Chemical reactions of oily sludge catalyzed by iron oxide under supercritical water gasification condition

Houjun Zhang , Fang Chen , Jipeng Xu , Jinli Zhang , You Han

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 886 -896.

PDF (4029KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (6) : 886 -896. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-021-2125-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Chemical reactions of oily sludge catalyzed by iron oxide under supercritical water gasification condition

Author information +
History +
PDF (4029KB)

Abstract

Supercritical water gasification is a promising technology in dealing with the degradation of hazardous waste, such as oily sludge, accompanied by the production of fuel gases. To evaluate the mechanism of Fe2O3 catalyst and the migration pathways of heteroatoms and to investigate the systems during the process, reactive force field molecular dynamics simulations are adopted. In terms of the catalytic mechanisms of Fe2O3, the surface lattice oxygen is consumed by small carbon fragments to produce CO and CO2, improving the catalytic performance of the cluster due to more unsaturated coordination Fe sites exposed. Lattice oxygen combines with •H radicals to form water molecules, improving the catalytic performance. Furthermore, the pathway of asphaltene degradation was revealed at an atomic level, as well as products. Moreover, the adsorption of hydroxyl radical on the S atom caused breakage of the two C–S bonds in turn, forming •HSO intermediate, so that the organic S element was fixed into the inorganic liquid phase. The heteroatom O was removed under the effects of supercritical water. Heavy metal particles presented in the oily sludge, such as iron in association with Fe2O3 catalyst, helped accelerate the degradation of asphaltenes.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

oily sludge / SCWG / ReaxFF / Fe2O3 / heteroatoms

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Houjun Zhang, Fang Chen, Jipeng Xu, Jinli Zhang, You Han. Chemical reactions of oily sludge catalyzed by iron oxide under supercritical water gasification condition. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 886-896 DOI:10.1007/s11705-021-2125-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Gao N, Li J, Quan C, Tan H. Product property and environmental risk assessment of heavy metals during pyrolysis of oily sludge with fly ash additive. Fuel, 2020, 266: 117090

[2]

Hamidi Y, Ataei S A, Sarrafi A. A highly efficient method with low energy and water consumption in biodegradation of total petroleum hydrocarbons of oily sludge. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 293: 112911

[3]

Liu J, Zhang Y, Peng K, Zhao X, Xiong Y, Huang X. A review of the interfacial stability mechanism of aging oily sludge: heavy components, inorganic particles, and their synergism. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 415: 125624

[4]

Zou H, Liu C, Evrendilek F, He Y, Liu J. Evaluation of reaction mechanisms and emissions of oily sludge and coal co-combustions in O2/CO2 and O2/N2 atmospheres. Renewable Energy, 2021, 171: 1327–1343

[5]

Gao N, Li J, Quan C, Wang X, Yang Y. Oily sludge catalytic pyrolysis combined with fine particle removal using a Ni-ceramic membrane. Fuel, 2020, 277: 118134

[6]

Li Z, Zhou Y, Meng X, Wang S. Harmless and efficient treatment of oily drilling cuttings. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2021, 202: 108542

[7]

Gao Y, Ding R, Wu S, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Yang M. Influence of ultrasonic waves on the removal of different oil components from oily sludge. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(13-16): 1771–1775

[8]

Chen G, Li J, Li K, Lin F, Tian W, Che L, Yan B, Ma W, Song Y. Nitrogen, sulfur, chlorine containing pollutants releasing characteristics during pyrolysis and combustion of oily sludge. Fuel, 2020, 273: 117772

[9]

Kruse A, Dahmen N. Water—a magic solvent for biomass conversion. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2015, 96: 36–45

[10]

Okolie J A, Nanda S, Dalai A K, Kozinski J A. Optimization and modeling of process parameters during hydrothermal gasification of biomass model compounds to generate hydrogen-rich gas products. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(36): 18275–18288

[11]

Ding W, Shi J, Wei W, Cao C, Jin H. A molecular dynamics simulation study on solubility behaviors of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in supercritical water/hydrogen environment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(3): 2899–2904

[12]

Khan M K, Cahyadi H S, Kim S M, Kim J. Efficient oil recovery from highly stable toxic oily sludge using supercritical water. Fuel, 2019, 235: 460–472

[13]

Adar E, Ince M, Bilgili M S. Supercritical water gasification of sewage sludge by continuous flow tubular reactor: a pilot scale study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 391: 123499

[14]

Hantoko D, Antoni , Kanchanatip E, Yan M, Weng Z, Gao Z, Zhong Y. Assessment of sewage sludge gasification in supercritical water for H2-rich syngas production. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 131: 63–72

[15]

Lin J, Liao Q, Hu Y, Ma R, Cui C, Sun S, Liu X. Effects of process parameters on sulfur migration and H2S generation during supercritical water gasification of sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403: 123678

[16]

Chen Y, Yi L, Li S, Yin J, Jin H. Catalytic gasification of sewage sludge in near and supercritical water with different catalysts. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 388: 124292

[17]

Qian L, Wang S, Xu D, Guo Y, Tang X, Wang L. Treatment of municipal sewage sludge in supercritical water: a review. Water Research, 2016, 89: 118–131

[18]

Cao C, Xie Y, Mao L, Wei W, Shi J, Jin H. Hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of soda black liquor with various metal oxides. Renewable Energy, 2020, 157: 24–32

[19]

Han Y, Wang Y, Ma T, Li W, Zhang J, Zhang M. Mechanistic understanding of Cu-based bimetallic catalysts. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 689–748

[20]

Gao Y, Zhu W, Liu J, Lin P, Zhang J, Huang T, Liu K. Mesoporous sulfur-doped CoFe2O4 as a new Fenton catalyst for the highly efficient pollutants removal. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 295: 120273

[21]

van Duin A C T, Dasgupta S, Lorant F, Goddard W A. ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2001, 105(41): 9396–9409

[22]

Han Y, Jiang D, Zhang J, Li W, Gan Z, Gu J. Development, application and challenges of ReaxFF reactive force field in molecular simulations. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 16–38

[23]

Zhang J, Weng X, Han Y, Li W, Cheng J, Gan Z, Gu J. The effect of supercritical water on coal pyrolysis and hydrogen production: a combined ReaxFF and DFT study. Fuel, 2013, 108: 682–690

[24]

Han Y, Ma T, Chen F, Li W, Zhang J. Supercritical water gasification of naphthalene over iron oxide catalyst: a ReaxFF molecular dynamics study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(57): 30486–30498

[25]

Zhang J, Gu J, Han Y, Li W, Gan Z, Gu J. Supercritical water oxidation vs supercritical water gasification: which process is better for explosive wastewater treatment? Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(4): 1251–1260

[26]

Han Y, Chen F, Ma T, Gong H, Al-Shwafy K W A, Li W, Zhang J, Zhang M. Size effect of a Ni nanocatalyst on supercritical water gasification of lignin by reactive molecular dynamics simulations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(51): 23014–23024

[27]

Jiang D, Wang Y, Zhang M, Zhang J, Li W, Han Y. H2 and CO production through coking wastewater in supercritical water condition: ReaxFF reactive molecular dynamics simulation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(15): 9667–9678

[28]

Han Y, Ma T, Chen F, Li W, Zhang J. Synergistic mechanism of Ni catalyst and supercritical water during refractory organic wastewater treatment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(4): 1535–1547

[29]

Bai Y, Sui H, Liu X, He L, Li X, Thormann E. Effects of the N, O, and S heteroatoms on the adsorption and desorption of asphaltenes on silica surface: a molecular dynamics simulation. Fuel, 2019, 240: 252–261

[30]

Schuler B, Meyer G, Pena D, Mullins O C, Gross L. Unraveling the molecular structures of asphaltenes by atomic force microscopy. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137(31): 9870–9876

[31]

Stephens P J, Devlin F J, Chabalowski C F, Frisch M J. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1994, 98(45): 11623–11627

[32]

Krishnan R, Binkley J S, Seeger R, Pople J A. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1980, 72(1): 650–654

[33]

Shin Y K, Kwak H, Vasenkov A V, Sengupta D, van Duin A C T. Development of a ReaxFF reactive force field for Fe/Cr/O/S and application to oxidation of butane over a pyrite-covered Cr2O3 catalyst. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(12): 7226–7236

[34]

Hu Y, Qi L, Rao K T V, Zhao B, Li H, Zeng Y, Xu C. Supercritical water gasification of biocrude oil from low-temperature liquefaction of algal lipid extraction residue. Fuel, 2020, 276: 118017

[35]

Sorensen M R, Voter A F. Temperature-accelerated dynamics for simulations of infrequent events. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2000, 112(21): 9599–9606

[36]

Wang X, Xue X, Zhang C. Early events of the carburization of Fe nanoparticles in ethylene pyrolysis: reactive force field molecular dynamics simulations. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(20): 10835–10845

[37]

Bentria E T, Akande S O, Becquart C S, Mousseau N, Bouhali O, El-Mellouhi F. Capturing the iron carburization mechanisms from the surface to bulk. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020, 124(52): 28569–28579

[38]

Liu X, Wen X, Hoffmann R. Surface activation of transition metal nanoparticles for heterogeneous catalysis: what we can learn from molecular dynamics. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(4): 3365–3375

[39]

Chen H, He Z, Zhang B, Feng H, Kandasamy S, Wang B. Effects of the aqueous phase recycling on bio-oil yield in hydrothermal liquefaction of spirulina platensis, α-cellulose, and lignin. Energy, 2019, 179: 1103–1113

[40]

Meng N, Jiang D, Liu Y, Gao Z, Cao Y, Zhang J, Gu J, Han Y. Sulfur transformation in coal during supercritical water gasification. Fuel, 2016, 186: 394–404

[41]

Dasireddy V D B C, Likozar B. Direct methanol production from mixed methane/H2O/N2O feedstocks over Cu-Fe/Al2O3 catalysts. Fuel, 2021, 301: 121084

[42]

Kou J, Yi L, Li G, Cheng K, Wang R, Zhang D, Jin H, Guo L. Structural effect of ZrO2 on supported Ni-based catalysts for supercritical water gasification of oil-containing wastewater. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(24): 12874–12885

[43]

Mastuli M S, Kamarulzaman N, Kasim M F, Mahat A M, Matsumura Y, Taufiq-Yap Y H. Catalytic supercritical water gasification of oil palm frond biomass using nanosized MgO doped Zn catalysts. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2019, 154: 104610

[44]

Samiee-Zafarghandi R, Hadi A, Karimi-Sabet J. Graphene-supported metal nanoparticles as novel catalysts for syngas production using supercritical water gasification of microalgae. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2019, 121: 13–21

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4029KB)

Supplementary files

FCE-21059-OF-ZH_suppl_1

4031

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/