Ultrasound and microbubbles: Their functions in gene transfer in vitro

Abstract

To examine the role of ultrasound in gene delivery in vitro, three cells lines were exposed to the low-frequency ultrasound of varying intensities and for different durations to evaluate their effect on gene transfection and cell viability of the cells. Microbubble (MB), Optison (10%), was also used to observe the role of the microbubbles in gene transfection. The results demonstrated that as the ultrasound intensity and the exposure time increased, the gene transfer rate increased and the cell viability decreased, but at high energy intensities, the cell viability decreased dramatically, which caused the transfer rate to decrease. The most efficient ultrasound intensity for inducing gene transfer was 1 W/cm² with duration being 20 s. At the same energy intensity, higher ultrasound intensity could achieve maximal gene transfer rate earlier. Microbubbles could increase ultrasound-induced cell gene transfer rate by about 2 to 3 times mainly at lower energy intensities. Moreover, microbubbles could raise the maximum gene transfer rate mediated by ultrasound. It is concluded that the low-frequency ultrasound can induce cell gene transfer and the cell gene transfer rate and viability are correlated with not only the ultrasound energy intensity but also the ultrasound intensity, the higher ultrasound intensity achieves its maximal transfer rate more quickly and the ultrasound intensity that can induce optimal gene transfer is 1 W/cm2 with duration being 20 s, and microbubbles can significantly increase the maximal gene transfer rate in vitro.

Keywords

ultrasound / microbubble / gene delivery

References

[1] DonnellyJ., BerryK., UlmerJ. B.. Technical and regulatory hurdles for DNA vaccines. Int J Parasitol, 2003, 33(5–6): 457-467

[2] ZangC., DengY. B., ZangQ. P.. Effect of ultrasound contrast agent on gene delivery. Clin J Ultrasonogr (Chinese), 2004, 13(11): 868-869

[3] ChenY. C., LiangH. D., ZhangQ. P., et al.. Pluronic block copolymers: Novel functions in ultrasound-mediated gene transfer and against cell damage. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2006, 32(1): 131-137

[4] LiuJ., LewisT. N., PrausnitzM. R.. Non-invasive assessment and control of ultrasound-mediated membrane permeabilization. Pharm Res, 1998, 15(6): 918-924

[5] KoikeH., TomitaN., AzumaH., et al.. An efficient gene transfer method mediated by ultrasound and microbubbles into the kidney. J Gene Med, 2005, 7(1): 108-116

[6] GuoD. P., LiX. Y., SunP., et al.. Ultrasound/microbubble enhances foreign gene expression in ECV304 cells and murine myocardium. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai), 2004, 36(12): 824-31

[7] WangW., BianZ. Z., WuY. J., et al.. Bioeffects of low-frequency ultrasonic gene delivery and safety on cell membrane permeability control. J Ultrasound Med, 2004, 23(12): 1569-82

[8] FrenkelP. A., ChenS. Y., ThaiT., et al.. DNA-loaded albumin microbubbles enhance ultrasound-mediated transfection in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28(6): 817-822

[9] FerilL. B., KondoT.. Biological effects of low intensity ultrasound: the mechanism involved, and its implications on therapy and on biosafety of ultrasound. J Radiat Res (Tokyo), 2004, 45(4): 479-489

[10] LawrieA., BriskenA. F., FrancisS. E., et al.. Ultrasound-enhanced transgene expression in vascular cells is not dependent upon cavitation-induced free radicals. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2003, 29(10): 1453-1461