Protective holobiome promotes strawberry tolerance of biotic stresses
Jin-Soo Son , Su Yeon Lee , Mee Kyung Sang , Francesco Spinelli , Choong-Min Ryu
Stress Biology ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 23
The commercial cultivation of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) is increasingly challenged by biotic stresses such as plant pathogens and insect pests, while climate change exacerbates abiotic stresses. Reliance on chemical fumigants and broad-spectrum pesticides presents risks to human health, environmental quality, and microbial diversity. The strawberry holobiome, defined as the integrated community of plant-associated microorganisms that inhabit the rhizosphere, phyllosphere, endosphere, and fruit surface, is emerging as a key determinant of plant health and productivity. Recent metagenomic and metabolomic studies have identified cultivar-specific microbial consortia that suppress plant disease, enhance stress tolerance via induced systemic resistance, and modulate fruit quality. The engineering of synthetic microbial communities (SynComs) offers a targeted approach to microbiome augmentation, but the lack of high-resolution functional data hinders the development of effective SynComs, especially in hydroponic and substrate culture systems. This review synthesizes recent advances in holobiome profiling, evaluates microbial biocontrol strategies against major pathogens, and outlines future directions, including AI (artificial intelligence)-driven community design, integrated multi-omics analysis, and microbiome-assisted breeding. Addressing these gaps will enable precision management of the strawberry microbiome to sustain yield, quality, and resilience under dynamic environmental conditions.
Biological control / Biotic stress / Holobiome / ISR / PGPR / Strawberry
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
Anandhakumar J, Zeller W (2004) Investigation on the Biocontrol of Phytophthora diseases on strawberry based on antagonism. Paper presented at the Ecofruit-11th International Conference on Cultivation Technique and Phytopathological Problems in Organic Fruit-Growing: Proceedings to the Conference, Weinsberg, Germany, 3-5 February 2004 |
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
Darrow GM (1966) The strawberry. History, breeding and physiology. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York |
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
FAO (2023) Statistical databases. https://www.fao.org/statistics/en/ |
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Hadavi E, Ghazijahani N (2018) Closed and Semi-closed Systems in Agriculture. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 33: Climate Impact on Agriculture. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99076-7_10 |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
Jamwal M, Sharma N (2019) Chapter 23 soilless culture. In: Sharma RM et al (eds) Strawberries: Production, Postharvest Management and Protection. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21441 |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
Oğuz İ, İbrahim Oğuz H, Ebru Kafkas N (2022) Strawberry cultivation techniques. In: Recent Studies on Strawberries. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.104611 |
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
Pastrana AM, Basallote-Ureba MJ, Aguado A, Akdi K, Capote N (2016) Biological control of strawberry soil-borne pathogens Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium solani, using Trichoderma asperellum and Bacillus spp. Phytopathol Mediterra 55:109–120. https://doi.org/10.14601/PHYTOPATHOL_MEDITERR-16363 |
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
Simpson D (2018) The Economic Importance of Strawberry Crops. In: Hytönen T, Graham J, Harrison R (eds) The Genomes of Rosaceous Berries and Their Wild Relatives. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76020-9_1 |
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
Stone BW, Weingarten EA, Jackson CR (2018) The role of the phyllosphere microbiome in plant health and function. Ann Plant Rev Online:533–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0614 |
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
Verma P, Singh G, Singh SK, Mirza AA, Bakshi M, Anmol, Lakshya, Kumar L, Rupesh (2025) Modulating Productivity of Strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) through artificial full-spectrum light in indoor vertical farming. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 25 (1):1219-1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02197-8 |
| [98] |
|
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
|
| [102] |
|
| [103] |
Wardlaw J, Davis C, MacLeod C, Robertson A (2023) Pesticide Usage in Scotland, Soft Fruit Crops 2022. Scottish Government, Edinburgh |
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
|
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
Zhang M, Kong Z, Fu H, Shu X, Xue Q, Lai H, Guo Q (2023a) Rhizosphere microbial ecological characteristics of strawberry root rot. Front Microbiol 14:1286740. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1286740 |
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
| [122] |
|
The Author(s)
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |