Effect of catalyst layer mesoscopic pore-morphology on cold start process of PEM fuel cells

Abstract

Water transport is of paramount importance to the cold start of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Analysis of water transport in cathode catalyst layer (CCL) during cold start reveals the distinct characteristics from the normal temperature operation. This work studies the effect of CCL mesoscopic pore-morphology on PEMFC cold start. The CCL mesoscale morphology is characterized by two tortuosity factors of the ionomer network and pore structure, respectively. The simulation results demonstrate that the mesoscale morphology of CCL has a significant influence on the performance of PEMFC cold start. It was found that cold-starting of a cell with a CCL of less tortuous mesoscale morphology can succeed, whereas starting up a cell with a CCL of more tortuous mesoscale morphology may fail. The CCL of less tortuous pore structure reduces the water back diffusion resistance from the CCL to proton exchange membrane (PEM), thus enhancing the water storage in PEM, while reducing the tortuosity in ionomer network of CCL is found to enhance the water transport in and the water removal from CCL. For the sake of better cold start performance, novel preparation methods, which can create catalyst layers of larger size primary pores and less tortuous pore structure and ionomer network, are desirable.

Key words： cold start; energy conversion; fuel cells; mesoscale morphology; tortuosity; water management

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. 2018YFB0905303) and the Shanghai Automotive Industry Sci-Tech Development Foundation (Grant No. 1706).

References

1 Tai X Y, Zhakeyev A, Wang H, . Accelerating fuel cell development with additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art, opportunities and challenges. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2019, 19(6): 636–650

2 Zhang T, Wang P, Chen H, . A review of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation under start-stop operating condition. Applied Energy, 2018, 223: 249–262

3 Ajanovic A, Haas R. Economic and environmental prospects for battery electric- and fuel cell vehicles: a review. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2019, 19(5): 515–529

4 Dafalla A M, Jiang F M. Stresses and their impacts on proton exchange membrane fuel cells: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(4): 2327–2348

5 Pan W, Li P, Gan Q, . Thermal stability analysis of cold start processes in PEM fuel cells. Applied Energy, 2020, 261: 114430

6 Huo S, Jiao K, Park J W. On the water transport behavior and phase transition mechanisms in cold start operation of PEM fuel cell. Applied Energy, 2019, 233–234: 776–788

7 Luo Y, Jiao K. Cold start of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 64: 29–61

8 Amamou A A, Kelouwani S, Boulon L, . A Comprehensive review of solutions and strategies for cold start of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cells. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2016, 4: 4989–5002

9 Shojaeefard M H, Molaeimanesh G R, Nazemian M, . A review on microstructure reconstruction of PEM fuel cells porous electrodes for pore scale simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(44): 20276–20293

10 Ko J, Ju H. Comparison of numerical simulation results and experimental data during cold-start of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Applied Energy, 2012, 94: 364–374

11 Gwak G, Ko J, Ju H. Effects of porous properties on cold-start behavior of polymer electrolyte fuel cells from sub-zero to normal operating temperatures. Scientific Reports, 2015, 4(1):5770

12 Li L, Wang S, Yue L, . Cold-start icing characteristics of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 12033–12042

13 Cetinbas F C, Ahluwalia R K, Kariuki N N, . Effects of porous carbon morphology, agglomerate structure and relative humidity on local oxygen transport resistance. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2020, 167(1): 013508

14 Ozden A, Shahgaldi S, Li X, . The impact of ionomer type on the morphological and microstructural degradations of proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrodes under freeze-thaw cycles. Applied Energy, 2019, 238: 1048–1059

15 Shahgaldi S, Ozden A, Li X, . Cathode catalyst layer design with gradients of ionomer distribution for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 1476–1486

16 Shahgaldi S, Alaefour I, Li X. Impact of manufacturing processes on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. Applied Energy, 2018, 225: 1022–1032

17 Zhao J, Ozden A, Shahgaldi S, . Effect of Pt loading and catalyst type on the pore structure of porous electrodes in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Energy, 2018, 150: 69–76

18 Wu H W. A review of recent development: transport and performance modeling of PEM fuel cells. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 81–106

19 Heidary H, Jafar Kermani M, Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm N. Performance analysis of PEM fuel cells cathode catalyst layer at various operating conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(47): 22274–22284

20 Wang C Y. Fundamental models for fuel cell engineering. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(10): 4727–4766

21 Jiang F M, Wang C Y. Numerical modeling of liquid water motion in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(2): 942–950

22 Sabharwal M, Pant L M, Patel N, . Computational analysis of gas transport in fuel cell catalyst layer under dry and partially saturated conditions. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2019, 166(7): F3065–F3080

23 Hou Y, Deng H, Pan F, . Pore-scale investigation of catalyst layer ingredient and structure effect in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Applied Energy, 2019, 253: 113561

24 Molaeimanesh G R, Akbari M H. Agglomerate modeling of cathode catalyst layer of a PEM fuel cell by the lattice boltzmann method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(15): 5169–5185

25 Moein-Jahromi M, Kermani M J. Performance prediction of PEM fuel cell cathode catalyst layer using agglomerate model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(23): 17954–17966

26 Weber A Z, Borup R L, Darling R M, . A critical review of modeling transport phenomena in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2014, 161(12): F1254–F1299

27 Sassin M B, Garsany Y, Atkinson R W III,. Understanding the interplay between cathode catalyst layer porosity and thickness on transport limitations en route to high-performance PEMFCs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(31): 16944–16955

28 Carcadea E, Varlam M, Marinoiu A,. Influence of catalyst structure on PEM fuel cell performance— a numerical investigation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(25): 12829–12841

29 Molaeimanesh G R, Bamdezh M A, Nazemian M. Impact of catalyst layer morphology on the performance of PEM fuel cell cathode via lattice Boltzmann simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(45): 20959–20975

30 Nandy A, Jiang F M, Ge S, . Effect of cathode pore volume on PEM fuel cell cold start. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2010, 157(5): B726–B736

31 Luo Y, Jia B, Jiao K, . Catalytic hydrogen-oxygen reaction in anode and cathode for cold start of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(32): 10293–10307

32 Hiramitsu Y, Mitsuzawa N, Okada K, . Effects of ionomer content and oxygen permeation of the catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane fuel cell cold start-up. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(4): 1038–1045

33 Xie X, Zhang G, Zhou J, . Experimental and theoretical analysis of ionomer/carbon ratio effect on PEM fuel cell cold start operation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(17): 12521–12530

34 Ko J, Ju H. Effects of cathode catalyst layer design parameters on cold start behavior of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(1): 682–691

35 He P, Chen L, Mu Y T, . Lattice Boltzmann method simulation of ice melting process in the gas diffusion layer of fuel cell. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 149: 119121

36 Wu W, Jiang F M. Microstructure reconstruction and characterization of PEMFC electrodes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(28): 15894–15906

37 Jiang F M, Fang W, Wang C Y. Non-isothermal cold start of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 53(2): 610–621

38 Siegel N P, Ellis M W, Nelson D J, . Single domain PEMFC model based on agglomerate catalyst geometry. Journal of Power Sources, 2003, 115(1): 81–89

39 Zhang J, Cao P, Xu L, . Modeling nanostructured catalyst layer in PEMFC and catalyst utilization. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering in China, 2011, 5(3): 297–302

40 Wu R, Liao Q, Zhu X, . Pore network modeling of cathode catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(15): 11255–11267

41 Khan M A, Sundén B, Yuan J. Analysis of multi-phase transport phenomena with catalyst reactions in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells—a review. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(19): 7899–7916

42 Nguyen P T, Berning T, Djilali N. Computational model of a PEM fuel cell with serpentine gas flow channels. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 130(1–2): 149–157

43 Tjaden B, Brett D J L, Shearing P R. Tortuosity in electrochemical devices: a review of calculation approaches. International Materials Reviews, 2018, 63(2): 47–67

44 Wei L, Liao Z H, Suo Z, . Numerical study of cold start performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with coolant circulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(39): 22160–22172

45 Wei L, Dafalla A M, Jiang F M. Effects of reactants/coolant non-uniform inflow on the cold start performance of PEMFC stack. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(24): 13469–13482

46 Chippar P, Ju H. Evaluating cold-start behaviors of end and intermediate cells in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) stack. Solid State Ionics, 2012, 225: 85–91

47 Meng H. Numerical analyses of non-isothermal self-start behaviors of PEM fuel cells from subfreezing startup temperatures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(20): 5738–5747

48 Bradean R, Haas H, Desousa A, . Models for predicting MEA water content during fuel cell operation and after shutdown. In: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase. Cincinnati, OH, US, 2005, 10983–10990

49 Tajiri K, Tabuchi Y, Wang C Y. Isothermal cold start of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2007, 154(2): B147–B152

50 Dafalla A M, Wei L, Liao Z H, . Effects of clamping pressure on cold start behavior of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2019, 19(3): 221–230

51 Macauley N, Lujan R W, Spernjak D, . Durability of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells operated at subfreezing temperatures. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016, 163(13): F1317–F1329