Positive stool culture could predict the clinical outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Lijuan Hu , Qi Wang , Xiaohui Zhang , Lanping Xu , Yu Wang , Chenhua Yan , Huan Chen , Yuhong Chen , Kaiyan Liu , Hui Wang , Xiaojun Huang , Xiaodong Mo

Front. Med. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 492 -503.

PDF (379KB)
Front. Med. ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 492 -503. DOI: 10.1007/s11684-019-0681-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Positive stool culture could predict the clinical outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Author information +
History +
PDF (379KB)

Abstract

We aimed to identify the effect of positive stool cultures (PSCs) on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) (n = 332). PSCs were observed in 61 patients (PSC group, 18.4%). Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens was associated with a higher risk of bloodstream infection, and Candida in stool specimens was related to a higher risk of platelet engraftment failure. The cumulative incidence of infection-related mortality 1 year after haplo-HSCT in the PSC group was higher than that of the patients who showed persistently negative stool cultures (NSC group; 19.2% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.017). The probabilities of overall survival (71.4% vs. 83.8%, P = 0.031) and disease-free survival (69.6% vs. 81.0%, P = 0.048) 1 year after haplo-HSCT for the PSC group were significantly lower than those for the NSC group, particularly for patients who had Candida in their stool specimens. In multivariate analysis, Candida in stool specimens significantly increased the risk of mortality and was associated with poorer survival. Our results showed that PSC influenced the clinical outcomes after haplo-HSCT, particularly those who had Candida in their stool specimens.

Keywords

haploidentical / hematopoietic stem cell transplantation / stool culture / Candida

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lijuan Hu, Qi Wang, Xiaohui Zhang, Lanping Xu, Yu Wang, Chenhua Yan, Huan Chen, Yuhong Chen, Kaiyan Liu, Hui Wang, Xiaojun Huang, Xiaodong Mo. Positive stool culture could predict the clinical outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front. Med., 2019, 13(4): 492-503 DOI:10.1007/s11684-019-0681-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Introduction

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the most effective post-consolidative and curative option for patients with hematological malignances. China has a shortage of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors and unrelated donors [1]. As such, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using an HLA-haploidentical donor (haplo-HSCT) becomes a viable alternative to transplant procedures [24], and it has been the largest source of allo-HSCT donors in China since 2013 [5,6]. However, severe complications, such as engraftment failure, acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and infection, remarkably influence the clinical outcomes of haplo-HSCT [7,8].

The human gastrointestinal tract harbors a highly diverse microbial population, and the composition of intestinal microbiota has been implicated in several human diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis [9], malnutrition, kwashiorkor development [10], obesity [11], and diabetes [12]. Several studies have also investigated how intestinal microbiota affected allo-HSCT outcomes [13,14]. The intestinal microbiota of many patients undergoing haplo-HSCT may be altered during transplantation because of the intense conditioning and the use of prophylactic or therapeutic antibiotics. Positive stool cultures (PSCs) can reflect the dominant microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract because most of haplo-HSCT recipients routinely received bacterial decontamination; however, studies have yet to identify the role of stool cultures in haplo-HSCT recipients.

In this retrospective study, we aimed to identify the effect of microorganisms in stool cultures on the clinical outcomes of haplo-HSCT recipients.

Materials and methods

Patients

Consecutive patients who underwent non-T cell-depleted haplo-HSCT from January 2016 to November 2017 at the Peking University Institute of Hematology (PUIH) were enrolled if they underwent a comprehensive fecal culture analysis, which targeted all bacteria and fungi in the gastrointestinal tract during the pre-engraftment phase. A total of 332 patients were enrolled (Table 1). The endpoint of the last follow-up was on March 31, 2018. The Institutional Review Board of Peking University approved this study, and informed consent was obtained from all of the subjects and donors. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Transplant regimen

The major preconditioning treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies consisted of the administration of cytarabine (4 g/(m2/day), from days -10 to -9, and day 0 as the first day of donor cell infusion), busulfan (3.2 mg/(kg/day) administered intravenously on days -8 to -6), cyclophosphamide (CY, 1.8 g/(m2/day), from days -5 to -4), and semustine (250 mg/m2, on day -3). This treatment also included rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG, thymoglobulin, 2.5 mg/(kg/day) and rabbit ATG from Imtix Sangstat, Lyon, France; from days -5 to -2) [15]. For patients with severe aplastic anemia, the preconditioning treatment included the administration of busulfan (3.2 mg/(kg/day) administered intravenously from days -7 to -6), CY (50 mg/(kg/day), from days -5 to -2), and ATG (thymoglobulin, 2.5 mg/(kg/day); rabbit ATG from Imtix Sangstat, Lyon, France; from days -5 to -2). All of patients received cyclosporine A (CSA), mycophenolate mofetil, and short-term methotrexate for aGVHD prophylaxis. All of the patients received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized, fresh, and unmanipulated bone marrow (G-BM) cells and peripheral blood (G-PB) stem cells [16,17].

Infection prevention regimen

All of the patients were hospitalized in rooms with high-efficiency particulate arresting (HEPA) air filters for 4–5 weeks from day –10 until the time at which neutrophil recovery was achieved. All of the patients received antibiotics for gastrointestinal decontamination before and during the period the patient had neutropenia. In particular, fluoroquinolone was orally given to adults, and an injection liquid of gentamicin was orally given to children. The patients received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent Pneumocystis jirovecii infection from days –10 to+180. The patients who did not have an invasive fungal infection (IFI) before they underwent haplo-HSCT received fluconazole (n = 57) or itraconazole capsules (n = 140) to prevent IFI from days –10 to+75. Conversely, the patients who had an IFI before they had haplo-HSCT were given itraconazole injection (n = 28), voriconazole (n = 58), posaconazole (n = 1), or echinocandins (n = 48) to prevent the recrudescence of IFI from days –10 to+100. Acyclovir (200–400 mg) was also orally administered against herpes simplex virus and varicella zoster virus. It was administered twice daily from day+1 until the time CSA was discontinued. Ganciclovir (5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously twice daily from days –9 to –2 to achieve prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection. The infection surveillance and treatment protocols used at our institute were described in detail in a previous study [18].

Stool specimen analysis

After the patients received haplo-HSCT, the surveillance cultures of microorganisms, including bacteria and fungi, in stool specimens were prepared during the pre-engraftment period, that is, from day -10 until the neutrophil engraftment. The target microorganisms were all bacteria and fungi in the gastrointestinal tract. The routine culturing of strictly anaerobic bacteria was not performed because processing specimens immediately after they were collected is impossible. Stool specimens were collected into sterile containers and inoculated in Columbia blood agar with a sterile swab within 2 h of collection. The Columbia blood agar plate was incubated for 18–24 h at 35 °C. If any of the bacteria and fungi did not grow for 24 h, the incubation time was extended to 48 h. Subsequently, up to five colonies of any bacteria or fungi were subcultured and isolated for further identification. The identified species were confirmed through matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF, Bruker Autoflex, Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested in a clinical microbiology laboratory by using a Vitek 2 compact automated system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France).

Definitions and assessments

The following subjects were defined as low risk: (1) subjects with acute leukemia were at a standard risk if they were in first or second complete remission (CR); (2) subjects with lymphoma or multiple myeloma were at a standard risk if they were in first or second CR, partial remission, or had a stable disease; (3) subjects with chronic myeloid leukemia in the first chronic phase; (4) subjects with myelodysplastic syndrome with<20% BM blasts; and (5) subjects with nonmalignant hematologic disorders (severe aplastic anemia, n = 37; adrenoleukodystrophy, n = 2; and mucopolysaccharidoses, n = 1). The other subjects were at a high risk [7]. Disease risk index during diagnosis was reported in accordance with the criteria of Armand et al. [19], and a nonmalignant hematology disorder was defined as a low risk in the present study. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the 1st day an absolute neutrophil count of≥0.5 × 109 cells/L was observed for 3 consecutive days, and platelet engraftment denoted the 1st day a platelet count of≥20 × 109 cells/L was observed for 7 consecutive days without transfusion. aGVHD was diagnosed in accordance with the internationally accepted criteria [20]. Relapse was defined by the morphologic evidence of disease in the peripheral blood, marrow, or extramedullary sites or by the recurrence and sustained presence of pretransplantation chromosomal abnormalities. Patients who showed a minimal residual disease (MRD) were not considered to have relapsed. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was defined as death because of any cause in the first 28 days post-HSCT or death without evidence of disease recurrence beyond day 28. Infection-related mortality (IRM) was defined as death resulting from infection. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from transplantation to death because of any cause. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as survival in continuous CR.

Statistical analysis

Data were censored at the time of death or the last available follow-up. Continuous variables were compared using a Mann–Whitney U test, whereas categorical variables were compared using c2 and Fisher’s exact tests. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Competing risk analyses were performed to calculate the cumulative incidence of engraftments, aGVHD, relapse, and NRM. Gray’s test was conducted to assess differences between the groups [21]. Potential prognostic factors for outcomes were evaluated through multivariate analysis via Cox proportional hazard regression with a forward stepwise model selection approach. Cox proportional hazard models included the following variables: sex of the recipient, age (<18 years vs.≥18 years), underlying disease (hematologic malignancy vs. nonmalignant hematologic disorder), matching of sex between donor and recipient (female to male vs. others), donor–recipient relationship (mother to child vs. others), donor–recipient blood type (major mismatched/major and minor mismatched vs. others), HLA disparity (0–1 vs. 2–3), disease risk index before haplo-HSCT (low risk, intermediate risk, high risk, and very high risk), previous broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure (yes vs. no), and microorganisms in stool specimens. Independent variables with P>0.1 were sequentially excluded from the model, and those with P<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All reported P values were based on two-sided hypothesis tests. Data analyses were primarily conducted with SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), whereas competing risk analysis was performed with the R software package (v. 2.6.1).

Results

Results of stool cultures

A total of 1440 stool specimens were obtained from 332 patients during the pre-engraftment phase after they received haplo-HSCT. PSCs were observed in 61 patients (18.4%; PSC group), and the characteristics were comparable with those of patients who had persistently negative stool cultures (NSC group) (Table 1). The median time from transplantation to obtaining positive stool result was+1 day (range, -9 to+18 days, and day 0 as the 1st day of donor cell infusion), 27 before and 34 after donor cell infusion, respectively. The most common bacterium identified from stool specimens was Escherichia coli followed by Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae (Table 2). Sixteen specimens of Enterobacteriaceae were positive for extended-spectrum b-lactamases (ESBL; Escherichia coli, 12; Klebsiella pneumoniae, 3; Proteus mirabilis, 1), and none of the specimens of Staphylococcus were methicillin resistant. The most common yeast identified from stool specimens was Candida albicans followed by Candida glabrata and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The detection rate of Candida was comparable between patients receiving azole and echinocandin antifungal agents for IFI prophylaxis (7.0% vs. 14.6%, P = 0.088). Multiple pathogens (≥2 pathogens) were identified in 15 patients, and most of them were identified as Enterobacteriaceae plus Enterococcus (n = 7) or Enterococcus plus Candida (n = 4) in stool specimens.

Effect of PSC on bloodstream infection (BSI) and other infections

BSI

A BSI was observed in 63 patients after transplantation. The most common pathogen was E. coli (n = 18), followed by K. pneumoniae (n = 10), Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 7), E. faecium (n = 5), Staphylococcus hemolyticus (n = 4), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 4), Staphylococcus hominis (n = 3), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 2). A total of 25 specimens of Enterobacteriaceae had ESBL (E. coli, 16; K. pneumoniae, 9), and all of the specimens of Staphylococcus were methicillin resistant. Two patients presented Trichosporon asahii BSI. The BSI rate was comparable between PSC and NSC groups (24.6% vs. 17.7%, P = 0.216). The patients whose stools had Enterobacteriaceae had a higher rate of BSI than those without Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens (37.5% vs. 17.5%, P = 0.027). The patients whose stools had E. coli seemed to have a higher rate of E. coli BSI than those without E. coli in stool specimens (13.6% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.107). Similarly, the patients whose stools contained K. pneumoniae seemed to have a higher rate of K. pneumoniae BSI than those without K. pneumoniae in stool specimens (25.0%% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.116). In general, the patients whose stools had Enterobacteriaceae had a higher rate of Enterobacteriaceae BSI than those without Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens (16.7% vs. 7.8%, P = 0.132). However, the patients whose stools had Enterococcus (20.0% vs. 18.9%, P = 1.000) or Candida (18.5% vs. 19.0%, P = 1.000) did not have a higher rate of BSI. The patients with Enterococcus in their stools did not also have a higher rate of Enterococcus BSI (0.0% vs. 1.9%, P = 1.000). The patients with Candida in their stools did not have a higher rate of fungal BSI (0.0% vs. 0.7%, P = 1.000).

Other infections

The rate of central nervous system infection (8.3% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.084) and skin infection (12.5% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.071) of the patients whose stools were positive for Enterobacteriaceae was higher than that of the patients without Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens. The patients whose stools presented Enterococcus had a higher rate of gut infection (20.0% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.053) than those without Enterococcus in the stool specimens. The patients with Candida detected in their stools had a significantly higher rate of pulmonary infection (77.8% vs. 54.4%, P = 0.019) than those without Candida in the stool specimens (Supplementary Table 1). None of the patients manifested invasive candidiasis in the present study, and the patients whose Candida specimens were isolated from their stools did not experience a higher rate of other IFIs than those without Candida in the stool specimens (3.7% vs. 3.6%, P = 1.000).

Effect of PSC on engraftment and aGVHD

The neutrophil engraftments occurred at a median of 13 (range, 8–26 days) and 14 days (range, 2–30 days) in NSC and PSC groups (P = 0.749), respectively, whereas platelet engraftments occurred at a median of 20 (range, 7–120 days) and 21 days (range, 8–210 days) in NSC and PSC groups, respectively (P = 0.263). The neutrophil and platelet engraftments were comparable between the NSC and PSC groups (Table 3); however, the 100-day cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment in patients with Candida in the stool specimens (66.7%, 95% CI 48.1%–85.3%) was lower than that in patients without Candida in the stool specimens (87.9%, 95% CI 84.2%–91.6%; P = 0.043). The presence of Candida in the stool specimens was associated with a high risk of platelet engraftment failure (Table 3).

The occurrence of grades II to IV and grades III to IV aGVHD was comparable between the NSC and PSC groups, respectively. Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcus, and Candida, which were isolated from stool specimens, did not result in an increased risk of aGVHD (Table 3).

Effect of PSC on relapse, NRM, IRM, DFS, and OS

The cumulative incidence of relapse 1 year after haplo-HSCT was comparable between the NSC (6.3%, 95% CI 3.0%–9.6%) and PSC (8.1%, 95% CI 0.3%–15.9%; P = 0.594; Fig. 1A; Table 4) groups. The causes of NRM are presented in Supplementary Table 2. The cumulative incidence of NRM 1 year after haplo-HSCT in the PSC group (22.2%, 95% CI 10.8%–33.6%) tended to be higher than that of the NSC group (12.7%, 95% CI 8.5%–16.9%; P = 0.059; Fig. 1B; Table 4). The probability of IRM 1 year after haplo-HSCT in the PSC group (19.2%, 95% CI 8.2%–30.2%) was significantly higher than that in the NSC group (8.9%, 95% CI 5.1%–12.7%; P = 0.017; Fig. 1C; Table 4).

The probabilities of OS and DFS 1 year after haplo-HSCT were lower in the PSC group than in the NSC group (OS: PSC, 71.4%, 95% CI 58.8%–84.0%; NSC, 83.8%, 95% CI 79.1%–88.5%, P = 0.031; DFS: PSC, 69.6%, 95% CI 56.8%–82.4%; NSC, 81.0%, 95% CI 75.9%–86.1%, P = 0.048; Fig. 1D and 1E; Table 4).

Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcus in the stool specimens were not associated with relapse, NRM, and survival; conversely, Candida in the stool specimens was significantly related to higher IRM and lower survival rate than those without Candida detected in their stool (Fig. 2A–2C; Table 4). In multivariate analysis, the presence of Candida in the stool specimens significantly increased the risk of NRM and IRM and was associated with a poor OS and DFS (Table 5).

The patients with hematologic malignancies and who had PSC or Candida detected in their stools showed poor survival rates. Likewise, the patients with nonmalignant hematologic disorders and who had PSC or Candida in their stools had poor survival rates (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2).

Discussion

In the present study, we observed that Enterobacteriaceae and Candida present in stool specimens were associated with a higher risk of BSI and a higher risk of platelet engraftment failure in patients receiving haplo-HSCT, respectively. PSCs were associated with low survival rates, particularly for those who had Candida in their stool specimens. To our knowledge, this study is the first to provide an opportunity for investigating the unexplored role of PSCs in haplo-HSCT recipients.

The presence of Candida in stool specimens significantly increased the risk of NRM and was associated with poor OS and DFS possibly because the presence of Candida in stools is associated with pulmonary infection after haplo-HSCT is completed, and pulmonary infection after patients receive allo-HSCT negatively influences their survival [18,2224]. This phenomenon may also be attributed to the negative effect of Candida on platelet engraftment. Infection may contribute to the delayed engraftment in allo-HSCT [25,26]. In our study, the NRM of patients with prolonged thrombocytopenia was higher and their survival rates were lower after they received haplo-HSCT compared with patients without prolonged thrombocytopenia [27]. The colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by Candida may be a potential risk factor of invasive candidiasis in patients with neutropenia [28,29]. However, invasive candidiasis infection was not identified in the present study. Therefore, stool specimens should be monitored to determine the presence of Candida after patients receive haplo-HSCT.

The rate of BSI of patients with Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens was higher than that of patients who had NSCs. Among patients receiving a HLA identical sibling donor or an unrelated donor HSCT, patients whose gut is colonized by antibiotic-resistant bacteria experience bacteremia [3032], and the suppression of intestinal microflora can significantly decrease the incidence of bacteremia [33]. A high concentration of Enterobacteriaceae in stool may pose a high risk of the translocation of bacteria in the blood stream. An early BSI can increase the risk of the subsequent development of grade II or higher of aGVHD [34], and the mortality of BSI in patients with neutropenia can be as high as 20% [35,36]. Thus, decreasing gut colonization by Enterobacteriaceae is likely a good approach to improve the clinical outcomes of haplo-HSCT recipients.

The role of microbiota following allo-HSCT has been investigated, and aGVHD significantly decreases in mice transferred in a germ-free environment [37,38]. Several clinical studies on intestinal decontamination in patients receiving allo-HSCT have shown promising results. Beelen et al. [39] demonstrated that the median concentrations of anaerobic bacteria are high in the post-transplant period in patients who have contracted grades II to IV of aGVHD, and an antimicrobial therapy targeted toward intestinal anaerobic bacteria significantly reduces the severity of aGVHD. However, these results have not been reproduced in other studies [40,41], and administering a broad-spectrum antibiotic for patients who receive allo-HSCT increases GVHD-related mortality in mice and humans [42,43]. In the present study, the microorganisms in the stool specimens were not associated with the occurrence of aGVHD. Conflicting results have been obtained likely because these studies have been conducted in a nonsterile clinical setting instead of a microbiologically isolated environment, and decontaminating regimens have been successful to varying degrees [44,45].

Diversity in the intestinal flora is lost after patients receive allo-HSCT, and an intestinal microbiome exhibiting restricted diversity is an independent risk factor of the increased mortality of patients who receive allo-HSCT [46,47]. In the present study, one or two kinds of microorganisms were observed in the stool specimens of most patients in the PSC group, suggesting a restricted diversity of the intestinal microbiome. This finding might also contribute to the poor survival of the PSC group. However, we did not use pyrosequencing to screen the microorganisms in the stool specimens, and we could not further estimate the intestinal flora diversity in haplo-HSCT recipients.

Several factors, such as previous broad-spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids, and transplantation, may negatively affect the microbiota in the gut of patients after they undergo halo-HSCT. However, these factors were all comparable between PSC and NSC groups. This similarity might be due to the widespread use of spectrum antibiotics in the neutropenia phase of patients with a hematologic disorder. Moreover, corticosteroids are widely used to prevent anaphylactic reactions and serum sickness because ATG is one of the most important components of the conditioning regimen for haplo-HSCT recipients. These findings might partially support the finding that exposure to previous broad-spectrum antibiotics and corticosteroids was similar between PSC and NSC groups. Only three patients received autologous stem cell transplantation, and we could not investigate any further correlation between previous transplantation and microbiota after patients underwent haplo-HSCT.

A major limitation of this study is its retrospective design and the relatively small specimen size of the PSC group. Our cohort did not include other haplo-HSCT protocols, such as haplo-HSCT with depleted T cells or with post-transplant CY. As such, the role of microorganisms in the stool specimens of haplo-HSCT recipients should be further examined. Second, the prevalence of bacteria might vary, possibly influencing the association between microorganisms in stool specimens and clinical outcomes. Third, oral decontamination differed between adults (fluoroquinolone, which shows anti-coccus and anti-bacillus activities) and children (gentamicin, which induces anti-bacillus activity only). However, the age of patients and the proportion of children were comparable between PSC and NSC groups. In addition, age did not influence the clinical outcomes in multivariate analysis. Therefore, age might not affect the clinical outcomes in the present study. Lastly, oral decontamination might vary between patients because some patients might not have taken oral decontamination because of severe vomiting, nausea, or oral mucositis. However, the rates of severe oral mucositis and gastrointestinal tract during preconditioning regimens were comparable between PSC and NSC groups, indirectly suggesting that the oral decontamination status was comparable between the groups.

In summary, our results showed that PSCs considerably influenced the clinical outcomes of patients who received haplo-HSCT, particularly those who had Candida in their stool specimens. Additional prospective studies involving pyrosequencing to screen microorganisms in stool specimens might help further identify the effect of intestinal microbiota on the clinical outcomes of haplo-HSCT.

References

[1]

Lv M, Huang XJ. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China: where we are and where to go. J Hematol Oncol 2012; 5(1): 10

[2]

Wang Y, Liu QF, Xu LP, Liu KY, Zhang XH, Ma X, Fan ZP, Wu DP, Huang XJ. Haploidentical vs. identical-sibling transplant for AML in remission: a multicenter, prospective study. Blood 2015; 125(25): 3956–3962

[3]

Wang Y, Liu QF, Xu LP, Liu KY, Zhang XH, Ma X, Wu MQ, Wu DP, Huang XJ. Haploidentical versus matched-sibling transplant in adults with Philadelphia-negative high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a biologically phase III randomized study. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22(14): 3467–3476

[4]

Wang Y, Wang HX, Lai YR, Sun ZM, Wu DP, Jiang M, Liu DH, Xu KL, Liu QF, Liu L, Wang JB, Gao F, Ou-Yang J, Gao SJ, Xu LP, Huang XJ. Haploidentical transplant for myelodysplastic syndrome: registry-based comparison with identical sibling transplant. Leukemia 2016; 30(10): 2055–2063

[5]

Xu LP, Wu DP, Han MZ, Huang H, Liu QF, Liu DH, Sun ZM, Xia LH, Chen J, Wang HX, Wang C, Li CF, Lai YR, Wang JM, Zhou DB, Chen H, Song YP, Liu T, Liu KY, Huang XJ. A review of hematopoietic cell transplantation in China: data and trends during 2008–2016. Bone Marrow Transplant 2017; 52(11): 1512–1518

[6]

Xu L, Chen H, Chen J, Han M, Huang H, Lai Y, Liu D, Liu Q, Liu T, Jiang M, Ren H, Song Y, Sun Z, Wang J, Wu D, Zhou D, Zou P, Liu K, Huang X. The consensus on indications, conditioning regimen, and donor selection of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematological diseases in China-recommendations from the Chinese Society of Hematology. J Hematol Oncol 2018; 11(1): 33

[7]

Huang XJ, Chang YJ. Unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical blood and marrow hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011; 17(2): 197–204

[8]

Fuchs EJ. HLA-haploidentical blood or marrow transplantation with high-dose, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Bone Marrow Transplant 2015; 50(S2 Suppl 2): S31–S36

[9]

Scher JU, Sczesnak A, Longman RS, Segata N, Ubeda C, Bielski C, Rostron T, Cerundolo V, Pamer EG, Abramson SB, Huttenhower C, Littman DR. Expansion of intestinal Prevotella copri correlates with enhanced susceptibility to arthritis. eLife 2013; 2: e01202

[10]

Smith MI, Yatsunenko T, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Mkakosya R, Cheng J, Kau AL, Rich SS, Concannon P, Mychaleckyj JC, Liu J, Houpt E, Li JV, Holmes E, Nicholson J, Knights D, Ursell LK, Knight R, Gordon JI. Gut microbiomes of Malawian twin pairs discordant for kwashiorkor. Science 2013; 339(6119): 548–554

[11]

Turnbaugh PJ, Hamady M, Yatsunenko T, Cantarel BL, Duncan A, Ley RE, Sogin ML, Jones WJ, Roe BA, Affourtit JP, Egholm M, Henrissat B, Heath AC, Knight R, Gordon JI. A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins. Nature 2009; 457(7228): 480–484

[12]

Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, Liang S, Zhang W, Guan Y, Shen D, Peng Y, Zhang D, Jie Z, Wu W, Qin Y, Xue W, Li J, Han L, Lu D, Wu P, Dai Y, Sun X, Li Z, Tang A, Zhong S, Li X, Chen W, Xu R, Wang M, Feng Q, Gong M, Yu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Hansen T, Sanchez G, Raes J, Falony G, Okuda S, Almeida M, LeChatelier E, Renault P, Pons N, Batto JM, Zhang Z, Chen H, Yang R, Zheng W, Li S, Yang H, Wang J, Ehrlich SD, Nielsen R, Pedersen O, Kristiansen K, Wang J. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012; 490(7418): 55–60

[13]

Docampo MD, Auletta JJ, Jenq RR. Emerging influence of the intestinal microbiota during allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: control the gut and the body will follow. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2015; 21(8): 1360–1366

[14]

Shono Y, van den Brink MRM. Gut microbiota injury in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Nat Rev Cancer 2018; 18(5): 283–295

[15]

Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W, Chen YH, Zhang XH, Lu DP. Treatment of acute leukemia with unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical blood and bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15(2): 257–265

[16]

Wang Y, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Zhang XH, Han W, Chen H, Chen YH, Wang FR, Wang JZ, Sun YQ, Huang XJ. Long-term follow-up of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T cell depletion for the treatment of leukemia: nine years of experience at a single center. Cancer 2013; 119(5): 978–985

[17]

Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W, Chen YH, Wang JZ, Gao ZY, Zhang YC, Jiang Q, Shi HX, Lu DP. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38(4): 291–297

[18]

Mo XD, Zhang XH, Xu LP, Wang Y, Yan CH, Chen H, Chen YH, Han W, Wang FR, Wang JZ, Liu KY, Huang XJ. Late-onset severe pneumonia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: prognostic factors and treatments. Transpl Infect Dis 2016; 18(4): 492–503

[19]

Armand P, Kim HT, Logan BR, Wang Z, Alyea EP, Kalaycio ME, Maziarz RT, Antin JH, Soiffer RJ, Weisdorf DJ, Rizzo JD, Horowitz MM, Saber W. Validation and refinement of the Disease Risk Index for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2014; 123(23): 3664–3671

[20]

Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, Thomas ED. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15(6): 825–828

[21]

Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18(6): 695–706

[22]

Huisman C, van der Straaten HM, Canninga-van Dijk MR, Fijnheer R, Verdonck LF. Pulmonary complications after T-cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation: low incidence and strong association with acute graft-versus-host disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38(8): 561–566

[23]

Chen CS, Boeckh M, Seidel K, Clark JG, Kansu E, Madtes DK, Wagner JL, Witherspoon RP, Anasetti C, Appelbaum FR, Bensinger WI, Deeg HJ, Martin PJ, Sanders JE, Storb R, Storek J, Wade J, Siadak M, Flowers ME, Sullivan KM. Incidence, risk factors, and mortality from pneumonia developing late after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2003; 32(5): 515–522

[24]

Krowka MJ, Rosenow EC 3rd, Hoagland HC. Pulmonary complications of bone marrow transplantation. Chest 1985; 87(2): 237–246

[25]

Chevallier P, Hebia-Fellah I, Planche L, Guillaume T, Bressolette-Bodin C, Coste-Burel M, Rialland F, Mohty M, Imbert-Marcille BM. Human herpes virus 6 infection is a hallmark of cord blood transplant in adults and may participate to delayed engraftment: a comparison with matched unrelated donors as stem cell source. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45(7): 1204–1211

[26]

Mo XD, Yan X, Hu W, Zhang XH, Xu LP, Wang Y, Xu XD, Wang LN, He XX, Yan CH, Chen H, Chen YH, Liu KY, Huang XJ. Perianal infections in the phase before engraftment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations: a study of the incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Acta Haematol 2018; 139(1): 19–27

[27]

Zhao X, Zhao X, Huo M, Fan Q, Pei X, Wang Y, Zhang X, Xu L, Huang X, Liu K, Chang Y. Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies predict prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia and inferior outcomes of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017: 1043836

[28]

Zollner-Schwetz I, Auner HW, Paulitsch A, Buzina W, Staber PB, Ofner-Kopeinig P, Reisinger EC, Olschewski H, Krause R. Oral and intestinal Candida colonization in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Infect Dis 2008; 198(1): 150–153

[29]

Nucci M, Anaissie E. Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut? Clin Infect Dis 2001; 33(12): 1959–1967

[30]

Bilinski J, Robak K, Peric Z, Marchel H, Karakulska-Prystupiuk E, Halaburda K, Rusicka P, Swoboda-Kopec E, Wroblewska M, Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Basak GW. Impact of gut colonization by antibiotic-resistant bacteria on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective, single-center study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22(6): 1087–1093

[31]

Sadowska-Klasa A, Piekarska A, Prejzner W, Bieniaszewska M, Hellmann A. Colonization with multidrug-resistant bacteria increases the risk of complications and a fatal outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Hematol 2018; 97(3): 509–517

[32]

Taur Y, Xavier JB, Lipuma L, Ubeda C, Goldberg J, Gobourne A, Lee YJ, Dubin KA, Socci ND, Viale A, Perales MA, Jenq RR, van den Brink MR, Pamer EG. Intestinal domination and the risk of bacteremia in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2012; 55(7): 905–914

[33]

Vossen JM, Heidt PJ, van den Berg H, Gerritsen EJ, Hermans J, Dooren LJ. Prevention of infection and graft-versus-host disease by suppression of intestinal microflora in children treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1990; 9(1): 14–23

[34]

Poutsiaka DD, Price LL, Ucuzian A, Chan GW, Miller KB, Snydman DR. Blood stream infection after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with increased mortality. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40(1): 63–70

[35]

Blennow O, Ljungman P, Sparrelid E, Mattsson J, Remberger M. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of bloodstream infections during the pre-engraftment phase in 521 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. Transpl Infect Dis 2014; 16(1): 106–114

[36]

Yan CH, Xu T, Zheng XY, Sun J, Duan XL, Gu JL, Zhao CL, Zhu J, Wu YH, Wu DP, Hu JD, Huang H, Jiang M, Li J, Hou M, Wang C, Shao ZH, Liu T, Hu Y, Huang XJ. Epidemiology of febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological disease—a prospective multicentre survey in China. Chin J Hematol (Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi) 2016; 37(3): 177–182 (in Chinese)

[37]

van Bekkum DW, Roodenburg J, Heidt PJ, van der Waaij D. Mitigation of secondary disease of allogeneic mouse radiation chimeras by modification of the intestinal microflora. J Natl Cancer Inst 1974; 52(2): 401–404

[38]

Jones JM, Wilson R, Bealmear PM. Mortality and gross pathology of secondary disease in germfree mouse radiation chimeras. Radiat Res 1971; 45(3): 577–588

[39]

Beelen DW, Elmaagacli A, Müller KD, Hirche H, Schaefer UW. Influence of intestinal bacterial decontamination using metronidazole and ciprofloxacin or ciprofloxacin alone on the development of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies: final results and long-term follow-up of an open-label prospective randomized trial. Blood 1999; 93(10): 3267–3275

[40]

Petersen FB, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Nelson N, Counts GW, Meyers JD, Thomas ED. Infectious complications in patients undergoing marrow transplantation: a prospective randomized study of the additional effect of decontamination and laminar air flow isolation among patients receiving prophylactic systemic antibiotics. Scand J Infect Dis 1987; 19(5): 559–567

[41]

Passweg JR, Rowlings PA, Atkinson KA, Barrett AJ, Gale RP, Gratwohl A, Jacobsen N, Klein JP, Ljungman P, Russell JA, Schaefer UW, Sobocinski KA, Vossen JM, Zhang MJ, Horowitz MM. Influence of protective isolation on outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21(12): 1231–1238

[42]

Weber D, Jenq RR, Peled JU, Taur Y, Hiergeist A, Koestler J, Dettmer K, Weber M, Wolff D, Hahn J, Pamer EG, Herr W, Gessner A, Oefner PJ, van den Brink MRM, Holler E. Microbiota disruption induced by early use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is an independent risk factor of outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2017; 23(5): 845–852

[43]

Shono Y, Docampo MD, Peled JU, Perobelli SM, Velardi E, Tsai JJ, Slingerland AE, Smith OM, Young LF, Gupta J, Lieberman SR, Jay HV, Ahr KF, Porosnicu Rodriguez KA, Xu K, Calarfiore M, Poeck H, Caballero S, Devlin SM, Rapaport F, Dudakov JA, Hanash AM, Gyurkocza B, Murphy GF, Gomes C, Liu C, Moss EL, Falconer SB, Bhatt AS, Taur Y, Pamer EG, van den Brink MRM, Jenq RR. Increased GVHD-related mortality with broad-spectrum antibiotic use after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in human patients and mice. Sci Transl Med 2016; 8(339): 339ra71

[44]

Staffas A, Burgos da Silva M, van den Brink MR. The intestinal microbiota in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant and graft-versus-host disease. Blood 2017; 129(8): 927–933

[45]

Shallis RM, Terry CM, Lim SH. Changes in intestinal microbiota and their effects on allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Am J Hematol 2018; 93(1): 122–128

[46]

Ubeda C, Taur Y, Jenq RR, Equinda MJ, Son T, Samstein M, Viale A, Socci ND, van den Brink MR, Kamboj M, Pamer EG. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus domination of intestinal microbiota is enabled by antibiotic treatment in mice and precedes bloodstream invasion in humans. J Clin Invest 2010; 120(12): 4332–4341

[47]

Taur Y, Jenq RR, Perales MA, Littmann ER, Morjaria S, Ling L, No D, Gobourne A, Viale A, Dahi PB, Ponce DM, Barker JN, Giralt S, van den Brink M, Pamer EG. The effects of intestinal tract bacterial diversity on mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2014; 124(7): 1174–1182

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (379KB)

2183

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/