Treatment of scaphoid nonunion: Pedicled vascularized bone graft vs. traditional bone graft

Yuan Bao , Hao Kang , Zi-yang Zhang , Ming-bo Nie , Feng-jin Guo

Current Medical Science ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 713 -716.

PDF
Current Medical Science ›› 2013, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 713 -716. DOI: 10.1007/s11596-013-1185-9
Article

Treatment of scaphoid nonunion: Pedicled vascularized bone graft vs. traditional bone graft

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The clinical results of the application of pedicled vascularized bone graft (VBG) from Lister’s tubercle vs. traditional bone graft (TBG) were evaluated and compared. Thirteen cases of symptomatic scaphoid nonunion were treated between January 2011 and December 2012, including 7 cases subject to VBG and the rest 6 cases to TBG, respectively. Outcomes were assessed by modified Mayo wrist score system. All cases were followed up for an average period of 3.5 months after operation. The results showed that total scores in VBG group were 86.4±9.4 after operation with excellent result in 4 cases, good in 2 and acceptable in one, and those in TBG group were 71.7±9.3 after operation with good result in 2 cases, acceptable in 3 and disappointing in one. Total score of wrist function was significantly improved in VBG group as compared with TBG group (P<0.05). Our study suggests that VBG method is more effective for treating scaphoid nonunion than TBG method.

Keywords

scaphoid nonunion / Herbert screw / vascularized bone grafts

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yuan Bao, Hao Kang, Zi-yang Zhang, Ming-bo Nie, Feng-jin Guo. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion: Pedicled vascularized bone graft vs. traditional bone graft. Current Medical Science, 2013, 33(5): 713-716 DOI:10.1007/s11596-013-1185-9

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

SendherR, LaddAL. The scaphoid. Orthop Clin North Am, 2013, 44(1): 107-120

[2]

KrasinE, GoldwirthM, GoldA, et al.. Review of the current methods in the diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures. Postgrad Med J, 2001, 77(906): 235-237

[3]

GeisslerWB, AdamsJE, BindraRR, et al.. Scaphoid fractures: what’s hot, what’s not. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94(2): 169-181

[4]

TuYK, ChenAC, ChouYC, et al.. Treatment for scaphoid fracture and nonunion—the application of 3.0 mm cannulated screws and pedicle vascularised bone grafts. Injury, 2008, 39(Suppl4): 96-106

[5]

AmadioPC, BerquistTH, SmithDK, et al.. Scaphoid malunion. J Hand Surg Am, 1989, 14(4): 679-687

[6]

TambeAD, CutlerL, StilwellJ, et al.. Scaphoid non-union: the role of vascularized grafting in recalcitrant non-unions of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Br, 2006, 31(2): 185-190

[7]

SteinmannSP, BishopAT, BergerRA. Use of the 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery as a vascularized pedicle bone graft for difficult scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am, 2002, 27(3): 391-401

[8]

BertelliJA, TaccaCP, RostJR. Thumb metacarpal vascularized bone graft in long-standing scaphoid nonunion—a useful graft via dorsal or palmar approach: a cohort study of 24 patients. J Hand Surg Am, 2004, 29(6): 1089-1097

[9]

StrawRG, DavisTR, DiasJJ. Scaphoid nonunion: treatment with a pedicled vascularized bone graft based on the 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular branch of the radial artery. J Hand Surg Br, 2002, 27(5): 413

[10]

ChristodoulouLS, KitsisCK, ChamberlainST. Internal fixation of scaphoid non-union: a comparative study of three methods. Injury, 2001, 32(8): 625-630

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

79

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/