A comparison of radiographic interpretation of silica exposed workers using the 1963 and the 1986 Chinese roentgenodiagnostic criteria of pneumoconioses

Abstract

As part of a larger study relating to silica exposure, silicosis, and lung cancer mortality in Chinese mine and factory workers, 1936 old posterior-anterior chest X-rays were re-interpreted according to the 1986 Chinese Roentgenodiagnostic Criteria of pneumoconioses. Each film was independently read by three individuals from a panel of eleven radiologists, and this reading was compared to the original one. Subsequent to the independent readings, a groups of three readers interpreted the films together, called the consensus readings. Comparisons were made by Chinese stage of pneumoconiosis. For the entire cohort, there was a crude agreement of 57.4% between the old and the new interpretations. Agreement within one step of full agreement was 92.5%. The interpretations done by median reading and by consensus were very similar. In general, there was a tendency for the old readings to be slightly higher compared to the new interpretations. This tendency was most marked in the tin mines, followed in decreasing order by the iron/copper mines, the potteries, and the tungsten mines. The agreement between the old and new interpretations is felt to be satisfactory.

Keywords

pneumoconioees / roentgenodiagnostic criteria

References

[1] HuangJQ, HongYZ. A comparsion of Chinese diagnostic standards of silicotic radiographs and the ILO International classification of radiographs of pneumoconioses. Ann Occu Hyg, 1984, 28: 13-13

[2] The 1986 Chinese roentgenodiagnostic criteria for the pneumoconioses, Chinese academy of preventive medicine, Beijing, 1986

[3] HodousTK, et al.. Wuhan-American comparison, A comparison of pneumoconiosis interpretation between Chinese and American readers and classifications. J Tongji Med Univ, 1991, 11(4): 225-225

[4] CohenJ. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Phychol Meas, 1960, 20: 37-37

[5] DucatmanAM, et al.. B-readers and asbestos medical surveillance. J Occup Med, 1988, 30: 644-644

[6] ParkerDL, et al.. Public health implications of the variability in the interpretation of “B” readings for pleural changes. J Occup Med, 1989, 31: 775-775

[7] RegerRB., et al.. The effect of film quality and other factors on the roentgenographic categorization of coal workers pneumoconiosis. Am J Roent Rad Ther Nuc Med, 1972, 115: 462-462

[8] PearsonNG, et al.. Effect of quality of chest radiographs on categorization of Coal workers pneumoconiosis. Br J Ind Med, 1965, 22: 81-81

[9] FletcherCM, OldhamPD. Problem of consistent radiological diagnoses in coal miners pneumoconiosis. Br J Ind Med, 1949, 6: 168-168