Diagnosis of congenital aortic arch anomalies in chinese children by multi-detector computed tomography angiography

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography for the diagnosis of congenital aortic arch anomalies and present the radiological images of congenital aortic arch anomalies in Chinese children. MDCT angiography and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) were applied for the diagnosis of congenital aortic arch anomalies in 362 Chinese children between May 2006 and December 2011 (age ranges from 5 days to 12 years; mean age, 3.3 years). Surgery and/or catheter angiography (CA) were conducted in all patients to confirm the final diagnosis. In the 362 Chinese children with congenital heart anomalies, congenital aortic arch anomalies were definitely diagnosed in 198 children and 164 children ruled out by operation and/or (CA). Among the 198 children with anomalies, coarctation of aorta (CoA), interruption of aortic arch (IAA), right aortic arch, aberrant right subclavian artery and double aortic arch were diagnosed in 134, 32, 20, 10 and 2 children respectively, and there were 6 cases with uncommon congenital aortic arch anomalies: 2 had double aortic arch including 1 with five branches of the aortic arch, 2 had isolation of the right subclavian artery with two patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), 1 had an isolation of the common carotid artery with a PDA, and 1 had double PDA with a single ventricle and pulmonary artery atresia. Among the 32 children with IAA, 28 were of type A, and 4 were of type B. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MDCT angiography for congenital aortic arch anomalies were 100% (198/198), 98% (161/164) and 99% (359/362), respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of TTE were 92% (182/198), 81% (133/164) and 87% (315/362), respectively. In conclusion, MDCT angiography is a reliable, noninvasive imaging technique for the diagnosis of congenital aortic arch anomalies in children. Sometimes, even more information can be obtained from this technique than from conventional angiography.

Keywords

congenital anomalies / multi-detector computed tomography angiography / aortic arch

References

[1] IkedaT, BanT. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch. Ryoikibetsu Shokogun Shirizu (Japanese), 1996199-202

[2] DillmanJR, AttiliAK, AgarwalPP, et al.. Common and uncommon vascular rings and slings: a multi-modality review. Pediatr Radiol, 2011, 41(11): 1440-1454

[3] VucurevicG, TanaskovicS, IlijevskiN, et al.. Right-sided aortic arch with anomalous origin of the left subclavian artery: case report. Srp Arh Celok Lek (Serbian), 2011, 139(9–10): 666-668

[4] LeeEY, SiegelMJ, HildeboltCF, et al.. MDCT evaluation of thoracic aortic anomalies in pediatric patients and young adults: comparison of axial, multiplanar, and 3D images. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2004, 182(3): 777-784

[5] MingZ, YuminZ, YuhuaL, et al.. Diagnosis of congenital obstructive aortic arch anomalies in Chinese children by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2006, 8(5): 747-753

[6] Kimura-HayamaET, MelendezG, MendizabalAL, et al.. Uncommon congenital and acquired aortic diseases: role of multidetector CT angiography. Radiographics, 2010, 30(1): 79-98

[7] Ramos-DuranL, NanceJWJr, SchoepfUJ, et al.. Developmental aortic arch anomalies in infants and children assessed with CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012, 198(5): 466-474

[8] SpevakPJ, JohnsonPT, FishmanEK. Surgically corrected congenital heart disease: utility of 64-MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 191(3): 854-861

[9] BeanM J, PannuH, FishmanEK. Three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging of complex congenital cardiovascular abnormalities. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005, 29(6): 721-724

[10] StuhlfautJW, BarestG, SakaiO, et al.. Impact of MDCT angiography on the use of catheter angiography for the assessment of cervical arterial injury after blunt or penetrating trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 185(4): 1063-1068

[11] OnbasO, KantarciM, KoplayM, et al.. Congenital anomalies of the aorta and vena cava: 16-detector-row CT imaging findings. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2008, 14(3): 163-171

[12] OuP, CelermajerDS, CalcagniG, et al.. Three-dimensional CT scanning: a new diagnostic modality in congenital heart disease. Heart, 2007, 93(8): 908-913

[13] KhatriS, VarmaSK, KhatriP, et al.. 64-slice multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography for evaluating congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol, 2008, 29(4): 755-762

[14] ChoiHS, ShinDH, KimKR, et al.. Preoperative three-dimensional CT angiography to distinguish between an aberrant subclavian artery and a double aortic arch in thyroid surgery: Report of 2 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2011, 38(1): 127-132

[15] HerzogC, MulvihillD M, NguyenS A, et al.. Pediatric cardiovascular CT angiography: radiation dose reduction using automatic anatomic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190(5): 1232-1240

[16] JonasRA, QuaegebeurJM, KirklinJW, et al.. Outcomes in patients with interrupted aortic arch and ventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1994, 107(4): 1099-1113

[17] ZapataH, EdwardsJ E, TitusJ L. Aberrant right subclavian artery with left aortic arch: associated cardiac anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol, 1993, 14(3): 159-161

[18] ZhuM, ZhongYM, JinB, et al.. Congenital aortic arch anomalies: diagnosis using contrast enhancement magnetic resonance angiography. BME & Clin Med, 2006, 10(5): 296-299