Effect of catalyst layer mesoscopic pore-morphology on cold start process of PEM fuel cells

Abstract

Water transport is of paramount importance to the cold start of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Analysis of water transport in cathode catalyst layer (CCL) during cold start reveals the distinct characteristics from the normal temperature operation. This work studies the effect of CCL mesoscopic pore-morphology on PEMFC cold start. The CCL mesoscale morphology is characterized by two tortuosity factors of the ionomer network and pore structure, respectively. The simulation results demonstrate that the mesoscale morphology of CCL has a significant influence on the performance of PEMFC cold start. It was found that cold-starting of a cell with a CCL of less tortuous mesoscale morphology can succeed, whereas starting up a cell with a CCL of more tortuous mesoscale morphology may fail. The CCL of less tortuous pore structure reduces the water back diffusion resistance from the CCL to proton exchange membrane (PEM), thus enhancing the water storage in PEM, while reducing the tortuosity in ionomer network of CCL is found to enhance the water transport in and the water removal from CCL. For the sake of better cold start performance, novel preparation methods, which can create catalyst layers of larger size primary pores and less tortuous pore structure and ionomer network, are desirable.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

cold start / energy conversion / fuel cells / mesoscale morphology / tortuosity / water management

References

[1] Tai X Y, Zhakeyev A, Wang H, . Accelerating fuel cell development with additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art, opportunities and challenges. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2019, 19(6): 636–650

[2] Zhang T, Wang P, Chen H, . A review of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cell degradation under start-stop operating condition. Applied Energy, 2018, 223: 249–262

[3] Ajanovic A, Haas R. Economic and environmental prospects for battery electric- and fuel cell vehicles: a review. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2019, 19(5): 515–529

[4] Dafalla A M, Jiang F M. Stresses and their impacts on proton exchange membrane fuel cells: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(4): 2327–2348

[5] Pan W, Li P, Gan Q, . Thermal stability analysis of cold start processes in PEM fuel cells. Applied Energy, 2020, 261: 114430

[6] Huo S, Jiao K, Park J W. On the water transport behavior and phase transition mechanisms in cold start operation of PEM fuel cell. Applied Energy, 2019, 233–234: 776–788

[7] Luo Y, Jiao K. Cold start of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2018, 64: 29–61

[8] Amamou A A, Kelouwani S, Boulon L, . A Comprehensive review of solutions and strategies for cold start of automotive proton exchange membrane fuel cells. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2016, 4: 4989–5002

[9] Shojaeefard M H, Molaeimanesh G R, Nazemian M, . A review on microstructure reconstruction of PEM fuel cells porous electrodes for pore scale simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(44): 20276–20293

[10] Ko J, Ju H. Comparison of numerical simulation results and experimental data during cold-start of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Applied Energy, 2012, 94: 364–374

[11] Gwak G, Ko J, Ju H. Effects of porous properties on cold-start behavior of polymer electrolyte fuel cells from sub-zero to normal operating temperatures. Scientific Reports, 2015, 4(1):5770

[12] Li L, Wang S, Yue L, . Cold-start icing characteristics of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 12033–12042

[13] Cetinbas F C, Ahluwalia R K, Kariuki N N, . Effects of porous carbon morphology, agglomerate structure and relative humidity on local oxygen transport resistance. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2020, 167(1): 013508

[14] Ozden A, Shahgaldi S, Li X, . The impact of ionomer type on the morphological and microstructural degradations of proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrodes under freeze-thaw cycles. Applied Energy, 2019, 238: 1048–1059

[15] Shahgaldi S, Ozden A, Li X, . Cathode catalyst layer design with gradients of ionomer distribution for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 171: 1476–1486

[16] Shahgaldi S, Alaefour I, Li X. Impact of manufacturing processes on proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. Applied Energy, 2018, 225: 1022–1032

[17] Zhao J, Ozden A, Shahgaldi S, . Effect of Pt loading and catalyst type on the pore structure of porous electrodes in polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Energy, 2018, 150: 69–76

[18] Wu H W. A review of recent development: transport and performance modeling of PEM fuel cells. Applied Energy, 2016, 165: 81–106

[19] Heidary H, Jafar Kermani M, Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm N. Performance analysis of PEM fuel cells cathode catalyst layer at various operating conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(47): 22274–22284

[20] Wang C Y. Fundamental models for fuel cell engineering. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(10): 4727–4766

[21] Jiang F M, Wang C Y. Numerical modeling of liquid water motion in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(2): 942–950

[22] Sabharwal M, Pant L M, Patel N, . Computational analysis of gas transport in fuel cell catalyst layer under dry and partially saturated conditions. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2019, 166(7): F3065–F3080

[23] Hou Y, Deng H, Pan F, . Pore-scale investigation of catalyst layer ingredient and structure effect in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Applied Energy, 2019, 253: 113561

[24] Molaeimanesh G R, Akbari M H. Agglomerate modeling of cathode catalyst layer of a PEM fuel cell by the lattice boltzmann method. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(15): 5169–5185

[25] Moein-Jahromi M, Kermani M J. Performance prediction of PEM fuel cell cathode catalyst layer using agglomerate model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(23): 17954–17966

[26] Weber A Z, Borup R L, Darling R M, . A critical review of modeling transport phenomena in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2014, 161(12): F1254–F1299

[27] Sassin M B, Garsany Y, Atkinson R W III,. Understanding the interplay between cathode catalyst layer porosity and thickness on transport limitations en route to high-performance PEMFCs. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(31): 16944–16955

[28] Carcadea E, Varlam M, Marinoiu A,. Influence of catalyst structure on PEM fuel cell performance— a numerical investigation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(25): 12829–12841

[29] Molaeimanesh G R, Bamdezh M A, Nazemian M. Impact of catalyst layer morphology on the performance of PEM fuel cell cathode via lattice Boltzmann simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(45): 20959–20975

[30] Nandy A, Jiang F M, Ge S, . Effect of cathode pore volume on PEM fuel cell cold start. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2010, 157(5): B726–B736

[31] Luo Y, Jia B, Jiao K, . Catalytic hydrogen-oxygen reaction in anode and cathode for cold start of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(32): 10293–10307

[32] Hiramitsu Y, Mitsuzawa N, Okada K, . Effects of ionomer content and oxygen permeation of the catalyst layer on proton exchange membrane fuel cell cold start-up. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(4): 1038–1045

[33] Xie X, Zhang G, Zhou J, . Experimental and theoretical analysis of ionomer/carbon ratio effect on PEM fuel cell cold start operation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(17): 12521–12530

[34] Ko J, Ju H. Effects of cathode catalyst layer design parameters on cold start behavior of polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(1): 682–691

[35] He P, Chen L, Mu Y T, . Lattice Boltzmann method simulation of ice melting process in the gas diffusion layer of fuel cell. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 149: 119121

[36] Wu W, Jiang F M. Microstructure reconstruction and characterization of PEMFC electrodes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(28): 15894–15906

[37] Jiang F M, Fang W, Wang C Y. Non-isothermal cold start of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 53(2): 610–621

[38] Siegel N P, Ellis M W, Nelson D J, . Single domain PEMFC model based on agglomerate catalyst geometry. Journal of Power Sources, 2003, 115(1): 81–89

[39] Zhang J, Cao P, Xu L, . Modeling nanostructured catalyst layer in PEMFC and catalyst utilization. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering in China, 2011, 5(3): 297–302

[40] Wu R, Liao Q, Zhu X, . Pore network modeling of cathode catalyst layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(15): 11255–11267

[41] Khan M A, Sundén B, Yuan J. Analysis of multi-phase transport phenomena with catalyst reactions in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells—a review. Journal of Power Sources, 2011, 196(19): 7899–7916

[42] Nguyen P T, Berning T, Djilali N. Computational model of a PEM fuel cell with serpentine gas flow channels. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 130(1–2): 149–157

[43] Tjaden B, Brett D J L, Shearing P R. Tortuosity in electrochemical devices: a review of calculation approaches. International Materials Reviews, 2018, 63(2): 47–67

[44] Wei L, Liao Z H, Suo Z, . Numerical study of cold start performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with coolant circulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(39): 22160–22172

[45] Wei L, Dafalla A M, Jiang F M. Effects of reactants/coolant non-uniform inflow on the cold start performance of PEMFC stack. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(24): 13469–13482

[46] Chippar P, Ju H. Evaluating cold-start behaviors of end and intermediate cells in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) stack. Solid State Ionics, 2012, 225: 85–91

[47] Meng H. Numerical analyses of non-isothermal self-start behaviors of PEM fuel cells from subfreezing startup temperatures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(20): 5738–5747

[48] Bradean R, Haas H, Desousa A, . Models for predicting MEA water content during fuel cell operation and after shutdown. In: 2005 AIChE Annual Meeting and Fall Showcase. Cincinnati, OH, US, 2005, 10983–10990

[49] Tajiri K, Tabuchi Y, Wang C Y. Isothermal cold start of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2007, 154(2): B147–B152

[50] Dafalla A M, Wei L, Liao Z H, . Effects of clamping pressure on cold start behavior of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2019, 19(3): 221–230

[51] Macauley N, Lujan R W, Spernjak D, . Durability of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells operated at subfreezing temperatures. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016, 163(13): F1317–F1329

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project (Grant No. 2018YFB0905303) and the Shanghai Automotive Industry Sci-Tech Development Foundation (Grant No. 1706).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2021 Higher Education Press