Effect of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater to methanogenic activity and microbial community

Guangqing Song, Hongbo Xi, Xiumei Sun, Yudong Song, Yuexi Zhou

PDF(450 KB)
PDF(450 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5) : 10. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-018-1056-5
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater to methanogenic activity and microbial community

Author information +
History +

Highlights

The inhibition ratio sharply increased with the increasing COD.

The absorbance of UV-vis at 420 nm showed a linear correlation with the SMA.

The molecular structure of EPS has changed when COD was 9585 mg/L.

Illumina Miseq sequencing was employed to reveal the microbial composition.

Abstract

The synthesis of 2-butenal, which is a vital raw material for the production of sorbic acid as a food preservative, generates some toxic by-products, so it is urgent to seek better detoxification strategies for the treatment of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater. In this study, batch experiments were carried out to investigate the inhibition effect of wastewater on the methanogenic activity. To understand the wastewater toxicity to anaerobic granular sludge, variations of the specific methanogenic activity (SMA) and extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) constituents at various wastewater CODs were investigated. Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectra and Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were employed to analyze the structure of the EPS. The results showed that the inhibitory ratio of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater was less than 8.4% on the anaerobic granular sludge when the CODs were less than 959 mg/L. However, the inhibitory ratio increased from 36.4% to 93.6% when CODs increased from 2396 mg/L to 9585 mg/L, with the SMA decreasing from 39.1 mL CH4/(gVSS·d) to 3.2 mL CH4/(gVSS·d). The diversity of the microbial community under various CODs was researched by Illumina 16S rRNA Miseq sequencing and the results demonstrated that ProteiniphilumPetrimonas and Syntrophobacter were the dominant bacteria genera in all sample. Regarding archaea, Methanobacterium was the most dominated archaea genera, followed by the Methanosaeta group in all samples. Moreover, the bacterial communities had changed obviously with increasing CODs, which indicated high CODs played a negative impact on the richness and diversity of bacterial community in the sludge samples.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

2-butenal manufacture wastewater / Methanogenic activity / Specific methanogenic activity (SMA) / Extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) / Microbial community

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Guangqing Song, Hongbo Xi, Xiumei Sun, Yudong Song, Yuexi Zhou. Effect of 2-butenal manufacture wastewater to methanogenic activity and microbial community. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1056-5

References

[1]
Aquino S F, Stuckey D C (2004). Soluble microbial products formation in anaerobic chemostats in the presence of toxic compounds. Water Research, 38(2): 255–266
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
Castello E, Santos C G Y, Iglesias T, Paolino G, Wenzel J, Borzacconi L, Etchebehere C (2009). Feasibility of biohydrogen production from cheese whey using a UASB reactor: Links between microbial community and reactor performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(14): 5674–5682
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chen S Y, Dong X Z (2005). Proteiniphilum acetatigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., from a UASB reactor treating brewery wastewater. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55(Pt 6): 2257–2261
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Cheng J Y, Kanjo Y, Suidan M T, Venosa A D (1996). Anaerobic biotransformation of 2,4-dinitrotoluene with ethanol as primary substrate: Mutual effect of the substrates on their biotransformation. Water Research, 30(2): 307–314
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Díaz E, Amils R, Sanz J L (2003). Molecular ecology of anaerobic granular sludge grown at different conditions. Water Science and Technology, 48(6): 57–64
Pubmed
[6]
Dong F, Zhao Q B, Zhao J B, Sheng G P, Tang Y, Tong Z H, Yu H Q, Li Y Y, Harada H (2010). Monitoring the restart-up of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor for the treatment of a soybean processing wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 101(6): 1722–1726
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
DuBois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A, Smith F (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28(3): 350–356
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Foladori P, Bruni L, Tamburini S (2014). Toxicant inhibition in activated sludge: fractionation of the physiological status of bacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 280: 758–766
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
Grabowski A, Tindall B J, Bardin V, Blanchet D, Jeanthon C (2005). Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 55(Pt 3): 1113–1121
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Gu A Z, Hedlund B P, Staley J T, Strand S E, Stensel H D (2004). Analysis and comparison of the microbial community structures of two enrichment cultures capable of reductively dechlorinating TCE and cis-DCE. Environmental Microbiology, 6(1): 45–54
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Ioannou L A, Li Puma G, Fatta-Kassinos D (2015). Treatment of winery wastewater by physicochemical, biological and advanced processes: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 286: 343–368
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner F O (2013). Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(1): e1
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Krakat N, Schmidt S, Scherer P (2011). Potential impact of process parameters upon the bacterial diversity in the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of beet silage. Bioresource Technology, 102(10): 5692–5701
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Li Y F, Shi J, Nelson M C, Chen P H, Graf J, Li Y B, Yu Z T (2016). Impact of different ratios of feedstock to liquid anaerobic digestion effluent on the performance and microbiome of solid-state anaerobic digesters digesting corn stover. Bioresource Technology, 200: 744–752
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Lin R C, Cheng J, Ding L K, Song W L, Zhou J H, Cen K F (2015). Sodium borohydride removes aldehyde inhibitors for enhancing biohydrogen fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 197: 323–328
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Liu C, Li H, Zhang Y Y, Si D D, Chen Q W (2016). Evolution of microbial community along with increasing solid concentration during high-solids anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Bioresource Technology, 216: 87–94
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Mizuno K, Morishita Y, Ando A, Tsuchiya N, Hirata M, Tanaka K (2012). Genus-specific and phase-dependent effects of nitrate on a sulfate-reducing bacterial community as revealed by dsrB-based DGGE analyses of wastewater reactors. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 28(2): 677–686
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Morgan J W, Forster C F, Evison L (1990). A comparative study of the nature of biopolymers extracted from anaerobic and activated sludges. Water Research, 24(6): 743–750
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Ohtsuki T, Sato K, Sugimoto N, Akiyama H, Kawamura Y (2012). Absolute quantitative analysis for sorbic acid in processed foods using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Analytica Chimica Acta, 734: 54–61
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Oliveira S V W B, Moraes E M, Adorno M A T, Varesche M B A, Foresti E, Zaiat M (2004). Formaldehyde degradation in an anaerobic packed-bed bioreactor. Water Research, 38(7): 1685–1694
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Owen W F, Stuckey D C, Healy Jr J B, Young L Y, McCarty P L (1979). Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research, 13(6): 485–492
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Pereira N S, Zaiat M (2009). Degradation of formaldehyde in anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (ASBBR). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(2-3): 777–782
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Shakoori A R, Makhdoom M, Haq R U (2000). Hexavalent chromium reduction by a dichromate-resistant gram-positive bacterium isolated from effluents of tanneries. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 53(3): 348–351
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Tran T, Bolto B, Gray S, Hoang M, Ostarcevic E (2007). An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane element used in a brackish water treatment plant. Water Research, 41(17): 3915–3923
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Venkiteshwaran K, Milferstedt K, Hamelin J, Fujimoto M, Johnson M, Zitomer D H (2017). Correlating methane production to microbiota in anaerobic digesters fed synthetic wastewater. Water Research, 110: 161–169
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Wang Y, Wang Q H, Li M, Yang Y N, He W, Yan G X, Guo S H (2016). An alternative anaerobic treatment process for treatment of heavy oil refinery wastewater containing polar organics. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 105: 44–51
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Wang Z C, Gao M C, Wang S, Xin Y J, Ma D, She Z L, Wang Z, Chang Q B, Ren Y (2014). Effect of hexavalent chromium on extracellular polymeric substances of granular sludge from an aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 251: 165–174
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Wang Z W, Wu Z C, Tang S J (2009). Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Research, 43(9): 2504–2512
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Wei D, Li M T, Wang X D, Han F, Li L S, Guo J, Ai L J, Fang L L, Liu L, Du B, Wei Q (2016). Extracellular polymeric substances for Zn (II) binding during its sorption process onto aerobic granular sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 301: 407–415
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Xie S B, Wu Y Q, Wang W T, Wang J S, Luo Z P, Li S Y (2014). Effects of acid/alkaline pretreatment and gamma-ray irradiation on extracellular polymeric substances from sewage sludge. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 97: 349–353
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Zhang D Q, Tan S K, Gersberg R M (2010). Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8): 1623–1633
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Zhang X W, Yue Q Y, Yue D T, Gao B Y, Wang X J (2015). Application of Fe0/C/Clay ceramics for decoloration of synthetic Acid Red 73 and Reactive Blue 4 wastewater by micro-electrolysis. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 9(3): 402–410
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zhao X G, Jiang G W, Li A, Li Y (2016). Technology, cost, a performance of waste-to-energy incineration industry in China. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55: 115–130
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zhu L, Qi H Y, Lv M L, Kong Y, Yu Y W, Xu X Y (2012). Component analysis of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) during aerobic sludge granulation using FTIR and 3D-EEM technologies. Bioresource Technology, 124: 455–459
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

We offer our appreciation to project supported by the China Special S&T Project on Treatment and Control of Water Pollution (2017ZX07402-002).

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1056-5 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(450 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/