From seawater to hydrogen via direct photocatalytic vapor splitting: A review on device design and system integration

Abstract

Solar-driven hydrogen production from seawater attracts great interest for its emerging role in decarbonizing global energy consumption. Given the complexity of natural seawater content, photocatalytic vapor splitting offers a low-cost and safe solution, but with a very low solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency. With a focus on cutting-edge photothermal–photocatalytic device design and system integration, the recent research advances on vapor splitting from seawater, as well as industrial implementations in the past decades were reviewed. In addition, the design strategies of the key processes were reviewed, including vapor temperature and pressure control during solar thermal vapor generation from seawater, capillary-fed vaporization with salt repellent, and direct photocatalytic vapor splitting for hydrogen production. Moreover, the existing laboratory-scale and industrial-scale systems, and the integration principles and remaining challenges in the future seawater-to-hydrogen technology were discussed.

Key words： seawater; hydrogen; photocatalytic; vapor splitting; solar-driven

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Waterloo, Canada Research Chair Tier I—Zero-Emission Vehicles and Hydrogen Energy Systems (Grant No. 950-232215), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Discovery Grants Program, RGPIN-2020-04149 and RGPIN-2021-02453.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 InternationalEnergy Agency. Global hydrogen review 2021. 2023–10–6, available at website of IEA

2 HausmannJ N, Schlögl R, MenezesP W, et al. Is direct seawater splitting economically meaningful? Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(7): 3679–3685 10.1039/D0EE03659E

3 Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu Z. . Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst. Nature Energy, 2023, 8: 264–272

4 KhanM A, Al-Attas T, RoyS, et al. Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production: a solution looking for a problem? Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(9): 4831–4839 10.1039/D1EE00870F

5 Kronawitter C X, Vayssieres L, Shen S. . A perspective on solar-driven water splitting with all-oxide hetero-nanostructures. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(10): 3889–3899

6 XuSYuB. Current development and prospect of hydrogen energy technology in China. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(6): 1-12 (in Chinese)

7 Davenport D M, Deshmukh A, Werber J R. . High-pressure reverse osmosis for energy-efficient hypersaline brine desalination: Current status, design considerations, and research needs. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2018, 5(8): 467–475

8 Fujiwara M, Kikuchi M. Solar desalination of seawater using double-dye-modified PTFE membrane. Water Research, 2017, 127: 96–103

9 Shaheen A, AlBadi S, Zhuman B. . Photothermal air gap membrane distillation for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 431(1): 133909

10 Lee A, Elam J W, Darling S B. Membrane materials for water purification: Design, development, and application. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2016, 2(1): 17–42

11 Stoll T, Zafeiropoulos G, Tsampas M N. Solar fuel production in a novel polymeric electrolyte membrane photoelectrochemical (PEM-PEC) cell with a web of titania nanotube arrays as photoanode and gaseous reactants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(40): 17807–17817

12 Döscher H, Geisz J F, Deutsch T G. . Sunlight absorption in water-efficiency and design implications for photoelectrochemical devices. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(9): 2951–2956

13 Gopinath C S, Nalajala N. A scalable and thin film approach for solar hydrogen generation: A review on enhanced photocatalytic water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A.Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2021, 9(3): 1353–1371

14 Guo L, Chen Y, Su J. . Obstacles of solar-powered photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production: A perspective from energy flow and mass flow. Energy, 2019, 172: 1079–1086

15 Zhang J, Hu W, Cao S. . Recent progress for hydrogen production by photocatalytic natural or simulated seawater splitting. Nano Research, 2020, 13(9): 2313–2322

16 Pang X, Das S, Davis J T. . Membraneless electrolyzers for low-cost hydrogen production. ECS Meeting Abstracts, 2020, MA2020(1): 1587

17 Yao Y, Gao X, Meng X. Recent advances on electrocatalytic and photocatalytic seawater splitting for hydrogen evolution. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(13): 9087–9100

18 Alketbi A S, Raza A, Sajjad M. . Direct solar vapor generation with micro-3D printed hydrogel device. EcoMat, 2022, 4(1): 12157

19 Tao F, Green M, Garcia A V. . Recent progress of nanostructured interfacial solar vapor generators. Applied Materials Today, 2019, 17: 45–84

20 Zhou L, Li X, Ni G W. . The revival of thermal utilization from the Sun: Interfacial solar vapor generation. National Science Review, 2019, 6(3): 562–578

21 Zhu L, Gao M, Peh C K N. . Recent progress in solar-driven interfacial water evaporation: Advanced designs and applications. Nano Energy, 2019, 57: 507–518

22 He H, Song Z, Lan Y. . Photocorrosion-based BiOCl photothermal materials for synergistic solar-driven desalination and photoelectrochemistry energy storage and release. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(14): 17947–17956

23 Goto Y, Hisatomi T, Wang Q. . A particulate photocatalyst water-splitting panel for large-scale solar hydrogen generation. Joule, 2018, 2(3): 509–520

24 Hisatomi T, Maeda K, Takanabe K. . Aspects of the water splitting mechanism on (Ga_1–xZn_x)(N_1–xO_x) photocatalyst modified with Rh_2–yCr_yO₃ cocatalyst. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(51): 21458–21466

25 Nishioka S, Osterloh F E, Wang X. . Photocatalytic water splitting. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2023, 31(3): 1–15

26 Herrmann J M. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catalysis Today, 1999, 53(1): 115–129

27 Gao M, Peh C K, Zhu L. . Photothermal catalytic gel featuring spectral and thermal management for parallel freshwater and hydrogen production. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(23): 2000925

28 Shearer C J, Hisatomi T, Domen K. . Gas phase photocatalytic water splitting of moisture in ambient air: Toward reagent-free hydrogen production. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, 2020, 401(1): 112757

29 Suguro T, Kishimoto F, Kariya N. . A hygroscopic nano-membrane coating achieves efficient vapor-fed photocatalytic water splitting. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 5698

30 Spurgeon J M, Lewis N S. Proton exchange membrane electrolysis sustained by water vapor. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2993

31 Li Z, Tian B, Zhen W. . Inhibition of hydrogen and oxygen recombination using oxygen transfer reagent hemin chloride in Pt/TiO₂ dispersion for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 203: 408–415

32 Dionigi F, Vesborg P C K, Pedersen T. . Gas phase photocatalytic water splitting with Rh₂–_yCr_yO₃/GaN:ZnO in μ-reactors. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2937–2942

33 Guo S, Li X, Li J. . Boosting photocatalytic hydrogen production from water by photothermally induced biphase systems. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1343

34 Cheng P, Quan X, Gong S. . Recent analytical and numerical studies on phase-change heat transfer. Advances in Heat Transfer, 2014, 46: 187–248

35 Zhang H L, Baeyens J, Degrève J. . Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 22: 466–481

36 Zhao L, Bhatia B, Zhang L. . A passive high-temperature high-pressure solar steam generator for medical sterilization. Joule, 2020, 4(12): 2733–2745

37 Neumann O, Urban A, Day J. . Solar vapor generation enabled by nanoparticles. ACS Nano, 2013, 7, (1): 42–49

38 Zavoico A B. Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0. Sandia National Laboratory Technical Report SAND2001-2100. 2001

39 Abbas R, Montes M J, Piera M. . Solar radiation concentration features in Linear Fresnel Reflector arrays. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 54(1): 133–144

40 Ni G, Li G, Boriskina S V. . Steam generation under one sun enabled by a floating structure with thermal concentration. Nature Energy, 2016, 1(9): 16126

41 Ito Y, Tanabe Y, Han J. . Multifunctional porous graphene for high-efficiency steam generation by heat localization. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(29): 4302–4307

42 H . Ghasemi H, Ni G, Marconnet A M, et al. Solar steam generation by heat localization. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 449

43 Fang J, Liu J, Gu J. . Hierarchical porous carbonized lotus seedpods for highly efficient solar steam generation. Chemistry of Materials, 2018, 30(18): 6217–6221

44 Raza A, Lu J, Alzaim S. . Novel receiver-enhanced solar vapor generation: Review and perspectives. Energies, 2018, 11(1): 253

45 Li X, Li J, Lu J. . Enhancement of interfacial solar vapor generation by environmental energy. Joule, 2018, 2(7): 1331–1338

46 Jia C, Li Y, Yang Z. . Rich mesostructures derived from natural woods for solar steam generation. Joule, 2017, 1(3): 588–599

47 He S, Chen C, Kuang Y. . Nature-inspired salt resistant bimodal porous solar evaporator for efficient and stable water desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(5): 1558–1567

48 Li W, Li F, Zhang D. . Porous wood-carbonized solar steam evaporator. Wood Science and Technology, 2021, 55(3): 625–637

49 Liang J, Ji X, Han J. . Modeling and experimental investigation on a direct steam generation solar collector with flat plate thermal concentration. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2020, 38(5): 1879–1892

50 Neumann O, Feronti C, Neumann A D. . Compact solar autoclave based on steam generation using broadband light-harvesting nanoparticles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(29): 11677–11681

51 Li J, Du M, Lv G. . Interfacial solar steam generation enables fast-responsive, energy-efficient, and low-cost off-grid sterilization. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(49): 1805159

52 Alhosani M H, Li H, Alketbi A S. . Enhanced liquid propagation and wicking along nanostructured porous surfaces. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2021, 23(7): 2100118

53 Vaartstra G, Zhang L, Lu Z. . Capillary-fed, thin film evaporation devices. Journal of Applied Physics, 2020, 128(13): 130901

54 Abdelsalam M A. Bio-inspired solar thermal brine treatment with direct vapor generation. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Abu Dhabi: Khalifa University, 2023

55 Xu K, Wang C, Li Z. . Salt mitigation strategies of solar-driven interfacial desalination. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 31(8): 2007855

56 Xia Y, Kang Y, Wang Z. . Rational designs of interfacial-heating solar-thermal desalination devices: Recent progress and remaining challenges. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A. Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2021, 9(11): 6612–6633

57 Zhang L, Li X, Zhong Y. . Highly efficient and salt rejecting solar evaporation via a wick-free confined water layer. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 849

58 Ni G, Zandavi S H, Javid S M. . A salt-rejecting floating solar still for low-cost desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(6): 1510–1519

59 Shalaby S M, Sharshir S W, Kabeel A E. . Reverse osmosis desalination systems powered by solar energy: Preheating techniques and brine disposal challenges—A detailed review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 251: 114971

60 Gebreslase G A. Review on membranes for the filtration of aqueous based solution: Oil in water emulsion. Journal of Membrane Science & Technology, 2018, 8(2): 1000188

61 Deshmukh A, Boo C, Karanikola V. . Membrane distillation at the water-energy nexus: Limits, opportunities, and challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(5): 1177–1196

62 Wang Y, Lee J, Werber J R. . Capillary-driven desalination in a synthetic mangrove. Science Advances, 2020, 6(8): eaax5253

63 Yang Y, Zhao H, Yin Z. . A general salt-resistant hydrophilic/hydrophobic nanoporous double layer design for efficient and stable solar water evaporation distillation. Materials Horizons, 2018, 5(6): 1143–1150

64 Xu W, Hu X, Zhuang S. . Flexible and salt resistant Janus absorbers by electrospinning for stable and efficient solar desalination. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(14): 1702884

65 Hu R, Zhang J, Kuang Y. . A Janus evaporator with low tortuosity for long-term solar desalination. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A. Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2019, 7(25): 15333–15340

66 Gao S, Dong X, Huang J. . Bioinspired soot-deposited Janus fabrics for sustainable solar steam generation with salt-rejection. Global Challenges, 2019, 3(8): 1800117

67 Liu G, Chen T, Xu J. . Salt-rejecting solar interfacial evaporation. Cell Reports. Physical Science, 2021, 2(1): 100310

68 Cooper T A, Zandavi S H, Ni G W. . Contactless steam generation and superheating under one sun illumination. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 5086

69 Menon A K, Haechler I, Kaur S. . Enhanced solar evaporation using a photo-thermal umbrella for wastewater management. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(2): 144–151

70 Domen K, Naito S, Soma M. . Photocatalytic decomposition of water vapour on an NiO–SrTiO₃ catalyst. Journal of the Chemical Society. Chemical Communications, 1980, (12): 543–544

71 Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358): 37–38

72 Chen X, Shen S, Guo L. . Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(11): 6503–6570

73 WahabA K, Idriss H. Study of the photocatalytic reforming and oxidation of Glycerol over Ag–Pd/TiO₂. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52(Part B), 159−171.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.344

74 Wahab A K, Nadeem M A, Idriss H. Hydrogen production during ethylene glycol photoreactions over Ag-Pd/TiO₂ at different partial pressures of oxygen. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2019, 7: 476835

75 Zhang W, Banerjee-Ghosh K, Tassinari F. . Enhanced electrochemical water splitting with chiral molecule-coated Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(10): 2308–2313

76 Leduc J, Goenuellue Y, Ghamgosar P. . Electronically-coupled phase boundaries in α-Fe₂O₃/Fe₃O₄ nanocomposite photoanodes for enhanced water oxidation. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2019, 2(1): 334–342

77 Amano F, Ishinaga E, Yamakata A. Effect of particle size on the photocatalytic activity of WO₃ particles for water oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(44): 22584–22590

78 Wang F, DiValentin C, Pacchioni G. Rational band gap engineering of WO₃ photocatalyst for visible light water splitting. ChemCatChem, 2012, 4(4): 476–478

79 Hamid S B A, Teh S J, Lai C W. Photocatalytic water oxidation on ZnO: A review. Catalysts, 2017, 7(3): 93

80 Ni M, Leung M K H, Leung D Y C. . A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO₂ for hydrogen production. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007, 11(3): 401–425

81 Hong Y, Fang Z, Yin B. . A visible-light-driven heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic water splitting over Ta₂O₅ modified g-C₃N₄ photocatalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(10): 6738–6745

82 Marschall R. Semiconductor composites: Strategies for enhancing charge carrier separation to improve photocatalytic activity. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24(17): 2421–2440

83 Qian R, Zong H, Schneider J. . Charge carrier trapping, recombination and transfer during TiO₂ photocatalysis: An overview. Catalysis Today, 2019, 335: 78–90

84 Fu C F, Wu X, Yang J. Material design for photocatalytic water splitting from a theoretical perspective. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(48): 1802106

85 Dingenen F, Verbruggen S W. Tapping hydrogen fuel from the ocean: A review on photocatalytic, photoelectrochemical and electrolytic splitting of seawater. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 142: 110866

86 Zhu C C, Jiang T, Yang H C. . ZnFe₂O₄ nanoparticles with iron-rich surfaces for enhanced photocatalytic water vapor splitting. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 636: 157842

87 Daeneke T, Dahr N, Atkin P. . Surface water dependent properties of sulfur-rich molybdenum sulfides: Electrolyteless gas phase water splitting. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(7): 6782–6794

88 Chowdhury F A, Trudeau M L, Guo H. . A photochemical diode artificial photosynthesis system for unassisted high efficiency overall pure water splitting. Nature Communication, 2018, 9: 1707

89 Wang Q, Hisatomi T, Jia Q. . Scalable water splitting on particulate photocatalyst sheets with a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency exceeding 1%. Nature Materials, 2016, 15: 611–615

90 Maeda K, Teramura K, Lu D. . Noble-metal/Cr₂O₃ core/shell nanoparticles as a cocatalyst for photocatalytic overall water splitting. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2006, 45(46): 7806–7809

91 Ng K H, Lai S Y, Cheng C K. . Photocatalytic water splitting for solving energy crisis: Myth, fact or busted?. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 417: 128847

92 Nishiyama H, Yamada T, Nakabayashi M. . Photocatalytic solar hydrogen production from water on a 100-m² scale. Nature, 2021, 598(7880): 304–307

93 Jin Z, Yan X, Hao X. Rational design of a novel p-n heterojunction based on 3D layered nanoflower MoS_x supported CoWO₄ nanoparticles for superior photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2020, 569: 34–49

94 Bhattacharya R N, Lee C Y, Pollak F H. . Optical study of amorphous MoS₃: Determination of the fundamental energy gap. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1987, 91(2): 235–242

95 Tang M L, Grauer D C, Lassalle-Kaiser B. . Structural and electronic study of an amorphous MoS₃ hydrogen-generation catalyst on a quantum-controlled photosensitizer. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 50(43): 10203–10207

96 Zhang S, Zhao H, Li X. . A hierarchical Si_PN/CN/MoS_x photocathode with low internal resistance and strong light-absorption for solar hydrogen production. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2022, 300: 120758

97 Shin S, Jin Z, Kwon D H. . High turnover frequency of hydrogen evolution reaction on amorphous MoS₂ thin film directly grown by atomic layer deposition. Langmuir, 2015, 31(3): 1196–1202

98 Benck J D, Chen Z, Kuritzky L Y. . Amorphous molybdenum sulfide catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen production: Insights into the origin of their catalytic activity. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(9): 1916–1923

99 Bourgeteau T, Tondelier D, Geffroy B. . A H₂-evolving photocathode based on direct sensitization of MoS₃ with an organic photovoltaic cell. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(9): 2706

100 Zhou P, Navid I A, Ma Y. . Solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of more than 9% in photocatalytic water splitting. Nature, 2023, 613(7942): 66–70

101 Schrauzer G N, Guth T D. Photolysis of water and photoreduction of nitrogen on titanium dioxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1977, 99(22): 7189–7193

102 Domen K, Naito S, Onishi T. . Study of the photocatalytic decomposition of water vapor over a nickel(II) oxide-strontium titanate (SrTiO₃) catalyst. ChemInform, 1982, 86(18): 3657–3661

103 Lee W H, Lee C W, Cha G D. . Floatable photocatalytic hydrogel nanocomposites for large-scale solar hydrogen production. Nature Nanotechnology, 2023, 18(7): 754–762

104 Han H, Huang K, Yao Y. . Enhanced photocatalytic splitting of photothermally induced water vapor to evolve hydrogen. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 450: 138419

105 Gao M, Connor P K N, Ho G W. Plasmonic photothermic directed broadband sunlight harnessing for seawater catalysis and desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(10): 3151–3160

106 Sansom C, Patchigolla K, Jonnalagadda K. . Design of a novel CSP/MED desalination system. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Freiburg. New York: AIP Publishing, 2022, 2445(1): 140012

107 Chen S, Zhao P, Xie G. . A floating solar still inspired by continuous root water intake. Desalination, 2021, 512: 115133

108 NEOM. NEOM adopts pioneering solar dome technology for sustainable desalination project 2020. 2023-10-6, available at website of NEOM

109 Zheng Y, Ma M, Shao H. Recent advances in efficient and scalable solar hydrogen production through water splitting. Carbon Neutrality, 2023, 2(1): 23

110 Schreck M, Niederberger M. Photocatalytic gas phase reactions. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31(3): 597–618

111 Jenny S, Matsuoka M, Takeuchi M. . Understanding TiO₂ photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(19): 9919–9986

112 Patial S, Hasija V, Raizada P. . Tunable photocatalytic activity of SrTiO₃ for water splitting: Strategies and future scenario. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(3): 103791

113 Acar C, Dincer I, Naterer G F. Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production. International Journal of Energy Research, 2016, 40(11): 1449–1473

114 Mikaeili F, Gilmore T, Gouma P I. Photochemical water splitting via transition metal oxides. Catalysts, 2022, 12(11): 1303

115 Yang M Q, Gao M, Hong M. . Visible-to-NIR photon harvesting: Progressive engineering of catalysts for solar-powered environmental purification and fuel production. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(47): 1802894

116 Zhu L, Gao M, Peh C K N. . Solar-driven photothermal nanostructured materials designs and prerequisites for evaporation and catalysis applications. Materials Horizons, 2018, 5(3): 323–343

117 Tu Y, Zhou J, Lin S, et al. Photomolecular effect leading to water evaporation exceeding thermal limit. 2022, arXiv: 2201. 10385 2022

118 Tu Y, Chen G. Photomolecular effect: Visible light absorption at water-vapor interface. 2022, arXiv:2202.10646 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10646