Functional role of ATM in the cellular response to DNA damage

Ming LIU, Wenxiang HU

PDF(253 KB)
PDF(253 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (2) : 179-187. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-009-0268-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Functional role of ATM in the cellular response to DNA damage

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) plays a key role in regulating the cellular response to ionizing radiation. The tumor-suppressor gene ATM, mutations in which cause the human genetic disease ataxia telangiectasia, encodes a key protein kinase that controls the cellular response to double-stranded breaks. Activation of ATM results in phosphorylation of many downstream targets that modulate numerous damage response pathways, most notably cell cycle checkpoints. Here, we highlight some of the new developments in the field in our understanding of the mechanism of activation of ATM and its signaling pathways, explore whether DNA double-strand breaks are the sole activators of ATM and ATM-dependent signaling pathways, and address some of the prominent, unanswered questions related to ATM and its function. The scope of this article is to provide a brief overview of the recent literature on this subject and to raise questions that could be addressed in future studies.

Keywords

ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) / cell cycle checkpoint / DNA damage / signalling transduction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ming LIU, Wenxiang HU. Functional role of ATM in the cellular response to DNA damage. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(2): 179‒187 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-009-0268-4

References

[1]
Lavin M F, Shiloh Y. The genetic defect in ataxia-telangiectasia. Annual Review of Immunology, 1997, 15(1): 177–202
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Chun H H, Gatti R A. Ataxia-telangiectasia, an evolving phenotype. DNA Repair, 2004, 3(8-9): 1187–1196
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
You Z, Bailis J M, Johnson S A, Dilworth S M, Hunter T. Rapid activation of ATM on DNA flanking double-strand breaks. Nature Cell Biology, 2007, 9(11): 1311–1318
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Lavin M F. ATM and the Mre11 complex combine to recognize and signal DNA double-strand breaks. Oncogene, 2007, 26(56): 7749–7758
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Li B, Liu M, Hu W X. Molecular docking and molecular dynamic simulations of fentanyl analogs binding to u-opioid receptors. Acta Phys-Chim Sin, 2010, 26(1): 206–214 (in Chinese)
[6]
Lovejoy C A, Cortez D. Common mechanisms of PIKK regulation. DNA Repair, 2009, 8(9): 1004–1008
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Bonilla C Y, Melo J A, Toczyski D P. Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Molecular Cell, 2008, 30(3): 267–276
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Carson C T, Schwartz R A, Stracker T H, Lilley C E, Lee D V, Weitzman M D. The Mre11 complex is required for ATM activation and the G2/M checkpoint. EMBO Journal, 2003, 22(24): 6610–6620
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Lee J H, Paull T T. ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science, 2005, 308(5721): 551–554
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Uziel T, Lerenthal Y, Moyal L, Andegeko Y, Mittelman L, Shiloh Y. Requirement of the MRN complex for ATM activation by DNA damage. EMBO Journal, 2003, 22(20): 5612–5621
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Falck J, Coates J, Jackson S P. Conserved modes of recruitment of ATM, ATR and DNA- PKcs to sites of DNA damage. Nature, 2005, 434(7033): 605–611
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Fanning E, Klimovich V, Nager A R. A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways. Nucleic Acids Research, 2006, 34(15): 4126–4137
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Stracker T H, Morales M, Couto S S, Hussein H, Petrini J H. The carboxy terminus of NBS1 is required for induction of apoptosis by the MRE11 complex. Nature, 2007, 447(7141): 218–221
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kanu N, Behrens A. ATMIN defines an NBS1-independent pathway of ATM signalling. EMBO Journal, 2007, 26(12): 2933–2941
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Bakkenist C J, Kastan M B. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature, 2003, 421(6922): 499–506
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Liu M, Hu W X. Applications of immunoassay in targeted drug screening. Chinese J Appl Chem, 2009, 26(Suppl): 492–496 (in Chinese)
[17]
Zhong X Y, Pfeifer G P, Xu X Z. Microcephalin encodes a centrosomal protein. Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex), 2006, 5(4): 457–458
[18]
Sun Y, Xu Y, Roy K, Price B D. DNA damage-induced acetylation of lysine 3016 of ATM activates ATM kinase activity. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2007, 27(24): 8502–8509
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Mochan T A, Venere M, DiTullio R A Jr, Halazonetis T D. 53BP1 and NFBD1/MDC1-Nbs1 function in parallel interacting pathways activating ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) in response to DNA damage. Cancer Research, 2003, 63(24): 8586–8591
[20]
Wang B, Matsuoka S, Carpenter P B, Elledge S J. 53BP1, a mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint. Science, 2002, 298(5597): 1435–1438
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Foray N, Marot D, Gabriel A, Randrianarison V, Carr A M, Perricaudet M, Ashworth A, Jeggo P. A subset of ATM- and ATR-dependent phosphorylation events requires the BRCA1 protein. EMBO Journal, 2003, 22(11): 2860–2871
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Aglipay J A, Martin S A, Tawara H, Lee S W, Ouchi T. ATM activation by ionizing radiation requires BRCA1-associated BAAT1. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006, 281(14): 9710–9718
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Guo J Y, Yamada A, Kajino T, Wu J Q, Tang W, Freel C D, Feng J, Chau B N, Wang M Z, Margolis S S, Yoo H Y, Wang X F, Dunphy W G, Irusta P M, Hardwick J M, Kornbluth S. Aven-dependent activation of ATM following DNA damage. Current Biology, 2008, 18(13): 933–942
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Kozlov S, Gueven N, Keating K, Ramsay J, Lavin M F. ATP activates ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) in Vitro: importance of autophosphorylation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2003, 278(11): 9309–9317
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Berkovich E, Monnat R J Jr, Kastan M B. Roles of ATM and NBS1 in chromatin structure modulation and DNA double-strand break repair. Nature Cell Biology, 2007, 9(6): 683–690
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Zou L, Elledge S J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science, 2003, 300(5625): 1542–1548
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Soutoglou E, Misteli T. Activation of the cellular DNA damage response in the absence of DNA lesions. Science, 2008, 320(5882): 1507–1510
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Krause D R, Jonnalagadda J C, Gatei M H, Sillje H H, Zhou B B, Nigg E A, Khanna K. Suppression of Tousled-like kinase activity after DNA damage or replication block requires ATM, NBS1 and Chk1. Oncogene, 2003, 22(38): 5927–5937
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Ziv Y, Bielopolski D, Galanty Y, Lukas C, Taya Y, Schultz D C, Lukas J, Bekker-Jensen S, Bartek J, Shiloh Y. Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nature Cell Biology, 2006, 8(8): 870–876
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Adkins M W, Tyler J K. Transcriptional activators are dispensable for transcription in the absence of Spt6-mediated chromatin reassembly of promoter regions. Molecular Cell, 2006, 21(3): 405–416
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Cimprich K A, Cortez D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, 2008, 9(8): 616–627
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Petersen P, Chou D M, You Z S, Hunter T, Walter J C, Walter G. Protein phosphatase 2A antagonizes ATM and ATR in a Cdk2- and Cdc7-independent DNA damage checkpoint. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2006, 26(5): 1997–2011
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgments

The financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20872095) was gratefully acknowledged.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(253 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/