IDEEA activity monitor: validity of activity recognition for lying, reclining, sitting and standing

Yuyu Jiang, Janet L. Larson

PDF(98 KB)
PDF(98 KB)
Front. Med. ›› DOI: 10.1007/s11684-012-0236-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE

IDEEA activity monitor: validity of activity recognition for lying, reclining, sitting and standing

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Recent evidence demonstrates the independent negative effects of sedentary behavior on health, but there are few objective measures of sedentary behavior. Most instruments measure physical activity and are not validated as measures of sedentary behavior. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the IDEEA system’s measures of sedentary and low-intensity physical activities: lying, reclining, sitting and standing. Thirty subjects, 14 men and 16 women, aged 23 to 77 years, body mass index (BMI) between 18 to 34 kg/m2, participated in the study. IDEEA measures were compared to direct observation for 27 activities: 10 lying in bed, 3 lying on a sofa, 1 reclining in a lawn chair, 10 sitting and 3 standing. Two measures are reported, the percentage of activities accurately identified and the percentage of monitored time that was accurately labeled by the IDEEA system for all subjects. A total of 91.6% of all observed activities were accurately identified and 92.4% of the total monitored time was accurately labeled. The IDEEA system did not accurately differentiate between lying and reclining so the two activities were combined for calculating accuracy. Using this approach the IDEEA system accurately identified 96% of sitting activities for a total of 97% of the monitored sitting time, 99% and 99% for standing, 87% and 88% for lying in bed, 87% and 88% for lying on the sofa, and 83% and 83% for reclining on a lawn chair. We conclude that the IDEEA system accurately recognizes sitting and standing positions, but it is less accurate in identifying lying and reclining positions. We recommend combining the lying and reclining activities to improve accuracy. The IDEEA system enables researchers to monitor lying, reclining, sitting and standing with a reasonable level of accuracy and has the potential to advance the science of sedentary behaviors and low-intensity physical activities.

Keywords

IDEEA / activity monitor / sedentary behavior

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yuyu Jiang, Janet L. Larson. IDEEA activity monitor: validity of activity recognition for lying, reclining, sitting and standing. Front Med, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-012-0236-0

References

[1]
Bauman A, Ainsworth BE, Sallis JF, Hagströmer M, Craig CL, Bull FC, Pratt M, Venugopal K, Chau J, Sjöström M; IPS Group. The descriptive epidemiology of sitting. A 20-country comparison using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Am J Prev Med2011; 41(2): 228–235
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Hamilton MT, Hamilton DG, Zderic TW. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes2007; 56(11): 2655–2667
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan DW. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev2010; 38(3): 105–113
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Santos D, Silva A, Baptista F, Santos R, Vale S, Mota J, Sardinha LB. Sedentary behavior and physical activity are independently related to functional fitness in older adults. Exp Gerontol2012; 47(12): 908–912
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc2009; 41(5): 998–1005
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Katzmarzyk PT, Lee IM. Sedentary behaviour and life expectancy in the USA: a cause-deleted life table analysis. BMJ Open2012; 2(4): e000828
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med2003; 37(3): 197–206, discussion 206
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2008; 5(1): 56
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Klesges RC, Eck LH, Mellon MW, Fulliton W, Somes GW, Hanson CL. The accuracy of self-reports of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc1990; 22(5): 690–697
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Zhang K, Werner P, Sun M, Pi-Sunyer FX, Boozer CN. Measurement of human daily physical activity. Obes Res2003; 11(1): 33–40
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Mackey AH, Hewart P, Walt SE, Stott NS. The sensitivity and specificity of an activity monitor in detecting functional activities in young people with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2009; 90(8): 1396–1401
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Zhang K, Pi-Sunyer FX, Boozer CN. Improving energy expenditure estimation for physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc2004; 36(5): 883–889
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Ainsworth BE. The compendium of physical activities tracking guide. 2002. http://prevention.sph.sc.edu/tools/docs/documents_ compendium.pdf (Accessed on <month>June</month><day>19</day>, 2010)
[14]
Whybrow S, Ritz P, Horgan G, Stubbs R. An evaluation of the IDEEATM activity monitor for estimating energy expenditure. Br J Nutr2012 Apri 2. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1017/S0007114512000645
[15]
Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O’Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc2000; 32(9 Suppl): S498–S504
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Sahlin C, Franklin KA, Stenlund H, Lindberg E. Sleep in women: Normal values for sleep stages and position and the effect of age, obesity, sleep apnea, smoking, alcohol and hypertension. Sleep Med2009; 10(9): 1025–1030
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Gordon S, Grimmer-Sommers K, Trott P. Sleep position, age, gender, sleep quality and waking cervico-thoracic symptoms. Internet J Allied Health Sci Pract2007;5(1):8. http://ijahsp.nova.edu (Accessed on <month>February</month><day>3</day>, 2011)
[18]
Thorp A, Healy G, Owen N, Salmon J, Ball K, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Dunstan DW. Deleterious associations of sitting time and television viewing time with cardio-metabolic risk biomarkers: AusDiab 2004–2005. Diabetes Care2010; 33(2): 327–334
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Helmerhorst HJ, Wijndaele K, Brage S, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U. Objectively measured sedentary time may predict insulin resistance independent of moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity. Diabetes2009; 58(8): 1776–1779
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Wijndaele K, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Barnett AG, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Zimmet PZ, Owen N. Increased cardiometabolic risk is associated with increased TV viewing time. Med Sci Sports Exerc2010; 42(8): 1511–1518
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

We thank 30 subjects helping us complete the research.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(98 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/