiple organ dysfunction (Fig. 1). Therefore, to avoid blood-borne infection of the CNS and further central respiratory failure, systematic antiviral therapy, and traditional Chinese medicine therapy should be administered as soon as possible. However, the efficacy of ACE inhibitor therapy has been controversial so far [
39]. On the one hand, binding of the virus to ACE2 is not associated with the enzyme function of ACE2 [
40], while the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) targets the hydrolytic function of ACE2. On the other hand, ACE2 activation shows that lung-protective effects in lung injury and inhibition of Ang II degradation by ACE2 are likely to exacerbate the inflammatory response [
41]. Local ACEI administration may be a better choice than a systematic ACEI application.
Digestive tract route
Except for the respiratory tract, SARS-CoV-2 can also infect the gastrointestinal tract. A retrospective study of nine pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection found a case whose chief symptom was diarrhea [
42]. Another study involving 1099 COVID-19 patients confirmed that nearly 10% of the patients had gastrointestinal symptoms, such as diarrhea and vomiting [
13,
43]. Furthermore, CoV nucleic acid has been detected in the stool of COVID-19 patients, indicating that the gastrointestinal system is a potential target of SARS-CoV-2 [
44,
45].
As mentioned above, ACE2 is not only expressed in alveolar epithelial cells but also in intestinal epithelial cells. Single-cell RNA sequencing data show that expression of ACE2 in colon cells is positively correlated with genes regulating virus infection, and innate and cellular immunity, but negatively correlated with virus transcription, protein translation, humoral immunity, phagocytosis, and complement activation [
46]. Based on these findings, SARS-CoV-2 may interact with ACE2 in the gastrointestinal tract and destroy the gastrointestinal epithelial cell barrier, increase the production of inflammatory cytokines, decrease gastrointestinal absorptive capacity, and increase secretion by the gastrointestinal mucosa. With the disruption caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, increasing amounts of inflammatory factors are produced, which eventually leads to a cytokine storm. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is different from that of SARS-CoV in that SARS-CoV-2 spike has a site that is activated by furin, a host cell enzyme that is found in a variety of human tissues, including intestine and lung (Fig. 2). This may be one of the reasons why COVID-19 is more infectious than SARS [
47].
A virus that enters the intestine binds to specific host-cell receptors to penetrate and infect host cells to produce more virions. Once sufficient virions have accumulated, they are released into the surrounding environment where they can infect more resident host cells. Enteroviruses, such as poliovirus, coxsackievirus, and echovirus, reproduce in the intestine and can invade intestinal epithelial cells [
48]. The inflammatory response to host cell death can decrease the expression of the intestinal barrier proteins ZO-1, occludin or claudin 3, which disrupts the integrity of the intestinal barrier [
49,
50]. Besides, the inflammatory response can also trigger intestinal microbiota disorder, which aggregates the damage of the intestinal mucosa barrier structure [
51]. Taking all these factors into account, the virus can easily enter the blood circulation through the cracked intestinal barrier, while viruses in lymphoid tissue can influence remote organs through the lymphatic pathway.
The virus can also invade local peripheral nerves and after replication can advance along their axons to the CNS. Herpes simplex viruses can spread via the dorsal root ganglia to the autonomic ganglia of the enteric nervous system in the colon [
52]. Influenza A virus may have access to the CNS and alter the hippocampus function via the vagus nerve, affecting cognition and behavior [
53,
54]. Although there is no direct evidence to show that SARS-CoV-2 can enter the CNS retrogradely via the intestinal branch of the vagus nerve, the disrupted gastrointestinal environment may influence the integrity of the BBB through immune, neural, and humoral pathways, thus facilitating the movement of the peripheral virus into the CNS. Last but not the least, the vomiting center receives neural signals from sensory receptors in the digestive tract and afferent fibers of the vagus nerve can form synapses in the solitary nucleus affecting the vomiting reflex. When neural signals exceed the threshold, the vomiting reflex is activated. Therefore, it is of great significance to pay attention to the nerve pathway between the digestive system and the CNS for the treatment of intestinal complications caused by viral infection.
In light of the possibility of fecal-oral transmission, masks and hand hygiene are fundamental and effective precautions. From the perspective of containing the virus, ACE2 inhibition and viral spike protein activation are potential targets for clinical intervention of the gastrointestinal symptoms of COVID-19 patients.
Lymphatics and/or cerebrospinal fluid route
It is reported that SARS-CoV can directly invade hilar lymph nodes and mesenteric root lymph nodes both in humans and civets [
55,
56], indicating that lymph nodes, especially in the lung and intestine, are also main target organs. There is also an abundant lymphatic network in the mucosa of the eyes [
57], oral tissues [
58], and tracheal bronchus [
59], which may be also invaded by SARS-CoV-2. When peripheral lymphoid tissue is invaded, the virus eventually enters blood circulation via the flow of lymph fluid.
As mentioned above, the excess of free radicals, such as superoxide anions, nitric oxide (NO), and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS) [
60], and the cytokine storm induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause severe inflammation and multiple organ damage, including severe BBB disruption, which leads to the entry of the virus into the brain via the hematogenous route [
61]. The brain has its own lymphatic drainage system [
62] and under normal physiologic conditions, cerebral solutes move in the interstitial fluid (ISF) and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) through the glymphatic pathway. CSF from the subarachnoid space fluxes into the brain from perivascular spaces and exchanges with ISF. The bulk movement of CSF into the brain drives the convective flow of ISF and interstitial solutes to the peri-venous route [
63]. However, this lymphatic drainage pathway in the brain can be destroyed under pathological conditions, such as virus infection [
64], which leads to brain edema and changes in brain morphology, structure, and function, ultimately resulting in the consequence that virus overflows into the perivascular space and finally enters into the CSF (Fig. 2). This may be the main cause of CNS symptoms in severe or critical patients. A case report described a medical graduate student (24 years old) infected with SARS-CoV-2 who had to stay awake and breathe consciously and actively during intensive care. If not, she risked death because she was likely to stop breathing [
6]. This indicates that for severe and critical patients, the virus enters the brain through a damaged blood-brain barrier and aggravates neurological symptoms and impairs consciousness, and even causes dysfunction of the cardiorespiratory center in the brainstem.
The nasal mucosa can be a route of entry for the virus. Both SARS-CoV and MERS-COV, when given intranasally, can enter the brain [
17,
19]. The perineural spaces that encompass olfactory nerves and the nasal lymphatics are important for CSF drainage [
65]. After invading the nasal mucosa and reaching the lamina propria, SARS-CoV-2 may enter channels created by olfactory ensheathing cells surrounding the olfactory nerves, where they can access the CSF.
Summary
The novel human coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, may be an underestimated opportunistic pathogen of the CNS. Once the virus enters a host cell, intrinsic and innate immune responses are triggered in the early stage of infection. The subsequent cytokine storm and systemic hypoxemia induced by respiratory distress may facilitate the entry of the virus into the brain. In severe ARDS-patients, secondary injury caused by mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment may also be involved. SARS-CoV-2 may enter the brain of immune-compromised individuals through different routes involving the vasculature, the olfactory and trigeminal nerves, the cerebrospinal fluid, and the lymphatic system.
At present, it is difficult to determine which approach dominates. The pathway of the virus into the brain may be mainly related to the route of transmission and the distribution of intracellular receptors of the virus. The vascular pathway into the brain is theoretically fast, but only when the disease progresses to a certain extent and the BBB is dysfunctional. In addition, the neuronal retrograde transport in the peripheral nerve pathway is quite slow [
65]. Nevertheless, the olfactory epithelium is characterized by the presence of olfactory sensory neurons [
17,
19]. The SARS-CoV-2 can enter the olfactory sensory neurons and replicate quickly. Furthermore, previous studies suggest that CoVs may first invade peripheral nerve terminals and then enter into the brain through a trans-synaptic transfer [
15,
16,
53]. Considering the olfactory nerve is anatomically close to the center, the olfactory nerve pathway may be the main way for the virus to enter the brain in the early stage of infection.
Awareness of the potential neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 will have critical significance for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Multiple precautions and measures, including wearing masks and hand hygiene to prevent the virus from contacting and invading the human body, as well as advanced medical interventions are critically necessary. Clinical physical examination of the nervous system, pathogenic detection of CSF, early antiviral therapy with neuroprotection, and prompt endotracheal intubation and mechanical respiratory support should be proposed for early identification and timely management of neurological complications. Based on the previous human coronavirus epidemic outcomes, the long-term psychological and neurocognitive rehabilitation should not be ignored.