Microbial growth study of advanced foam control agents (FCAs) for fermentation process

Wenjing Qi , Xue Chen , Erica Frankel , Xinjie Tong , Zeyu Zhong

ENG. Chem. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) : 59

PDF (2354KB)
ENG. Chem. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (8) :59 DOI: 10.1007/s11705-026-2676-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Microbial growth study of advanced foam control agents (FCAs) for fermentation process
Author information +
History +
PDF (2354KB)

Abstract

Foam generation is a common occurrence in industrial processes involving liquids, gases, surfactants under agitation. In fermentation, uncontrolled foaming poses significant challenges, including broth loss, microbial contamination, and reduced product yields. Foam control agents (FCAs) are commonly employed to mitigate these issues without adversely affecting microbial viability. However, the performance of FCAs is highly sensitive to both manufacturing and application conditions, necessitating evaluation methods that closely replicate real-world fermentation environments. In this study, a commercial fermentation broth was used as the foaming medium, with continuous airflow applied using FOAMSCANTM equipment to simulate industrial conditions. The foam suppression efficiency and microbial compatibility of various polyglycol based FCAs—differing in molecular shape, cloud point, surface tension, viscosity, and specific gravity—were systematically investigated. Predictive models were developed to accurately estimate foam volume and microbial growth, offering valuable insights into the performance and biological safety of FCAs in fermentation processes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

foam control / fermentation / process / microorganism / polyglycol

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Wenjing Qi, Xue Chen, Erica Frankel, Xinjie Tong, Zeyu Zhong. Microbial growth study of advanced foam control agents (FCAs) for fermentation process. ENG. Chem. Eng., 2026, 20 (8) : 59 DOI:10.1007/s11705-026-2676-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Pelton R . A review of antifoam mechanisms in fermentation. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2002, 29(4): 149–154

[2]

Tiso T , Demling P , Karmainski T , Oraby A , Eiken J , Liu L , Bongartz P , Wessling M , Desmond P , Schmitz S . et al. Foam control in biotechnological processes—challenges and opportunities. Discover Chemical Engineering, 2024, 4(1): 2

[3]

Deotale S M , Dutta S , Moses J A , Anandharamakrishnan C . Foaming and defoaming—concepts and their significance in food and allied industries: a review. Discover Chemical Engineering, 2023, 3(1): 9

[4]

Fedorov A G , Pilon L . Glass foams: formation, transport properties, and heat, mass, and radiation transfer. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2002, 311(2): 154–173

[5]

Leuner H , Gerstenberg C , Lechner K , McHardy C , Rauh C , Repke J U . Overcoming unwanted foam in industrial processes of the chemical and food industry—an ongoing survey. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2020, 163: 281–294

[6]

Zhou Y , Zhang Y , Wang Y . Foam fractionation as an efficient method for the separation and recovery of surface-active compounds. ACS Omega, 2024, 9(12): 12345–12356

[7]

Sanchez S , Demain A L . Metabolic regulation of fermentation processes. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2002, 31(7): 895–906

[8]

Raj T , Chandrasekhar K , Kumar A N , Kim S H . Recent biotechnological trends in lactic acid bacterial fermentation for food processing industries. Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing, 2022, 2(1): 14–40

[9]

Ranghar S, Agrawal S, Agrawal P K. Microbial Interventions in Agriculture and Environment. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2019, 347–384

[10]

Kumari A, Kundu P K, Gupta M M, Bala K, Chandra S, Dutta R, Das A. Novel Feedstocks for Biofuels Production. Singapore: Springer Nature in Singapore, 2022, 65–116

[11]

Singh A, Pant D. Biofuels Production—Sustainability and Advances in Microbial Technologies. Cham: Springer, 2020

[12]

Etoc A , Delvigne F , Lecomte J P , Thonart P . Foam control in fermentation bioprocess. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2006, 130(1): 392–404

[13]

Tomtas P . Formation and elimination of foam in the technological process of potato starch production. Przemysl Spozywczy, 2019, 1(1): 26–32

[14]

Wang P , Ni H , Wang C , Wang R . Novel mechanical foam breaker based on self-oscillation for promoting the application of foam drilling technology. Chemical Engineering Science, 2018, 188: 121–131

[15]

Gallego-Juárez J A, Rodríguez G, Riera E, Cardoni A. Power Ultrasonics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015: 793–814

[16]

Ghildyal N P, Lonsane B K, Karanth N G. Advances in Applied Microbiology Volume 33. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988: 173–222

[17]

Vaghari H, Anarjan N, Najian Y, Jafarizadeh-Malmiri H. Essentials in Fermentation Technology. Cham: Springer, 2019: 85–103

[18]

Shanu K, Choudhary S, Kumari S, Anu K, Devi S. Recent Advances in Bioprocess Engineering and Bioreactor Design. Singapore: Springer Nature in Singapore, 2024, 139–169

[19]

Rose P K. Zero Waste Biorefinery. Singapore: Springer Nature in Singapore, 2022, 233–268

[20]

Allikian K, Edgar R, Syed R, Zhang S. Essentials in Fermentation Technology. Cham: Springer, 2019, 41–84

[21]

Don Whitley Scientific Limited. Rapid microbiological methods: rapid automated bacterial impedance technique (RABIT), 2019.

[22]

Kui L . Structure and performance of polyether defoamer. Fine and Specialty Chemicals, 2006, 14: 3–7

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

PDF (2354KB)

Supplementary files

Supplementary materials

170

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/