Integrating the first- and second-generation bioethanol co-production from wheat and wheat straw process: techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment

Xingchen Yang , Zhenli Yan , Chaojun Du , Zigao Zhao , Yujie Chen , Haoran Wu , Huanhuan Zhang , Chun Chang

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (7) : 64

PDF (3172KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (7) : 64 DOI: 10.1007/s11705-025-2573-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Integrating the first- and second-generation bioethanol co-production from wheat and wheat straw process: techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment

Author information +
History +
PDF (3172KB)

Abstract

This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility and environmental implications of integrating first-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) bioethanol co-production using wheat grain and wheat straw (WS) as feedstocks. Three pretreatment methods—formic acid, sodium chlorite, and alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP)—were investigated, with AHP identified as the most industrially viable due to its mild conditions, high cellulose retention (73%), and reduced wastewater generation. The results indicated that the integrated 1G + 2G process exhibited high bioethanol production capacity (241300 t·y–1) and mass yield (22.74%) under the conditions of 1200 t·d–1 of wheat and 2000 t·d–1 of WS. Furthermore, an energy recovery potential of 60.51%, alongside a 60.65% reduction in CO2 emissions could be achieved. 1G + 2G process has a competitive minimum ethanol selling price (MESP: $431·t–1), high internal rate of return (37%), and return on investment (76%). Life cycle assessment highlighted terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (35%) and freshwater ecotoxicity potential (32%) as dominant environmental impacts, driven by nitrogen fertilizer use and fuel combustion efficiency. Sensitivity analysis showed feedstock costs and ethanol pricing as critical economic drivers, while reducing nitrogen fertilizer application and optimizing combustion efficiency were key to mitigating environmental burdens. This work provides actionable insights for advancing integrated biorefineries with enhanced yield, economic viability, and sustainability.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

biomass valorization / green chemistry / biofuel / biorefinery

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xingchen Yang, Zhenli Yan, Chaojun Du, Zigao Zhao, Yujie Chen, Haoran Wu, Huanhuan Zhang, Chun Chang. Integrating the first- and second-generation bioethanol co-production from wheat and wheat straw process: techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(7): 64 DOI:10.1007/s11705-025-2573-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

UnitedStates Department of Agriculture. China: Biofuels Annual. Technical Report CH2024-0100. 2024

[2]

Rusănescu C O , Ciobanu M , Rusănescu M , Dinculoiu R L . Pretreatments applied to wheat straw to obtain bioethanol. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(4): 1612

[3]

Li Y , Sun H , Zhang Y , Wang X , Gao M , Sun X , Wang Q . Research progress for co-production ethanol and biobased products. Industrial Crops and Products, 2024, 212: 118351

[4]

Fagundes V D , Machado Ê L , de Cássia de Souza Schneider R , Colla L M . Life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from banana, potato, and papaya waste. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29(10): 1846–1862

[5]

Long F , Liu H . An integration of machine learning models and life cycle assessment for lignocellulosic bioethanol platforms. Energy Conversion and Management, 2023, 292: 117379

[6]

Wang L , Yu X , Yang Y , Chen X , Wang Q , Zhang X , Ran L , Xiong F . Morphology and physicochemical properties of starch in wheat superior and inferior grains. Stärke, 2018, 70(3–4): 1700177

[7]

Amaraweera S M , Gunathilake C , Gunawardene O H P , Fernando N M L , Wanninayaka D B , Manamperi A , Dassanayake R S , Rajapaksha S M , Gangoda M , Fernando C A N . . Preparation and characterization of biodegradable cassava starch thin films for potential food packaging applications. Cellulose, 2021, 28(16): 10531–10548

[8]

WatanabeSNishitsujiYHayakawaKShiY C. Pasting properties of a- and b-type wheat starch granules and annealed starches in relation to swelling and solubility. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2024, 261 129738

[9]

Cudjoe D , Han M S , Nandiwardhana A P . Electricity generation using biogas from organic fraction of municipal solid waste generated in provinces of china: techno-economic and environmental impact analysis. Fuel Processing Technology, 2020, 203: 106381

[10]

Naqvi S R , kazmi B , Ammar Taqvi S A , Chen W H , Juchelková D . Techno economic analysis for advanced methods of green hydrogen production. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2024, 48: 100939

[11]

Rajagopal D , Vanderghem C , MacLean H L . Life cycle assessment for economists. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2017, 9(1): 361–381

[12]

Fang M , Wattoo E , Palmer B , Guliov D , Bicho P , Cao Y , Pediredla V K , Gopaluni B . Real-time process operation evaluation and model reliability assessment for chemi-thermomechanical pulping process. Control Engineering Practice, 2023, 138: 105598

[13]

SluiterAHamesBRuizRScarlataCSluiterJTemplatonDCrockerD. Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Technical Report NREL/TP-510–42618. 2010

[14]

Zhao L , Wang D . Combined effects of a biobutanol/ethanol-gasoline (E10) blend and exhaust gas recirculation on performance and pollutant emissions. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(7): 3250–3257

[15]

Ayodele B V , Alsaffar M A , Mustapa S I . An overview of integration opportunities for sustainable bioethanol production from first- and second-generation sugar-based feedstocks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 245: 118857

[16]

Bu Y , Wang L , Chen H . Recalcitrant structure analysis of the enzymatic residues in corn stover pretreated with steam explosion. Industrial Crops and Products, 2024, 222: 119772

[17]

Lee S H , Seah G X , Yang K L . A catalytic alkaline hydrogen peroxide (CAHP) pretreatment method for corn stover and optimization. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2023, 13(6): 4767–4775

[18]

Hackula A , O’Shea R , Murphy J D , Wall D M . Developing distillery biorefineries through dark fermentation of whiskey production by-products: the effect of organic loading rate on decarbonisation pathways. Energy Conversion and Management, 2024, 301: 118064

[19]

LeClerc H O , Erythropel H C , Backhaus A , Lee D S , Judd D R , Paulsen M M , Ishii M , Long A , Ratjen L , Gonsalves Bertho G . . The CO2 tree: the potential for carbon dioxide utilization pathways. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2025, 13(1): 5–29

[20]

de Oliveira Pereira I , dos Santos  A , Guimarães N C , Lima C S , Zanella E , Matsushika A , Rabelo S C , Stambuk B U , Ienczak J L . First- and second-generation integrated process for bioethanol production: fermentation of molasses diluted with hemicellulose hydrolysate by recombinant saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2024, 121(4): 1313–1323

[21]

Singh P , Kiran U , Dutta B C , Bhutani S , Ghosh S . Bioconversion of hemicellulosic fraction of wheat straw biomass to bioethanol by scheffersomyces stipitis: a KLa-based scale-up study. Industrial Crops and Products, 2024, 214: 118461

[22]

Tang W T , Chien C K , Ward J D . A review of energy intensification strategies for distillation processes: cyclic operation, stacking, heat pumps, side-streams, dividing walls, and beyond. Separation and Purification Technology, 2025, 357: 130030

[23]

Hillestad M , Ostadi M , Alamo Serrano G D , Rytter E , Austbø B , Pharoah J G , Burheim O S . Improving carbon efficiency and profitability of the biomass to liquid process with hydrogen from renewable power. Fuel, 2018, 234: 1431–1451

[24]

Khajeeram S , Unrean P . Techno-economic assessment of high-solid simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and economic impacts of yeast consortium and on-site enzyme production technologies. Energy, 2017, 122: 194–203

[25]

Cheng G , Zhao Y , Pan S , Wang X , Dong C . A comparative life cycle analysis of wheat straw utilization modes in China. Energy, 2020, 194: 116914

[26]

Zhou X , Li G , Liu F , Li N . Production of ethanol from corn straw based on chemical looping gasification: economic analysis. Bioresource Technology, 2022, 360: 127568

[27]

Losordo Z , McBride J , Van Rooyen J , Wenger K , Willies D , Froehlich A , Macedo I , Lynd L . Cost competitive second-generation ethanol production from hemicellulose in a brazilian sugarcane biorefinery. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2016, 10(5): 589–602

[28]

Dias M O S , Junqueira T L , Cavalett O , Cunha M P , Jesus C D F , Rossell C E V , Maciel Filho R , Bonomi A . Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 103(1): 152–161

[29]

Petersen A M , Okoro O V , Du Preez J , Görgens J F . Evaluation of biorefining scenarios for advanced fuels production from triticale grain. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(9): 11003–11013

[30]

Petersen A M , Okoro O V , Chireshe F , Moonsamy T , Görgens Johann F . Systematic cost evaluations of biological and thermochemical processes for ethanol production from biomass residues and industrial off-gases. Energy Conversion and Management, 2021, 243: 114398

[31]

Shah A , Darr M . A life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of the corn stover feedstock supply system for cellulosic biorefineries. Biofuels, Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2017, 11(4): 648–664

[32]

Jiang Z , Zheng H , Xing B . Environmental life cycle assessment of wheat production using chemical fertilizer, manure compost, and biochar-amended manure compost strategies. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 760: 143342

[33]

Shin M , Hwang S , Kim J , Kim B , Jung J S . A study on analyses of the production data of feed crops and vulnerability to climate impacts according to climate change in Republic of Korea. Applied Sciences, 2023, 13(20): 11603

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (3172KB)

Supplementary files

FCE-25027-of-YX_suppl_1

394

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/