REVIEW ARTICLE

A systemic review of hydrogen supply chain in energy transition

  • Haoming MA ,
  • Zhe SUN ,
  • Zhenqian XUE ,
  • Chi ZHANG ,
  • Zhangxin CHEN
Expand
  • Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
zhachen@ucalgary.ca

Received date: 16 Oct 2022

Accepted date: 28 Dec 2022

Published date: 15 Feb 2023

Copyright

2023 Higher Education Press

Abstract

Targeting the net-zero emission (NZE) by 2050, the hydrogen industry is drastically developing in recent years. However, the technologies of hydrogen upstream production, midstream transportation and storage, and downstream utilization are facing obstacles. In this paper, the development of hydrogen industry from the production, transportation and storage, and sustainable economic development perspectives were reviewed. The current challenges and future outlooks were summarized consequently. In the upstream, blue hydrogen is dominating the current hydrogen supply, and an implementation of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) can raise its cost by 30%. To achieve an economic feasibility, green hydrogen needs to reduce its cost by 75% to approximately 2 $/kg at the large scale. The research progress in the midterm sector is still in a preliminary stage, where experimental and theoretical investigations need to be conducted in addressing the impact of embrittlement, contamination, and flammability so that they could provide a solid support for material selection and large-scale feasibility studies. In the downstream utilization, blue hydrogen will be used in producing value-added chemicals in the short-term. Over the long-term, green hydrogen will dominate the market owing to its high energy intensity and zero carbon intensity which provides a promising option for energy storage. Technologies in the hydrogen industry require a comprehensive understanding of their economic and environmental benefits over the whole life cycle in supporting operators and policymakers.

Cite this article

Haoming MA , Zhe SUN , Zhenqian XUE , Chi ZHANG , Zhangxin CHEN . A systemic review of hydrogen supply chain in energy transition[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2023 , 17(1) : 102 -122 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-023-0861-0

1
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Energy Review 2021. Technical Report, IEA, 2021

2
InternationalEnergy Agency. Net Zero by 2050. Technical Report, IEA, 2021

3
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2021. Technical Report, IEA, 2021

4
BritishPetroleum. BP Energy Outlook 2022 edition. Technical Report, British Institute of Energy Economics, 2022

5
Abdalla A M, Hossain S, Nisfindy O B. . Hydrogen production, storage, transportation and key challenges with applications: a review. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 165: 602–627

DOI

6
Dincer I. Green methods for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1954–1971

DOI

7
Longden T, Beck F J, Jotzo F. . ‘Clean’ hydrogen? – Comparing the emissions and costs of fossil fuel versus renewable electricity based hydrogen. Applied Energy, 2022, 306: 118145

DOI

8
Hermesmann M, Müller T E. Green, turquoise, blue, or grey? Environmentally friendly hydrogen production in transforming energy systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2022, 90: 100996

DOI

9
Bauer C, Treyer K, Antonini C. . On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2021, 6(1): 66–75

DOI

10
van der Spek M, Banet C, Bauer C. . Perspective on the hydrogen economy as a pathway to reach net-zero CO2 emissions in Europe. Energy & Environmental Science, 2022, 15(3): 1034–1077

DOI

11
Howarth R W, Jacobson M Z. How green is blue hydrogen?. Energy Science & Engineering, 2021, 9(10): 1676–1687

DOI

12
Yan Y, Thanganadar D, Clough P T. . Process simulations of blue hydrogen production by upgraded sorption enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 222: 113144

DOI

13
LauH C. The color of energy: the competition to be the energy of the future. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2021

14
Yu M, Wang K, Vredenburg H. Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(41): 21261–21273

DOI

15
Ehlig-EconomidesCHatzignatiouD G. Blue hydrogen economy—A new look at an old idea. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, the UAE, 2021

16
Bauer C, Treyer K, Antonini C. . On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2021, 6(1): 66–75

DOI

17
Newborough M, Cooley G. Developments in the global hydrogen market: the spectrum of hydrogen colours. Fuel Cells Bulletin, 2020, 2020(11): 16–22

DOI

18
Mosca L, Medrano Jimenez J A, Wassie S A. . Process design for green hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(12): 7266–7277

DOI

19
Palmer G, Roberts A, Hoadley A. . Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and net energy assessment of large-scale hydrogen production via electrolysis and solar PV. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(10): 5113–5131

DOI

20
Jin L, Monforti Ferrario A, Cigolotti V. . Evaluation of the impact of green hydrogen blending scenarios in the Italian gas network: Optimal design and dynamic simulation of operation strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 2022, 2: 100022

DOI

21
Godula-JopekAJehleWWellnitzJ. Hydrogen Storage Technologies: New Materials, Transport, and Infrastructure. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2012

22
ZohuriB. Hydrogen Energy: Challenges and Solutions for a Cleaner Future. Cham: Springer, 2019

23
Adris A M, Pruden B B, Lim C J. . On the reported attempts to radically improve the performance of the steam methane reforming reactor. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1996, 74(2): 177–186

DOI

24
Oliveira E L G, Grande C A, Rodrigues A E. Effect of catalyst activity in SMR-SERP for hydrogen production: Commercial vs. large-pore catalyst. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(3): 342–354

DOI

25
Collodi G, Azzaro G, Ferrari N. . Techno-economic evaluation of deploying CCS in SMR based merchant H2 poduction with NG as feedstock and fuel. Energy Procedia, 2017, 114: 2690–2712

DOI

26
Stenberg V, Rydén M, Mattisson T. . Exploring novel hydrogen production processes by integration of steam methane reforming with chemical-looping combustion (CLC-SMR) and oxygen carrier aided combustion (OCAC-SMR). International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 74: 28–39

DOI

27
Yan Y, Manovic V, Anthony E J. . Techno-economic analysis of low-carbon hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam methane reforming (SE-SMR) processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 226: 113530

DOI

28
Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 67: 597–611

DOI

29
van der Spek M, Fout T, Garcia M. . Uncertainty analysis in the techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture and storage technologies. Critical review and guidelines for use. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 100: 103113

DOI

30
Carapellucci R, Giordano L. Steam, dry and autothermal methane reforming for hydrogen production: A thermodynamic equilibrium analysis. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 469: 228391

DOI

31
Chen H L, Lee H M, Chen S H. . Review of plasma catalysis on hydrocarbon reforming for hydrogen production-interaction, integration, and prospects. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008, 85(1–2): 1–9

DOI

32
LeValley T L, Richard A R, Fan M. The progress in water gas shift and steam reforming hydrogen production technologies—A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(30): 16983–17000

DOI

33
Liu C, Ye J, Jiang J. . Progresses in the preparation of coke resistant Ni-based catalyst for steam and CO2 reforming of methane. ChemCatChem, 2011, 3(3): 529–541

DOI

34
Yoo J, Bang Y, Han S J. . Hydrogen production by tri-reforming of methane over nickel–alumina aerogel catalyst. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical, 2015, 410: 74–80

DOI

35
Ersöz A. Investigation of hydrocarbon reforming processes for micro-cogeneration systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(23): 7084–7094

DOI

36
ScipioniAManzardoARenJ. Hydrogen Economy: Supply Chain, Life Cycle Analysis and Energy Transition for Sustainability. Academic Press, 2017

37
Steinberg M, Cheng H C. Modern and prospective technologies for hydrogen production from fossil fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1989, 14(11): 797–820

DOI

38
Faye O, Szpunar J, Eduok U. A critical review on the current technologies for the generation, storage, and transportation of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(29): 13771–13802

DOI

39
Holladay J D, Hu J, King D L. . An overview of hydrogen production technologies. Catalysis Today, 2009, 139(4): 244–260

DOI

40
Dai H, Zhu H. Enhancement of partial oxidation reformer by the free-section addition for hydrogen production. Renewable Energy, 2022, 190: 425–433

DOI

41
Caudal J, Fiorina B, Labégorre B. . Modeling interactions between chemistry and turbulence for simulations of partial oxidation processes. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 134: 231–242

DOI

42
Jahromi A F, Ruiz-López E, Dorado F. . Electrochemical promotion of ethanol partial oxidation and reforming reactions for hydrogen production. Renewable Energy, 2022, 183: 515–523

DOI

43
Bartels J R, Pate M B, Olson N K. An economic survey of hydrogen production from conventional and alternative energy sources. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(16): 8371–8384

DOI

44
DeFalco L. Marrelli LLaquanielloG. Membrane Reactors for Hydrogen Production Processes. London: Springer, 2011

45
Lattner J R, Harold M P. Comparison of conventional and membrane reactor fuel processors for hydrocarbon-based PEM fuel cell systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(4): 393–417

DOI

46
Kim J, Park J, Qi M. . Process integration of an autothermal reforming hydrogen production system with cryogenic air separation and carbon dioxide capture using liquefied natural gas cold energy. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(19): 7257–7274

DOI

47
Damen K, van Troost M, Faaij A. . A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2006, 32(2): 215–246

DOI

48
Demirbaş A. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management, 2001, 42(11): 1357–1378

DOI

49
Krishnamoorthy V, Pisupati S V. A critical review of mineral matter related issues during gasification of coal in fixed, fluidized, and entrained flow gasifiers. Energies, 2015, 8(9): 10430–10463

DOI

50
Jiang L, Chen Z, Farouq Ali S M. Thermal-hydro-chemical-mechanical alteration of coal pores in underground coal gasification. Fuel, 2020, 262: 116543

DOI

51
Ma H, Chen S, Xue D. . Outlook for the coal industry and new coal production technologies. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(2): 119–120

DOI

52
Jiang L, Xue D, Wei Z. . Coal decarbonization: a state-of-the-art review of enhanced hydrogen production in underground coal gasification. Energy Reviews, 2022, 1(1): 100004

DOI

53
Perkins G. Underground coal gasification—Part I: Field demonstrations and process performance. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 67: 158–187

DOI

54
Weger L, Abánades A, Butler T. Methane cracking as a bridge technology to the hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(1): 720–731

DOI

55
Schneider S, Bajohr S, Graf F. . State of the art of hydrogen production via pyrolysis of natural gas. ChemBioEng Reviews, 2020, 7(5): 150–158

DOI

56
Plevan M, Geißler T, Abánades A. . Thermal cracking of methane in a liquid metal bubble column reactor: Experiments and kinetic analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(25): 8020–8033

DOI

57
Geißler T, Abánades A, Heinzel A. . Hydrogen production via methane pyrolysis in a liquid metal bubble column reactor with a packed bed. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 299: 192–200

DOI

58
Sánchez-Bastardo N, Schlögl R, Ruland H. Methane pyrolysis for CO2–free H2 production: A green process to overcome renewable energies unsteadiness. Chemieingenieurtechnik (Weinheim), 2020, 92(10): 1596–1609

DOI

59
Ashik U P M, Wan Daud W M A, Abbas H F. Production of greenhouse gas free hydrogen by thermocatalytic decomposition of methane—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 44: 221–256

DOI

60
Amin A M, Croiset E, Epling W. Review of methane catalytic cracking for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(4): 2904–2935

DOI

61
DagleR ADagleVBeardenM D, . An Overview of Natural Gas Conversion Technologies for Co-production of Hydrogen and Value-added Solid Carbon Products. Technical Report, USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 2017

62
Guéret C, Daroux M, Billaud F. Methane pyrolysis: thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(5): 815–827

DOI

63
Muradov N, Veziroǧlu T. From hydrocarbon to hydrogen–carbon to hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30(3): 225–237

DOI

64
Gautier M, Rohani V, Fulcheri L. Direct decarbonization of methane by thermal plasma for the production of hydrogen and high value-added carbon black. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(47): 28140–28156

DOI

65
Bakken J A, Jensen R, Monsen B. . Thermal plasma process development in Norway. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1998, 70(6): 1223–1228

DOI

66
Gaudernack B, Lynum S. Hydrogen from natural gas without release of CO2 to the atmosphere. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1998, 23(12): 1087–1093

DOI

67
Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z, Takriff M S. Methane decomposition over unsupported mesoporous nickel ferrites: Effect of reaction temperature on the catalytic activity and properties of the produced nanocarbon. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(72): 68081–68091

DOI

68
Lee K K, Han G Y, Yoon K J. . Thermocatalytic hydrogen production from the methane in a fluidized bed with activated carbon catalyst. Catalysis Today, 2004, 93–95: 81–86

DOI

69
Dunker A M, Kumar S, Mulawa P A. Production of hydrogen by thermal decomposition of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor—Effects of catalyst, temperature, and residence time. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(4): 473–484

DOI

70
Keipi T, Tolvanen H, Konttinen J. Economic analysis of hydrogen production by methane thermal decomposition: comparison to competing technologies. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 159: 264–273

DOI

71
Gatica J M, Cifredo G A, Blanco G. . Unveiling the source of activity of carbon integral honeycomb monoliths in the catalytic methane decomposition reaction. Catalysis Today, 2015, 249: 86–93

DOI

72
Gatica J M, Gómez D M, Harti S. . Monolithic honeycomb design applied to carbon materials for catalytic methane decomposition. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2013, 458: 21–27

DOI

73
Serban M, Lewis M A, Marshall C L. . Hydrogen production by direct contact pyrolysis of natural gas. Energy & Fuels, 2003, 17(3): 705–713

DOI

74
Geißler T, Plevan M, Abánades A. . Experimental investigation and thermo-chemical modeling of methane pyrolysis in a liquid metal bubble column reactor with a packed bed. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(41): 14134–14146

DOI

75
Kang D, Rahimi N, Gordon M J. . Catalytic methane pyrolysis in molten MnCl2-KCl. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 254: 659–666

DOI

76
Palmer C, Tarazkar M, Kristoffersen H H. . Methane pyrolysis with a molten Cu–Bi alloy catalyst. ACS Catalysis, 2019, 9(9): 8337–8345

DOI

77
Upham D C, Agarwal V, Khechfe A. . Catalytic molten metals for the direct conversion of methane to hydrogen and separable carbon. Science, 2017, 358(6365): 917–921

DOI

78
Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z, Jia Q. . Catalytic decomposition of undiluted methane into hydrogen and carbon nanotubes over Pt promoted Ni/CeO2 catalysts. New Journal of Chemistry, 2018, 42(18): 14843–14856

DOI

79
Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofibers production by methane decomposition over nickel-alumina catalysts. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 33(2): 490–499

DOI

80
Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Hydrogen and carbon nanofibers synthesis by methane decomposition over Ni–Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(12): 5494–5503

DOI

81
Fakeeha A H, Ibrahim A A, Khan W U. . Hydrogen production via catalytic methane decomposition over alumina supported iron catalyst. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 2018, 11(3): 405–414

DOI

82
Avdeeva L B, Reshetenko T V, Ismagilov Z R. . Iron-containing catalysts of methane decomposition: Accumulation of filamentous carbon. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2002, 228(1–2): 53–63

DOI

83
Ayillath Kutteri D, Wang I W, Samanta A. . Methane decomposition to tip and base grown carbon nanotubes and COx-free H2 over mono-and bimetallic 3d transition metal catalysts. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2018, 8(3): 858–869

DOI

84
Silva R R, Oliveira H A, Guarino A C P F. . Effect of support on methane decomposition for hydrogen production over cobalt catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(16): 6763–6772

DOI

85
Pinilla J, Suelves I, Lázaro M. . Influence on hydrogen production of the minor components of natural gas during its decomposition using carbonaceous catalysts. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 192(1): 100–106

DOI

86
Zhang J, Li X, Chen H. . Hydrogen production by catalytic methane decomposition: Carbon materials as catalysts or catalyst supports. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(31): 19755–19775

DOI

87
Fidalgo B, Muradov N, Menéndez J. Effect of H2S on carbon-catalyzed methane decomposition and CO2 reforming reactions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(19): 14187–14194

DOI

88
Guil-Lopez R, Botas J, Fierro J. . Comparison of metal and carbon catalysts for hydrogen production by methane decomposition. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2011, 396(1−2): 40–51

DOI

89
Abánades A, Rubbia C, Salmieri D. Thermal cracking of methane into Hydrogen for a CO2-free utilization of natural gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(20): 8491–8496

DOI

90
Ermakova M, Ermakov D Y. Ni/SiO2 and Fe/SiO2 catalysts for production of hydrogen and filamentous carbon via methane decomposition. Catalysis Today, 2002, 77(3): 225–235

DOI

91
Ouyang M, Boldrin P, Maher R C. . A mechanistic study of the interactions between methane and nickel supported on doped ceria. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 248: 332–340

DOI

92
Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Methane decomposition over Ni–Fe/Al2O3 catalysts for production of COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(3): 1574–1584

DOI

93
Rastegarpanah A, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. . Influence of group VIB metals on activity of the Ni/MgO catalysts for methane decomposition. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2019, 248: 515–525

DOI

94
Bayat N, Meshkani F, Rezaei M. Thermocatalytic decomposition of methane to COx-free hydrogen and carbon over Ni–Fe–Cu/Al2O3 catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(30): 13039–13049

DOI

95
Al-Fatesh A S, Fakeeha A H, Ibrahim A A. . Decomposition of methane over alumina supported Fe and Ni−Fe bimetallic catalyst: Effect of preparation procedure and calcination temperature. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 2018, 22(2): 239–247

DOI

96
Moliner R, Suelves I, Lázaro M. . Thermocatalytic decomposition of methane over activated carbons: Influence of textural properties and surface chemistry. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30(3): 293–300

DOI

97
Lee E K, Lee S Y, Han G Y. . Catalytic decomposition of methane over carbon blacks for CO2-free hydrogen production. Carbon, 2004, 42(12−13): 2641–2648

DOI

98
Takenaka S, Ogihara H, Yamanaka I. . Decomposition of methane over supported-Ni catalysts: Effects of the supports on the catalytic lifetime. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2001, 217(1−2): 101–110

DOI

99
Zhang J, Li X, Xie W. . K2CO3-promoted methane pyrolysis on nickel/coal-char hybrids. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2018, 136: 53–61

DOI

100
Parkinson B, Tabatabaei M, Upham D C. . Hydrogen production using methane: techno-economics of decarbonizing fuels and chemicals. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(5): 2540–2555

DOI

101
Abánades A, Ruiz E, Ferruelo E M. . Experimental analysis of direct thermal methane cracking. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(20): 12877–12886

DOI

102
Abánades A, Rathnam R K, Geißler T. . Development of methane decarbonisation based on liquid metal technology for CO2-free production of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(19): 8159–8167

DOI

103
Zhou L, Enakonda L R, Li S. . Iron ore catalysts for methane decomposition to make COx free hydrogen and carbon nano material. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2018, 87: 54–63

DOI

104
Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z. Methane decomposition over Ni, Co and Fe based monometallic catalysts supported on sol gel derived SiO2 microflakes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 262: 1009–1021

DOI

105
Ermakova M, Ermakov D Y, Kuvshinov G. Effective catalysts for direct cracking of methane to produce hydrogen and filamentous carbon: Part I. Nickel catalysts. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2000, 201(1): 61–70

DOI

106
Al-Fatesh A S, Amin A, Ibrahim A. . Effect of Ce and Co addition to Fe/Al2O3 for catalytic methane decomposition. Catalysts, 2016, 6(3): 40

DOI

107
Wang J, Jin L, Li Y. . Preparation of Fe-doped carbon catalyst for methane decomposition to hydrogen. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2017, 56(39): 11021–11027

DOI

108
Zhou L, Enakonda L R, Saih Y. . Catalytic methane decomposition over Fe-Al2O3. ChemSusChem, 2016, 9(11): 1243–1248

DOI

109
Cunha A, Órfão J, Figueiredo J. Methane decomposition on Fe–Cu Raney-type catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90(10): 1234–1240

DOI

110
Schultz I, Agar D W. Decarbonisation of fossil energy via methane pyrolysis using two reactor concepts: Fluid wall flow reactor and molten metal capillary reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(35): 11422–11427

DOI

111
Postels S, Abánades A, von der Assen N. . Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production by thermal cracking of methane based on liquid-metal technology. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(48): 23204–23212

DOI

112
VollMKleinschmitP. Carbon, 6. Carbon Black. In: Elvers B, eds. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Hoboken: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, 2000

113
Fau G, Gascoin N, Gillard P. . Methane pyrolysis: literature survey and comparisons of available data for use in numerical simulations. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2013, 104: 1–9

DOI

114
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019. Technical Report, IEA, 2019

115
InternationalEnergy Agency. The Future of Hydrogen. Technical Report, IEA, 2019

116
InternationalEnergy Agency. Achieving Net Zero Heavy Industry Sectors in G7 Members. Technical Report, IEA, 2022

117
White C M, Strazisar B R, Granite E J. . Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations–coalbeds and deep saline aquifers. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2003, 53(6): 645–715

DOI

118
Riahi K, Rubin E S, Schrattenholzer L. Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy, 2004, 29(9−10): 1309–1318

DOI

119
DavidsonOMetzB. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Technical Report, IPCC, 2005

120
Middleton J. . Identifying geologic characteristics and operational decisions to meet global carbon sequestration goals. Energy & Environmental Science, 2020, 13(12): 5000–5016

DOI

121
Chaffee A L, Knowles G P, Liang Z. . CO2 capture by adsorption: materials and process development. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2007, 1(1): 11–18

DOI

122
Bachu S, Bonijoly D, Bradshaw J. . CO2 storage capacity estimation: methodology and gaps. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2007, 1(4): 43–443

DOI

123
Faltinson J, Gunter B. Integrated economic model CO2 capture, transport, ECBM and saline aquifer storage. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 4001–4005

DOI

124
MacDowell N, Florin N, Buchard A. . An overview of CO2 capture technologies. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(11): 1645

DOI

125
Yu C H, Huang C H, Tan C S. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2012, 12(5): 745–769

DOI

126
MorganM GMcCoyS T. Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Removing the Legal and Regulatory Barriers. New York: Routledge, 2012

127
Espinal L, Poster D L, Wong-Ng W. . Measurement, standards, and data needs for CO2 capture materials: A critical review. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(21): 11960–11975

DOI

128
Rubin E S, Short C, Booras G. . A proposed methodology for CO2 capture and storage cost estimates. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 17: 488–503

DOI

129
Zhang X, Fan J L, Wei Y M. Technology roadmap study on carbon capture, utilization and storage in China. Energy Policy, 2013, 59: 536–550

DOI

130
Leung D Y C, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer M M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 39: 426–443

DOI

131
Allinson W G G, Cinar Y, Neal P R R. . CO2-storage capacity—Combining geology, engineering and economics. SPE Economics & Management, 2014, 6(1): 15–27

DOI

132
Ma H, Yang Y, Zhang Y. . Optimized schemes of enhanced shale gas recovery by CO2-N2 mixtures associated with CO2 sequestration. Energy Conversion and Management, 2022, 268: 116062

DOI

133
MaHMcCoySChenZ. Economic and engineering co-optimization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery. In: Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Lyon, France, 2022

134
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Energy and CO2 Status Report 2018. Technical Report, IEA, 2018

135
GlobalCCS Institute. Global Status of CCS 2020. Technical Report, Global CCS Institute, 2020

136
BritishPetroleum. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021. Technical Report, BP, 2021

137
Bui M, Adjiman C S, Bardow A. . Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, 2018, 11(5): 1064–1065

DOI

138
IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate Change. Future Global Climate: Scenario-based Projections and Near Term Information. Technical Report, IPCC, 2021

139
InternationalRenewable Energy Agency. World Energy Transitions Outlook. Technical Report, IRENA, 2022

140
InternationalRenewable Energy Agency. Hydrogen: A Renewable Energy Perspective. Technical Report, IRENA, 2019

141
Song C, Liu Q, Ji N. . Alternative pathways for efficient CO2 capture by hybrid processes—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82: 215–231

DOI

142
Wang X, Song C. Carbon capture from flue gas and the atmosphere: A perspective. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2020, 8: 560849

DOI

143
EvansTGryniaE. Carbon capture–purpose and technologies. 2020, available at website of gasliquids

144
Sekera J, Lichtenberger A. Assessing carbon capture: Public policy, science, and societal need. Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 2020, 5(3): 14

DOI

145
Wei Y M, Kang J N, Liu L C. . A proposed global layout of carbon capture and storage in line with a 2  °C climate target. Nature Climate Change, 2021, 11(2): 112–118

DOI

146
Becattini V, Gabrielli P, Mazzotti M. Role of carbon capture, storage, and utilization to enable a net-zero-CO2-emissions aviation sector. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(18): 6848–6862

DOI

147
Zhang K, Bokka H K, Lau H C. Decarbonizing the energy and industry sectors in Thailand by carbon capture and storage. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2022, 209: 109979

DOI

148
Hao Z, Barecka M H, Lapkin A A. Accelerating net zero from the perspective of optimizing a carbon capture and utilization system. Energy & Environmental Science, 2022, 15(5): 2139–2153

DOI

149
Brandl P, Bui M, Hallett J P. . Beyond 90% capture: Possible, but at what cost?. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2021, 105: 103239

DOI

150
Ostovari H, Muller L, Skocek J. . From unavoidable CO2 source to CO2 sink? A cement industry based on CO2 mineralization.. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(8): 5212–5223

DOI

151
Sun S, Sun H, Williams P T. . Recent advances in integrated CO2 capture and utilization: A review. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2021, 5(18): 4546–4559

DOI

152
Wang N, Akimoto K, Nemet G F. What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects.. Energy Policy, 2021, 158: 112546

DOI

153
Hanein T, Simoni M, Woo C L. . Decarbonisation of calcium carbonate at atmospheric temperatures and pressures, with simultaneous CO2 capture, through production of sodium carbonate. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(12): 6595–6604

DOI

154
Subraveti S G, Roussanaly S, Anantharaman R. . How much can novel solid sorbents reduce the cost of post-combustion CO2 capture? A techno-economic investigation on the cost limits of pressure–vacuum swing adsorption.. Applied Energy, 2022, 306: 117955

DOI

155
Mohsin I, Al-Attas T A, Sumon K Z. . Economic and environmental assessment of integrated carbon capture and utilization. Cell Reports Physical Science, 2020, 1(7): 100104

DOI

156
DakeL P. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier Science, 1983

157
Balogun H A, Bahamon D, AlMenhali S. . Are we missing something when evaluating adsorbents for CO2 capture at the system level?. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(12): 6360–6380

DOI

158
Dixon J, Bell K, Brush S. Which way to net zero? A comparative analysis of seven UK 2050 decarbonisation pathways.. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 2022, 2: 100016

DOI

159
AdamsBSutterDMazzottiM, . Combining direct air capture and geothermal heat and electricity generation for net-negative carbon dioxide emissions. In: Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2020

160
Deutz S, Bardow A. Life-cycle assessment of an industrial direct air capture process based on temperature–vacuum swing adsorption. Nature Energy, 2021, 6(2): 203–213

DOI

161
McQueen N, Gomes K V, McCormick C. . A review of direct air capture (DAC): Scaling up commercial technologies and innovating for the future. Progress in Energy, 2021, 3(3): 032001

DOI

162
McQueen N, Desmond M J, Socolow R H. . Natural gas vs. electricity for solvent-based direct air capture. Frontiers in Climate, 2021, 2: 618644

DOI

163
Bistline J E T, Blanford G J. Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 3732

DOI

164
Terlouw T, Treyer K, Bauer C. . Life cycle assessment of direct air carbon capture and storage with low-carbon energy sources. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(16): 11397–11411

DOI

165
Erans M, Sanz-Pérez E S, Hanak D P. . Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges. Energy & Environmental Science, 2022, 15(4): 1360–1405

DOI

166
InternationalEnergy Agency. Direct Air Capture. Technical Report, IEA, 2022

167
McQueen N, Psarras P, Pilorgé H. . Cost analysis of direct air capture and sequestration coupled to low-carbon thermal energy in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(12): 7542–7551

DOI

168
InternationalEnergy Agency. Canada 2022. Technical Report, IEA, 2022

169
CongressionalResearch Service. The Tax Credit for Carbon Sequestration (Section 45Q). Technical Report, CRS, 2021

170
CollidiG. Reference Data and Supporting Literature Reviews for SMR Based Hydrogen Production with CCS. Technical Report, IEAGHG, 2017

171
Mathiesen B V, Lund H, Karlsson K. 100% renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(2): 488–501

DOI

172
Flamos A, Georgallis P, Doukas H. . Using biomass to achieve European Union Energy Targets—A review of biomass status, potential, and supporting policies. International Journal of Green Energy, 2011, 8(4): 411–428

DOI

173
Demirbaş A. Yields of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples. Fuel, 2001, 80(13): 1885–1891

DOI

174
Parthasarathy P, Narayanan K S. Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield—A review. Renewable Energy, 2014, 66: 570–579

DOI

175
Fremaux S, Beheshti S M, Ghassemi H. . An experimental study on hydrogen-rich gas production via steam gasification of biomass in a research-scale fluidized bed. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 91: 427–432

DOI

176
Balat M. Hydrogen-rich gas production from biomass via pyrolysis and gasification processes and effects of catalyst on hydrogen yield. Energy Sources. Part A, Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2008, 30(6): 552–564

DOI

177
Ni M, Leung D Y, Leung M K. . An overview of hydrogen production from biomass. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006, 87(5): 461–472

DOI

178
Godula-JopekA. Hydrogen Production: By Electrolysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2015

179
Rakousky C, Reimer U, Wippermann K. . Polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis: Restraining degradation in the presence of fluctuating power. Journal of Power Sources, 2017, 342: 38–47

DOI

180
Khan M A, Al-Attas T, Roy S. . Seawater electrolysis for hydrogen production: A solution looking for a problem?. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(9): 4831–4839

DOI

181
Zhang Y, Ying Z, Zhou J. . Electrolysis of the Bunsen reaction and properties of the membrane in the sulfur–iodine thermochemical cycle. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(35): 13581–13588

DOI

182
Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A, Nørskov J K. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces. Chemical Physics, 2005, 319(1−3): 178–184

DOI

183
Levene J I, Mann M K, Margolis R M. . An analysis of hydrogen production from renewable electricity sources. Solar Energy, 2007, 81(6): 773–780

DOI

184
Khan S U, Al-Shahry M, Ingler W B Jr. Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science, 2002, 297(5590): 2243–2245

DOI

185
Yan Z, Hitt J L, Turner J A. . Renewable electricity storage using electrolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020, 117(23): 12558–12563

DOI

186
Chatenet M, Pollet B G, Dekel D R. . Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chemical Society Reviews, 2022, 51(11): 4583–4762

DOI

187
Nnabuife S G, Ugbeh-Johnson J, Okeke N E. . Present and projected developments in hydrogen production: A technological review. Carbon Capture Science & Technology, 2022, 100042

DOI

188
Xie H, Zhao Z, Liu T. . A membrane-based seawater electrolyser for hydrogen generation. Nature, 2022, 612(7941): 673–678

DOI

189
Diéguez P, Ursúa A, Sanchis P. . Thermal performance of a commercial alkaline water electrolyzer: Experimental study and mathematical modeling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(24): 7338–7354

DOI

190
Zeng K, Zhang D. Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, 36(3): 307–326

DOI

191
Funk J E. Thermochemical hydrogen production: Past and present. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2001, 26(3): 185–190

DOI

192
Orhan M F, Dincer I, Rosen M A. Energy and exergy assessments of the hydrogen production step of a copper–chlorine thermochemical water splitting cycle driven by nuclear-based heat. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(22): 6456–6466

DOI

193
Abanades S, Charvin P, Lemont F. . Novel two-step SnO2/SnO water-splitting cycle for solar thermochemical production of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(21): 6021–6030

DOI

194
Ratlamwala T, Dincer I. Comparative energy and exergy analyses of two solar-based integrated hydrogen production systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(24): 7568–7578

DOI

195
SchultzK R. Use of the Modular Helium Reactor for Hydrogen Production. General Atomics Report: GA-A24428, 2003

196
Orhan M, Dincer I, Naterer G. Cost analysis of a thermochemical Cu–Cl pilot plant for nuclear-based hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(21): 6006–6020

DOI

197
Charvin P, Stéphane A, Florent L. . Analysis of solar chemical processes for hydrogen production from water splitting thermochemical cycles. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(6): 1547–1556

DOI

198
Kothari R, Buddhi D, Sawhney R. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(2): 553–563

DOI

199
Navarro R M, Pena M, Fierro J. Hydrogen production reactions from carbon feedstocks: Fossil fuels and biomass. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(10): 3952–3991

DOI

200
Laurinavichene T V, Kosourov S N, Ghirardi M L. . Prolongation of H2 photoproduction by immobilized, sulfur-limited Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures. Journal of Biotechnology, 2008, 134(3−4): 275–277

DOI

201
Kovács K L, Maróti G, Rákhely G. A novel approach for biohydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(11): 1460–1468

DOI

202
Bak T, Nowotny J, Rekas M. . Photo-electrochemical properties of the TiO2-Pt system in aqueous solutions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(1): 19–26

DOI

203
Aroutiounian V, Arakelyan V, Shahnazaryan G. Metal oxide photoelectrodes for hydrogen generation using solar radiation-driven water splitting. Solar Energy, 2005, 78(5): 581–592

DOI

204
Akikusa J, Khan S U. Photoelectrolysis of water to hydrogen in p-SiC/Pt and p-SiC/n-TiO2 cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(9): 863–870

DOI

205
IbrahimM N MKoederitzL F. Two-phase relative permeability prediction using a linear regression model. In: SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, West Virginia, USA, 2000

206
Züttel A. Materials for hydrogen storage. Materials Today, 2003, 6(9): 24–33

DOI

207
Ogden J, Jaffe A M, Scheitrum D. . Natural gas as a bridge to hydrogen transportation fuel: Insights from the literature. Energy Policy, 2018, 115: 317–329

DOI

208
Conte M, Iacobazzi A, Ronchetti M. . Hydrogen economy for a sustainable development: State-of-the-art and technological perspectives. Journal of Power Sources, 2001, 100(1−2): 171–187

DOI

209
KrishnaRTitusESalimianM, . Hydrogen storage for energy application. In: LIU J, eds. Hydrogen Storage. London: IntechOpen, 2012

210
Barthélémy H, Weber M, Barbier F. Hydrogen storage: recent improvements and industrial perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11): 7254–7262

DOI

211
Okada Y, Sasaki E, Watanabe E. . Development of dehydrogenation catalyst for hydrogen generation in organic chemical hydride method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(10): 1348–1356

DOI

212
Lan R, Irvine J T S, Tao S. Ammonia and related chemicals as potential indirect hydrogen storage materials. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1482–1494

DOI

213
He T, Pei Q, Chen P. Liquid organic hydrogen carriers. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2015, 24(5): 587–594

DOI

214
Clot E, Eisenstein O, Crabtree R H. Computational structure–activity relationships in H2 storage: How placement of N atoms affects release temperatures in organic liquid storage materials. Chemical Communications (Cambridge), 2007, (22): 2231–2233

DOI

215
Forberg D, Schwob T, Zaheer M. . Single-catalyst high-weight% hydrogen storage in an N-heterocycle synthesized from lignin hydrogenolysis products and ammonia. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1): 13201

DOI

216
Fujita K i, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi M. . Homogeneous perdehydrogenation and perhydrogenation of fused bicyclic N-heterocycles catalyzed by iridium complexes bearing a functional bipyridonate ligand. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014, 136(13): 4829–4832

DOI

217
Luo W, Zakharov L N, Liu S Y. 1, 2-BN cyclohexane: Synthesis, structure, dynamics, and reactivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(33): 13006–13009

DOI

218
Luo W, Campbell P G, Zakharov L N. . A single-component liquid-phase hydrogen storage material. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(48): 19326–19329

DOI

219
Brückner N, Obesser K, Bösmann A. . Evaluation of Industrially applied heat-transfer fluids as liquid organic hydrogen carrier systems. ChemSusChem, 2014, 7(1): 229–235

DOI

220
Enthaler S, von Langermann J, Schmidt T. Carbon dioxide and formic acid—The couple for environmental-friendly hydrogen storage?. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(9): 1207–1217

DOI

221
Grasemann M, Laurenczy G. Formic acid as a hydrogen source–recent developments and future trends. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(8): 8171–8181

DOI

222
VezirogluT NZaginaichenkoS YSchurD V, . Hydrogen materials science and chemistry of carbon nanomaterials. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Hydrogen Materials Science and Chemistry of Carbon Nanomaterials, Sudak, 2006

223
Babarit A, Gilloteaux J C, Clodic G. . Techno-economic feasibility of fleets of far offshore hydrogen-producing wind energy converters. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(15): 7266–7289

DOI

224
BlackstockE. Kawasaki launches the world’s first liquid hydrogen transport ship. 2019-12-15, available at website of newatlas

225
Pan B, Yin X, Ju Y. . Underground hydrogen storage: influencing parameters and future outlook. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 294: 102473

DOI

226
Zheng J, Liu X, Xu P. . Development of high pressure gaseous hydrogen storage technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(1): 1048–1057

DOI

227
Zhou L. Progress and problems in hydrogen storage methods. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2005, 9(4): 395–408

DOI

228
Sakintuna B, Lamari-Darkrim F, Hirscher M. Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(9): 1121–1140

DOI

229
Schulz R, Huot J, Liang G X. . Structure and hydrogen sorption properties of ball milled Mg dihydride. Journal of Metastable and Nanocrystalline Materials, 1999, 2: 615–622

230
Niaz S, Manzoor T, Pandith A H. Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods and perspectives. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50: 457–469

DOI

231
David E. An overview of advanced materials for hydrogen storage. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 162–163: 169–177

DOI

232
Grochala W, Edwards P P. Thermal decomposition of the non-interstitial hydrides for the storage and production of hydrogen. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(3): 1283–1316

DOI

233
Huot J, Liang G, Boily S. . Structural study and hydrogen sorption kinetics of ball-milled magnesium hydride. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 1999, 293–295: 495–500

DOI

234
Darkrim F L, Malbrunot P, Tartaglia G. Review of hydrogen storage by adsorption in carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(2): 193–202

DOI

235
Darkrim F, Levesque D. High adsorptive property of opened carbon nanotubes at 77 K. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2000, 104(29): 6773–6776

DOI

236
Dillon A, Heben M. Hydrogen storage using carbon adsorbents: past, present and future. Applied Physics. A, Materials Science & Processing, 2001, 72(2): 133–142

DOI

237
Chen P, Wu X, Lin J. . High H2 uptake by alkali-doped carbon nanotubes under ambient pressure and moderate temperatures. Science, 1999, 285(5424): 91–93

DOI

238
Chen C H, Huang C C. Hydrogen storage by KOH-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 237–246

DOI

239
Zhao Q, Yuan W, Liang J. . Synthesis and hydrogen storage studies of metal−organic framework UiO-66. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(29): 13104–13109

DOI

240
Li J, Cheng S, Zhao Q. . Synthesis and hydrogen-storage behavior of metal–organic framework MOF-5. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(3): 1377–1382

DOI

241
Xia L, Liu Q, Wang F. . Improving the hydrogen storage properties of metal-organic framework by functionalization. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2016, 22(10): 254

DOI

242
Bobbitt N S, Chen J, Snurr R Q. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage at cryogenic temperature. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(48): 27328–27341

DOI

243
Ozturk Z, Kose D A, Sahin Z S. . Novel 2D micro-porous metal-organic framework for hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(28): 12167–12174

DOI

244
Railey P, Song Y, Liu T. . Metal organic frameworks with immobilized nanoparticles: Synthesis and applications in photocatalytic hydrogen generation and energy storage. Materials Research Bulletin, 2017, 96: 385–394

DOI

245
Rahali S, Belhocine Y, Seydou M. . Multiscale study of the structure and hydrogen storage capacity of an aluminum metal-organic framework. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(22): 15271–15282

DOI

246
Chen Z, Chen J, Li Y. Metal–organic-framework-based catalysts for hydrogenation reactions. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 38(7): 1108–1126

DOI

247
Tarkowski R. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 105: 86–94

DOI

248
Lankof L, Urbańczyk K, Tarkowski R. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 160: 112309

DOI

249
Lankof L, Tarkowski R. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt formation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(38): 19479–19492

DOI

250
Sáinz-García A, Abarca E, Rubí V. . Assessment of feasible strategies for seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(26): 16657–16666

DOI

251
Hemme C, Van Berk W. Hydrogeochemical modeling to identify potential risks of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2018, 8(11): 2282

DOI

252
Rosa L, Mazzotti M. Potential for hydrogen production from sustainable biomass with carbon capture and storage. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 157: 112123

DOI

253
English J M, English K L. An overview of carbon capture and storage and its potential role in the energy transition. First Break, 2022, 40(4): 35–40

DOI

254
Agaton C B, Batac K I T, Reyes E M Jr. Prospects and challenges for green hydrogen production and utilization in the Philippines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(41): 17859–17870

DOI

255
Ahmed A, Al-Amin A Q, Ambrose A F. . Hydrogen fuel and transport system: A sustainable and environmental future. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(3): 1369–1380

DOI

256
Ball M, Wietschel M. The future of hydrogen–opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(2): 615–627

DOI

257
Li Y, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. The economic feasibility of green hydrogen and fuel cell electric vehicles for road transport in China. Energy Policy, 2022, 160: 112703

DOI

258
InternationalEnergy Agency. Hydrogen Projects Database. Technical Report, IEA, 2021

259
Ratnakar R R, Gupta N, Zhang K. . Hydrogen supply chain and challenges in large-scale LH2 storage and transportation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(47): 24149–24168

DOI

260
ScottR BDentonW HNichollsC M. Technology and Uses of Liquid Hydrogen. Pergamon: Elsevier, 2013

261
Zhang K, Lau H C, Chen Z. Using blue hydrogen to decarbonize heavy oil and oil sands operations in Canada. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10(30): 10003–10013

DOI

262
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review. Technical Report, IEA, 2022

263
Schoots K, Ferioli F, Kramer G. . Learning curves for hydrogen production technology: An assessment of observed cost reductions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(11): 2630–2645

DOI

264
Pastore L M, Lo Basso G, Sforzini M. . Technical, economic and environmental issues related to electrolysers capacity targets according to the Italian Hydrogen Strategy: A critical analysis. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 166: 112685

DOI

265
Lane B, Reed J, Shaffer B. . Forecasting renewable hydrogen production technology shares under cost uncertainty. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(54): 27293–27306

DOI

266
USDepartment of Education. DOE technical targets for hydrogen production from electrolysis. 2022–10, available at website of energy government

267
Zhang X, Bauer C, Mutel C L. . Life cycle assessment of power-to-gas: Approaches, system variations and their environmental implications. Applied Energy, 2017, 190: 326–338

DOI

268
Algunaibet I M, Guillén-Gosálbez G. Life cycle burden-shifting in energy systems designed to minimize greenhouse gas emissions: Novel analytical method and application to the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 229: 886–901

DOI

269
González-Garay A, Frei M S, Al-Qahtani A. . Plant-to-planet analysis of CO2-based methanol processes. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(12): 3425–3436

DOI

270
Parkinson B, Balcombe P, Speirs J. . Levelized cost of CO2 mitigation from hydrogen production routes. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(1): 19–40

DOI

271
Sleep S, Munjal R, Leitch M. . Carbon footprinting of carbon capture and utilization technologies: Discussion of the analysis of carbon XPRIZE competition team finalists. Clean Energy, 2021, 5(4): 587–599

DOI

272
Motazedi K, Salkuyeh Y K, Laurenzi I J. . Economic and environmental competitiveness of high temperature electrolysis for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(41): 21274–21288

DOI

273
Liu C M, Sandhu N K, McCoy S T. . A life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from direct air capture and Fischer–Tropsch fuel production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2020, 4(6): 3129–3142

DOI

274
Kolb S, Plankenbühler T, Hofmann K. . Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of renewable gas technologies: A comparative review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 146: 111147

DOI

275
Bergerson J A, Brandt A, Cresko J. . Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: Evaluation techniques at different stages of market and technical maturity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2020, 24(1): 11–25

DOI

276
Bergerson J, Cucurachi S, Seager T P. Bringing a life cycle perspective to emerging technology development. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2020, 24(1): 6–10

DOI

Outlines

/