Removal of malachite green from aqueous solution by sorption on hydrilla verticillata biomass using response surface methodology

R. RAJESHKANNAN, N. RAJAMOHAN, M. RAJASIMMAN

PDF(351 KB)
PDF(351 KB)
Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. ›› 2009, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (2) : 146-154. DOI: 10.1007/s11705-009-0007-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Removal of malachite green from aqueous solution by sorption on hydrilla verticillata biomass using response surface methodology

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of adsorbent dose, pH, temperature, initial dye concentration and contact time on malachite green removal from an aqueous medium using hydrilla verticillata biomass has been investigated. The central composite face-centered experimental design (CFCD) in response surface methodology (RSM) was used for designing the experiments as well as for full response surface estimation. The optimum conditions for maximum removal of malachite green from an aqueous solution of 75.52 mg/L were as follows: adsorbent dose (11.14 g/L), pH (8.4), temperature (48.4°C) and contact time (194.5 min). This was evidenced by the higher value of coefficient of determination (R2=0.9158).

Keywords

response surface methodology / hydrilla verticillata / malachite green / adsorption / central composite design

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
R. RAJESHKANNAN, N. RAJAMOHAN, M. RAJASIMMAN. Removal of malachite green from aqueous solution by sorption on hydrilla verticillata biomass using response surface methodology. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 146‒154 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-009-0007-x

References

[1]
Mohamed M. Acid dye removal: comparison of surfactant- modified mesoporous FSM-16 with activated carbon derived from rice husk. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, 272: 28-34
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Ho S and Mckay G A. Comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Trans IChemE, 1998, 7: 123-129
[3]
Safarik I, Tackova L and Safarikova M. Adsorption of dyes on magnetically labeled baker’s yeast cells, European Cells and Materials, 2002, 3: 52-55
[4]
Chiou M S, Ho PY, Li H Y. Adsorption Behavior of Dye AAVN and RB4 in Acid Solutions on Chemically Cross-Linked Chitosan Beads. J Chin Inst Chem Engrs, 2003, 34: 625-634
[5]
Bunluesin S, Bruattrachue M, Prayadpokethitiyook. Batch and continuous packed column studies of cadmium biosorption by hydrilla verticillata biomass. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2007, 103: 509-513
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Low K S, Lee C K, Heng L L. Sorption of basic dyes by Hydrilla verticillata, Environmental Technology , 1994, 15: 115-124
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Khattri S D, Singh M K. Colour removal from dye wastewater using sugar cane dust as an adsorbent, Adsorpt Sci Technol, 1999, 17: 269-282
[8]
Culp S J, Beland F A. Malachite green: a toxicological review, J Am College Toxicol, 1996, 15: 219-238
[9]
Culp S J, Blankenship L R, Kusewitt D F, Doerge D R. Toxicity and metabolism of malachite green and leucomalachite green during short-term feeding to Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F[1]mice, Chem Biol Interact, 1999, 122: 153-170
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Alderman D J. Malachite green-a review, J Fish Dis, 1985, 8: 289-298
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Sawa Y, Hoten M, Antibacterial activity of basic dyes on the dyed acrylic fibers, Sen I Gakkaishi , 2001, 57: 153-158
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Clifton-Hadley R S, Alderman D J. The effects of malachite green upon proliferative kidney-disease, J. Fish Dis, 1987, 10: 101-107
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
McKay G, Otterburn M S, Aga D A. Fullers earth and fired clay as adsorbent for dye stuffs, equilibrium and rate constants, Water Air Soil Pollut, 1985, 24: 307-322
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Gregory A R, Elliot S, Kluge P. Ames testing of direct black 3B parallel carcinogenecity, J Appl Toxicol, 1991, 1: 308-313
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Srivastava S J, Singh N D, Srivastava A K, Sinha R. A cute toxicity of malachite green and its effects on certain blood parameters of a catfish, Heteropneustes Fossilis, Aquat Toxicol, 1995, 31: 241-247
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Singh S, Das M, Khanna S K. Biodegradation of malachite green and rhodamine-B by cecal microflora of rats, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994, 200 : 1544-1550
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Srivastava S, Sinha R, Roy D. Toxicological effects of malachite green, Aquat Toxicol, 2004, 66: 319-329
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Elibol M, Ozer D. Response surface methodological approach for inclusion of perfluorocarbon in actinorhodin fermentation medium. Process Biochem, 2002, 38: 667-773
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Umesh K, Garg Kaur M P, Garg Dhiraj Sud M V. Removal of nickel[II] from aqueous solution by adsorption on agricultural waste biomass using a response methodological approach. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99: 1325-1331
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Annadurai G, Juang R S, Lee D J. Adsorption of heavy metals from water using banana and orange peels. Water Sci Technol 2003, 47: 185-190
[21]
Gopal M, Pakshirajan K, Swaminathan T. Heavy metal removal by biosorption using Phanerochaete hrysosporium. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2002, 102: 227-237
CrossRef Google scholar

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(351 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/