Multi-scale revolution of artificial intelligence in chemical industry

Ying Li , Quanhu Sun , Zutao Zhu , Huaqiang Wen , Saimeng Jin , Xiangping Zhang , Zhigang Lei , Weifeng Shen

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (7) : 57

PDF (5491KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (7) : 57 DOI: 10.1007/s11705-025-2562-1
REVIEW ARTICLE

Multi-scale revolution of artificial intelligence in chemical industry

Author information +
History +
PDF (5491KB)

Abstract

With the advent of the fourth technological revolution, the new generation of artificial intelligence (AI) has imparted new significance and opportunities to the modeling of momentum, heat, and mass transfer, as well as chemical reaction processes with the realm of chemical engineering. AI techniques are being widely employed in the chemical industry and are constantly evolving to offer more effective solutions for tackling practical challenges. This review delves the transformation of the chemical industry from traditional digital simulations to advanced AI-based approaches, targeting high efficiency and low carbon emissions across the scale from molecules to factories. Particular emphasis is mainly placed on the research carried out within the research group of Weifeng Shen. At the molecular level, the intelligent capture of molecular characteristics and the precise determination of structure-property relationships have reached a mature stage. Furthermore, multifunction-driven reverse molecular design for solvents, reaction reagents, and other substances has been accomplished through AI-based high-throughput screening and generative models. To improve the safety, environmental friendliness, and carbon reduction performance of chemical separation processes, a series of innovative reinforcement strategies have been put forward, with a primary focus on the systematic optimization of solvent design. On the process scale of actual production, it frequently occurs that the constructed mechanism model fails to align with the actual system behavior, thereby restricting the industrial application of the model. To solve this issue, mechanism-data hybrid-driven frameworks have been successfully developed, leveraging AI-enhanced prediction, diagnosis, optimization, and control for complex separation systems in practice. Finally, as a bridge connecting big data intelligent technology and actual industrial processes, dynamic digital twin modeling is discussed for its potential to boost efficiency and sustainability in the chemical industry.

Graphical abstract

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ying Li, Quanhu Sun, Zutao Zhu, Huaqiang Wen, Saimeng Jin, Xiangping Zhang, Zhigang Lei, Weifeng Shen. Multi-scale revolution of artificial intelligence in chemical industry. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(7): 57 DOI:10.1007/s11705-025-2562-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Daoutidis P , Megan L , Tang W . The future of control of process systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2023, 178: 108365

[2]

He C , Zhang C , Bian T , Jiao K , Su W , Wu K J , Su A . A review on artificial intelligence enabled design, synthesis, and process optimization of chemical products for industry 4.0. Processes, 2023, 11(2): 330

[3]

Wang X , Yu N , Jiao Z , Li L , Yu H , Wei S . Machine learning: enhanced molecular network reveals global exposure to hundreds of unknown PFAS. Science Advances, 2024, 10(21): eadn1039

[4]

Song J , Han B . Green chemistry: a tool for the sustainable development of the chemical industry. National Science Review, 2015, 2(3): 255–256

[5]

Qian F . Smart and optimal manufacturing: the key for the transformation and development of the process industry. Engineering, 2017, 3(2): 151

[6]

Kamkar M , Leonard K C , Ferrer I , Loo S C J , Biddinger E J , Brady D , Carrier D J , Gathergood N , Han H , Hermans I . . Artificial intelligence (AI) for sustainable resource management and chemical processes. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2024, 12(8): 2924–2926

[7]

Zhou T , Mcbride K , Linke S , Song Z , Sundmacher K . Computer-aided solvent selection and design for efficient chemical processes. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2020, 27: 35–44

[8]

Lai N , Tew Y , Zhong X , Yin J , Li J , Yan B , Wang X . Artificial intelligence (AI) workflow for catalyst design and optimization. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62(43): 17835–17848

[9]

Lee J W , Kim S , Pineda I T . Review of nanoabsorbents for capture enhancement of CO2 and its industrial applications with design criteria. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 138: 110524

[10]

Deng W , Liu L , Li X , Huang Y , Hu M , Zheng Y , Yin Y , Huan Y , Cui S , Sun Z . . Machine-learning-enhanced trial-and-error for efficient optimization of rubber composites. Advanced Materials, 2025, 37(16): 2407763

[11]

Chen C , Reniers G . Chemical industry in China: the current status, safety problems, and pathways for future sustainable development. Safety Science, 2020, 128: 104741

[12]

Zhao J , Shi T , Ren J . Accelerating operation optimization of complex chemical processes: a novel framework integrating artificial neural network and mixed-integer linear programming. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 481: 148421

[13]

Yang T , Yi X , Lu S , Johansson K H , Chai T . Intelligent manufacturing for the process industry driven by industrial artificial intelligence. Engineering, 2021, 7(9): 1224–1230

[14]

Tiong L C O , Yoo H J , Kim N , Kim C , Lee K Y , Han S S , Kim D . Machine vision-based detections of transparent chemical vessels toward the safe automation of material synthesis. npj Computational Materials, 2024, 10(1): 42

[15]

Zhou G , Zhang C , Li Z , Ding K , Wang C . Knowledge-driven digital twin manufacturing cell towards intelligent manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 2020, 58(4): 1034–1051

[16]

de Almeida A F , Moreira R , Rodrigues T . Synthetic organic chemistry driven by artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews. Chemistry, 2019, 3(10): 589–604

[17]

Yang X , Zhou J , Xie Z , Ke G . Chemical process fault diagnosis based on enchanted machine-learning approach. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 97(12): 3074–3086

[18]

Xu W , Wang Y , Zhang D , Yang Z , Yuan Z , Lin Y , Yan H , Zhou X , Yang C . Transparent AI-assisted chemical engineering process: machine learning modeling and multi-objective optimization for integrating process data and molecular-level reaction mechanisms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 448: 141412

[19]

Jiang S , Zavala V M . Convolutional neural nets in chemical engineering: foundations, computations, and applications. AIChE Journal, 2021, 67(9): e17282

[20]

Chiang L H , Braun B , Wang Z , Castillo I . Towards artificial intelligence at scale in the chemical industry. AIChE Journal, 2022, 68(6): e17644

[21]

Tao F , Xiao B , Qi Q , Cheng J , Ji P . Digital twin modeling. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2022, 64: 372–389

[22]

Li J , Zhao T , Yang Q , Du S , Xu L . A review of quantitative structure-activity relationship: the development and current status of data sets, molecular descriptors, and mathematical models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2025, 256: 105278

[23]

Chen M , Yang J , Tang C , Lu X , Wei Z , Liu Y , Yu P , Li H H . Improving ADMET prediction accuracy for candidate drugs: factors to consider in QSPR modeling approaches. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, 2024, 24(3): 222–242

[24]

Zhu T , Li S , Tao C . A new perspective on predicting the reaction rate constants of hydrated electrons for organic contaminants: exploring molecular structure characterization methods and ambient conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 904: 166316

[25]

Ma M , Lei X . A deep learning framework for predicting molecular property based on multi-type features fusion. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 169: 107911

[26]

Liang X , Zhang X , Zhang L , Liu L , Du J , Zhu X , Ng K M . Computer-aided polymer design: integrating group contribution and molecular dynamics. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(34): 15542–15552

[27]

Shaahmadi F , Smith S A , Schwarz C E , Burger A J , Cripwell J T . Group-contribution SAFT equations of state: a review. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2023, 565: 113674

[28]

Hu Y , Su Y , Jin S , Chien I L , Shen W . Systematic approach for screening organic and ionic liquid solvents in homogeneous extractive distillation exemplified by the tert-butanol dehydration. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019, 211: 723–737

[29]

Cocchi M , Menziani M C , Debenedetti P G , Cruciani G . Theoretical versus empirical molecular descriptors in monosubstituted benzenes. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1992, 14(1-3): 209–224

[30]

MauriAConsonniVTodeschiniR. Molecular Descriptors. Berlin: Springer, 2017, 2065–2093

[31]

Zhang R , Wang Y , Zhu W , Xin L , Qi J , Wang Y , Zhu Z , Cui P . Insight into the mechanism of machine learning models for predicting ionic liquids toxicity based on molecular structure descriptors. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2024, 12(49): 17749–17760

[32]

Yang X , Wang Y , Byrne R , Schneider G , Yang S . Concepts of artificial intelligence for computer-assisted drug discovery. Chemical Reviews, 2019, 119(18): 10520–10594

[33]

Zhang K , Yang X , Wang Y , Yu Y , Huang N , Li G , Li X , Wu J C , Yang S . Artificial intelligence in drug development. Nature Medicine, 2025, 31(1): 45–59

[34]

Dong J , Cao D , Miao H , Liu S , Deng B C , Yun Y H , Wang N N , Lu A P , Zeng W B , Chen A F . ChemDes: an integrated web-based platform for molecular descriptor and fingerprint computation. Journal of Cheminformatics, 2015, 7(1): 60

[35]

Zhu Z , Wu D , Zhang J , Ren J , Jin S , Shen W . An adaptive and interpretable modeling architecture assisted rapid and reliable consensus prediction for hazardous properties of chemicals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 471: 143441

[36]

Wu Z , Jiang D , Wang J , Zhang X , Du H , Pan L , Hsieh C Y , Cao D , Hou T . Knowledge-based BERT: a method to extract molecular features such as computational chemists. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2022, 23(3): bbac131

[37]

Xu J , Wang L , Wang L , Liang G , Shen X , Xu W . Prediction of Setschenow constants of organic compounds based on a 3D structure representation. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2011, 107(1): 178–184

[38]

Xiang H , Zeng L , Hou L , Li K , Fu Z , Qiu Y , Nussinov R , Hu J , Rosen-Zvi M , Zeng X . . A molecular video-derived foundation model for scientific drug discovery. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 9696

[39]

Atz K , Grisoni F , Schneider G . Geometric deep learning on molecular representations. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2021, 3(12): 1023–1032

[40]

Kearnes S , McCloskey K , Berndl M , Pande V , Riley P . Molecular graph convolutions: moving beyond fingerprints. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30(8): 595–608

[41]

Wu D , Zhu Z , Zhang J , Wen H , Jin S , Shen W . An interpretable solute-solvent interactive attention module intensified graph-learning architecture toward enhancing the prediction accuracy of an infinite dilution activity coefficient. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2024, 63(19): 8741–8750

[42]

Zhang J , Wang Q , Lei Y , Shen W . An interpretable 3D multi-hierarchical representation-based deep neural network for environmental, health, and safety properties prediction of organic solvents. Green Chemistry, 2024, 26(7): 4181–4191

[43]

Hirschberg J , Manning C D . Advances in natural language processing. Science, 2015, 349(6245): 261–266

[44]

Young T , Hazarika D , Poria S , Cambria E . Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2018, 13(3): 55–75

[45]

Su Y , Wang Z , Jin S , Shen W , Ren J , Eden M . An architecture of deep learning in QSPR modeling for the prediction of critical properties using molecular signatures. AIChE Journal, 2019, 65(9): e16678

[46]

Zhou Z , Eden M , Shen W . Treat molecular linear notations as sentences: accurate quantitative structure-property relationship modeling via a natural language processing approach. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62(12): 5336–5346

[47]

Li J , Cheng K , Wang S , Morstatter F , Trevino R P , Tang J , Liu H . Feature selection: a data perspective. ACM Computing Surveys, 2018, 50(6): 1–45

[48]

Ponzoni I , Sebastián-Pérez V , Requena-Triguero C , Roca C , Martínez M J , Cravero F , Díaz M F , Páez J A , Arrayás R G , Adrio J . . Hybridizing feature selection and feature learning approaches in QSAR modeling for drug discovery. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 2403

[49]

Yang A , Sun S , Su Y , Kong Z , Ren J , Shen W . Insight to the prediction of CO2 solubility in ionic liquids based on the interpretable machine learning model. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 297: 120266

[50]

Wen H , Nan S , Wu D , Sun Q , Tong Y , Zhang J , Jin S , Shen W . A systematic review on intensifications of artificial intelligence assisted green solvent development. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2023, 62(48): 20473–20491

[51]

Huang B , Tong Y , Chen Y , Eslamimanesh A , Shen W , Wei S . Dual self-adaptive intelligent optimization of feature and hyperparameter determination in constructing a DNN based QSPR property prediction model. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2022, 61(32): 12052–12060

[52]

Wang Z , Su Y , Jin S , Shen W , Ren J , Zhang X , Clark J . A novel unambiguous strategy of molecular feature extraction in machine learning assisted predictive models for environmental properties. Green Chemistry, 2020, 22(12): 3867–3876

[53]

Kasza J , Wolfe R . Interpretation of commonly used statistical regression models. Respirology, 2014, 19(1): 14–21

[54]

Tropsha A , Isayev O , Varnek A , Schneider G , Cherkasov A . Integrating QSAR modelling and deep learning in drug discovery: the emergence of deep QSAR. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2024, 23(2): 141–155

[55]

Matsuzaka Y , Uesawa Y . Ensemble learning, deep learning-based, and molecular descriptor-based quantitative structure-activity relationships. Molecules, 2023, 28(5): 2410

[56]

Cervantes J , Garcia-Lamont F , Rodríguez-Mazahua L , Lopez A . A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: applications, challenges, and trends. Neurocomputing, 2020, 408: 189–215

[57]

Rodríguez-Pérez R , Bajorath J . Interpretation of machine learning models using shapley values: application to compound potency and multi-target activity predictions. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2020, 34(10): 1013–1026

[58]

Ahmad I , Basheri M , Iqbal M J , Rahim A . Performance comparison of support vector machine, random forest, and extreme learning machine for intrusion detection. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 2018, 6: 33789–33795

[59]

Song Z , Shi H , Zhang X , Zhou T . Prediction of CO2 solubility in ionic liquids using machine learning methods. Chemical Engineering Science, 2020, 223: 115752

[60]

Baum Z J , Yu X , Ayala P Y , Zhao Y , Watkins S P , Zhou Q . Artificial intelligence in chemistry: current trends and future directions. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2021, 61(7): 3197–3212

[61]

Zhang J , Wang Q , Shen W . Message-passing neural network based multi-task deep-learning framework for COSMO-SAC based σ-profile and VCOSMO prediction. Chemical Engineering Science, 2022, 254: 117624

[62]

Wang Z , Su Y , Shen W , Jin S , Clark J , Ren J , Zhang X . Predictive deep learning models for environmental properties: the direct calculation of octanol-water partition coefficients from molecular graphs. Green Chemistry, 2019, 21(16): 4555–4565

[63]

Dobbelaere M R , Plehiers P P , Van De Vijver R , Stevens C V , Van Geem K M . Machine learning in chemical engineering: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Engineering, 2021, 7(9): 1201–1211

[64]

Cao Y , Taghvaie Nakhjiri A , Ghadiri M . Different applications of machine learning approaches in materials science and engineering: comprehensive review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2024, 135: 108783

[65]

Wang J , Liu K , Zhang Y , Leng B , Lu J H . Recent advances of few-shot learning methods and applications. Science China Technological Sciences, 2023, 66(4): 920–944

[66]

Jiang W , Huang K , Geng J , Deng X . Multi-scale metric learning for few-shot learning. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2021, 31(3): 1091–1102

[67]

Wen H , Su Y , Wang Z , Jin S , Ren J , Shen W , Eden M . A systematic modeling methodology of deep neural network-based structure-property relationship for rapid and reliable prediction on flashpoints. AIChE Journal, 2022, 68(1): e17402

[68]

Wen H , Nan S , Zhang J , Lei Z , Shen W . Chemical space deconstruction-based dynamic model ensemble architecture for molecular property prediction. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 295: 120118

[69]

Yang L , Shami A . On hyperparameter optimization of machine learning algorithms: theory and practice. Neurocomputing, 2020, 415: 295–316

[70]

Zhang J , Wang Q , Shen W . Hyper-parameter optimization of multiple machine learning algorithms for molecular property prediction using hyperopt library. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2022, 52: 115–125

[71]

Acar E , Bayrak G , Jung Y , Lee I , Ramu P , Ravichandran S S . Modeling, analysis, and optimization under uncertainties: a review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 64(5): 2909–2945

[72]

Vellido A . The importance of interpretability and visualization in machine learning for applications in medicine and health care. Neural Computing & Applications, 2020, 32(24): 18069–18083

[73]

Zhang Y , Tino P , Leonardis A , Tang K . A survey on neural network interpretability. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2021, 5(5): 726–742

[74]

Carter A , Imtiaz S , Naterer G F . Review of interpretable machine learning for process industries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 170: 647–659

[75]

Zhang J , Wang Q , Su Y , Jin S , Ren J , Eden M , Shen W . An accurate and interpretable deep learning model for environmental properties prediction using hybrid molecular representations. AIChE Journal, 2022, 68(6): e17634

[76]

Yang A , Sun S , Qi L , Kong Z , Sunarso J , Shen W . Development of an interpretable QSPR model to predict the octanol-water partition coefficient based on three artificial intelligence algorithms. Green Chemical Engineering, 2025, 6(2): 193–199

[77]

Koscher B A , Canty R B , McDonald M A , Greenman K P , McGill C J , Bilodeau C L , Jin W , Wu H , Vermeire F H , Jin B . . Autonomous, multiproperty-driven molecular discovery: from predictions to measurements and back. Science, 2023, 382(6677): eadi1407

[78]

Vithayathil Varghese N , Mahmoud Q H . A survey of multi-task deep reinforcement learning. Electronics, 2020, 9(9): 1363

[79]

Yang A , Su Y , Wang Z , Jin S , Ren J , Zhang X , Shen W , Clark J . A multi-task deep learning neural network for predicting flammability-related properties from molecular structures. Green Chemistry, 2021, 23(12): 4451–4465

[80]

Gao C , Min X , Fang M , Tao T , Zheng X , Liu Y , Wu X , Huang Z . Innovative materials science via machine learning. Advanced Functional Materials, 2022, 32(1): 2108044

[81]

Goswami L , Deka M K , Roy M . Artificial intelligence in material engineering: a review on applications of artificial intelligence in material engineering. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2023, 25(13): 2300104

[82]

Mullowney M W , Duncan K R , Elsayed S S , Garg N , van der Hooft J J J , Martin N I , Meijer D , Terlouw B R , Biermann F , Blin K . . Artificial intelligence for natural product drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2023, 22(11): 895–916

[83]

Liao M , Lan K , Yao Y . Sustainability implications of artificial intelligence in the chemical industry: a conceptual framework. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2022, 26(1): 164–182

[84]

Ureel Y , Dobbelaere M R , Ouyang Y , De Ras K , Sabbe M K , Marin G B , Van Geem K M . Active machine learning for chemical engineers: a bright future lies ahead. Engineering, 2023, 27: 23–30

[85]

Yu B , Zhang L , Ye X , Wu J Q , Ying H Y , Zhu W , Yu Z Y , Wu X M . State-of-the-art review on various applications of machine learning techniques in materials science and engineering. Chemical Engineering Science, 2025, 306: 121147

[86]

Austin N D , Sahinidis N V , Trahan D W . Computer-aided molecular design: an introduction and review of tools, applications, and solution techniques. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2016, 116: 2–26

[87]

Millini R . Beyond trial and error for zeolite catalysts. Science, 2017, 355(6329): 1028

[88]

Martínez T J . Ab initio reactive computer aided molecular design. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2017, 50(3): 652–656

[89]

Zhang Y , Wei S , Dong C , Wang B , Liang Y , Wang Y , Chen X . Progress in QSPR modelling methods. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2021, 66(22): 2832–2844

[90]

Xu S , Cui X , Xing Y , Di J , Zhang X , He J , Feng H . Computer-aided molecular design of double-salt ionic liquid solvents for extractive distillation with the COSMO-SAC and genetic algorithm. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2021, 60(49): 18086–18093

[91]

Chemmangattuvalappil N G . Development of solvent design methodologies using computer-aided molecular design tools. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2020, 27: 51–59

[92]

Walters W P , Barzilay R . Applications of deep learning in molecule generation and molecular property prediction. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2021, 54(2): 263–270

[93]

Zhang J , Wang Q , Eden M , Shen W . A deep learning-based framework towards inverse green solvent design for extractive distillation with multi-index constraints. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2023, 177: 108335

[94]

Zhang J , Wang Q , Wen H , Gerbaud V , Jin S , Shen W . Multi-objective optimization strategy for green solvent design via a deep generative model learned from pre-set molecule pairs. Green Chemistry, 2024, 26(1): 412–427

[95]

Gao X , Ciura K , Ma Y , Mikolajczyk A , Jagiello K , Wan Y , Gao Y , Zheng J , Zhong S , Puzyn T . . Toward the integration of machine learning and molecular modeling for designing drug delivery nanocarriers. Advanced Materials, 2024, 36(45): 2407793

[96]

Wei J , Chu X , Sun X , Xu K , Deng H X , Chen J , Wei Z , Lei M . Machine learning in materials science. InfoMat, 2019, 1(3): 338–358

[97]

Shen T , Teng L , Hu Y , Shen W . Systematic screening procedure and innovative energy-saving design for ionic liquid-based extractive distillation process. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2023, 17(1): 34–45

[98]

Yang A , Su Y , Shi T , Ren J , Shen W , Zhou T . Energy-efficient recovery of tetrahydrofuran and ethyl acetate by triple-column extractive distillation: entrainer design and process optimization. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022, 16(2): 303–315

[99]

Li Y , Yang Z , Deng X , Li N , Li S , Lei Z , Eslamimanesh A , Jin S , Shen W . A mechanism-data hybrid-driven framework for identifying dynamic characteristic of actual chemical processes. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2023, 199: 115–129

[100]

Du L , Jin S , Yang Z , Sun S , Yang A , Shen W . An efficient multi-criteria decision making for assessing the optimization of reactive extractive distillation in terms of economy, environment, and safety. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2023, 197: 838–850

[101]

Su Y , L , Shen W , Wei S . An efficient technique for improving methanol yield using dual CO2 feeds and dry methane reforming. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14(4): 614–628

[102]

Shah P , Pahari S , Bhavsar R , Kwon J S I . Hybrid modeling of first-principles and machine learning: a step-by-step tutorial review for practical implementation. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2025, 194: 108926

[103]

Mora-Mariano D , Flores-Tlacuahuac A . A machine learning approach for the surrogate modeling of uncertain distributed process engineering models. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2022, 186: 433–450

[104]

Domínguez-Barbero D , García-González J , Sanz-Bobi M Á . Twin-delayed deep deterministic policy gradient algorithm for the energy management of microgrids. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 125: 106693

[105]

Bishnu S K , Alnouri S Y , Al Mohannadi D M . Stochastic algorithm-based optimization using artificial intelligence/machine learning models for sorption enhanced steam methane reformer reactor. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2025, 196: 109060

[106]

Alatas B . ACROA: artificial chemical reaction optimization algorithm for global optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(10): 13170–13180

[107]

Cao H , Li Y , Chang C , Zhang X , Yang A , Shen W . A deep learning hybrid framework combining an efficient evolutionary algorithm for complex many-objective optimization of sustainable triple CO2 feed methanol production. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2024, 12(17): 6682–6696

[108]

Torres A I , Ferreira J , Pedemonte M . Machine learning and process systems engineering for sustainable chemical processes: a short review. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 2025, 51: 100982

[109]

Rangaiah G P , Feng Z M , Hoadley A F . Multi-objective optimization applications in chemical process engineering: tutorial and review. Processes, 2020, 8(5): 508

[110]

Sharma S , Kumar V . A comprehensive review on multi-objective optimization techniques: past, present, and future. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2022, 29(7): 5605–5633

[111]

Sharma N , Liu Y . A hybrid science-guided machine learning approach for modeling chemical processes: a review. AIChE Journal, 2022, 68(5): e17609

[112]

SlimBRituparnaDAbhishekG. Recent advances in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Berlin: Springer, 2017

[113]

Yang L , Liu S , Chang C , Yang S , Shen W . An efficient and invertible machine learning-driven multi-objective optimization architecture for light olefins separation system. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 285: 119553

[114]

Al-MalahK. Aspen Plus: Chemical Engineering Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2022

[115]

Zhou J , Chu Y , Ren J , Shen W , He C . Integrating machine learning and mathematical programming for efficient optimization of operating conditions in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based combined systems. Energy, 2023, 281: 128218

[116]

Du J , Cao H , Li Y , Yang Z , Eslamimanesh A , Fakhroleslam M , Mansouri S S , Shen W . Development of hybrid surrogate model structures for design and optimization of CO2 capture processes: Part I. vacuum pressure swing adsorption in a confined space. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 283: 119379

[117]

Bracconi M . Intensification of catalytic reactors: a synergic effort of multiscale modeling, machine learning, and additive manufacturing. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2022, 181: 109148

[118]

Zhu L , Chen X , Ouyang B , Yan W , Lei H , Chen Z , Luo Z . Review of machine learning for hydrodynamics, transport, and reactions in multiphase flows and reactors. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2022, 61(28): 9901–9949

[119]

Lei H , Zhu L , Luo Z . Study of filtered interphase heat transfer using highly resolved CFD-DEM simulations. AIChE Journal, 2021, 67(4): e17121

[120]

Liu J , Cao X , Zhou H , Li L , Liu X , Zhao P , Dong J . A digital twin-driven approach towards traceability and dynamic control for processing quality. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2021, 50: 101395

[121]

Liu S , Bao J , Zheng P . A review of digital twin-driven machining: from digitization to intellectualization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2023, 67: 361–378

[122]

Li Y , Hu L , Li N , Shen W . A light attention-mixed-base deep learning architecture toward process multivariable modeling and knowledge discovery. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2023, 174: 108259

[123]

Bai Y , Zhao J . A novel transformer-based multi-variable multi-step prediction method for chemical process fault prognosis. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 169: 937–947

[124]

Bishnu S K , Alnouri S Y , Al-Mohannadi D M . Computational applications using data driven modeling in process systems: a review. Digital Chemical Engineering, 2023, 8: 100111

[125]

Li Y , Cao H , Wang X , Yang Z , Li N , Shen W . A new correlation-similarity conjoint algorithm for developing encoder-decoder based deep learning multi-step prediction model of chemical process. Chemical Engineering Science, 2024, 288: 119748

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (5491KB)

1927

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/