Remediation of arsenic contaminated soil by sulfidated zero-valent iron

Abstract

• Sulfidation significantly enhanced As(V) immobilization in soil by zerovalent iron.

• S-ZVI promoted the conversion of exchangeable As to less mobile Fe-Mn bound As.

• Column test further confirmed the feasibility of sulfidated ZVI on As retention.

• S-ZVI amendment and magnetic separation markedly reduced TCLP leachability of As.

In this study, the influences of sulfidation on zero-valent iron (ZVI) performance toward As(V) immobilization in soil were systemically investigated. It was found that, compared to unamended ZVI, sulfidated ZVI (S-ZVI) is more favorable to immobilize As(V) in soil and promote the conversion of water soluble As to less mobile Fe-Mn bound As. Specifically, under the optimal S/Fe molar ratio of 0.05, almost all of the leached As could be sequestrated by>0.5 wt.% S-ZVI within 3 h. Although the presence of HA could decrease the desorption of As from soil, HA inhibited the reactivity of S-ZVI to a greater extent. Column experiments further proved the feasibility of applying S-ZVI on soil As(V) immobilization. More importantly, to achieve a good As retention performance, S-ZVI should be fully mixed with soil or located on the downstream side of As migration. The test simulating the flooding conditions in rice culture revealed there was also a good long-term stability of soil As(V) after S-ZVI remediation, where only 0.7% of As was desorbed after 30 days of incubation. Magnetic separation was employed to separate the immobilized As(V) from soil after S-ZVI amendment, where the separation efficiency was found to be dependent of the iron dosage, liquid to soil ratio, and reaction time. Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) tests revealed that the leachability of As from soil was significantly reduced after the S-ZVI amendment and magnetic separation treatment. All these findings provided some insights into the remediation of As(V)-polluted soil by ZVI.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Soil / As(V) / Sulfidation / Zero-valent iron / Magnetic separation

References

[1] Al-Abed S R, Jegadeesan G, Purandare J, Allen D (2007). Arsenic release from iron rich mineral processing waste: Influence of pH and redox potential. Chemosphere, 66(4): 775–782

[2] Anders M W, Bull R J, Cantor K P, Chakraborti D, Chen C J, Deangelo A B (2004). IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Lyon: IARC Press

[3] Bae S, Lee W (2014). Influence of riboflavin on nanoscale zero-valent iron reactivity during the degradation of carbon tetrachloride. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(4): 2368–2376

[4] Bang S, Johnson M D, Korfiatis G P, Meng X G (2005). Chemical reactions between arsenic and zero-valent iron in water. Water Research, 39(5): 763–770

[5] Bhattacharjee S, Ghoshal S (2018). Optimal design of sulfidated nanoscale zerovalent iron for enhanced trichloroethene degradation. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(19): 11078–11086

[6] Biterna M, Arditsoglou A, Tsikouras E, Voutsa D (2007). Arsenate removal by zero valent iron: Batch and column tests. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149(3): 548–552

[7] Buschmann J, Kappeler A, Lindauer U, Kistler D, Berg M, Sigg L (2006). Arsenite and arsenate binding to dissolved humic acids: Influence of pH, type of humic acid, and aluminum. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(19): 6015–6020

[8] Comba S, Di Molfetta A, Sethi R (2011). A comparison between field applications of nano-, micro-, and millimetric zero-valent iron for the remediation of contaminated aquifers. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 215(1–4): 595–607

[9] Das H K, Mitra A K, Sengupta P K, Hossain A, Islam F, Rabbani G H (2004). Arsenic concentrations in rice, vegetables, a fish in Bangladesh: A preliminary study. Environment International, 30(3): 383–387

[10] Dong J, Zhao Y S, Zhao R, Zhou R (2010). Effects of pH and particle size on kinetics of nitrobenzene reduction by zero-valent iron. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 22(11): 1741–1747

[11] Dou X M, Li R, Zhao B, Liang W Y (2010). Arsenate removal from water by zero-valent iron/activated carbon galvanic couples. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 182(1–3): 108–114

[12] Fan D, Anitori R P, Tebo B M, Tratnyek P G, Lezama Pacheco J S, Kukkadapu R K, Engelhard M H, Bowden M E, Kovarik L, Arey B W (2013). Reductive sequestration of pertechnetate (⁹⁹TcO₄^‒) by nano zerovalent iron (nZVI) transformed by abiotic sulfide. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(10): 5302–5310

[13] Fan D, Lan Y, Tratnyek P G, Johnson R L, Filip J, O’Carroll D M, Nunez Garcia A, Agrawal A (2017). Sulfidation of iron-based materials: A review of processes and implications for water treatment and remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(22): 13070–13085

[14] Guan X H, Yang H Y, Sun Y K, Qiao J L (2019). Enhanced immobilization of chromium(VI) in soil using sulfidated zero-valent iron. Chemosphere, 228: 370–376

[15] Guo X J, Yang Z, Liu H, Lv X F, Tu Q S, Ren Q D, Xia X H, Jing C Y (2015). Common oxidants activate the reactivity of zero-valent iron (ZVI) and hence remarkably enhance nitrate reduction from water. Separation and Purification Technology, 146: 227–234

[16] Han Y L, Yan W L (2016). Reductive dechlorination of trichloroethene by zero-valent iron nanoparticles: Reactivity enhancement through sulfidation treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(23): 12992–13001

[17] He C S, He D, Collins R N, Garg S, Mu Y, Waite T D (2018). Effects of good’s buffers and pH on the structural transformation of zero valent iron and the oxidative degradation of contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(3): 1393–1403

[18] He F, Zhao D, Paul C (2010). Field assessment of carboxymethyl cellulose stabilized iron nanoparticles for in situ destruction of chlorinated solvents in source zones. Water Research, 44(7): 2360–2370

[19] Huang S S, Xu C H, Shao Q Q, Wang Y H, Zhang B L, Gao B Y, Zhou W Z, Tratnyek P G (2018). Sulfide-modified zerovalent iron for enhanced antimonite sequestration: Characterization, performance, and reaction mechanisms. Chemical Engineering Journal, 338: 539–547

[20] Jones C A, Inskeep W P, Neuman D R (1997). Arsenic transport in contaminated mine tailings following liming. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26(2): 433–439

[21] Jung H B, Charette M A, Zheng Y (2009). Field, laboratory, and modeling study of reactive transport of groundwater arsenic in a coastal aquifer. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(14): 5333–5338

[22] Kögel-Knabner I, Amelung W, Cao Z H, Fiedler S, Frenzel P, Jahn R, Kalbitz K, Kolbl A, Schloter M (2010). Biogeochemistry of paddy soils. Geoderma, 157(1–2): 1–14

[23] Krol M M, Oleniuk A J, Kocur C M, Sleep B E, Bennett P, Xiong Z, O’Carroll D M (2013). A field-validated model for in situ transport of polymer-stabilized nZVI and implications for subsurface injection. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(13): 7332–7340

[24] Macur R E, Wheeler J T, Mcdermott T R, Inskeep W P (2001). Microbial populations associated with the reduction and enhanced mobilization of arsenic in mine tailings. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(18): 3676–3682

[25] Mak M S H, Rao P H, Lo I M C (2009). Effects of hardness and alkalinity on the removal of arsenic(V) from humic acid-deficient and humic acid-rich groundwater by zero-valent iron. Water Research, 43(17): 4296–4304

[26] O’Carroll D, Sleep B, Krol M, Boparai H, Kocur C (2013). Nanoscale zero valent iron and bimetallic particles for contaminated site remediation. Advances in Water Resources, 51: 104–122

[27] Peng X, Xi B D, Zhao Y, Shi Q T, Meng X G, Mao X H, Jiang Y H, Ma Z F, Tan W B, Liu H L, Gong B (2017). Effect of arsenic on the formation and adsorption property of ferric hydroxide precipitates in ZVI treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(17): 10100–10108

[28] Phenrat T, Hongkumnerd P, Suk-In J, Khum-In V (2019). Nanoscale zerovalent iron particles for magnet-assisted soil washing of cadmium-contaminated paddy soil: Proof of concept. Environmental Chemistry, 16(6): 446–458

[29] Rao P, Mak M S, Liu T, Lai K C, Lo I M (2009). Effects of humic acid on arsenic(V) removal by zero-valent iron from groundwater with special references to corrosion products analyses. Chemosphere, 75(2): 156–162

[30] Redman A D, Macalady D L, Ahmann D (2002). Natural organic matter affects arsenic speciation and sorption onto hematite. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(13): 2889–2896

[31] Su Y M, Adeleye A S, Huang Y X, Zhou X F, Keller A A, Zhang Y L (2016). Direct synthesis of novel and reactive sulfide-modified nano iron through nanoparticle seeding for improved cadmium-contaminated water treatment. Scientific Reports, 6, 24358

[32] Sun Y K, Guan X H, Wang J M, Meng X G, Xu C H, Zhou G M (2014). Effect of weak magnetic field on arsenate and arsenite removal from water by zerovalent iron: An XAFS investigation. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(12): 6850–6858

[33] Tang C L, Huang Y H, Zeng H, Zhang Z Q (2014). Reductive removal of selenate by zero-valent iron: The roles of aqueous Fe²⁺ and corrosion products, and selenate removal mechanisms. Water Research, 67: 166–174

[34] Tessier A, Campbell P G C, Bisson M (1979). Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace-metals. Analytical Chemistry, 51(7): 844–851

[35] Wang J, Wang P M, Gu Y, Kopittke P M, Zhao F J, Wang P (2019). Iron-manganese (oxyhydro)oxides, rather than oxidation of sulfides, determine mobilization of Cd during soil drainage in paddy soil systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(5): 2500–2508

[36] Zavala Y J, Duxbury J M (2008). Arsenic in rice: I. Estimating normal levels of total arsenic in rice grain. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(10): 3856–3860

[37] Zhou Z, Alhadidi Q, Quiñones Deliz K, Yamaguchi Greenslet H, Bonzongo J C (2020). Removal of oxyanion forming elements from contaminated soils through combined sorption onto zero-valent iron (ZVI) and magnetic separation: Arsenic and chromium as case studies. Soil & Sediment Contamination, 29(2): 180–191

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press