Forecasting industrial emissions: a monetary approach vs. a physical approach

Yang DONG , Yi LIU , Jining CHEN , Yebin DONG , Benliang QU

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5) : 734 -742.

PDF (214KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (5) : 734 -742. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-012-0451-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Forecasting industrial emissions: a monetary approach vs. a physical approach

Author information +
History +
PDF (214KB)

Abstract

Forecasts of industrial emissions provide a basis for impact assessment and development planning. To date, most studies have assumed that industrial emissions are simply coupled to production value at a given stage of technical progress. It has been argued that the monetary method tends to overestimate pollution loads because it is highly influenced by market prices and fails to address spatial development schemes. This article develops a land use-based environmental performance index (L-EPI) that treats the industrial land areas as a dependent variable for pollution emissions. The basic assumption of the method is that at a planning level, industrial land use change can represent the change in industrial structure and production yield. This physical metric provides a connection between the state-of-the-art and potential impacts of future development and thus avoids the intrinsic pitfalls of the industrial Gross Domestic Product-based approach. Both methods were applied to examine future industrial emissions at the planning area of Dalian Municipality, North-west China, under a development scheme provided by the urban master plan. The results suggested that the L-EPI method is highly reliable and applicable for the estimation and explanation of the spatial variation associated with industrial emissions.

Keywords

industrial emissions / environmental performance index / spatial planning / industrial land use

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yang DONG, Yi LIU, Jining CHEN, Yebin DONG, Benliang QU. Forecasting industrial emissions: a monetary approach vs. a physical approach. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2012, 6(5): 734-742 DOI:10.1007/s11783-012-0451-6

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Mörtberg U M, Balfors B, Knol W C. Landscape ecological assessment: a tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 82(4): 457–470

[2]

Chávez-Zichinelli C A, MacGregor-Fors I, Rohana P T, Valdéz R, Romano M C, Schondube J E. Stress responses of the House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) to different urban land uses. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 98(3-4): 183–189

[3]

Che X Z, Shang J C, Wang J H. Strategic environmental assessment and its development in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2002, 22(2): 101–109

[4]

Kørnøv L. Strategic environmental assessment as catalyst of healthier spatial planning: the Danish guidance and practice. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2009, 29(1): 60–65

[5]

Liu Y, Chen J N, He W, Tong Q, Li W. Application of an uncertainty analysis approach to strategic environmental assessment for urban planning. Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 44(8): 3136–3141

[6]

Tao T, Tan Z, He X. Integrating environment into land-use planning through strategic environmental assessment in China: towards legal frameworks and operational procedures. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2007, 27(3): 243–265

[7]

Therivel R. Strategic environmental assessment of development plans in Great Britain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1998, 18(1): 39–57

[8]

Zhao N, Liu Y, Chen J N. Regional industrial production’s spatial distribution and water pollution control: a plant-level aggregation method for the case of a small region in China. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407(17): 4946–4953

[9]

Pauleit S, Duhme F. Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 52(1): 1–20

[10]

Peng B, Zhou S.Study on Land-Use Planning. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2003

[11]

Sadler B, Verheem R. Strategic Environmental Assessment: Status, Challenges and Future Direction. The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment, the EIA Commission of the Netherlands, 1996

[12]

Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Environmental Impact Assessment. Beijing: China Law Press, 2002

[13]

Stinchcombe K, Gibson R B. Strategic environmental assessment as a means of pursuing sustainability: ten advantages and ten challenges. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2001, 3(3): 343–372

[14]

Wu C F. Land-Use Planning. Beijing: Geological Press, 2000

[15]

Yan J.Land-Use Planning in China: Theory, Methodology and Strategy. Beijing: Economic Management Press, 2001

[16]

Zhu D, Ru J. Strategic environmental assessment in China: motivations, politics, and effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88(4): 615–626

[17]

Malcolm A, Zhang L, Linninger A A. Optimal regulations for sustainable chemical manufacturing. International Journal of Environment Pollution, 2007, 29(1/2/3): 144–164

[18]

Malcolm A, Zhang L, Linninger A A. Design of environmental regulatory policies for sustainable emission reduction. AlChE Journal, 2006, 52(8): 2792–2804

[19]

Lee D S, Pacyna J M. An industrial emissions inventory of calcium for Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 1999, 33(11): 1687–1697

[20]

dos Santos Lucon O, Moutinho dos Santos E. The HORUS model—inventory of atmospheric pollutant emissions from industrial combustion in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2005, 25(2): 197–214

[21]

Pham T B T, Manomaiphiboon K, Vongmahadlek C. Development of an inventory and temporal allocation profiles of emissions from power plants and industrial facilities in Thailand. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 397(1-3): 103–118

[22]

Akashi O, Hanaoka T, Matsuoka Y, Kainuma M. A projection for global CO2 emissions from the industrial sector through 2030 based on activity level and technology changes. 2011, Energy, 36(4): 1855–1867

[23]

Mingsheng C, Yulu G. The mechanism and measures of adjustment of industrial organization structure: the perspective of energy saving and emission reduction. Energy Procedia, 2011, 5: 2562–2567

[24]

Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim N A, Saidur R, Kazi S N. Energy savings and emissions reductions for rewinding and replacement of industrial motor. Energy, 2011, 36(1): 233–240

[25]

Liu L C, Fan Y, Wu G, Wei Y M. Using LMDI method to analyze the change of China’s industrial CO2 emissions from final fuel use: an empirical analysis. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(11): 5892–5900

[26]

Henriques J M FDantas F, Schaeffer R. Potential for reduction of CO2 emissions and a low-carbon scenario for the Brazilian industrial sector. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(4): 1946–1961

[27]

Zhao M, Tan L R, Zhang W, Ji M, Liu Y, Yu L. Decomposing the influencing factors of industrial carbon emissions in Shanghai using the LMDI method. Energy, 2010, 35(6): 2505–2510

[28]

Du B, Zheng M H, Tian H, Liu A, Huang Y, Li L, Ba T, Li N, Ren Y, Li Y, Dong S, Su G. Occurrence and characteristics of polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in stack gas emissions from industrial thermal processes. Chemosphere, 2010, 80(10): 1227–1233

[29]

Jin G Z, Lee S J, Park H, Lee J E, Shin S K, Chang Y S. Characteristics and emission factors of PCDD/Fs in various industrial wastes in South Korea. Chemosphere, 2009, 75(9): 1226–1231

[30]

Kim K H, Hong Y J, Pal R, Jeon E C, Koo Y S, Sunwoo Y. Investigation of carbonyl compounds in air from various industrial emission sources. Chemosphere, 2008, 70(5): 807–820

[31]

El-Fadel M, Zeinati M, Ghaddar N, Mezher T. Uncertainty in estimating and mitigating industrial related GHG emissions. Energy Policy, 2001, 29(12): 1031–1043

[32]

Bhanarkar A D, Rao P S, Gajghate D G, Nema P. Inventory of SO2, PM and toxic metals emissions from industrial sources in Greater Mumbai, India. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(21): 3851–3864

[33]

Li Y F, Zhang Y J, Cao G L, Liu J H, Barrie L A. Distribution of seasonal SO2 emissions from fuel combustion and industrial activities in Shanxi province, China, with 1/6°×1/4° longitude/latitude resolution. Atmospheric Environment, 1999, 33(2): 257–265

[34]

Tolmasquim M T, Cohen C, Szklo A S. CO2 emissions in the Brazilian industrial sector according to the integrated energy planning model (IEPM). Energy Policy, 2001, 29(8): 641–651

[35]

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the Republic of China. The Guidelines for Urban Planning Drawing Up. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House, 2005

[36]

Standing Committee of the National People's Congress. Urban and Rural Planning Law of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House, 2007

[37]

China’s Ministry of Construction. GB50137-2011: Standards for Urban Land Use Classification and Planning Construction. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2011

[38]

National Bureau of Statistics of China. GB/T4754-2002: Industrial Classification and Codes for National Economic Activities. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2002

[39]

Li D C, Yeh C W, Chang C J. An improved grey-based approach for early manufacturing data forecasting. Computer and Industrial Engineering, 2009, 57(4): 1161–1167

[40]

Lin C T, Yang S Y. Forecast of the output value of Taiwan’s optoelectronics industry using the grey forecasting model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2003, 70(2): 177–186

[41]

Mao M, Chirwa E C. Application of grey model GM (1,1) to vehicle fatality risk estimation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006, 73(5): 588–605

[42]

Xie D, Liu Y, Chen J N. Mapping urban environmental noise: a land use regression method. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 45(17): 7358–7364

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (214KB)

2784

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/