Please wait a minute...

Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2020, Vol. 14 Issue (4) : 59     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1238-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Co-application of energy uncoupling and ultrafiltration in sludge treatment: Evaluations of sludge reduction, supernatant recovery and membrane fouling control
An Ding1(), Yingxue Zhao1, Zhongsen Yan2, Langming Bai1, Haiyang Yang1, Heng Liang1, Guibai Li1, Nanqi Ren1
1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (SKLUWRE), Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
2. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China
Download: PDF(2689 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• Effects of metabolic uncouplers addition on sludge reduction were carried out.

• TCS addition effectively inhibited ATP synthesis and reduced sludge yield.

• The effluent quality such as TOC and ammonia deteriorated but not significantly.

• Suitable dosage retarded biofouling during sludge water recovery by UF membrane.

Energy uncoupling is often used for sludge reduction because it is easy to operate and does not require a significant amount of extra equipments (i.e. no additional tank required). However, over time the supernatant extracted using this method can deteriorate, ultimately requiring further treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of using a low-pressure ultrafiltration membrane process for sludge water recovery after the sludge had undergone an energy uncoupling treatment (using 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS)). Energy uncoupling was found to break apart sludge floc by reducing extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content. Analysis of supernatant indicated that when energy uncoupling and membrane filtration were co-applied and the TCS dosage was below 30 mg/L, there was no significant deterioration in organic component removal. However, ammonia and phosphate concentrations were found to increase as the concentration of TCS added increased. Additionally, due to low sludge concentrations and EPS contents, addition of 30–60 mg/L TCS during sludge reduction increased the permeate flux (two times higher than the control) and decreased the hydraulic reversible and cake layer resistances. In contrast, high dosage of TCS aggravated membrane fouling by forming compact fouling layers. In general, this study found that the co-application of energy uncoupling and membrane filtration processes represents an effective alternative method for simultaneous sludge reduction and sludge supernatant recovery.

Keywords Sludge reduction      Energy uncoupling      Ultrafiltration membrane      Membrane fouling     
Corresponding Author(s): An Ding   
Issue Date: 01 April 2020
 Cite this article:   
An Ding,Yingxue Zhao,Zhongsen Yan, et al. Co-application of energy uncoupling and ultrafiltration in sludge treatment: Evaluations of sludge reduction, supernatant recovery and membrane fouling control[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 59.
 URL:  
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-020-1238-9
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2020/V14/I4/59
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
An Ding
Yingxue Zhao
Zhongsen Yan
Langming Bai
Haiyang Yang
Heng Liang
Guibai Li
Nanqi Ren
Fig.1  Effect of TCS addition on sludge reduction: (a) MLSS concentration; (b) MLVSS concentration; (c) total ATP contents and (d) sludge yield.
Fig.2  Effect of TCS concentration on particle size of sludge: (a) the suspended sludge on Day 7; (b) the suspended sludge on Day 22; and (c) resuspended bio-fouling layer adhered on the membrane surface.
Fig.3  Effect of TCS on EPS and SMP distribution of the sludge: (a) EPS polysaccharides; (b) EPS proteins; (c) SMP polysaccharides; (d) SMP proteins; (e) EEM spectra of the EPS samples on Day 22; and (f) EEM spectra of the SMP samples on Day 22. E1, E2, E3 and E4 were the EPS samples; and S1, S2, S3 and S4 were the SMP samples from the four systems, respectively.
Fig.4  Effect of TCS addition on the permeate quality of the membrane process: (a) COD; (b) ammonium; and (c) total phosphorus.
Fig.5  Effects of TCS on permeability and fouling resistances during ultrafiltration membrane: (a) permeability development with time; (b) hydraulic and reversible and irreversible resistances; (c) pore blocking and cake layer resistances.
Sample Thickness
(μm)
Proteins
(mg/g)
Polysaccharides
(mg/g)
ATP
(μmol/m2)
Surface porosity
(%)
Reactor 1 171.0±5.9 45.9±2.4 103.6±7.1 178.6±11.3 25.7±0.1
Reactor 2 150.7±4.2 30.2±3.5 65.8±3.7 128.6±9.2 21.5±0.8
Reactor 3 134.8±6.3 22.7±2.2 72.1±4.8 89.5±3.1 16.2±0.6
Reactor 4 118.1±3.5 16.9±1.4 61.3±5.8 73.7±4.7 7.7±0.3
Tab.1  Characterization of fouling layer with different concentration of TCS: Thickness, EPS, ATP contents and surface porosity (after drying) 40 (n = 3)
Fig.6  Three dimensional reconstructions of the Z-stacks acquired with confocal laser scanning microscopy images of bio-fouling layer on the membranes.
1 A Baker (2001). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(5): 948–953
https://doi.org/10.1021/es000177t
2 G W Chen, H Q Yu, H X Liu, D Q Xu (2006). Response of activated sludge to the presence of 2,4-dichlorophenol in a batch culture system. Process Biochemistry, 41(8): 1758–1763
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.03.022
3 W Chen, P Westerhoff, J A Leenheer, K Booksh (2003). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(24): 5701–5710
https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
4 d T S e Oliveira, S F Corsino, D Di Trapani, M Torregrossa, G Viviani (2018). Biological minimization of excess sludge in a membrane bioreactor: Effect of plant configuration on sludge production, nutrient removal efficiency and membrane fouling tendency. Bioresource Technology, 259: 146–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.03.035
5 A Ding, H Liang, G Li, I Szivak, J Traber, W Pronk (2017a). A low energy gravity-driven membrane bioreactor system for grey water treatment: Permeability and removal performance of organics. Journal of Membrane Science, 542 (11): 408–417
6 A Ding, H Liang, F Qu, L Bai, G Li, H H Ngo, W Guo (2014). Effect of granular activated carbon addition on the effluent properties and fouling potentials of membrane-coupled expanded granular sludge bed process. Bioresource Technology, 171(1): 240–246
7 A Ding, D Lin, Y Zhao, H H Ngo, W Guo, L Bai, X Luo, G Li, N Ren, H Liang (2019). Effect of metabolic uncoupler, 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) on sludge properties and fouling potential in ultrafiltration membrane process. Science of the Total Environment, 650: 1882–1888
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.321
8 A Ding, J Wang, D Lin, X Tang, X Cheng, G Li, N Ren, H Liang (2017b). In situ coagulation versus pre-coagulation for gravity-driven membrane bioreactor during decentralized sewage treatment: Permeability stabilization, fouling layer formation and biological activity. Water Research, 126: 197–207
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.09.027
9 L Dvořák, M Gómez, M Dvořáková, I Růžičková, J Wanner (2011). The impact of different operating conditions on membrane fouling and EPS production. Bioresource Technology, 102(13): 6870–6875
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.061
10 F Fang, H L Hu, M M Qin, Z X Xue, J S Cao, Z R Hu (2015). Effects of metabolic uncouplers on excess sludge reduction and microbial products of activated sludge. Bioresource Technology, 185: 1–6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.054
11 X C Feng, W Q Guo, S S Yang, H S Zheng, J S Du, Q L Wu, N Q Ren (2014). Possible causes of excess sludge reduction adding metabolic uncoupler, 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS), in sequence batch reactors. Bioresource Technology, 173: 96–103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.085
12 E Ferrer-Polonio, J Fernández-Navarro, J L Alonso-Molina, A Bes-Piá, I Amorós, J A Mendoza-Roca (2019). Changes in the process performance and microbial community by addition of the metabolic uncoupler 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide in sequencing batch reactors. Science of the Total Environment, 694: 133726
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133726
13 W Q Guo, S S Yang, W S Xiang, X J Wang, N Q Ren (2013). Minimization of excess sludge production by in-situ activated sludge treatment processes: A comprehensive review. Biotechnology Advances, 31(8): 1386–1396
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.06.003
14 B Jiang, Y Liu (2010). Energy uncoupling inhibits aerobic granulation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(3): 589–595
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2122-5
15 B Jiang, Y Liu (2013). Dependence of structure stability and integrity of aerobic granules on ATP and cell communication. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97(11): 5105–5112
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4315-6
16 X Y Li, S F Yang (2007). Influence of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the flocculation, sedimentation and dewaterability of activated sludge. Water Research, 41(5): 1022–1030
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.037
17 Y Li, A M Li, J Xu, B Liu, L C Fu, W W Li, H Q Yu (2012). SMP production by activated sludge in the presence of a metabolic uncoupler, 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCS). Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 95(5): 1313–1321
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3765-6
18 Y Liu (2000). Effect of chemical uncoupler on the observed growth yield in batch culture of activated sludge. Water Research, 34(7): 2025–2030
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00386-3
19 T Maqbool, V L Quang, J Cho, J Hur (2016). Characterizing fluorescent dissolved organic matter in a membrane bioreactor via excitation–emission matrix combined with parallel factor analysis. Bioresource Technology, 209: 31–39
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.089
20 F Meng, H Zhang, F Yang, S Zhang, Y Li, X Zhang (2006). Identification of activated sludge properties affecting membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors. Separation and Purification Technology, 51(1): 95–103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2006.01.002
21 F Meng, S Zhang, Y Oh, Z Zhou, H S Shin, S R Chae (2017). Fouling in membrane bioreactors: An updated review. Water Research, 114: 151–180
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.006
22 F Meng, Z Zhou, B J Ni, X Zheng, G Huang, X Jia, S Li, Y Xiong, M Kraume (2011). Characterization of the size-fractionated biomacromolecules: Tracking their role and fate in a membrane bioreactor. Water Research, 45(15): 4661–4671
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.026
23 M Peter-Varbanets, F Hammes, M Vital, W Pronk (2010). Stabilization of flux during dead-end ultra-low pressure ultrafiltration. Water Research, 44(12): 3607–3616
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.04.020
24 M N Pons, S Le Bonte, O Potier (2004). Spectral analysis and fingerprinting for biomedia characterisation. Journal of Biotechnology, 113(1–3): 211–230
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.03.028
25 Y Tian, J Zhang, D Wu, Z Li, Y Cui (2013). Distribution variation of a metabolic uncoupler, 2,6-dichlorophenol (2,6-DCP) in long-term sludge culture and their effects on sludge reduction and biological inhibition. Water Research, 47(1): 279–288
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.008
26 Z Wang, H Yu, J Ma, X Zheng, Z Wu (2013). Recent advances in membrane bio-technologies for sludge reduction and treatment. Biotechnology Advances, 31(8): 1187–1199
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.02.004
27 Y Wei, R T Van Houten, A R Borger, D H Eikelboom, Y Fan (2003). Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment. Water Research, 37(18): 4453–4467
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00441-X
28 H Xu, Y Liu (2011). Control and cleaning of membrane biofouling by energy uncoupling and cellular communication. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(2): 595–601
https://doi.org/10.1021/es102911m
[1] FSE-20013-OF-DA_suppl_1 Download
Related articles from Frontiers Journals
[1] Shuo Wei, Lei Du, Shuo Chen, Hongtao Yu, Xie Quan. Electro-assisted CNTs/ceramic flat sheet ultrafiltration membrane for enhanced antifouling and separation performance[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 11-.
[2] An Ding, Yingxue Zhao, Huu Hao Ngo, Langming Bai, Guibai Li, Heng Liang, Nanqi Ren, Jun Nan. Metabolic uncoupler, 3,3′,4′,5-tetrachlorosalicylanilide addition for sludge reduction and fouling control in a gravity-driven membrane bioreactor[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 96-.
[3] Caiyun Hou, Sen Qiao, Yue Yang, Jiti Zhou. A novel sequence batch membrane carbonation photobioreactor developed for microalgae cultivation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 92-.
[4] Xuehao Zhao, Yinhu Wu, Xue Zhang, Xin Tong, Tong Yu, Yunhong Wang, Nozomu Ikuno, Kazuki Ishii, Hongying Hu. Ozonation as an efficient pretreatment method to alleviate reverse osmosis membrane fouling caused by complexes of humic acid and calcium ion[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 55-.
[5] Chao Pang, Chunhua He, Zhenhu Hu, Shoujun Yuan, Wei Wang. Aggravation of membrane fouling and methane leakage by a three-phase separator in an external anaerobic ceramic membrane bioreactor[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 50-.
[6] Nathalie Tanne, Rui Xu, Mingyue Zhou, Pan Zhang, Xiaomao Wang, Xianghua Wen. Influence of pore size and membrane surface properties on arsenic removal by nanofiltration membranes[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 19-.
[7] Guangrong Sun, Chuanyi Zhang, Wei Li, Limei Yuan, Shilong He, Liping Wang. Effect of chemical dose on phosphorus removal and membrane fouling control in a UCT-MBR[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 1-.
[8] Lu Ao, Wenjun Liu, Yang Qiao, Cuiping Li, Xiaomao Wang. Comparison of membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of down-flow and up-flow biological activated carbon effluents[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 9-.
[9] Yonglei Wang, Baozhen Liu, Kefeng Zhang, Yongjian Liu, Xuexin Xu, Junqi Jia. Investigate of in situ sludge reduction in sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Performances, mechanisms and comparison of different carriers[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(5): 5-.
[10] Yuqin Lu, Xiao Bian, Hailong Wang, Xinhua Wang, Yueping Ren, Xiufen Li. Simultaneously recovering electricity and water from wastewater by osmotic microbial fuel cells: Performance and membrane fouling[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 5-.
[11] Shuai Wang, Tong Li, Chen Chen, Baicang Liu, John C. Crittenden. PVDF ultrafiltration membranes of controlled performance via blending PVDF-g-PEGMA copolymer synthesized under different reaction times[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 3-.
[12] Qingbin Guo, Sheng Chang. Tetra-detector size exclusion chromatography characterization of molecular and solution properties of soluble microbial polysaccharides from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(2): 16-.
[13] Xudong WANG,Miao ZHOU,Xiaorong MENG,Lei WANG,Danxi HUANG. Effect of protein on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane fouling behavior under different pH conditions: interface adhesion force and XDLVO theory analysis[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 12-.
[14] Haiqing CHANG,Baicang LIU,Wanshen LUO,Guibai LI. Fouling mechanisms in the early stage of an enhanced coagulation-ultrafiltration process[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(1): 73-83.
[15] Xia HUANG, Kang XIAO, Yuexiao SHEN. Recent advances in membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment in China[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2010, 4(3): 245-271.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed