Machine learning and computational modeling informed cold-start design and optimization for proton exchange membrane fuel cells with cathode catalytic H2-O2 reaction heating
Sheng Yang , Jiaqin Zhu , Chengwei Deng , Wei Du , Feng Shao , Ming Gong , Litao Zhu
ENG. Chem. Eng. ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3) : 19
Machine learning and computational modeling informed cold-start design and optimization for proton exchange membrane fuel cells with cathode catalytic H2-O2 reaction heating
The start-up performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells in low-temperature environments directly affects their service life and market promotion prospects. However, it is still challenging to fully understand how different operating parameters synergistically intensify the cold startup efficiency of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. In this study, the cold-start performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells is optimized via cathode catalytic H2-O2 reaction heating, integrated with machine learning for key indicator prediction and multi-objective optimization for operating parameter screening. The proposed strategy achieves a temperature rise exceeding 30 °C without external load at –20 °C, suppressing the peak ice volume fraction in the cathode catalyst layer to 3.28 vol % and ensuring post-start stability. Machine learning models can predict key cold-start indicators with high precision. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis further reveals the complex nonlinear interactions between parameters and clarifies the key factors affecting cold-start performance. Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II optimization identifies Pareto-optimal solutions, demonstrating enhanced cold-start efficiency via synergistic regulation of reactant supply, temperature elevation, controlled anode back pressure, and coolant flow. These findings provide guidance for the engineering design and parameter regulation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells in cold-climate applications.
Proton exchange membrane fuel cell / cold-start performance / machine learning / multi-objective optimization / SHapley Additive exPlanations
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
Higher Education Press
Supplementary files
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |