An approach to locational marginal price based zonal congestion management in deregulated electricity market

Md SARWAR, Anwar Shahzad SIDDIQUI

PDF(570 KB)
PDF(570 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (2) : 240-248. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-016-0404-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

An approach to locational marginal price based zonal congestion management in deregulated electricity market

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Congestion of transmission line is a vital issue and its management pose a technical challenge in power system deregulation. Congestion occurs in deregulated electricity market when transmission capacity is not sufficient to simultaneously accommodate all constraints of power transmission through a line. Therefore, to manage congestion, a locational marginal price (LMP) based zonal congestion management approach in a deregulated electricity market has been proposed in this paper. As LMP is an economic indicator and its difference between two buses across a transmission line provides the measure of the degree of congestion, therefore, it is efficiently and reliably used in deregulated electricity market for congestion management. This paper utilizes the difference of LMP across a transmission line to categorize various congestion zones in the system. After the identification of congestion zones, distributed generation is optimally placed in most congestion sensitive zones using LMP difference in order to manage congestion. The performance of the proposed methodology has been tested on the IEEE 14-bus system and IEEE 57-bus system.

Keywords

locational marginal price (LMP) / distributed generation / pool market / deregulated electricity market / congestion management

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Md SARWAR, Anwar Shahzad SIDDIQUI. An approach to locational marginal price based zonal congestion management in deregulated electricity market. Front. Energy, 2016, 10(2): 240‒248 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-016-0404-z

References

[1]
Christie R D, Wollenberg B F, Wangensteen I. Transmission management in the deregulated environment. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2000, 88(2): 170–195
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Kumar A, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. Congestion management in competitive power market: a bibliographical survey. Electric Power Systems Research, 2005, 76(1-3): 153–164
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Lo K L, Yuen Y S, Snider L A. Congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies. London, UK, 2000, 47–52
[4]
Dutta S, Singh S P. Optimal rescheduling of generators for congestion management based on particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008, 23(4): 1560–1569
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Siddiqui A S, Sarwar M, Ahsan S. Congestion Management using improved inertia weight particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE Power India International Conference (PIICON). New Delhi, India, 2014, 1–5
[6]
Fang R S, David A K. Transmission congestion management in an electricity market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(3): 877–883
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Fang R S, David A K. Optimal dispatch under transmission contracts. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1999, 14(2): 732–737
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Singh S N, David A K. Optimal location of FACTS devices for congestion management. Electric Power Systems Research, 2001, 58(2): 71–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Acharya N, Mithulananthan N. Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(3-4): 352–360
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Afkousi-Paqaleh M, Abbaspour-Tehrani Fard A, Rashidinejad M. Distributed generation placement for congestion management considering economical and financial issues. Electrical Engineering, 2010, 92(6): 193–201
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Yu C N, Ilic M D. Congestion clusters-based markets for transmission management. In: Winter Meeting of IEEE Power Engineering Society. New York, USA, 1999, 1–11
[12]
Kumar A, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. A zonal congestion management approach using real and reactive power rescheduling. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2004, 19(1): 554–562
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Kumar A, Srivastava S C, Singh S N. A zonal congestion management approach using ac transmission congestion distribution factors. Electric Power Systems Research, 2004, 72(1): 85–93
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Fu Y, Li Z. Different models and properties on LMP calculations. In: IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, Montreal, Canada, 2006, 1–9
[15]
Shahidehpour M, Yamin H, Li Z. Market Operations in Electric Power Systems. New York: Wiley, 2002
[16]
Jain R, Siddiqui A S, Jamil M, Gupta C P, Preeti. A strategy for FTR bidding in deregulated electricity markets. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2014, 1–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Rahimi F, Ipakchi A. Demand response as a market resource under smart grid paradigm. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2010, 1(1): 82–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
De Oliveira E I, Marangon Lima I W, De Almeida K C. Allocation of FACTS devices in hydro-thermal systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2000, 15(1): 276–282
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Gautam D, Mithulananthan N. Optimal DG placement in deregulated electricity market. Electric Power Systems Research, 2007, 77(12): 1627–1636
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Singh K, Yadav V K, Padhy N P, Sharma J. Congestion management considering optimal placement of distributed generator in deregulated power system networks. Electric Power Components and Systems, 2014, 42(1): 13–22
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(570 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/