Review of characterization and modeling of polymer electrolyte fuel cell catalyst layer: The blessing and curse of ionomer

Abstract

Ionomer impregnation represents a milestone in the evolution of polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC) catalyst layers. Ionomer acts as the binder, facilitates proton transport, and thereby drastically improves catalyst utilization and effectiveness. However, advanced morphological and functional characterizations have revealed that up to 60% of Pt nanoparticles can be trapped in the micropores of carbon support particles. Ionomer clusters and oxygen molecules can hardly enter into micropores, leading to low Pt utilization and effectiveness. Moreover, the ionomer thin-films covering Pt nanoparticles can cause significant mass transport loss especially at high current densities. Ionomer-free ultra-thin catalyst layers (UTCLs) emerge as a promising alternative to reduce Pt loading by improving catalyst utilization and effectiveness, while theoretical issues such as the proton conduction mechanism remain puzzling and practical issues such as the rather narrow operation window remain unsettled. At present, the development of PEFC catalyst layer has come to a crossroads: staying ionomer-impregnated or going ionomer-free. It is always beneficial to look back into the past when coming to a crossroads. This paper addresses the characterization and modeling of both the conventional ionomer-impregnated catalyst layer and the emerging ionomer-free UTCLs, featuring advances in characterizing microscale distributions of Pt particles, ionomer, support particles and unraveling their interactions; advances in fundamental understandings of proton conduction and flooding behaviors in ionomer-free UTCLs; advances in modeling of conventional catalyst layers and especially UTCLs; and discussions on high-impact research topics in characterizing and modeling of catalyst layers.

Key words： polymer electrolyte fuel cell; ultra-thin catalyst layer; electrostatic interactions; characterization and modeling; structure-property-performance relation; water management

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1664259). J. Huang is indebted to Prof Michael Eikerling at Simon Fraser University for the tremendous support and guidance when J. Huang was a visiting PhD student in Eikerling research group.

References

1 Litster S, Mclean G F. PEM fuel cell electrodes. Journal of Power Sources, 2004, 130(1–2): 61–76

2 Weber A Z, Newman J. Modelling transport in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(10): 4679–4726

3 Eikerling M H, Malek K, Wang Q. Catalyst Layer Modelling: Structure, Properties and Performance, PEM Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts and Catalyst Layers. London: Springer, 2008: 381–446

4 Debe M K. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 2012, 486(7401): 43–51

5 Debe M K. Tutorial on the fundamental characteristics and practical properties of nanostructured thin film (NSTF) catalysts. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2013, 160(6): F522–F534

6 Eikerling M, Kulikovsky A. Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells: Physical Principles of Materials and Operation. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2014

7 Weber A Z, Borup R L, Darling R M, Das P K, Dursch T J, Gu W, Harvey D, Kusoglu A, Litster S, Mench M M, Mukundan R, Owejan J P, Pharoah J G, Secanell M, Zenyuk I V. A critical review of modelling transport phenomena in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2014, 161(12): F1254–F1299

8 Holdcroft S. Fuel cell catalyst layer: a polymer science perspective. Chemistry of Materials, 2014, 26(1): 381–393

9 Kongkanand A, Mathias M F. The priority and challenge of high-power performance of low-platinum proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2016, 7(7): 1127–1137

10 Zamel N. The catalyst layer and its dimensionality — a look into its ingredients and how to characterize their effects. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 309: 141–159

11 Uchida M, Park Y C, Kakinuma K, Yano H, Tryk D A, Kamino T, Uchida H, Watanabe M. Effect of the state of distribution of supported Pt nanoparticles on effective Pt utilization in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15(27): 11236–11247

12 Park Y C, Tokiwa H, Kakinuma K, Watanabe M, Uchida M. Effects of carbon supports on Pt distribution, ionomer coverage and cathode performance for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 315: 179–191

13 Bard A J, Inzelt G, Scholz F. Electrochemical Dictionary. London: Springer, 2008, 286

14 Bard A J, Inzelt G, Scholz F. Electrochemical Dictionary. London: Springer, 2008, 523

15 Perry M L, Fuller T F. A historical perspective of fuel cell technology in the 20th century. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2002, 149(7): S59–S67

16 Ostwald F W. Scientific electrochemistry of today and technical electrochemistr of tomorrow. Z. fürElektrotechnik und Elektrochemie, 1894, 1: 122–125

17 Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Fuel cell technologies office multi-year research, development, and demonstration plan. 2016, http://energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/downloads/fuel-cell-technologies-office-multi-year-research-development-and-22

18 Mond L, Langer C. A new form of gas battery. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 46:296–304

19 Taitelbaum I, Tobler J. StudienüberBrennstoffketten. ZeitschriftFürElektrochemie Und AngewandtePhysikalische Chemie, 1910, 16(9): 286–300

20 Rezaei Niya S M, Hoorfar M. Study of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technique – a review. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 240(240): 281–293

21 Stephens I E L, Bondarenko A S, Grønbjerg U, Rossmeisl J, Chorkendorff I. Understanding the electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction on platinum and its alloys. Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5(5): 6744–6762

22 Schoenbein C F. On the voltaic polarization of certain solid and fluid substances. Philosophical Magazine, 1838, 14(85): 43–45

23 Grove W R. On voltaic series and the combination of gases by platinum. Philosophical Magazine, 1839, 14(86): 127–130

24 Grove W R. On a gaseous voltaic battery. Journal of The Franklin Institute-engineering and Applied Mathematics, 1843, 35(4): 277–280

25 Grubb J W T. Fuel cell. U.S. Patent 2, 913, 511. 1959-11-17

26 Grubb W T, Niedrach L W. Batteries with solid ion-exchange membrane electrolytes II. Low-temperature hydrogen-oxygen fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1960, 107(2): 131–135

27 Niedrach L W, Alford H R. A new high-performance fuel cell employing conducting-porous-teflon electrodes and liquid electrolytes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1965, 112(2): 117–124

28 Appleby A J, Yeager E B. Solid polymer electrolyte fuel cells (SPEFCs). Energy, 1986, 11(1–2): 137–152

29 Waters R F. Fuel cell electrode and process for its manufacture: U.S. Patent 3, 405, 007. 1968–10–8

30 Petrow H G, Allen R J. Catalytic platinum metal particles on a substrate and method of preparing the catalyst. U.S. Patent 3, 992, 331. 1976–11–16

31 Jalan V M, Bushnell C L. Method for producing highly dispersed catalytic platinum. U.S. Patent 4, 136, 059. 1979–1–23

32 George M, Kemp F. Sequential catalyzation of fuel cell supported platinum catalyst. U.S. Patent 3, 857, 737. 1974–12–31

33 Martin C R, Rhoades T A, Ferguson J A. Dissolution of perfluorinated ion-containing polymers. Analytical Chemistry, 1982, 54(9): 1639–1641

34 Raistrick I D. Modified gas diffusion electrode for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Proceedings of the symposium on diaphragms, separation, and ion-exchange membranes. Ponnington (NJ): Electrochemical Society. 1986: 6–7

35 Wilson M S, Gottesfeld S. Thin-film catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cell electrodes. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1992, 22(1): 1–7

36 Wilson M S, Gottesfeld S. High performance catalyzed membranes of ultra-low Pt loadings for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1992, 139(2): L28–L30

37 Kocha S S. Principles of MEA preparation. Handbook of Fuel Cells. New Jersey: Wiley 2010

38 W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc. PRIMEA MEAs for Transportation, 2003

39 Debe M K, Schmoeckel A K, Vernstrom G D, Atanasoski R. High voltage stability of nanostructured thin film catalysts for PEM fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 161(2): 1002–1011

40 Fuel Cell System Cost – 2015, DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record. 2015

41 Lee M, Uchida M, Yano H, Tryk D A, Uchida H, Watanabe M. New evaluation method for the effectiveness of platinum/carbon electrocatalysts under operating conditions. Electrochimica Acta, 2010, 55(28): 8504–8512

42 Borup R L, Meyers J, Pivovar B, Kim Y S, Mukundan R, Garland N, Myers D, Wilson M, Garzon F, Wood D, Zelenay P, More K, Stroh K, Zawodzinski T, Boncella J, McGrath J E, Inaba M, Miyatake K, Hori M, Ota K, Ogumi Z, Miyata S, Nishikata A, Siroma Z, Uchimoto Y, Yasuda K, Kimijima K, Iwashita N. Scientific aspects of polymer electrolyte fuel cell durability and degradation. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(10): 3904–3951

43 Jahnke T, Futter G, Latz A, Malkow T, Papakonstantinou G, Tsotridis G, Schott P, Gérard M, Quinaud M, Quiroga M, Franco A A, Malek K, Calle-Vallejo F, Ferreira de Morais R, Kerber T, Sautet P, Loffreda D, Strahl S, Serra M, Polverino P, Pianese C, Mayur M, Bessler W G, Kompis C. Performance and degradation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells: state of the art in modeling from atomistic to system scale. Journal of Power Sources, 2016, 304: 207–233

44 Strong A, Thornberry C, Beattie S, Chen R, Coles S R. Depositing catalyst layers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: a review. Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology, 2015, 12(6): 064001

45 Mauritz K A, Moore R B. State of Understanding of Nafion. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(10): 4535–4586

46 Wee J, Lee K, Kim S H. Fabrication methods for low-Pt-loading electrocatalysts in proton exchange membrane fuel cell systems. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 165(2): 667–677

47 Soboleva T, Zhao X, Malek K, Xie Z, Navessin T, Holdcroft S. On the micro-, meso-, and macroporous structures of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2010, 2(2): 375–384

48 Soboleva T, Malek K, Xie Z, Navessin T, Holdcroft S. PEMFC catalyst layers: the role of micropores and mesopores on water sorption and fuel cell activity. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2011, 3(6): 1827–1837

49 Malek K, Eikerling M, Wang Q, Navessin T, Liu Z. Self-organization in catalyst layers of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2007, 111(36): 13627–13634

50 Malek K, Mashio T, Eikerling M. Microstructure of catalyst layers in PEM fuel cells redefined: a computational approach. Electrocatalysis (New York), 2011, 2(2): 141–157

51 Lopez-Haro M, Guétaz L, Printemps T, Morin A, Escribano S, Jouneau P-H, Bayle-Guillemaud P, Chandezon F, Gebel G. Three-dimensional analysis of Nafion layers in fuel cell electrodes. Nature Communications, 2014

52 Guetaz L, Lopez-Haro M, Escribano S, Morin A, Gebel G, Cullen D A, More K L, Borup R L. Catalyst-Layer Ionomer Imaging of Fuel Cells. ECS Transactions, 2015, 69(17): 455–464

53 Boyer C, Gamburzev S, Velev O, Srinivasan S, Appleby A J. Measurements of proton conductivity in the active layer of PEM fuel cell gas diffusion electrodes. Electrochimica Acta, 1998, 43(24): 3703–3709

54 Makharia R, Mathias M F, Baker D R. Measurement of catalyst layer electrolyte resistance in PEFCs using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2005, 152(5): A970–A977

55 Liu Y, Murphy M, Baker D R, Gu W, Ji C, Jorne J, Gasteiger H A. Determination of electrode sheet resistance in cathode catalyst layer by AC impedance. ECS Transactions, 2007, 11(1): 473– 484

56 Liu Y, Ji C, Gu W, Baker D R, Jorne J, Gasteiger H A. Proton conduction in PEM fuel cell cathodes: effects of electrode thickness and ionomer equivalent weight. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2010, 157(8): B1154–B1162

57 Iden H, Ohma A, Shinohara K. Analysis of proton transport in pseudo catalyst layers. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2009, 156(9): B1078–B1084

58 Hess K C, Epting W K, Litster S. Spatially resolved, in situ potential measurements through porous electrodes as applied to fuel cells. Analytical Chemistry, 2011, 83(24): 9492–9498

59 Karan K. Determination of CL Ionomer Conductivity. ECS Transactions, 2013, 50(2): 395–403

60 Paul D K, Fraser A, Karan K. Towards the understanding of proton conduction mechanism in PEMFC catalyst layer: conductivity of adsorbed Nafion films. Electrochemistry Communications, 2011, 13(8): 774–777

61 Paul D K, McCreery R, Karan K. Proton transport property in supported Nafion nanothin films by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2014, 161(14): F1395–F1402

62 Ono Y, Nagao Y. Interfacial structure and proton conductivity of Nafion at the Pt-deposited surface. Langmuir, 2016, 32(1): 352–358

63 Kusoglu A, Kwong A, Clark K T, Gunterman H P, Weber A Z. Water uptake of fuel-cell catalyst layers. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(9): F530–F535

64 Fukuyama Y, Shiomi T, Kotaka T, Tabuchi Y. The impact of platinum reduction on oxygen transport in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 117: 367–378

65 Suzuki T, Kudo K, Morimoto Y. Model for investigation of oxygen transport limitation in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 222: 379–389

66 Owejan J P, Owejan J E, Gu W. Impact of platinum loading and catalyst layer structure on PEMFC performance. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2013, 160(8): F824–F833

67 Liu H, Epting W K, Litster S. Gas transport resistance in polymer electrolyte thin films on oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. Langmuir, 2015, 31(36): 9853–9858

68 Jinnouchi R, Kudo K, Kitano N, Morimoto Y. Molecular dynamics simulations on O₂ permeation through nafion ionomer on platinum surface. Electrochimica Acta, 2016, 188: 767–776

69 Nonoyama N, Okazaki S, Weber A Z, Ikogi Y, Yoshida T. Analysis of oxygen-transport diffusion resistance in proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(4): B416

70 Sabharwal M, Pant L M, Putz A, Susac D, Jankovic J, Secanell M. Analysis of catalyst layer microstructures: from imaging to performance. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2016, 16(6): 734–753

71 Giner J, Hunter C. The Mechanism of operation of the Teflon-bonded gas diffusion electrode: a mathematical model. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1969, 116(8): 1124–1130

72 Iczkowski R P, Cutlip M B. Voltage loss in fuel cell cathodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1980, 127(7): 1433–1440

73 Ridge S J, White R E, Tsou Y. Oxygen reduction in a proton exchange membrane test cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1989, 136(7): 1902–1909

74 Celiker H, Alsaleh M A, Gultekin S. A mathematical model for the performance of raney metal gas diffusion electrodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1991, 138(6): 1671–1681

75 Broka K, Ekdunge P. Modelling the PEM fuel cell cathode. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1997, 27(3): 281–289

76 Ihonen J, Jaouen F, Lindbergh G, Lundblad A, Sundholm G. Investigation of mass-transport limitation in the solid polymer fuel cell cathode. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2002, 149(4): A448–A454

77 Sun W, Peppley B A, Karan K. An improved two-dimensional agglomerate cathode model to study the influence of catalyst layer structural parameters. Electrochimica Acta, 2005, 50(16–17): 3359–3374

78 Kamarajugadda S, Mazumder S. Numerical investigation of the effect of cathode catalyst layer structure and composition on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 183(2): 629–642

79 Siegel N P, Ellis M W, Nelson D J, von Spakovsky M R. Single domain PEMFC model based on agglomerate catalyst geometry. Journal of Power Sources, 2003, 115(1): 81–89

80 Yin K M. Parametric study of proton-exchange-membrane fuel cell cathode using an agglomerate model. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2005, 152(3): A583–A593

81 Secanell M, Songprakorp R, Suleman A, Djilali N. Multi-objective optimization of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell membrane electrode assembly. Energy & Environmental Science, 2008, 1(3): 378–388

82 Secanell M, Karan K, Suleman A, Djilali N. Multivariable optimization of PEMFC cathodes using an agglomerate model. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 52(22): 6318–6337

83 Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm N, Fesanghary M, Fushinobu K, Okazaki K. A study of the agglomerate catalyst layer for the cathode side of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell: modelling and optimization. Electrochimica Acta, 2012, 60: 55–65

84 Rao R M, Bhattacharyya D, Rengaswamy R, Choudhury S R. A two-dimensional steady state model including the effect of liquid water for a PEM fuel cell cathode. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 173(1): 375–393

85 Eikerling M. Water management in cathode catalyst layers of PEM fuel cells a structure-based model. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2006, 153(3): E58

86 Liu J, Eikerling M. Model of cathode catalyst layers for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: the role of porous structure and water accumulation. Electrochimica Acta, 2008, 53(13): 4435–4446

87 Jain P, Biegler L T, Jhon M S. Sensitivity of PEFC models to cathode layer microstructure. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2010, 157(8): B1222–B1229

88 Epting W K, Litster S. Effects of an agglomerate size distribution on the PEFC agglomerate model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(10): 8505–8511

89 Cetinbas F C, Advani S G, Prasad A K. A modified agglomerate model with discrete catalyst particles for the PEM fuel cell catalyst layer. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2013, 160(8): F750–F756

90 Wang Q, Eikerling M, Song D. Structure and performance of different types of agglomerates in cathode catalyst layer of PEM fuel cells. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2004, 573(1): 61–69

91 Xia Z, Wang Q, Eikerling M, Liu Z. Effectiveness factor of Pt utilization in cathode catalyst layer of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 2008, 86(7): 657–667

92 Sadeghi E, Putz A, Eikerling M. Hierarchical model of reaction rate distributions and effectiveness factors in catalyst layers of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2013, 160(10): F1159–F1169

93 Sadeghi E, Putz A, Eikerling M. Effects of ionomer coverage on agglomerate effectiveness in catalyst layers of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 2014, 18(5): 1271–1279

94 Zenyuk I V, Litster S. Modelling ion conduction and electrochemical reactions in water films on thin-film metal electrodes with application to low temperature fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 146(10): 194–206

95 Kotoi R, Inoue G, Kawase M. Reaction and mass transport simulation of polymer electrolyte fuel cell for the analysis of the key factors affecting the output performance in the catalyst layer. ECS Transactions, 2016, 75(14): 385–392

96 Perry M L, Newman J, Cairns E J. Mass transport in gas-diffusion electrodes: a diagnostic tool for fuel-cell cathodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1998, 145(1): 5–15

97 Lin G, He W, van Nguyen T. Modelling liquid water effects in the gas diffusion and catalyst layers of the cathode of a PEM fuel cell. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2004, 151(12): A1999–A2006

98 Madhusudana Rao R, Rengaswamy R. Dynamic characteristics of spherical agglomerate for study of cathode catalyst layers in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC). Journal of Power Sources, 2006, 158(1): 110–123

99 Harvey D, Pharoah J G, Karan K. A comparison of different approaches to modelling the PEMFC catalyst layer. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 179(1): 209–219

100 Das P K, Li X, Liu Z S. A three-dimensional agglomerate model for the cathode catalyst layer of PEM fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 179(1): 186–199

101 Ma S, Solterbeck C H, Odgaard M, Skou E. Microscopy studies on pronton exchange membrane fuel cell electrodes with different ionomer contents. Applied Physics A, Materials Science & Processing, 2009, 96(3): 581–589

102 Yoon W, Weber A Z. Modelling low-platinum-loading effects in fuel-cell catalyst layers. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(158): B1007–B1018

103 Jomori S, Nonoyama N, Yoshida T. Analysis and modelling of PEMFC degradation: effect on oxygen transport. Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 215: 18–27

104 Dobson P, Lei C, Navessin T, Secanell M. Characterization of the PEM fuel cell catalyst layer microstructure by nonlinear least-squares parameter estimation. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(5): B514–B523

105 Cetinbas F C, Advani S G, Prasad A K. Three dimensional proton exchange membrane fuel cell cathode model using a modified agglomerate approach based on discrete catalyst particles. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 250(3): 110–119

106 Moore M, Wardlaw P, Dobson P, Boisvert J J, Putz A, Spiteri R J, Secanell M. Understanding the effect of kinetic and mass transport processes in cathode agglomerates. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2014, 161(8): E3125–E3137

107 Hao L, Moriyama K, Gu W, Wang C Y. Modelling and experimental validation of Pt loading and electrode composition effects in PEM fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2015, 162(8): F854–F867

108 Weber M F, Mamicheafara S, Dignam M J. Sputtered fuel cell electrodes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1987, 134(6): 1416–1419

109 O’Hayre R, Lee S J, Cha S, Prinz F B. A sharp peak in the performance of sputtered platinum fuel cells at ultra-low platinum loading. Journal of Power Sources, 2002, 109(2): 483–493

110 Bonakdarpour A, Stevens K, Vernstrom G D, Atanasoski R, Schmoeckel A K, Debe M K, Dahn J R. Oxygen reduction activity of Pt and Pt-Mn-Co electrocatalysts sputtered on nano-structured thin film support. Electrochimica Acta, 2007, 53(2): 688–694

111 Gasda M D, Teki R, Lu T M, Koratkar N, Eisman G A, Gall D. Sputter-deposited Pt PEM fuel cell electrodes: particles vs. layers. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2009, 156(5): B614–B619

112 Cavarroc M, Ennadjaoui A, Mougenot M, Brault P, Escalier R, Tessier Y, Durand J, Roualdès S, Sauvage T, Coutanceau C. Performance of plasma sputtered fuel cell electrodes with ultra-low Pt loadings. Electrochemistry Communications, 2009, 11(4): 859–861

113 Schwanitz B, Schulenburg H, Horisberger M, Wokaun A, Scherer G G. Stability of ultra-low Pt anodes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells prepared by magnetron sputtering. Electrocatalysis (New York), 2011, 2(1): 35–41

114 Schwanitz B, Rabis A, Horisberger M, Scherer G G, Schmidt T J. Sputtered cathodes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells: insights into potentials, challenges and limitations. Chimia, 2012, 66(3): 110–119

115 Mei W, Fukazawa T, Nakano Y, Akasaka Y, Naito K. Development of alternated catalyst layer structure for PEM fuel cells. ECS Transactions, 2013, 50(2): 1377–1384

116 Mei W, Fukazawa T, Yang T, Yoshinaga N, Kanai Y. Application of modified-ACLS electrodes on low-platinum PEFCs. ECS Transactions, 2015, 69(17): 755–759

117 Sievers G, Mueller S, Quade A, Steffen F, Jakubith S, Kruth A, Brueser V. Mesoporous Pt–Co oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts for low temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell synthesized by alternating sputtering. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 268: 255–260

118 Çögenli M S, Mukerjee S, Yurtcan A B. Membrane electrode assembly with ultra low platinum loading for cathode electrode of PEM fuel cell by using sputter deposition. Fuel Cells (Weinheim), 2015, 15(2): 288–297

119 Stucki S, Menth A. Industrial water electrolysis. In: Srinivasan S, Salzano F J, Landgrebe A Reds. The Electrochemical Society Softbound Proceedings Series, Pennington, USA, 1978, 180–185

120 McBreen J. Voltammetric studies of electrodes in contact with ionomeric membranes. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1985, 132(5): 1112–1116

121 Tu W, Liu W, Cha C, Wu B L. Study of the powder/membrane interface by using the powder microelectrode technique I. The Pt-black/Nafion^® interfaces. Electrochimica Acta, 1998, 43(24): 3731–3739

122 Paulus U A, Veziridis Z, Schnyder B, Kuhnke M, Scherer G G, Wokaun A. Fundamental investigation of catalyst utilization at the electrode/solid polymer electrolyte interface: Part I. Development of a model system. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2003, 541: 77–91

123 Jiang J, Yi B. Thickness effects of a carbon-supported platinum catalyst layer on the electrochemical reduction of oxygen in sulfuric acid solution. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2005, 577(1): 107–115

124 Tominaka S, Wu C, Kuroda K, Osaka T. Electrochemical analysis of perpendicular mesoporous Pt electrode filled with pure water for clarifying the active region in fuel cell catalyst layers. Journal of Power Sources, 2010, 195(8): 2236–2240

125 Thompson E L, Baker D. Proton conduction on ionomer-free Pt surfaces. ECS Transactions, 2011, 41(1): 709–720

126 An S J, Litster S. In Situ, ionic conductivity measurement of ionomer/binder-free Pt catalyst under fuel cell operating condition. ECS Transactions, 2013, 58(1): 427–441

127 Debe M K, Steinbach A J. An empirical model for the flooding behavior of ultra-thin PEM fuel cell electrodes. ECS Transactions, 2007, 11(1): 659–673

128 Steinbach A J, Debe M K, Wong J. A new paradigm for PEMFC ultra-thin electrode water management at low temperatures. ECS Transactions, 2010, 33(1): 1179–1188

129 Steinbach A J, Debe M K, Pejsa M J. Influence of anode GDL on PEMFC ultra-thin electrode water management at low temperatures. ECS Transactions, 2011, 41(1): 449–457

130 Debe M K, Atanasoski R T, Steinbach A J. Nanostructured thin film electrocatalysts-current status and future potential. ECS Transactions, 2011, 41(1): 937–954

131 Kongkanand A, Dioguardi M, Ji C, Thompson E L. Improving operational robustness of NSTF electrodes in PEM fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(8): F405– F411

132 Sinha P K, Gu W, Kongkanand A, Thompson E. Performance of nano structured thin film (NSTF) electrodes under partially-humidified conditions. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(7): B831–B840

133 Kongkanand A, Owejan J E, Moose S, Dioguardi M, Biradar M, Makharia R. Development of dispersed-catalyst/NSTF hybrid electrode. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2012, 159(11): F676–F682

134 Kongkanand A, Sinha P K. Load transients of nanostructured thin film electrodes in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(6): B703–B711

135 Chan K, Eikerling M. A pore-scale model of oxygen reduction in ionomer-free catalyst layers of PEFCs. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158(1): B18–B28

136 Petrii O A. Zero charge potentials of platinum metals and electron work functions. Russian Journal of Electrochemistry, 2013, 49(5): 401–422

137 Zenyuk I V, Litster S. Modelling ion conduction and electrochemical reactions in water films on thin-film metal electrodes with application to low temperature fuel cells. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 146: 194–206

138 Frumkin A N, Petrii O A. Potentials of zero total and zero free charge of platinum group metals. Electrochimica Acta, 1975, 20(5): 347–359

139 Garcia-Araez N, Climent V, Feliu J M. Potential-dependent water orientation on Pt(111), Pt(100), and Pt(110), as inferred from laser-pulsed experiments. electrostatic and chemical effects. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(21): 9290–9304

140 Huang J, Malek A, Zhang J, Eikerling M H. Non-monotonic surface charging behavior of platinum: a paradigm change. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(25): 13587–13595

141 Huang J, Zhang J, Eikerling M. Theory of electrostatic phenomena in water-filled Pt nanopores. Faraday Discussions, 2016, 193: 427–446

142 Huang J, Zhang J, Eikerling M H. Particle proximity effect in nanoparticle electrocatalysis: surface charging and electrostatic interactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(9): 4806–4815

143 Das P K, Weber A Z. Water management in PEMFC with ultra-thin catalyst-layers. ASME 2013 11th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology collocated with the ASME 2013 Heat Transfer Summer Conference and the ASME 2013 7th International Conference on Energy Sustainability. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013

144 Das P K, Santamaria A D, Weber A Z. Role of GDL surface wettability and operating conditions in liquid-water removal from NSTF catalyst layers. ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014

145 Zenyuk I V, Das P K, Weber A Z. Understanding impacts of catalyst-layer thickness on fuel-cell performance via mathematical modelling. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016, 163(7): F691–F703

146 Chan K, Eikerling M. Water balance model for polymer electrolyte fuel cells with ultrathin catalyst layers. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2014, 16(5): 2106–2117

147 Furuya Y, Iden H, Mashio T, Ohma A, Shinohara K. Effect of ionomer coverage on Pt-based catalyst on ORR activity. The Electrochemical Society, 2012 (40): 1522–1522

148 Modestov A D, Kapustin A V, Avakov V B, Landgraf I K, Tarasevich M R. Cathode catalyst layers with ionomer to carbon mass ratios in the range 0–2 studied by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and performance measurements. Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 272: 735–742

149 Dong B, Gwee L, Salas-de La Cruz D, Winey K I, Elabd Y A. Super proton conductive high-purity Nafion nanofibers. Nano Letters, 2010, 10(9): 3785–3790

150 Nouri-Khorasani A, Malek K, Malek A, Mashio T, Wilkinson D P, Eikerling M H. Molecular modelling of the proton density distribution in a water-filled slab-like nanopore bounded by Pt oxide and ionomer. Catalysis Today, 2016, 262: 133–140

151 Eslamibidgoli M J, Huang J, Kadyk T, Malek A, Eikerling M. How theory and simulation can drive fuel cell electrocatalysis. Nano Energy, 2016, 29: 334–361

152 Muzaffar T, Kadyk T, Eikerling M. Physical modelling of the proton density in nanopores of PEM fuel cells catalyst layers. Electrochimica Acta, 2017, 245: 1048–1058