P2P energy trading via public power networks: Practical challenges, emerging solutions, and the way forward

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading is an emerging energy supply paradigm where customers with distributed energy resources (DERs) are allowed to directly trade and share electricity with each other. P2P energy trading can facilitate local power and energy balance, thus being a potential way to manage the rapidly increasing number of DERs in net zero transition. It is of great importance to explore P2P energy trading via public power networks, to which most DERs are connected. Despite the extensive research on P2P energy trading, there has been little large-scale commercial deployment in practice across the world. In this paper, the practical challenges of conducting P2P energy trading via public power networks are identified and presented, based on the analysis of a practical Local Virtual Private Networks (LVPNs) case in North Wales, UK. The ongoing efforts and emerging solutions to tackling the challenges are then summarized and critically reviewed. Finally, the way forward for facilitating P2P energy trading via public power networks is proposed.

Key words： distribution network; local virtual private network; network charges; peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading; practical implementation.

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

References

1 Zhang C, Wu J, Zhou Y. . Peer-to-peer energy trading in a microgrid. Applied Energy, 2018, 220: 1–12

2 Zhou Y, Wu J, Long C. Evaluation of peer-to-peer energy sharing mechanisms based on a multiagent simulation framework. Applied Energy, 2018, 222: 993–1022

3 Morstyn T, Farrell N, Darby S J. . Using peer-to-peer energy-trading platforms to incentivize prosumers to form federated power plants. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(2): 94–101

4 Zhou Y, Wu J, Long C. . State-of-the-art analysis and perspectives for peer-to-peer energy trading. Engineering (Beijing), 2020, 6(7): 739–753

5 Cheng L F, Chen Y, Liu G Y. 2PnS-EG: A general two-population n-strategy evolutionary game for strategic long-term bidding in a deregulated market under different market clearing mechanisms. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2022, 142(Part A): 108182

6 Chen Y, Wei W, Liu F. . Energy trading and market equilibrium in integrated heat-power distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(4): 4080–4094

7 Cheng L F, Yu T. A new generation of AI: A review and perspective on machine learning technologies applied to smart energy and electric power systems. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(6): 1928–1973

8 Cheng L F, Yu T. Smart dispatching for energy internet with complex cyber-physical-social systems: A parallel dispatch perspective. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(8): 3080–3133

9 YanJYuenC SahaT K, . Call for papers for: Special issue on ‘energy sharing in the peer-to-peer network – moving towards real implementation. Applied Energy, 2021-01-02, available at the Elsevier website

10 Ofgem. Breakdown of an electricity bill. 2021-01-07, available at the website of Ofgem

11 PaceALord JEdwardsT, . A review of the embedded benefits accruing to distribution connected generation in GB. 2022-09-08, available at the website of theade

12 Ofgem. “Ofgem’s future insights series: Local energy in a transforming energy system. 2021-04-11, available at the website of Ofgem

13 Ofgem. Current arrangements. Access and forward-looking charges significant code review—Summer 2019 working paper. 2021-01-07, available at the website of Ofgem

14 PaceALord JEdwardsT, . A review of the embedded benefits accruing to distribution connected generation in GB. 2021-01-07, available at the website of theade

15 Scottish & Southern Electricity Networks. How are DUoS charges calculated?—Overview. 2021-01-07, available at the website of Scottish & Southern Electricity Networks

16 Ofgem. Links with procurement of flexibility – discussion note. Access and forward-looking charges significant code review – Summer 2019 working paper. 2021-01-17, available at the website of Ofgem

17 Nepal R, Foster J. Electricity networks privatization in Australia: An overview of the debate. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2015, 48: 12–24

18 Castaneda M, Jimenez M, Zapata S. . Myths and facts of the utility death spiral. Energy Policy, 2017, 110: 105–116

19 Ofgem. Illustrative examples note. Access and forward-looking charges significant code review – Summer 2019 working paper. 2021-01-21, available at the website of Ofgem

20 Ofgem. Electricity network access and forward-looking charging review: Open letter on our shortlisted policy options. 2021-01-24, available at the website of Ofgem

21 Ofgem. Options for reform of access rights for distribution and transmission—Discussion note. 2021-01-24, available at the website of Ofgem

22 Ofgem. Access and forward-looking charges significant code review: Consultation on updates to minded to positions and response to June 2021 Consultation feedback. 2022-09-08, available at the website of Ofgem

23 EnergyNetworks Association (ENA). Open networks. 2022-09-08, available at the website of ENA

24 Tushar W, Saha T K, Yuen C. . Peer-to-peer trading in electricity networks: An overview. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(4): 3185–3200

25 Guerrero J, Chapman A C, Verbič G. Decentralized P2P energy trading under network constraints in a low-voltage network. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2019, 10(5): 5163–5173

26 Tushar W, Saha T K, Yuen C. . Grid influenced peer-to-peer energy trading. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(2): 1407–1418

27 Khorasany M, Mishra Y, Ledwich G. A decentralized bilateral energy trading system for peer-to-peer electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(6): 4646–4657

28 Liu H, Li J, Ge S. . Distributed day-ahead peer-to-peer trading for multi-microgrid systems in active distribution networks. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2020, 8: 66961–66976

29 Paudel A, Khorasany M, Gooi H B. Decentralized local energy trading in microgrids with voltage management. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2021, 17(2): 1111–1121

30 Yan M, Shahidehpour M, Paaso A. . Distribution network-constrained optimization of peer-to-peer transactive energy trading among multi-microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(2): 1033–1047

31 Nikolaidis A I, Charalambous C A, Mancarella P. A graph-based loss allocation framework for transactive energy markets in unbalanced radial distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(5): 4109–4118

32 Bhand I, Debbarma S. Transaction-tracing based loss allocation in distribution networks under TE system. IEEE Systems Journal, 2021, 15(4): 5664–5673

33 Nunna H K, Sesetti A, Rathore A K. . Multiagent-based energy trading platform for energy storage systems in Distribution systems with interconnected microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2020, 56(3): 3207–3217

34 Vega-Fuentes E, Yang J, Lou C. . Transaction-oriented dynamic power flow tracing for distribution networks—Definition and implementation in GIS environment. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(2): 1303–1313

35 Jogunola O, Wang W, Adebisi B. Prosumers matching and least-cost energy path optimization for peer-to-peer energy trading. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2020, 8: 95266–95277

36 Azizi A, Aminifar F, Moeini-Aghtaie M. . Transactive energy market mechanism with loss implication. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2021, 12(2): 1215–1223

37 Wang S, Taha A F, Wang J. . Energy crowdsourcing and peer-to-peer energy trading in blockchain-enabled smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2019, 49(8): 1612–1623

38 Morstyn T, Teytelboym A, Hepburn C. . Integrating P2P energy trading with probabilistic distribution locational marginal pricing. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(4): 3095–3106

39 Zhang K, Troitzsch S, Hanif S. . Coordinated market design for peer-to-peer energy trade and ancillary services in distribution grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(4): 2929–2941

40 Kim J, Dvorkin Y A. P2P-dominant distribution system architecture. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2020, 35(4): 2716–2725

41 Paudel A, Sampath L P M I, Yang J. . Peer-to-peer energy trading in smart grid considering power losses and network fees. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2020, 11(6): 4727–4737

42 Baroche T, Pinson P, Latimier R L. . Exogenous cost allocation in peer-to-peer electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2019, 34(4): 2553–2564