Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2017, Vol. 11 Issue (1) : 90-99     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-016-0363-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE |
Multiple linear regression, artificial neural network, and fuzzy logic prediction of 28 days compressive strength of concrete
Faezehossadat KHADEMI1(),Mahmoud AKBARI2,Sayed Mohammadmehdi JAMAL3,Mehdi NIKOO4
1. Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago IL 60616, USA
2. Civil Engineering Department, University of Kashan, Kashan 8731753153, Iran
3. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas 3995, IRAN
4. Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz 6134937333, IRAN
Download: PDF(1663 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Evaluating the in situ concrete compressive strength by means of cores cut from hardened concrete is acknowledged as the most ordinary method, however, it is very difficult to predict the compressive strength of concrete since it is affected by many factors such as different mix designs, methods of mixing, curing conditions, compaction, etc. In this paper, considering the experimental results, three different models of multiple linear regression model (MLR), artificial neural network (ANN), and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) are established, trained, and tested within the Matlab programming environment for predicting the 28 days compressive strength of concrete with 173 different mix designs. Finally, these three models are compared with each other and resulted in the fact that ANN and ANFIS models enables us to reliably evaluate the compressive strength of concrete with different mix designs, however, multiple linear regression model is not feasible enough in this area because of nonlinear relationship between the concrete mix parameters. Finally, the sensitivity analysis (SA) for two different sets of parameters on the concrete compressive strength prediction are carried out.

Keywords concrete      28 days compressive strength      multiple linear regression      artificial neural network      ANFIS      sensitivity analysis (SA)     
Corresponding Authors: Faezehossadat KHADEMI   
Online First Date: 16 November 2016    Issue Date: 27 February 2017
 Cite this article:   
Faezehossadat KHADEMI,Mahmoud AKBARI,Sayed Mohammadmehdi JAMAL, et al. Multiple linear regression, artificial neural network, and fuzzy logic prediction of 28 days compressive strength of concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 90-99.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-016-0363-9
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2017/V11/I1/90
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Faezehossadat KHADEMI
Mahmoud AKBARI
Sayed Mohammadmehdi JAMAL
Mehdi NIKOO
Fig.1  Overview of this research
number parameters unit maximum minimum
1 compressive strength of concrete kg/cm2 394.00 173.00
2 water-cement ratio _ 0.50 0.24
3 maximum size of aggregate mm 50.00 5.12
4 gravel kg 1050.00 559.00
5 cement kg 549.00 243.00
6 sand 3/8 kg 523.00 303.00
7 sand 3/4 kg 693.00 365.00
8 fineness modulus of sand _ 9.20 2.40
Tab.1  Characteristics of cylindrical samples [13]
Number parameters standard deviation (?) mean (µ)
1 compressive strength of concrete 54.98 279.27
2 water-cement ratio 0.19 0.43
3 maximum size of aggregate 14.25 23.89
4 gravel 95.71 779.13
5 cement 72.70 385.55
6 sand 3/8 64.45 427.05
7 sand 3/4 90.06 563.31
8 fineness modulus of Sand 1.30 3.27
Tab.2  Mean and standard deviation of each concrete characteristic [13]
Fig.2  Architecture of artificial neural network
Fig.3  Schematic of ANFIS Architecture
Fig.4  Structure of the ANN model used in Matlab software
Fig.5  Structure of the ANFIS model used in Matlab software
Fig.6  Comparison between the “measured” and “predicted” parameters for “training” data in MLR model
Fig.7  The training state for the artificial neural network model
Fig.8  Best validation performance in artificial neural network model
Fig.9  Comparison between the “target” and “output” parameters for “training” data in ANN model
Fig.10  Comparison between the “target” and “output” parameters for “validation” data in ANN model
Fig.11  Comparison between the “target” and “output” parameters for “training” data in ANFIS model
Fig.12  Comparison between the “target” and “output” parameters for “validation” data in ANFIS model
Fig.13  Comparison between the “target” and “output” parameters for “test” data in ANFIS model
Fig.14  Comparison between the measured and predicted compressive strength by the MLR model for “test” data
Fig.15  Comparison between the measured and predicted compressive strength by the ANN model for “test” data
Fig.16  Comparison between the measured and predicted compressive strength by the ANFIS model for “test” data
prediction model name coefficient of determination for set 1 coefficient of determination for set 2
MLR 0.7456 0.7311
ANN 0.9226 0.9010
ANFIS 0.8212 0.8053
Tab.3  Performing sensitivity analysis on MLR, ANN, and ANFIS models
1 Khademi F, Akbari M, Jamal S M. Prediction of compressive strength of concrete by data-driven models. i-manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 2015, 5(2): 16–23
2 Nikoo M, Torabian Moghadam F, Sadowski L. Prediction of concrete compressive strength by evolutionary artificial neural networks. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2015
3 Sobhani J, Najimi M, Pourkhorshidi A R, Parhizkar T. Prediction of the compressive strength of no-slump concrete: a comparative study of regression, neural network and ANFIS models. Construction & Building Materials, 2010, 24(5): 709–718
4 Sarıdemir M. Predicting the compressive strength of mortars containing metakaolin by artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Advances in Engineering Software, 2009, 40(9): 920–927
5 Ramezanianpour A A, Sobhani M, Sobhani J. Application of network-based neuro-fuzzy system for prediction of the strength of high strength concrete, 2004
6 Bal L, Buyle-Bodin F. Artificial neural network for predicting drying shrinkage of concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 38: 248–254
7 Atici U. Prediction of the strength of mineral admixture concrete using multivariable regression analysis and an artificial neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(8): 9609–9618
8 Sadowski Ł, Nikoo M, Nikoo M. Principal Component analysis combined with a self-organization feature map to determine the pull-off adhesion between concrete layers. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 78: 386–396
9 Nikoo M, Zarfam P, Nikoo M. Determining displacement in concrete reinforcement building with using evolutionary artificial neural networks. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2012, 16(12): 1699–1708
10 Amani J, Moeini R. Prediction of shear strength of reinforced concrete beams using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and artificial neural network. Scientia Iranica, 2012, 19(2): 242–248
11 Sadowski L, Nikoo M. Corrosion current density prediction in reinforced concrete by imperialist competitive algorithm. Neural Computing & Applications, 2014, 25(7–8): 1627–1638
12 Khademi F, Behfarnia K. Evaluation of concrete compressive strength using artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models. Iran University of Science & t echnology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 2016, 6(3): 423–432
13 Nikoo M, Zarfam P, Sayahpour H. Determination of compressive strength of concrete using self organization feature map (SOFM). Engineering with Computers, 2015, 31(1): 113–121
14 Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014, 59: 80–95
15 Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mechanics of Materials, 2014, 68: 70–84
16 Vu-Bac N, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Uncertainty quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 68: 446–464
17 Khademi F, Jamal, S M.Predicting the 28 Days compressive strength of concrete using artificial neural network. i-Manager's Journal on Civil Engineering, 2016, 6(2): 1
18 Sadrmomtazi A, Sobhani J, Mirgozar M A. Modeling compressive strength of EPS lightweight concrete using regression, neural network and ANFIS. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 42: 205–216
19 Hoła J, Schabowicz K.Application of artificial neural networks to determine concrete compressive strength based on non−destructive tests. Journal of civil Engineering and Management, 2005, 11(1): 23–32
20 Naderpour H, Kheyroddin A, Amiri G G. Prediction of FRP-confined compressive strength of concrete using artificial neural networks. Composite Structures, 2010, 92(12): 2817–2829
21 Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 1989, 2(5): 359–366
22 Jeong D I, Kim Y O. Rainfall-runoff models using artificial neural networks for ensemble streamflow prediction. Hydrological Processes, 2005, 19(19): 3819–3835
23 Boğa A R, Öztürk M, Topçu İ B. Using ANN and ANFIS to predict the mechanical and chloride permeability properties of concrete containing GGBFS and CNI. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2013, 45(1): 688–696
24 Jang J S R, Sun C T. Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1995, 83(3): 378–406
25 MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States, 2014
26 Gandomi A H, Sajedi S, Kiani B, Huang Q. Genetic programming for experimental big data mining: A case study on concrete creep formulation. Automation in Construction, 2016, 70: 89–97
27 Khademi F, Akbari M, Jamal S M.Measuring compressive strength of puzzolan concrete by ultrasonic pulse velocity method. i-Manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 2015, 5(3), 23
28 Sajedi S, Razavizadeh A, Minaii Z, Ghassemzadeh F, Shekarchi M. A rational method for calculation of restrained shrinkage stresses in repaired concrete members. Concrete Solutions, 2011, 461
29 Sajedi S, Huang Q. Probabilistic prediction model for average bond strength at steel–concrete interface considering corrosion effect. Engineering Structures, 2015, 99: 120–131
30 Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96: 520–535
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] T. Chandra Sekhara REDDY. Predicting the strength properties of slurry infiltrated fibrous concrete using artificial neural network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 490-503.
[2] Guowei MA, Li WANG. A critical review of preparation design and workability measurement of concrete material for largescale 3D printing[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 382-400.
[3] Rongrong YIN, Chenchen ZHANG, Qing WU, Baocheng LI, He XIE. Damage on lining concrete in highway tunnels under combined sulfate and chloride attack[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 331-340.
[4] Neftalí SARMIENTO-SOLANO, Miguel P. ROMO. In-plane transversal normal stresses in the concrete face of CFRD induced by the first-dam reservoir filling[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 81-91.
[5] P. ZAKIAN. An efficient stochastic dynamic analysis of soil media using radial basis function artificial neural network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(4): 470-479.
[6] Behnam VAKHSHOURI, Shami NEJADI. Instantaneous deflection of light-weight concrete slabs[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(4): 412-423.
[7] Osama Ahmed MOHAMED, Omar Fawwaz NAJM. Compressive strength and stability of sustainable self-consolidating concrete containing fly ash, silica fume, and GGBS[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(4): 406-411.
[8] Meng GUO, Yiqiu TAN, Xuesong DU, Zhaofeng LV. Study on the cohesion and adhesion of hot-poured crack sealants[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 353-359.
[9] Wan WANG, Jianzhuang XIAO, Shiying XU, Chunhui WANG. Experimental study on behavior of mortar-aggregate interface after elevated temperatures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(2): 158-168.
[10] Sanjeev Kumar VERMA,Sudhir Singh BHADAURIA,Saleem AKHTAR. In-situ condition monitoring of reinforced concrete structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 420-437.
[11] Mina YEKKALAR,Liv HASELBACH,Quinn LANGFITT. Testing development of different surface treatments on pervious concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 385-393.
[12] Ali KEZMANE,Said BOUKAIS,Mohand Hamizi. Numerical simulation of squat reinforced concrete wall strengthened by FRP composite material[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 445-455.
[13] Chunyan QUAN,Wei WANG,Jian ZHOU,Rong WANG. Cyclic behavior of stiffened joints between concrete-filled steel tubular column and steel beam with narrow outer diaphragm and partial joint penetration welds[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 333-344.
[14] A. SILVA,Y. JIANG,L. MACEDO,J. M. CASTRO,R. MONTEIRO,N. SILVESTRE. Seismic performance of composite moment-resisting frames achieved with sustainable CFST members[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 312-332.
[15] Konstantin SOBOLEV. Modern developments related to nanotechnology and nanoengineering of concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(2): 131-141.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed