From seawater to hydrogen via direct photocatalytic vapor splitting: A review on device design and system integration

Hongxia LI, Khaja WAHAB AHMED, Mohamed A. ABDELSALAM, Michael FOWLER, Xiao-Yu WU

PDF(7701 KB)
PDF(7701 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3) : 291-307. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-024-0917-9
REVIEW ARTICLE

From seawater to hydrogen via direct photocatalytic vapor splitting: A review on device design and system integration

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Solar-driven hydrogen production from seawater attracts great interest for its emerging role in decarbonizing global energy consumption. Given the complexity of natural seawater content, photocatalytic vapor splitting offers a low-cost and safe solution, but with a very low solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency. With a focus on cutting-edge photothermal–photocatalytic device design and system integration, the recent research advances on vapor splitting from seawater, as well as industrial implementations in the past decades were reviewed. In addition, the design strategies of the key processes were reviewed, including vapor temperature and pressure control during solar thermal vapor generation from seawater, capillary-fed vaporization with salt repellent, and direct photocatalytic vapor splitting for hydrogen production. Moreover, the existing laboratory-scale and industrial-scale systems, and the integration principles and remaining challenges in the future seawater-to-hydrogen technology were discussed.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

seawater / hydrogen / photocatalytic / vapor splitting / solar-driven

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hongxia LI, Khaja WAHAB AHMED, Mohamed A. ABDELSALAM, Michael FOWLER, Xiao-Yu WU. From seawater to hydrogen via direct photocatalytic vapor splitting: A review on device design and system integration. Front. Energy, 2024, 18(3): 291‒307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-024-0917-9

References

[1]
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global hydrogen review 2021. 2023–10–6, available at website of IEA
[2]
HausmannJ N, Schlögl R, MenezesP W, et al. Is direct seawater splitting economically meaningful? Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(7): 3679–3685 10.1039/D0EE03659E
[3]
Guo J, Zheng Y, Hu Z. . Direct seawater electrolysis by adjusting the local reaction environment of a catalyst. Nature Energy, 2023, 8: 264–272
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
KhanM A, Al-Attas T, RoyS, et al. Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production: a solution looking for a problem? Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(9): 4831–4839 10.1039/D1EE00870F
[5]
Kronawitter C X, Vayssieres L, Shen S. . A perspective on solar-driven water splitting with all-oxide hetero-nanostructures. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(10): 3889–3899
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
XuSYuB. Current development and prospect of hydrogen energy technology in China. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 23(6): 1-12 (in Chinese)
[7]
Davenport D M, Deshmukh A, Werber J R. . High-pressure reverse osmosis for energy-efficient hypersaline brine desalination: Current status, design considerations, and research needs. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2018, 5(8): 467–475
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Fujiwara M, Kikuchi M. Solar desalination of seawater using double-dye-modified PTFE membrane. Water Research, 2017, 127: 96–103
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Shaheen A, AlBadi S, Zhuman B. . Photothermal air gap membrane distillation for the removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 431(1): 133909
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Lee A, Elam J W, Darling S B. Membrane materials for water purification: Design, development, and application. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2016, 2(1): 17–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Stoll T, Zafeiropoulos G, Tsampas M N. Solar fuel production in a novel polymeric electrolyte membrane photoelectrochemical (PEM-PEC) cell with a web of titania nanotube arrays as photoanode and gaseous reactants. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(40): 17807–17817
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Döscher H, Geisz J F, Deutsch T G. . Sunlight absorption in water-efficiency and design implications for photoelectrochemical devices. Energy & Environmental Science, 2014, 7(9): 2951–2956
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Gopinath C S, Nalajala N. A scalable and thin film approach for solar hydrogen generation: A review on enhanced photocatalytic water splitting. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A.Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2021, 9(3): 1353–1371
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Guo L, Chen Y, Su J. . Obstacles of solar-powered photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production: A perspective from energy flow and mass flow. Energy, 2019, 172: 1079–1086
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Zhang J, Hu W, Cao S. . Recent progress for hydrogen production by photocatalytic natural or simulated seawater splitting. Nano Research, 2020, 13(9): 2313–2322
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Pang X, Das S, Davis J T. . Membraneless electrolyzers for low-cost hydrogen production. ECS Meeting Abstracts, 2020, MA2020(1): 1587
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Yao Y, Gao X, Meng X. Recent advances on electrocatalytic and photocatalytic seawater splitting for hydrogen evolution. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(13): 9087–9100
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Alketbi A S, Raza A, Sajjad M. . Direct solar vapor generation with micro-3D printed hydrogel device. EcoMat, 2022, 4(1): 12157
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Tao F, Green M, Garcia A V. . Recent progress of nanostructured interfacial solar vapor generators. Applied Materials Today, 2019, 17: 45–84
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zhou L, Li X, Ni G W. . The revival of thermal utilization from the Sun: Interfacial solar vapor generation. National Science Review, 2019, 6(3): 562–578
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Zhu L, Gao M, Peh C K N. . Recent progress in solar-driven interfacial water evaporation: Advanced designs and applications. Nano Energy, 2019, 57: 507–518
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
He H, Song Z, Lan Y. . Photocorrosion-based BiOCl photothermal materials for synergistic solar-driven desalination and photoelectrochemistry energy storage and release. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2023, 15(14): 17947–17956
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Goto Y, Hisatomi T, Wang Q. . A particulate photocatalyst water-splitting panel for large-scale solar hydrogen generation. Joule, 2018, 2(3): 509–520
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Hisatomi T, Maeda K, Takanabe K. . Aspects of the water splitting mechanism on (Ga1–xZnx)(N1–xOx) photocatalyst modified with Rh2–yCryO3 cocatalyst. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(51): 21458–21466
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Nishioka S, Osterloh F E, Wang X. . Photocatalytic water splitting. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2023, 31(3): 1–15
[26]
Herrmann J M. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catalysis Today, 1999, 53(1): 115–129
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Gao M, Peh C K, Zhu L. . Photothermal catalytic gel featuring spectral and thermal management for parallel freshwater and hydrogen production. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(23): 2000925
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Shearer C J, Hisatomi T, Domen K. . Gas phase photocatalytic water splitting of moisture in ambient air: Toward reagent-free hydrogen production. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A Chemistry, 2020, 401(1): 112757
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Suguro T, Kishimoto F, Kariya N. . A hygroscopic nano-membrane coating achieves efficient vapor-fed photocatalytic water splitting. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 5698
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Spurgeon J M, Lewis N S. Proton exchange membrane electrolysis sustained by water vapor. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2993
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Li Z, Tian B, Zhen W. . Inhibition of hydrogen and oxygen recombination using oxygen transfer reagent hemin chloride in Pt/TiO2 dispersion for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 203: 408–415
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Dionigi F, Vesborg P C K, Pedersen T. . Gas phase photocatalytic water splitting with Rh2yCryO3/GaN:ZnO in μ-reactors. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2937–2942
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Guo S, Li X, Li J. . Boosting photocatalytic hydrogen production from water by photothermally induced biphase systems. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1343
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Cheng P, Quan X, Gong S. . Recent analytical and numerical studies on phase-change heat transfer. Advances in Heat Transfer, 2014, 46: 187–248
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zhang H L, Baeyens J, Degrève J. . Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 22: 466–481
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Zhao L, Bhatia B, Zhang L. . A passive high-temperature high-pressure solar steam generator for medical sterilization. Joule, 2020, 4(12): 2733–2745
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Neumann O, Urban A, Day J. . Solar vapor generation enabled by nanoparticles. ACS Nano, 2013, 7, (1): 42–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Zavoico A B. Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0. Sandia National Laboratory Technical Report SAND2001-2100. 2001
[39]
Abbas R, Montes M J, Piera M. . Solar radiation concentration features in Linear Fresnel Reflector arrays. Energy Conversion and Management, 2012, 54(1): 133–144
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Ni G, Li G, Boriskina S V. . Steam generation under one sun enabled by a floating structure with thermal concentration. Nature Energy, 2016, 1(9): 16126
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Ito Y, Tanabe Y, Han J. . Multifunctional porous graphene for high-efficiency steam generation by heat localization. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(29): 4302–4307
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
H . Ghasemi H, Ni G, Marconnet A M, et al. Solar steam generation by heat localization. Nature Communications, 2014, 5: 449
[43]
Fang J, Liu J, Gu J. . Hierarchical porous carbonized lotus seedpods for highly efficient solar steam generation. Chemistry of Materials, 2018, 30(18): 6217–6221
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Raza A, Lu J, Alzaim S. . Novel receiver-enhanced solar vapor generation: Review and perspectives. Energies, 2018, 11(1): 253
CrossRef Google scholar
[45]
Li X, Li J, Lu J. . Enhancement of interfacial solar vapor generation by environmental energy. Joule, 2018, 2(7): 1331–1338
CrossRef Google scholar
[46]
Jia C, Li Y, Yang Z. . Rich mesostructures derived from natural woods for solar steam generation. Joule, 2017, 1(3): 588–599
CrossRef Google scholar
[47]
He S, Chen C, Kuang Y. . Nature-inspired salt resistant bimodal porous solar evaporator for efficient and stable water desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(5): 1558–1567
CrossRef Google scholar
[48]
Li W, Li F, Zhang D. . Porous wood-carbonized solar steam evaporator. Wood Science and Technology, 2021, 55(3): 625–637
CrossRef Google scholar
[49]
Liang J, Ji X, Han J. . Modeling and experimental investigation on a direct steam generation solar collector with flat plate thermal concentration. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2020, 38(5): 1879–1892
CrossRef Google scholar
[50]
Neumann O, Feronti C, Neumann A D. . Compact solar autoclave based on steam generation using broadband light-harvesting nanoparticles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(29): 11677–11681
CrossRef Google scholar
[51]
Li J, Du M, Lv G. . Interfacial solar steam generation enables fast-responsive, energy-efficient, and low-cost off-grid sterilization. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(49): 1805159
CrossRef Google scholar
[52]
Alhosani M H, Li H, Alketbi A S. . Enhanced liquid propagation and wicking along nanostructured porous surfaces. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2021, 23(7): 2100118
CrossRef Google scholar
[53]
Vaartstra G, Zhang L, Lu Z. . Capillary-fed, thin film evaporation devices. Journal of Applied Physics, 2020, 128(13): 130901
CrossRef Google scholar
[54]
Abdelsalam M A. Bio-inspired solar thermal brine treatment with direct vapor generation. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Abu Dhabi: Khalifa University, 2023
[55]
Xu K, Wang C, Li Z. . Salt mitigation strategies of solar-driven interfacial desalination. Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 31(8): 2007855
CrossRef Google scholar
[56]
Xia Y, Kang Y, Wang Z. . Rational designs of interfacial-heating solar-thermal desalination devices: Recent progress and remaining challenges. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A. Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2021, 9(11): 6612–6633
CrossRef Google scholar
[57]
Zhang L, Li X, Zhong Y. . Highly efficient and salt rejecting solar evaporation via a wick-free confined water layer. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 849
CrossRef Google scholar
[58]
Ni G, Zandavi S H, Javid S M. . A salt-rejecting floating solar still for low-cost desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(6): 1510–1519
CrossRef Google scholar
[59]
Shalaby S M, Sharshir S W, Kabeel A E. . Reverse osmosis desalination systems powered by solar energy: Preheating techniques and brine disposal challenges—A detailed review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 251: 114971
CrossRef Google scholar
[60]
Gebreslase G A. Review on membranes for the filtration of aqueous based solution: Oil in water emulsion. Journal of Membrane Science & Technology, 2018, 8(2): 1000188
CrossRef Google scholar
[61]
Deshmukh A, Boo C, Karanikola V. . Membrane distillation at the water-energy nexus: Limits, opportunities, and challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(5): 1177–1196
CrossRef Google scholar
[62]
Wang Y, Lee J, Werber J R. . Capillary-driven desalination in a synthetic mangrove. Science Advances, 2020, 6(8): eaax5253
CrossRef Google scholar
[63]
Yang Y, Zhao H, Yin Z. . A general salt-resistant hydrophilic/hydrophobic nanoporous double layer design for efficient and stable solar water evaporation distillation. Materials Horizons, 2018, 5(6): 1143–1150
CrossRef Google scholar
[64]
Xu W, Hu X, Zhuang S. . Flexible and salt resistant Janus absorbers by electrospinning for stable and efficient solar desalination. Advanced Energy Materials, 2018, 8(14): 1702884
CrossRef Google scholar
[65]
Hu R, Zhang J, Kuang Y. . A Janus evaporator with low tortuosity for long-term solar desalination. Journal of Materials Chemistry, A. Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2019, 7(25): 15333–15340
CrossRef Google scholar
[66]
Gao S, Dong X, Huang J. . Bioinspired soot-deposited Janus fabrics for sustainable solar steam generation with salt-rejection. Global Challenges, 2019, 3(8): 1800117
CrossRef Google scholar
[67]
Liu G, Chen T, Xu J. . Salt-rejecting solar interfacial evaporation. Cell Reports. Physical Science, 2021, 2(1): 100310
CrossRef Google scholar
[68]
Cooper T A, Zandavi S H, Ni G W. . Contactless steam generation and superheating under one sun illumination. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 5086
CrossRef Google scholar
[69]
Menon A K, Haechler I, Kaur S. . Enhanced solar evaporation using a photo-thermal umbrella for wastewater management. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(2): 144–151
CrossRef Google scholar
[70]
Domen K, Naito S, Soma M. . Photocatalytic decomposition of water vapour on an NiO–SrTiO3 catalyst. Journal of the Chemical Society. Chemical Communications, 1980, (12): 543–544
CrossRef Google scholar
[71]
Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 1972, 238(5358): 37–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[72]
Chen X, Shen S, Guo L. . Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(11): 6503–6570
CrossRef Google scholar
[73]
WahabA K, Idriss H. Study of the photocatalytic reforming and oxidation of Glycerol over Ag–Pd/TiO2. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52(Part B), 159−171.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.344
[74]
Wahab A K, Nadeem M A, Idriss H. Hydrogen production during ethylene glycol photoreactions over Ag-Pd/TiO2 at different partial pressures of oxygen. Frontiers in Chemistry, 2019, 7: 476835
CrossRef Google scholar
[75]
Zhang W, Banerjee-Ghosh K, Tassinari F. . Enhanced electrochemical water splitting with chiral molecule-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(10): 2308–2313
CrossRef Google scholar
[76]
Leduc J, Goenuellue Y, Ghamgosar P. . Electronically-coupled phase boundaries in α-Fe2O3/Fe3O4 nanocomposite photoanodes for enhanced water oxidation. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2019, 2(1): 334–342
CrossRef Google scholar
[77]
Amano F, Ishinaga E, Yamakata A. Effect of particle size on the photocatalytic activity of WO3 particles for water oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(44): 22584–22590
CrossRef Google scholar
[78]
Wang F, DiValentin C, Pacchioni G. Rational band gap engineering of WO3 photocatalyst for visible light water splitting. ChemCatChem, 2012, 4(4): 476–478
CrossRef Google scholar
[79]
Hamid S B A, Teh S J, Lai C W. Photocatalytic water oxidation on ZnO: A review. Catalysts, 2017, 7(3): 93
CrossRef Google scholar
[80]
Ni M, Leung M K H, Leung D Y C. . A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2007, 11(3): 401–425
CrossRef Google scholar
[81]
Hong Y, Fang Z, Yin B. . A visible-light-driven heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic water splitting over Ta2O5 modified g-C3N4 photocatalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(10): 6738–6745
CrossRef Google scholar
[82]
Marschall R. Semiconductor composites: Strategies for enhancing charge carrier separation to improve photocatalytic activity. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24(17): 2421–2440
CrossRef Google scholar
[83]
Qian R, Zong H, Schneider J. . Charge carrier trapping, recombination and transfer during TiO2 photocatalysis: An overview. Catalysis Today, 2019, 335: 78–90
CrossRef Google scholar
[84]
Fu C F, Wu X, Yang J. Material design for photocatalytic water splitting from a theoretical perspective. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(48): 1802106
CrossRef Google scholar
[85]
Dingenen F, Verbruggen S W. Tapping hydrogen fuel from the ocean: A review on photocatalytic, photoelectrochemical and electrolytic splitting of seawater. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 142: 110866
CrossRef Google scholar
[86]
Zhu C C, Jiang T, Yang H C. . ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles with iron-rich surfaces for enhanced photocatalytic water vapor splitting. Applied Surface Science, 2023, 636: 157842
CrossRef Google scholar
[87]
Daeneke T, Dahr N, Atkin P. . Surface water dependent properties of sulfur-rich molybdenum sulfides: Electrolyteless gas phase water splitting. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(7): 6782–6794
CrossRef Google scholar
[88]
Chowdhury F A, Trudeau M L, Guo H. . A photochemical diode artificial photosynthesis system for unassisted high efficiency overall pure water splitting. Nature Communication, 2018, 9: 1707
CrossRef Google scholar
[89]
Wang Q, Hisatomi T, Jia Q. . Scalable water splitting on particulate photocatalyst sheets with a solar-to-hydrogen energy conversion efficiency exceeding 1%. Nature Materials, 2016, 15: 611–615
CrossRef Google scholar
[90]
Maeda K, Teramura K, Lu D. . Noble-metal/Cr2O3 core/shell nanoparticles as a cocatalyst for photocatalytic overall water splitting. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2006, 45(46): 7806–7809
CrossRef Google scholar
[91]
Ng K H, Lai S Y, Cheng C K. . Photocatalytic water splitting for solving energy crisis: Myth, fact or busted?. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 417: 128847
CrossRef Google scholar
[92]
Nishiyama H, Yamada T, Nakabayashi M. . Photocatalytic solar hydrogen production from water on a 100-m2 scale. Nature, 2021, 598(7880): 304–307
CrossRef Google scholar
[93]
Jin Z, Yan X, Hao X. Rational design of a novel p-n heterojunction based on 3D layered nanoflower MoSx supported CoWO4 nanoparticles for superior photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2020, 569: 34–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[94]
Bhattacharya R N, Lee C Y, Pollak F H. . Optical study of amorphous MoS3: Determination of the fundamental energy gap. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1987, 91(2): 235–242
CrossRef Google scholar
[95]
Tang M L, Grauer D C, Lassalle-Kaiser B. . Structural and electronic study of an amorphous MoS3 hydrogen-generation catalyst on a quantum-controlled photosensitizer. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2011, 50(43): 10203–10207
CrossRef Google scholar
[96]
Zhang S, Zhao H, Li X. . A hierarchical SiPN/CN/MoSx photocathode with low internal resistance and strong light-absorption for solar hydrogen production. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2022, 300: 120758
CrossRef Google scholar
[97]
Shin S, Jin Z, Kwon D H. . High turnover frequency of hydrogen evolution reaction on amorphous MoS2 thin film directly grown by atomic layer deposition. Langmuir, 2015, 31(3): 1196–1202
CrossRef Google scholar
[98]
Benck J D, Chen Z, Kuritzky L Y. . Amorphous molybdenum sulfide catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen production: Insights into the origin of their catalytic activity. ACS Catalysis, 2012, 2(9): 1916–1923
CrossRef Google scholar
[99]
Bourgeteau T, Tondelier D, Geffroy B. . A H2-evolving photocathode based on direct sensitization of MoS3 with an organic photovoltaic cell. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(9): 2706
CrossRef Google scholar
[100]
Zhou P, Navid I A, Ma Y. . Solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of more than 9% in photocatalytic water splitting. Nature, 2023, 613(7942): 66–70
CrossRef Google scholar
[101]
Schrauzer G N, Guth T D. Photolysis of water and photoreduction of nitrogen on titanium dioxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1977, 99(22): 7189–7193
CrossRef Google scholar
[102]
Domen K, Naito S, Onishi T. . Study of the photocatalytic decomposition of water vapor over a nickel(II) oxide-strontium titanate (SrTiO3) catalyst. ChemInform, 1982, 86(18): 3657–3661
[103]
Lee W H, Lee C W, Cha G D. . Floatable photocatalytic hydrogel nanocomposites for large-scale solar hydrogen production. Nature Nanotechnology, 2023, 18(7): 754–762
CrossRef Google scholar
[104]
Han H, Huang K, Yao Y. . Enhanced photocatalytic splitting of photothermally induced water vapor to evolve hydrogen. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 450: 138419
CrossRef Google scholar
[105]
Gao M, Connor P K N, Ho G W. Plasmonic photothermic directed broadband sunlight harnessing for seawater catalysis and desalination. Energy & Environmental Science, 2016, 9(10): 3151–3160
CrossRef Google scholar
[106]
Sansom C, Patchigolla K, Jonnalagadda K. . Design of a novel CSP/MED desalination system. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems, Freiburg. New York: AIP Publishing, 2022, 2445(1): 140012
CrossRef Google scholar
[107]
Chen S, Zhao P, Xie G. . A floating solar still inspired by continuous root water intake. Desalination, 2021, 512: 115133
CrossRef Google scholar
[108]
NEOM. NEOM adopts pioneering solar dome technology for sustainable desalination project 2020. 2023-10-6, available at website of NEOM
[109]
Zheng Y, Ma M, Shao H. Recent advances in efficient and scalable solar hydrogen production through water splitting. Carbon Neutrality, 2023, 2(1): 23
CrossRef Google scholar
[110]
Schreck M, Niederberger M. Photocatalytic gas phase reactions. Chemistry of Materials, 2019, 31(3): 597–618
CrossRef Google scholar
[111]
Jenny S, Matsuoka M, Takeuchi M. . Understanding TiO2 photocatalysis: Mechanisms and materials. Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114(19): 9919–9986
CrossRef Google scholar
[112]
Patial S, Hasija V, Raizada P. . Tunable photocatalytic activity of SrTiO3 for water splitting: Strategies and future scenario. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2020, 8(3): 103791
CrossRef Google scholar
[113]
Acar C, Dincer I, Naterer G F. Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production. International Journal of Energy Research, 2016, 40(11): 1449–1473
CrossRef Google scholar
[114]
Mikaeili F, Gilmore T, Gouma P I. Photochemical water splitting via transition metal oxides. Catalysts, 2022, 12(11): 1303
CrossRef Google scholar
[115]
Yang M Q, Gao M, Hong M. . Visible-to-NIR photon harvesting: Progressive engineering of catalysts for solar-powered environmental purification and fuel production. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(47): 1802894
CrossRef Google scholar
[116]
Zhu L, Gao M, Peh C K N. . Solar-driven photothermal nanostructured materials designs and prerequisites for evaporation and catalysis applications. Materials Horizons, 2018, 5(3): 323–343
CrossRef Google scholar
[117]
Tu Y, Zhou J, Lin S, et al. Photomolecular effect leading to water evaporation exceeding thermal limit. 2022, arXiv: 2201. 10385 2022
[118]
Tu Y, Chen G. Photomolecular effect: Visible light absorption at water-vapor interface. 2022, arXiv:2202.10646 10.48550/arXiv.2202.10646

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Waterloo, Canada Research Chair Tier I—Zero-Emission Vehicles and Hydrogen Energy Systems (Grant No. 950-232215), and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Discovery Grants Program, RGPIN-2020-04149 and RGPIN-2021-02453.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(7701 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/