A systemic review of hydrogen supply chain in energy transition
Haoming MA, Zhe SUN, Zhenqian XUE, Chi ZHANG, Zhangxin CHEN
A systemic review of hydrogen supply chain in energy transition
Targeting the net-zero emission (NZE) by 2050, the hydrogen industry is drastically developing in recent years. However, the technologies of hydrogen upstream production, midstream transportation and storage, and downstream utilization are facing obstacles. In this paper, the development of hydrogen industry from the production, transportation and storage, and sustainable economic development perspectives were reviewed. The current challenges and future outlooks were summarized consequently. In the upstream, blue hydrogen is dominating the current hydrogen supply, and an implementation of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) can raise its cost by 30%. To achieve an economic feasibility, green hydrogen needs to reduce its cost by 75% to approximately 2 $/kg at the large scale. The research progress in the midterm sector is still in a preliminary stage, where experimental and theoretical investigations need to be conducted in addressing the impact of embrittlement, contamination, and flammability so that they could provide a solid support for material selection and large-scale feasibility studies. In the downstream utilization, blue hydrogen will be used in producing value-added chemicals in the short-term. Over the long-term, green hydrogen will dominate the market owing to its high energy intensity and zero carbon intensity which provides a promising option for energy storage. Technologies in the hydrogen industry require a comprehensive understanding of their economic and environmental benefits over the whole life cycle in supporting operators and policymakers.
hydrogen production / hydrogen transportation and storage / hydrogen economy / carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) / technology assessment
[1] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Energy Review 2021. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
|
[2] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Net Zero by 2050. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
|
[3] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review 2021. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
|
[4] |
BritishPetroleum. BP Energy Outlook 2022 edition. Technical Report, British Institute of Energy Economics, 2022
|
[5] |
Abdalla A M, Hossain S, Nisfindy O B.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Dincer I. Green methods for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1954–1971
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Longden T, Beck F J, Jotzo F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Hermesmann M, Müller T E. Green, turquoise, blue, or grey? Environmentally friendly hydrogen production in transforming energy systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2022, 90: 100996
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Bauer C, Treyer K, Antonini C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
van der Spek M, Banet C, Bauer C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Howarth R W, Jacobson M Z. How green is blue hydrogen?. Energy Science & Engineering, 2021, 9(10): 1676–1687
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Yan Y, Thanganadar D, Clough P T.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
LauH C. The color of energy: the competition to be the energy of the future. In: International Petroleum Technology Conference, 2021
|
[14] |
Yu M, Wang K, Vredenburg H. Insights into low-carbon hydrogen production methods: Green, blue and aqua hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(41): 21261–21273
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Ehlig-EconomidesCHatzignatiouD G. Blue hydrogen economy—A new look at an old idea. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, the UAE, 2021
|
[16] |
Bauer C, Treyer K, Antonini C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Newborough M, Cooley G. Developments in the global hydrogen market: the spectrum of hydrogen colours. Fuel Cells Bulletin, 2020, 2020(11): 16–22
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Mosca L, Medrano Jimenez J A, Wassie S A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Palmer G, Roberts A, Hoadley A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Jin L, Monforti Ferrario A, Cigolotti V.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Godula-JopekAJehleWWellnitzJ. Hydrogen Storage Technologies: New Materials, Transport, and Infrastructure. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2012
|
[22] |
ZohuriB. Hydrogen Energy: Challenges and Solutions for a Cleaner Future. Cham: Springer, 2019
|
[23] |
Adris A M, Pruden B B, Lim C J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Oliveira E L G, Grande C A, Rodrigues A E. Effect of catalyst activity in SMR-SERP for hydrogen production: Commercial vs. large-pore catalyst. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(3): 342–354
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Collodi G, Azzaro G, Ferrari N.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Stenberg V, Rydén M, Mattisson T.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Yan Y, Manovic V, Anthony E J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 67: 597–611
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
van der Spek M, Fout T, Garcia M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Carapellucci R, Giordano L. Steam, dry and autothermal methane reforming for hydrogen production: A thermodynamic equilibrium analysis. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 469: 228391
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Chen H L, Lee H M, Chen S H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
LeValley T L, Richard A R, Fan M. The progress in water gas shift and steam reforming hydrogen production technologies—A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(30): 16983–17000
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Liu C, Ye J, Jiang J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Yoo J, Bang Y, Han S J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Ersöz A. Investigation of hydrocarbon reforming processes for micro-cogeneration systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(23): 7084–7094
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
ScipioniAManzardoARenJ. Hydrogen Economy: Supply Chain, Life Cycle Analysis and Energy Transition for Sustainability. Academic Press, 2017
|
[37] |
Steinberg M, Cheng H C. Modern and prospective technologies for hydrogen production from fossil fuels. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1989, 14(11): 797–820
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[38] |
Faye O, Szpunar J, Eduok U. A critical review on the current technologies for the generation, storage, and transportation of hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(29): 13771–13802
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[39] |
Holladay J D, Hu J, King D L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Dai H, Zhu H. Enhancement of partial oxidation reformer by the free-section addition for hydrogen production. Renewable Energy, 2022, 190: 425–433
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Caudal J, Fiorina B, Labégorre B.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[42] |
Jahromi A F, Ruiz-López E, Dorado F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Bartels J R, Pate M B, Olson N K. An economic survey of hydrogen production from conventional and alternative energy sources. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(16): 8371–8384
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[44] |
DeFalco L. Marrelli LLaquanielloG. Membrane Reactors for Hydrogen Production Processes. London: Springer, 2011
|
[45] |
Lattner J R, Harold M P. Comparison of conventional and membrane reactor fuel processors for hydrocarbon-based PEM fuel cell systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(4): 393–417
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Kim J, Park J, Qi M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[47] |
Damen K, van Troost M, Faaij A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Demirbaş A. Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management, 2001, 42(11): 1357–1378
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
Krishnamoorthy V, Pisupati S V. A critical review of mineral matter related issues during gasification of coal in fixed, fluidized, and entrained flow gasifiers. Energies, 2015, 8(9): 10430–10463
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[50] |
Jiang L, Chen Z, Farouq Ali S M. Thermal-hydro-chemical-mechanical alteration of coal pores in underground coal gasification. Fuel, 2020, 262: 116543
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[51] |
Ma H, Chen S, Xue D.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[52] |
Jiang L, Xue D, Wei Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
Perkins G. Underground coal gasification—Part I: Field demonstrations and process performance. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 67: 158–187
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Weger L, Abánades A, Butler T. Methane cracking as a bridge technology to the hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(1): 720–731
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Schneider S, Bajohr S, Graf F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Plevan M, Geißler T, Abánades A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Geißler T, Abánades A, Heinzel A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[58] |
Sánchez-Bastardo N, Schlögl R, Ruland H. Methane pyrolysis for CO2–free H2 production: A green process to overcome renewable energies unsteadiness. Chemieingenieurtechnik (Weinheim), 2020, 92(10): 1596–1609
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[59] |
Ashik U P M, Wan Daud W M A, Abbas H F. Production of greenhouse gas free hydrogen by thermocatalytic decomposition of methane—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 44: 221–256
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Amin A M, Croiset E, Epling W. Review of methane catalytic cracking for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(4): 2904–2935
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[61] |
DagleR ADagleVBeardenM D,
|
[62] |
Guéret C, Daroux M, Billaud F. Methane pyrolysis: thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(5): 815–827
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[63] |
Muradov N, Veziroǧlu T. From hydrocarbon to hydrogen–carbon to hydrogen economy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30(3): 225–237
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[64] |
Gautier M, Rohani V, Fulcheri L. Direct decarbonization of methane by thermal plasma for the production of hydrogen and high value-added carbon black. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(47): 28140–28156
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[65] |
Bakken J A, Jensen R, Monsen B.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[66] |
Gaudernack B, Lynum S. Hydrogen from natural gas without release of CO2 to the atmosphere. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1998, 23(12): 1087–1093
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[67] |
Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z, Takriff M S. Methane decomposition over unsupported mesoporous nickel ferrites: Effect of reaction temperature on the catalytic activity and properties of the produced nanocarbon. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(72): 68081–68091
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[68] |
Lee K K, Han G Y, Yoon K J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[69] |
Dunker A M, Kumar S, Mulawa P A. Production of hydrogen by thermal decomposition of methane in a fluidized-bed reactor—Effects of catalyst, temperature, and residence time. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(4): 473–484
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[70] |
Keipi T, Tolvanen H, Konttinen J. Economic analysis of hydrogen production by methane thermal decomposition: comparison to competing technologies. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 159: 264–273
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[71] |
Gatica J M, Cifredo G A, Blanco G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[72] |
Gatica J M, Gómez D M, Harti S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[73] |
Serban M, Lewis M A, Marshall C L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[74] |
Geißler T, Plevan M, Abánades A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[75] |
Kang D, Rahimi N, Gordon M J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[76] |
Palmer C, Tarazkar M, Kristoffersen H H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[77] |
Upham D C, Agarwal V, Khechfe A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[78] |
Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z, Jia Q.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[79] |
Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofibers production by methane decomposition over nickel-alumina catalysts. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 33(2): 490–499
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[80] |
Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Hydrogen and carbon nanofibers synthesis by methane decomposition over Ni–Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(12): 5494–5503
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[81] |
Fakeeha A H, Ibrahim A A, Khan W U.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[82] |
Avdeeva L B, Reshetenko T V, Ismagilov Z R.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[83] |
Ayillath Kutteri D, Wang I W, Samanta A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[84] |
Silva R R, Oliveira H A, Guarino A C P F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[85] |
Pinilla J, Suelves I, Lázaro M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[86] |
Zhang J, Li X, Chen H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[87] |
Fidalgo B, Muradov N, Menéndez J. Effect of H2S on carbon-catalyzed methane decomposition and CO2 reforming reactions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(19): 14187–14194
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[88] |
Guil-Lopez R, Botas J, Fierro J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[89] |
Abánades A, Rubbia C, Salmieri D. Thermal cracking of methane into Hydrogen for a CO2-free utilization of natural gas. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(20): 8491–8496
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[90] |
Ermakova M, Ermakov D Y. Ni/SiO2 and Fe/SiO2 catalysts for production of hydrogen and filamentous carbon via methane decomposition. Catalysis Today, 2002, 77(3): 225–235
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[91] |
Ouyang M, Boldrin P, Maher R C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[92] |
Bayat N, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Methane decomposition over Ni–Fe/Al2O3 catalysts for production of COx-free hydrogen and carbon nanofiber. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(3): 1574–1584
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[93] |
Rastegarpanah A, Rezaei M, Meshkani F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[94] |
Bayat N, Meshkani F, Rezaei M. Thermocatalytic decomposition of methane to COx-free hydrogen and carbon over Ni–Fe–Cu/Al2O3 catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(30): 13039–13049
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[95] |
Al-Fatesh A S, Fakeeha A H, Ibrahim A A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[96] |
Moliner R, Suelves I, Lázaro M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[97] |
Lee E K, Lee S Y, Han G Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[98] |
Takenaka S, Ogihara H, Yamanaka I.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[99] |
Zhang J, Li X, Xie W.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[100] |
Parkinson B, Tabatabaei M, Upham D C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[101] |
Abánades A, Ruiz E, Ferruelo E M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[102] |
Abánades A, Rathnam R K, Geißler T.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[103] |
Zhou L, Enakonda L R, Li S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[104] |
Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z. Methane decomposition over Ni, Co and Fe based monometallic catalysts supported on sol gel derived SiO2 microflakes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 262: 1009–1021
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[105] |
Ermakova M, Ermakov D Y, Kuvshinov G. Effective catalysts for direct cracking of methane to produce hydrogen and filamentous carbon: Part I. Nickel catalysts. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2000, 201(1): 61–70
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[106] |
Al-Fatesh A S, Amin A, Ibrahim A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[107] |
Wang J, Jin L, Li Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[108] |
Zhou L, Enakonda L R, Saih Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[109] |
Cunha A, Órfão J, Figueiredo J. Methane decomposition on Fe–Cu Raney-type catalysts. Fuel Processing Technology, 2009, 90(10): 1234–1240
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[110] |
Schultz I, Agar D W. Decarbonisation of fossil energy via methane pyrolysis using two reactor concepts: Fluid wall flow reactor and molten metal capillary reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(35): 11422–11427
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[111] |
Postels S, Abánades A, von der Assen N.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[112] |
VollMKleinschmitP. Carbon, 6. Carbon Black. In: Elvers B, eds. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Hoboken: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, 2000
|
[113] |
Fau G, Gascoin N, Gillard P.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[114] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Energy & CO2 Status Report 2019. Technical Report, IEA, 2019
|
[115] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. The Future of Hydrogen. Technical Report, IEA, 2019
|
[116] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Achieving Net Zero Heavy Industry Sectors in G7 Members. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
|
[117] |
White C M, Strazisar B R, Granite E J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[118] |
Riahi K, Rubin E S, Schrattenholzer L. Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy, 2004, 29(9−10): 1309–1318
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[119] |
DavidsonOMetzB. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Technical Report, IPCC, 2005
|
[120] |
Middleton J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[121] |
Chaffee A L, Knowles G P, Liang Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[122] |
Bachu S, Bonijoly D, Bradshaw J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[123] |
Faltinson J, Gunter B. Integrated economic model CO2 capture, transport, ECBM and saline aquifer storage. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 4001–4005
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[124] |
MacDowell N, Florin N, Buchard A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[125] |
Yu C H, Huang C H, Tan C S. A review of CO2 capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2012, 12(5): 745–769
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[126] |
MorganM GMcCoyS T. Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Removing the Legal and Regulatory Barriers. New York: Routledge, 2012
|
[127] |
Espinal L, Poster D L, Wong-Ng W.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[128] |
Rubin E S, Short C, Booras G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[129] |
Zhang X, Fan J L, Wei Y M. Technology roadmap study on carbon capture, utilization and storage in China. Energy Policy, 2013, 59: 536–550
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[130] |
Leung D Y C, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer M M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 39: 426–443
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[131] |
Allinson W G G, Cinar Y, Neal P R R.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[132] |
Ma H, Yang Y, Zhang Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[133] |
MaHMcCoySChenZ. Economic and engineering co-optimization of CO2 storage and enhanced oil recovery. In: Proceedings of the 16th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference, Lyon, France, 2022
|
[134] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Energy and CO2 Status Report 2018. Technical Report, IEA, 2018
|
[135] |
GlobalCCS Institute. Global Status of CCS 2020. Technical Report, Global CCS Institute, 2020
|
[136] |
BritishPetroleum. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021. Technical Report, BP, 2021
|
[137] |
Bui M, Adjiman C S, Bardow A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[138] |
IntergovernmentalPanel on Climate Change. Future Global Climate: Scenario-based Projections and Near Term Information. Technical Report, IPCC, 2021
|
[139] |
InternationalRenewable Energy Agency. World Energy Transitions Outlook. Technical Report, IRENA, 2022
|
[140] |
InternationalRenewable Energy Agency. Hydrogen: A Renewable Energy Perspective. Technical Report, IRENA, 2019
|
[141] |
Song C, Liu Q, Ji N.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[142] |
Wang X, Song C. Carbon capture from flue gas and the atmosphere: A perspective. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2020, 8: 560849
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[143] |
EvansTGryniaE. Carbon capture–purpose and technologies. 2020, available at website of gasliquids
|
[144] |
Sekera J, Lichtenberger A. Assessing carbon capture: Public policy, science, and societal need. Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 2020, 5(3): 14
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[145] |
Wei Y M, Kang J N, Liu L C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[146] |
Becattini V, Gabrielli P, Mazzotti M. Role of carbon capture, storage, and utilization to enable a net-zero-CO2-emissions aviation sector. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(18): 6848–6862
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[147] |
Zhang K, Bokka H K, Lau H C. Decarbonizing the energy and industry sectors in Thailand by carbon capture and storage. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2022, 209: 109979
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[148] |
Hao Z, Barecka M H, Lapkin A A. Accelerating net zero from the perspective of optimizing a carbon capture and utilization system. Energy & Environmental Science, 2022, 15(5): 2139–2153
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[149] |
Brandl P, Bui M, Hallett J P.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[150] |
Ostovari H, Muller L, Skocek J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[151] |
Sun S, Sun H, Williams P T.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[152] |
Wang N, Akimoto K, Nemet G F. What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects.. Energy Policy, 2021, 158: 112546
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[153] |
Hanein T, Simoni M, Woo C L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[154] |
Subraveti S G, Roussanaly S, Anantharaman R.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[155] |
Mohsin I, Al-Attas T A, Sumon K Z.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[156] |
DakeL P. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier Science, 1983
|
[157] |
Balogun H A, Bahamon D, AlMenhali S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[158] |
Dixon J, Bell K, Brush S. Which way to net zero? A comparative analysis of seven UK 2050 decarbonisation pathways.. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 2022, 2: 100016
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[159] |
AdamsBSutterDMazzottiM,
|
[160] |
Deutz S, Bardow A. Life-cycle assessment of an industrial direct air capture process based on temperature–vacuum swing adsorption. Nature Energy, 2021, 6(2): 203–213
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[161] |
McQueen N, Gomes K V, McCormick C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[162] |
McQueen N, Desmond M J, Socolow R H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[163] |
Bistline J E T, Blanford G J. Impact of carbon dioxide removal technologies on deep decarbonization of the electric power sector. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 3732
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[164] |
Terlouw T, Treyer K, Bauer C.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[165] |
Erans M, Sanz-Pérez E S, Hanak D P.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[166] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Direct Air Capture. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
|
[167] |
McQueen N, Psarras P, Pilorgé H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[168] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Canada 2022. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
|
[169] |
CongressionalResearch Service. The Tax Credit for Carbon Sequestration (Section 45Q). Technical Report, CRS, 2021
|
[170] |
CollidiG. Reference Data and Supporting Literature Reviews for SMR Based Hydrogen Production with CCS. Technical Report, IEAGHG, 2017
|
[171] |
Mathiesen B V, Lund H, Karlsson K. 100% renewable energy systems, climate mitigation and economic growth. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(2): 488–501
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[172] |
Flamos A, Georgallis P, Doukas H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[173] |
Demirbaş A. Yields of hydrogen-rich gaseous products via pyrolysis from selected biomass samples. Fuel, 2001, 80(13): 1885–1891
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[174] |
Parthasarathy P, Narayanan K S. Hydrogen production from steam gasification of biomass: influence of process parameters on hydrogen yield—A review. Renewable Energy, 2014, 66: 570–579
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[175] |
Fremaux S, Beheshti S M, Ghassemi H.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[176] |
Balat M. Hydrogen-rich gas production from biomass via pyrolysis and gasification processes and effects of catalyst on hydrogen yield. Energy Sources. Part A, Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2008, 30(6): 552–564
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[177] |
Ni M, Leung D Y, Leung M K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[178] |
Godula-JopekA. Hydrogen Production: By Electrolysis. John Wiley & Sons, 2015
|
[179] |
Rakousky C, Reimer U, Wippermann K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[180] |
Khan M A, Al-Attas T, Roy S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[181] |
Zhang Y, Ying Z, Zhou J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[182] |
Rossmeisl J, Logadottir A, Nørskov J K. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces. Chemical Physics, 2005, 319(1−3): 178–184
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[183] |
Levene J I, Mann M K, Margolis R M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[184] |
Khan S U, Al-Shahry M, Ingler W B Jr. Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science, 2002, 297(5590): 2243–2245
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[185] |
Yan Z, Hitt J L, Turner J A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[186] |
Chatenet M, Pollet B G, Dekel D R.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[187] |
Nnabuife S G, Ugbeh-Johnson J, Okeke N E.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[188] |
Xie H, Zhao Z, Liu T.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[189] |
Diéguez P, Ursúa A, Sanchis P.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[190] |
Zeng K, Zhang D. Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, 36(3): 307–326
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[191] |
Funk J E. Thermochemical hydrogen production: Past and present. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2001, 26(3): 185–190
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[192] |
Orhan M F, Dincer I, Rosen M A. Energy and exergy assessments of the hydrogen production step of a copper–chlorine thermochemical water splitting cycle driven by nuclear-based heat. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(22): 6456–6466
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[193] |
Abanades S, Charvin P, Lemont F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[194] |
Ratlamwala T, Dincer I. Comparative energy and exergy analyses of two solar-based integrated hydrogen production systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(24): 7568–7578
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[195] |
SchultzK R. Use of the Modular Helium Reactor for Hydrogen Production. General Atomics Report: GA-A24428, 2003
|
[196] |
Orhan M, Dincer I, Naterer G. Cost analysis of a thermochemical Cu–Cl pilot plant for nuclear-based hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(21): 6006–6020
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[197] |
Charvin P, Stéphane A, Florent L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[198] |
Kothari R, Buddhi D, Sawhney R. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2008, 12(2): 553–563
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[199] |
Navarro R M, Pena M, Fierro J. Hydrogen production reactions from carbon feedstocks: Fossil fuels and biomass. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(10): 3952–3991
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[200] |
Laurinavichene T V, Kosourov S N, Ghirardi M L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[201] |
Kovács K L, Maróti G, Rákhely G. A novel approach for biohydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(11): 1460–1468
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[202] |
Bak T, Nowotny J, Rekas M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[203] |
Aroutiounian V, Arakelyan V, Shahnazaryan G. Metal oxide photoelectrodes for hydrogen generation using solar radiation-driven water splitting. Solar Energy, 2005, 78(5): 581–592
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[204] |
Akikusa J, Khan S U. Photoelectrolysis of water to hydrogen in p-SiC/Pt and p-SiC/n-TiO2 cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(9): 863–870
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[205] |
IbrahimM N MKoederitzL F. Two-phase relative permeability prediction using a linear regression model. In: SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, West Virginia, USA, 2000
|
[206] |
Züttel A. Materials for hydrogen storage. Materials Today, 2003, 6(9): 24–33
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[207] |
Ogden J, Jaffe A M, Scheitrum D.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[208] |
Conte M, Iacobazzi A, Ronchetti M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[209] |
KrishnaRTitusESalimianM,
|
[210] |
Barthélémy H, Weber M, Barbier F. Hydrogen storage: recent improvements and industrial perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11): 7254–7262
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[211] |
Okada Y, Sasaki E, Watanabe E.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[212] |
Lan R, Irvine J T S, Tao S. Ammonia and related chemicals as potential indirect hydrogen storage materials. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(2): 1482–1494
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[213] |
He T, Pei Q, Chen P. Liquid organic hydrogen carriers. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2015, 24(5): 587–594
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[214] |
Clot E, Eisenstein O, Crabtree R H. Computational structure–activity relationships in H2 storage: How placement of N atoms affects release temperatures in organic liquid storage materials. Chemical Communications (Cambridge), 2007,
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[215] |
Forberg D, Schwob T, Zaheer M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[216] |
Fujita K i, Tanaka Y, Kobayashi M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[217] |
Luo W, Zakharov L N, Liu S Y. 1, 2-BN cyclohexane: Synthesis, structure, dynamics, and reactivity. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133(33): 13006–13009
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[218] |
Luo W, Campbell P G, Zakharov L N.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[219] |
Brückner N, Obesser K, Bösmann A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[220] |
Enthaler S, von Langermann J, Schmidt T. Carbon dioxide and formic acid—The couple for environmental-friendly hydrogen storage?. Energy & Environmental Science, 2010, 3(9): 1207–1217
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[221] |
Grasemann M, Laurenczy G. Formic acid as a hydrogen source–recent developments and future trends. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(8): 8171–8181
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[222] |
VezirogluT NZaginaichenkoS YSchurD V,
|
[223] |
Babarit A, Gilloteaux J C, Clodic G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[224] |
BlackstockE. Kawasaki launches the world’s first liquid hydrogen transport ship. 2019-12-15, available at website of newatlas
|
[225] |
Pan B, Yin X, Ju Y.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[226] |
Zheng J, Liu X, Xu P.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[227] |
Zhou L. Progress and problems in hydrogen storage methods. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2005, 9(4): 395–408
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[228] |
Sakintuna B, Lamari-Darkrim F, Hirscher M. Metal hydride materials for solid hydrogen storage: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(9): 1121–1140
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[229] |
Schulz R, Huot J, Liang G X.
|
[230] |
Niaz S, Manzoor T, Pandith A H. Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods and perspectives. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50: 457–469
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[231] |
David E. An overview of advanced materials for hydrogen storage. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005, 162–163: 169–177
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[232] |
Grochala W, Edwards P P. Thermal decomposition of the non-interstitial hydrides for the storage and production of hydrogen. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(3): 1283–1316
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[233] |
Huot J, Liang G, Boily S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[234] |
Darkrim F L, Malbrunot P, Tartaglia G. Review of hydrogen storage by adsorption in carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(2): 193–202
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[235] |
Darkrim F, Levesque D. High adsorptive property of opened carbon nanotubes at 77 K. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2000, 104(29): 6773–6776
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[236] |
Dillon A, Heben M. Hydrogen storage using carbon adsorbents: past, present and future. Applied Physics. A, Materials Science & Processing, 2001, 72(2): 133–142
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[237] |
Chen P, Wu X, Lin J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[238] |
Chen C H, Huang C C. Hydrogen storage by KOH-modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 237–246
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[239] |
Zhao Q, Yuan W, Liang J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[240] |
Li J, Cheng S, Zhao Q.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[241] |
Xia L, Liu Q, Wang F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[242] |
Bobbitt N S, Chen J, Snurr R Q. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for hydrogen storage at cryogenic temperature. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(48): 27328–27341
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[243] |
Ozturk Z, Kose D A, Sahin Z S.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[244] |
Railey P, Song Y, Liu T.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[245] |
Rahali S, Belhocine Y, Seydou M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[246] |
Chen Z, Chen J, Li Y. Metal–organic-framework-based catalysts for hydrogenation reactions. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 38(7): 1108–1126
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[247] |
Tarkowski R. Underground hydrogen storage: characteristics and prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 105: 86–94
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[248] |
Lankof L, Urbańczyk K, Tarkowski R. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in salt domes. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 160: 112309
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[249] |
Lankof L, Tarkowski R. Assessment of the potential for underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt formation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(38): 19479–19492
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[250] |
Sáinz-García A, Abarca E, Rubí V.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[251] |
Hemme C, Van Berk W. Hydrogeochemical modeling to identify potential risks of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas fields. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2018, 8(11): 2282
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[252] |
Rosa L, Mazzotti M. Potential for hydrogen production from sustainable biomass with carbon capture and storage. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 157: 112123
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[253] |
English J M, English K L. An overview of carbon capture and storage and its potential role in the energy transition. First Break, 2022, 40(4): 35–40
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[254] |
Agaton C B, Batac K I T, Reyes E M Jr. Prospects and challenges for green hydrogen production and utilization in the Philippines. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(41): 17859–17870
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[255] |
Ahmed A, Al-Amin A Q, Ambrose A F.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[256] |
Ball M, Wietschel M. The future of hydrogen–opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(2): 615–627
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[257] |
Li Y, Taghizadeh-Hesary F. The economic feasibility of green hydrogen and fuel cell electric vehicles for road transport in China. Energy Policy, 2022, 160: 112703
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[258] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Hydrogen Projects Database. Technical Report, IEA, 2021
|
[259] |
Ratnakar R R, Gupta N, Zhang K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[260] |
ScottR BDentonW HNichollsC M. Technology and Uses of Liquid Hydrogen. Pergamon: Elsevier, 2013
|
[261] |
Zhang K, Lau H C, Chen Z. Using blue hydrogen to decarbonize heavy oil and oil sands operations in Canada. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10(30): 10003–10013
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[262] |
InternationalEnergy Agency. Global Hydrogen Review. Technical Report, IEA, 2022
|
[263] |
Schoots K, Ferioli F, Kramer G.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[264] |
Pastore L M, Lo Basso G, Sforzini M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[265] |
Lane B, Reed J, Shaffer B.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[266] |
USDepartment of Education. DOE technical targets for hydrogen production from electrolysis. 2022–10, available at website of energy government
|
[267] |
Zhang X, Bauer C, Mutel C L.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[268] |
Algunaibet I M, Guillén-Gosálbez G. Life cycle burden-shifting in energy systems designed to minimize greenhouse gas emissions: Novel analytical method and application to the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 229: 886–901
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[269] |
González-Garay A, Frei M S, Al-Qahtani A.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[270] |
Parkinson B, Balcombe P, Speirs J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[271] |
Sleep S, Munjal R, Leitch M.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[272] |
Motazedi K, Salkuyeh Y K, Laurenzi I J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[273] |
Liu C M, Sandhu N K, McCoy S T.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[274] |
Kolb S, Plankenbühler T, Hofmann K.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[275] |
Bergerson J A, Brandt A, Cresko J.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[276] |
Bergerson J, Cucurachi S, Seager T P. Bringing a life cycle perspective to emerging technology development. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2020, 24(1): 6–10
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |