Carbon footprint assessment for the waste management sector: A comparative analysis of China and Japan

Lu SUN, Zhaoling LI, Minoru FUJII, Yasuaki HIJIOKA, Tsuyoshi FUJITA

PDF(295 KB)
PDF(295 KB)
Front. Energy ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (3) : 400-410. DOI: 10.1007/s11708-018-0565-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Carbon footprint assessment for the waste management sector: A comparative analysis of China and Japan

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Waste management is becoming a crucial issue in modern society owing to rapid urbanization and the increasing generation of municipal solid waste (MSW). This paper evaluates the carbon footprint of the waste management sector to identify direct and indirect carbon emissions, waste recycling carbon emission using a hybrid life cycle assessment and input-output analysis. China and Japan was selected as case study areas to highlight the effects of different industries on waste management. The results show that the life cycle carbon footprints for waste treatment are 59.01 million tons in China and 7.01 million tons in Japan. The gap between these footprints is caused by the different waste management systems and treatment processes used in the two countries. For indirect carbon footprints, China’s material carbon footprint and depreciation carbon footprint are much higher than those of Japan, whereas the purchased electricity and heat carbon footprint in China is half that of Japan. China and Japan have similar direct energy consumption carbon footprints. However, CO2 emissions from MSW treatment processes in China (46.46 million tons) is significantly higher than that in Japan (2.72 million tons). The corresponding effects of waste recycling on CO2 emission reductions are considerable, up to 181.37 million tons for China and 96.76 million tons for Japan. Besides, measures were further proposed for optimizing waste management systems in the two countries. In addition, it is argued that the advanced experience that developed countries have in waste management issues can provide scientific support for waste treatment in developing countries such as China.

Keywords

waste management / waste recycling / carbon footprint / hybrid LCA

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lu SUN, Zhaoling LI, Minoru FUJII, Yasuaki HIJIOKA, Tsuyoshi FUJITA. Carbon footprint assessment for the waste management sector: A comparative analysis of China and Japan. Front. Energy, 2018, 12(3): 400‒410 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0565-z

References

[1]
Li Z, Dai H, Sun L, Xie Y, Liu Z, Wang P, Yabar H. Exploring the impacts of regional unbalanced carbon tax on CO2 emissions and industrial competitiveness in Liaoning province of China. Energy Policy, 2018, 113: 9–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
IPCC. Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report Summary for Policymakers. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2014
[3]
Gentil E, Christensen T H, Aoustin E. Greenhouse gas accounting and waste management. Waste Management & Research, 2009, 27(8): 696–706
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Sun L, Li H, Dong L, Fang K, Ren J, Geng Y, Fujii M, Zhang W, Zhang N, Liu Z. Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: a case of Liuzhou city, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 119: 78–88
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chen X, Fujita T, Ohnishi S, Fujii M, Geng Y. The impact of scale, recycling boundary, and type of waste on symbiosis and recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2012, 16(1): 129–141
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Jin R, Li B, Zhou T, Wanatowski D, Piroozfar A. An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 126: 86–98
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Berkel R V, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, Fujii M. Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. Environmental Science & Technology (ACS Publications), 2009, 43(5): 1271–1281
[8]
Fujii M, Fujita T, Chen X, Ohnishi S, Yamaguchi N. Smart recycling of organic solid wastes in an environmentally sustainable society. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2012, 63: 1–8
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Liang H, Dong L, Luo X, Ren J, Zhang N, Gao Z, Dou Y. Balancing regional industrial development: analysis on regional disparity of China’s industrial emissions and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 126: 223–235
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Brunner P H, Rechberger H. Waste to energy–key element for sustainable waste management. Waste management, 2015, 37: 3–12
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Generowicz A, Kulczycka J, Kowalski Z, Banach M. Assessment of waste management technology using BATNEEC options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92(4): 1314–1320
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Hoklis C, Sharp A. Comparison of GHG emission from municipal solid waste management technology in selected cities in Cambodia. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 931–932: 645–649
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Zhuang Y, Wu S W, Wang Y L, Wu W X, Chen Y X. Source separation of household waste: a case study in China. Waste Management, 2008, 28(10): 2022–2030
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Cheng H, Zhang Y, Meng A, Li Q. Municipal solid waste fueled power generation in China: a case study of waste-to-energy in Changchun city. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(21): 7509–7515
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Wen X, Luo Q, Hu H, Wang N, Chen Y, Jin J, Hao Y, Xu G, Li F, Fang W. Comparison research on waste classification between China and the EU, Japan, and the USA. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2014, 16(2): 321–334
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Dong H, Ohnishi S, Fujita T, Geng Y, Fujii M, Dong L. Achieving carbon emission reduction through industrial & urban symbiosis: a case of Kawasaki. Energy, 2014, 64: 277–286
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Long Y, Yoshida Y. Quantifying city-scale emission responsibility based on input-output analysis – insight from Tokyo, Japan. Applied Energy, 2018, 218: 349–360
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Schleussner C F, Rogelj J, Schaeffer M, Lissner T, Licker R, Fischer E M, Knutti R, Levermann A, Frieler K, Hare W. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nature Climate Change, 2016, 6(9): 827–835
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Guerrero LA, Maas G, Hogland W. Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste management, 2013, 33(1): 220–232
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Marshall R E, Farahbakhsh K. Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Management, 2013, 33(4): 988–1003
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Tan S T, Lee C T, Hashim H, Ho W S, Lim J S. Optimal process network for municipal solid waste management in Iskandar Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 71: 48–58
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Dong H, Geng Y, Xi F, Fujita T. Carbon footprint evaluation at industrial park level: a hybrid life cycle assessment approach. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 298–307
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistic Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistic Press, 2016
[24]
Wang Y, Zhu Q, Geng Y. Trajectory and driving factors for GHG emissions in the Chinese cement industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 53: 252–260
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
IPCC. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. 2014–9–21, http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/
[26]
Fujii M, Fujita T, Dong L, Lu C, Geng Y, Behera S K, Park H S, Chiu A S F. Possibility of developing low-carbon industries through urban symbiosis in Asian cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 114: 376–386
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Liu G, Hao Y, Dong L, Yang Z, Zhang Y, Ulgiati S. An emergy-LCA analysis of municipal solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 120: 131–143
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Yang N, Zhang H, Chen M, Shao L-M, He P-J. Greenhouse gas emissions from MSW incineration in China: impacts of waste characteristics and energy recovery. Waste Management, 2012, 32(12): 2552–2560
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Fujii M, Fujita T, Dong L, Lu C, Geng Y, Behera S K, Park H S, Chiu A S F. Possibility of developing low-carbon industries through urban symbiosis in Asian cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 114: 376–386
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Wang K, Wang C, Lu X, Chen J. Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China’s iron and steel industry. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(4): 2320–2335
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Gielen D, Moriguchi Y. CO2 in the iron and steel industry: an analysis of Japanese emission reduction potentials. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(10): 849–863
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Yanjia W, Chandler W. The Chinese nonferrous metals industry—energy use and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(11): 6475–6484
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Chung S S, Lo C W. Local waste management constraints and waste administrators in China. Waste Management, 2008, 28(2): 272–281
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Chen X, Geng Y, Fujita T. An overview of municipal solid waste management in China. Waste Management, 2010, 30(4): 716–724
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Eriksson O, Finnveden G, Ekvall T, Björklund A. Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: a comparison of waste incineration, biomass-and natural gas combustion. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(2): 1346–1362
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71461137008, 71325006, and 71311140172), the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (3K1709 and 3K163001) and Key Technology of IOT Big Data Platform for the Periodic Renting Electric Vehicles (No.16511105204).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(295 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/