An approach to locational marginal price based zonal congestion management in deregulated electricity market
Received date: 14 Aug 2015
Accepted date: 08 Nov 2015
Published date: 27 May 2016
Copyright
Congestion of transmission line is a vital issue and its management pose a technical challenge in power system deregulation. Congestion occurs in deregulated electricity market when transmission capacity is not sufficient to simultaneously accommodate all constraints of power transmission through a line. Therefore, to manage congestion, a locational marginal price (LMP) based zonal congestion management approach in a deregulated electricity market has been proposed in this paper. As LMP is an economic indicator and its difference between two buses across a transmission line provides the measure of the degree of congestion, therefore, it is efficiently and reliably used in deregulated electricity market for congestion management. This paper utilizes the difference of LMP across a transmission line to categorize various congestion zones in the system. After the identification of congestion zones, distributed generation is optimally placed in most congestion sensitive zones using LMP difference in order to manage congestion. The performance of the proposed methodology has been tested on the IEEE 14-bus system and IEEE 57-bus system.
Md SARWAR , Anwar Shahzad SIDDIQUI . An approach to locational marginal price based zonal congestion management in deregulated electricity market[J]. Frontiers in Energy, 2016 , 10(2) : 240 -248 . DOI: 10.1007/s11708-016-0404-z
1 |
Christie R D, Wollenberg B F, Wangensteen I. Transmission management in the deregulated environment. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2000, 88(2): 170–195
|
2 |
Kumar A, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. Congestion management in competitive power market: a bibliographical survey. Electric Power Systems Research, 2005, 76(1-3): 153–164
|
3 |
Lo K L, Yuen Y S, Snider L A. Congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. London, UK, 2000, 47–52
|
4 |
Dutta S, Singh S P. Optimal rescheduling of generators for congestion management based on particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(4): 1560–1569
|
5 |
Siddiqui A S, Sarwar M, Ahsan S. Congestion Management using improved inertia weight particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE Power India International Conference (PIICON). New Delhi, India, 2014, 1–5
|
6 |
Fang R S, David A K. Transmission congestion management in an electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 877–883
|
7 |
Fang R S, David A K. Optimal dispatch under transmission contracts. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(2): 732–737
|
8 |
Singh S N, David A K. Optimal location of FACTS devices for congestion management. Electric Power Systems Research, 2001, 58(2): 71–79
|
9 |
Acharya N, Mithulananthan N. Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(3-4): 352–360
|
10 |
Afkousi-Paqaleh M, Abbaspour-Tehrani Fard A, Rashidinejad M. Distributed generation placement for congestion management considering economical and financial issues. Electrical Engineering, 2010, 92(6): 193–201
|
11 |
Yu C N, Ilic M D. Congestion clusters-based markets for transmission management. In: Winter Meeting of IEEE Power Engineering Society. New York, USA, 1999, 1–11
|
12 |
Kumar A, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(1): 554–562
|
13 |
Kumar A, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. A zonal congestion management approach using ac transmission congestion distribution factors. Electric Power Systems Research, 2004, 72(1): 85–93
|
14 |
Fu Y, Li Z. Different models and properties on LMP calculations. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, Canada, 2006, 1–9
|
15 |
Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z. Market Operations in Electric Power Systems. New York: Wiley, 2002
|
16 |
Jain R, Siddiqui A S, Jamil M, Gupta C P, Preeti. A strategy for FTR bidding in deregulated electricity markets. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2014, 1–12
|
17 |
Rahimi F, Ipakchi A. Demand response as a market resource under smart grid paradigm. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2010, 1(1): 82–88
|
18 |
De Oliveira E I, Marangon Lima I W, De Almeida K C. Allocation of FACTS devices in hydro-thermal systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 276–282
|
19 |
Gautam D, Mithulananthan N. Optimal DG placement in deregulated electricity market. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(12): 1627–1636
|
20 |
Singh K, Yadav V K, Padhy N P, Sharma J. Congestion management considering optimal placement of distributed generator in deregulated power system networks. Electric Power Components and Systems, 2014, 42(1): 13–22
|
/
〈 | 〉 |