Tuning the primary selective nanochannels of MOF thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes for efficient removal of hydrophobic endocrine disrupting compounds

Abstract

• PA layer properties tune the primary nanochannels in MIL-101(Cr) TFN NF membranes.

• The dense PA layer induced transition of primary nanochannels of TFN NF membranes.

• Nanochannels around MOF contributed to the improved flux with a loose PA structure.

• Nanochannels in MOFs dominated the separation performance with a dense PA structure.

Metal organic framework (MOF) incorporated thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes have the potential to enhance the removal of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs). In MOF-TFN membranes, water transport nanochannels include (i) pores of polyamide layer, (ii) pores in MOFs and (iii) channels around MOFs (polyamide-MOF interface). However, information on how to tune the nanochannels to enhance EDCs rejection is scarce, impeding the refinement of TFN membranes toward efficient removal of EDCs. In this study, by changing the polyamide properties, the water transport nanochannels could be confined primarily in pores of MOFs when the polyamide layer became dense. Interestingly, the improved rejection of EDCs was dependent on the water transport channels of the TFN membrane. At low monomer concentration (i.e., loose polyamide structure), the hydrophilic nanochannels of MIL-101(Cr) in the polyamide layer could not dominate the membrane separation performance, and hence the extent of improvement in EDCs rejection was relatively low. In contrast, at high monomer concentration (i.e., dense polyamide structure), the hydrophilic nanochannels of MIL-101(Cr) were responsible for the selective removal of hydrophobic EDCs, demonstrating that the manipulation of water transport nanochannels in the TFN membrane could successfully overcome the permeability and EDCs rejection trade-off. Our results highlight the potential of tuning primary selective nanochannels of MOF-TFN membranes for the efficient removal of EDCs.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Porous metal organic framework / Thin-film nanocomposite membrane / Primary selective nanochannels / Nanofiltration / Endocrine disrupting compounds

References

[1] Boo C, Wang Y, Zucker I, Choo Y, Osuji C O, Elimelech M (2018). High performance nanofiltration membrane for effective removal of perfluoroalkyl substances at high water recovery. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(13): 7279–7288

[2] Costa M, Klein C B (2006). Toxicity and carcinogenicity of chromium compounds in humans. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 36(2): 155–163

[3] Dai R, Guo H, Tang C Y, Chen M, Li J, Wang Z (2019). Hydrophilic selective nanochannels created by metal organic frameworks in nanofiltration membranes enhance rejection of hydrophobic endocrine-disrupting compounds. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(23): 13776–13783

[4] Dai R, Wang X, Tang C Y, Wang Z (2020). Dually charged MOF-Based thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane for enhanced removal of charged pharmaceutically active compounds. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(12): 7619–7628

[5] Ferey G (2005). A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusually large pore volumes and surface area. Science, 309(5743): 2040–2042

[6] Guo H, Deng Y, Tao Z, Yao Z, Wang J, Lin C, Zhang T, Zhu B, Tang C Y (2016). Does hydrophilic polydopamine coating enhance membrane rejection of hydrophobic endocrine-disrupting compounds. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 3(9): 332–338

[7] Guo H, Deng Y, Yao Z, Yang Z, Wang J, Lin C, Zhang T, Zhu B, Tang C Y (2017a). A highly selective surface coating for enhanced membrane rejection of endocrine disrupting compounds: Mechanistic insights and implications. Water Research, 121: 197–203

[8] Guo H, Yao Z, Yang Z, Ma X, Wang J, Tang C Y (2017b). A one-step rapid assembly of thin film coating using green coordination complexes for enhanced removal of trace organic contaminants by membranes. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(21): 12638–12643

[9] Hering J G, Ingold K M (2012). Water resources management: What should be integrated? Science, 336(6086): 1234–1235

[10] Hwang Y K, Hong D Y, Chang J S, Jhung S H, Seo Y K, Kim J, Vimont A, Daturi M, Serre C, Férey G (2008). Amine grafting on coordinatively unsaturated metal centers of MOFs: Consequences for catalysis and metal encapsulation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 120(22): 4212–4216

[11] Kang Y, Obaid M, Jang J, Kim I S (2019). Sulfonated graphene oxide incorporated thin film nanocomposite nanofiltration membrane to enhance permeation and antifouling properties. Desalination, 470: 114125

[12] Kimura K, Toshima S, Amy G, Watanabe Y (2004). Rejection of neutral endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) and pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) by RO membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 245(1–2): 71–78

[13] Lau W J, Gray S, Matsuura T, Emadzadeh D, Paul Chen J, Ismail A F (2015). A review on polyamide thin film nanocomposite (TFN) membranes: History, applications, challenges and approaches. Water Research, 80: 306–324

[14] Li J R, Sculley J, Zhou H C (2012). Metal–organic frameworks for separations. Chemical Reviews, 112(2): 869–932

[15] Li M, Liang S, Wu Y, Yang M, Huang X (2020). Cross-stacked super-aligned carbon nanotube/activated carbon composite electrodes for efficient water purification via capacitive deionization enhanced ultrafiltration. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 107

[16] Li Y, Chung T S, Cao C, Kulprathipanja S (2005). The effects of polymer chain rigidification, zeolite pore size and pore blockage on polyethersulfone (PES)-zeolite A mixed matrix membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 260(1–2): 45–55

[17] Liu D, Cabrera J, Zhong L, Wang W, Duan D, Wang X, Liu S, Xie Y (2021). Using loose nanofiltration membrane for lake water treatment: A pilot study. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(4): 69

[18] Luo J, Wan Y (2013). Effects of pH and salt on nanofiltration: A critical review. Journal of Membrane Science, 438: 18–28

[19] Luo Y, Guo W, Ngo H H, Nghiem L D, Hai F I, Zhang J, Liang S, Wang X C (2014). A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Science of the Total Environment, 473–474: 619–641

[20] Ma D, Han G, Peh S B, Chen S B (2017). Water-stable metal–organic framework UiO-66 for performance enhancement of forward osmosis membranes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56(44): 12773–12782

[21] Pacheco F A, Pinnau I, Reinhard M, Leckie J O (2010). Characterization of isolated polyamide thin films of RO and NF membranes using novel TEM techniques. Journal of Membrane Science, 358(1–2): 51–59

[22] Ranocchiari M, Bokhoven J A (2011). Catalysis by metal–organic frameworks: fundamentals and opportunities. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 13(14): 6388–6396

[23] Roepke T A, Snyder M J, Cherr G N (2005). Estradiol and endocrine disrupting compounds adversely affect development of sea urchin embryos at environmentally relevant concentrations. Aquatic Toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 71(2): 155–173

[24] Roilo D, Patil P N, Brusa R S, Miotello A, Aghion S, Ferragut R, Checchetto R (2017). Polymer rigidification in graphene based nanocomposites: Gas barrier effects and free volume reduction. Polymer, 121: 17–25

[25] Sadeghi I, Kronenberg J, Asatekin A (2018). Selective transport through membranes with charged nanochannels formed by scalable self-assembly of random copolymer micelles. ACS Nano, 12(1): 95–108

[26] Schäfer A I, Nghiem L D, Waite T D (2003). Removal of the natural hormone estrone from aqueous solutions using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(1): 182–188

[27] Shannon M A, Bohn P W, Elimelech M, Georgiadis J G, Mariñas B J, Mayes A M (2008). Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature, 452(7185): 301–310

[28] Sorribas S, Gorgojo P, Téllez C, Coronas J, Livingston A G (2013). High flux thin film nanocomposite membranes based on metal–organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 135(40): 15201–15208

[29] Steinle-Darling E, Litwiller E, Reinhard M (2010). Effects of sorption on the rejection of trace organic contaminants during nanofiltration. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(7): 2592–2598

[30] Szoke S, Patzay G, Weiser L (2003). Characteristics of thin-film nanofiltration membranes at various pH-values. Desalination, 151(2): 123–129

[31] Tan Z, Chen S, Peng X, Zhang L, Gao C (2018). Polyamide membranes with nanoscale Turing structures for water purification. Science, 360(6388): 518–521

[32] Tang C Y, Yang Z, Guo H, Wen J J, Nghiem L D, Cornelissen E (2018). Potable water reuse through advanced membrane technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(18): 10215–10223

[33] Verliefde A R D, Cornelissen E R, Heijman S G J, Hoek E M V, Amy G L, Bruggen B V, van Dijk J C (2009). Influence of solute−membrane affinity on rejection of uncharged organic solutes by nanofiltration membranes. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(7): 2400–2406

[34] Wang S, Bromberg L, Schreuder-Gibson H, Hatton T A (2013). Organophophorous ester degradation by Chromium(III) terephthalate metal–organic framework (MIL-101) chelated to N,N-Dimethylaminopyridine and related aminopyridines. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 5(4): 1269–1278

[35] Wu X, Cui X, Wu W, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang Z (2019). Elucidating ultrafast molecular permeation through well-defined 2D nanochannels of lamellar membranes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 58(51): 18524–18529

[36] Xu S, Liu L, Wang Y (2017). Network cross-linking of polyimide membranes for pervaporation dehydration. Separation and Purification Technology, 185: 215–226

[37] Yang S, Zhang K (2020). Few-layers MoS₂ nanosheets modified thin film composite nanofiltration membranes with improved separation performance. Journal of Membrane Science, 595: 117526

[38] Yin J, Kim E S, Yang J, Deng B (2012). Fabrication of a novel thin-film nanocomposite (TFN) membrane containing MCM-41 silica nanoparticles (NPs) for water purification. Journal of Membrane Science, 423–424: 238–246

[39] Zhang H, Hou J, Hu Y, Wang P, Ou R, Jiang L, Liu J Z, Freeman B D, Hill A J, Wang H (2018). Ultrafast selective transport of alkali metal ions in metal organic frameworks with subnanometer pores. Science Advances, 4(2): eaaq0066

[40] Zhang R, Liu Y, He M, Su Y, Zhao X, Elimelech M, Jiang Z (2016). Antifouling membranes for sustainable water purification: Strategies and mechanisms. Chemical Society Reviews, 45(21): 5888–5924

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press