Plant-pathogen interactions: making the case for multi-omics analysis of complex pathosystems

Sadegh Balotf , Richard Wilson , Roghayeh Hemmati , Mahsa Eshaghi , Calum Wilson , Luis A. J. Mur

Stress Biology ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) : 66

PDF
Stress Biology ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1) :66 DOI: 10.1007/s44154-025-00260-7
Review
review-article

Plant-pathogen interactions: making the case for multi-omics analysis of complex pathosystems

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Understanding plant-pathogen interactions requires a systems-level perspective that single-omics approaches, such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, or metabolomics alone, often fail to provide. While these methods are informative, they are limited in their ability to capture the complexity of the dynamic molecular interactions between host and pathogen. Multi-omics strategies offer a powerful solution by integrating complementary data types, enabling a more comprehensive view of the molecular networks and pathways involved in disease progression and defence. Although technological advances have made omics analyses more accessible and affordable, their integration remains underutilised in plant science. This review highlights the limitations of single-omics studies in dissecting plant-pathogen interactions and emphasises the value of multi-omics approaches. We discuss available computational tools for data integration and visualisation, outline current challenges, including data heterogeneity, normalisation issues, and computational demands, and explore future directions such as the exploitation of artificial intelligence-based approaches and single-cell omics. We conclude that the increasing accessibility and affordability of omics analysis means that multi-omics strategies are now indispensable tools to investigate complex biological processes such as plant-pathogen interactions.

Keywords

Plant-pathogen interactions / Genomics / Transcriptomics / Proteomics / Metabolomics / Multi-omics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sadegh Balotf, Richard Wilson, Roghayeh Hemmati, Mahsa Eshaghi, Calum Wilson, Luis A. J. Mur. Plant-pathogen interactions: making the case for multi-omics analysis of complex pathosystems. Stress Biology, 2025, 5(1): 66 DOI:10.1007/s44154-025-00260-7

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Acharjee A, Kloosterman B, Visser RG, Maliepaard C. Integration of multi-omics data for prediction of phenotypic traits using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics, 2016, 17: 363-373

[2]

Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature, 2016, 537: 347-355

[3]

Afgan E, Baker D, Batut B, Van Den Beek M, Bouvier D, Čech M, Chilton J, Clements D, Coraor N, Grüning BA. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res, 2018, 46: W537-W544

[4]

Ailloud F, Lowe T, Cellier G, Roche D, Allen C, Prior P. Comparative genomic analysis of Ralstonia solanacearum reveals candidate genes for host specificity. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16: 1-11

[5]

Akbar S, Wei Y, Yuan Y, Khan MT, Qin L, Powell CA, Chen B, Zhang M. Gene expression profiling of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defense system following Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) infectio. BMC Plant Biol, 2020, 20: 1-12

[6]

Ali A, Alexandersson E, Sandin M, Resjö S, Lenman M, Hedley P, Levander F, Andreasson E. Quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics of potato in response to Phytophthora infestans in compatible and incompatible interactions. BMC Genomics, 2014, 15: 1-18

[7]

Allwood JW, Clarke A, Goodacre R, Mur LA. Dual metabolomics: a novel approach to understanding plant–pathogen interactions. Phytochemistry, 2010, 71: 590-597

[8]

Allwood JW, Williams A, Uthe H, van Dam NM, Mur LA, Grant MR, Pétriacq P. Unravelling plant responses to stress—The importance of targeted and untargeted metabolomics. Metabolites, 2021, 11: 558

[9]

Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2002, 1: 845-867

[10]

Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature, 2000, 408: 796-815

[11]

Argelaguet R, Velten B, Arnol D, Dietrich S, Zenz T, Marioni JC, Buettner F, Huber W, Stegle O. Multi omics factor analysis a framework for unsupervised integration of multi-omics data sets. Mol Syst Biol, 2018, 14 e8124

[12]

Asai S, Rallapalli G, Piquerez SJ, Caillaud M-C, Furzer OJ, Ishaque N, Wirthmueller L, Fabro G, Shirasu K, Jones JD. Expression profiling during Arabidopsis/downy mildew interaction reveals a highly-expressed effector that attenuates responses to salicylic acid. PLoS Pathog, 2014, 10 e1004443

[13]

Aylward J, Steenkamp ET, Dreyer LL, Roets F, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. A plant pathology perspective of fungal genome sequencing. IMA Fungus, 2017, 8: 1-15

[14]

Azizi P, Osman M, Hanafi MM, Sahebi M, Yusop MR, Taheri S. Adaptation of the metabolomics profile of rice after Pyricularia oryzae infection. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2019, 144: 466-479

[15]

Bai W, Li C, Li W, Wang H, Han X, Wang P, Wang L. Machine learning assists prediction of genes responsible for plant specialised metabolite biosynthesis by integrating multi-omics data. BMC Genomics, 2024, 25 418

[16]

Bakkeren G, Joly DL, Duplessis S (2016) Genomics research on non-model plant pathogens: Delivering novel insights into rust fungus biology. Front Plant Sci 7:216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00216

[17]

Balotf S, Wilson R, Tegg RS, Nichols DS, Wilson CR. In planta transcriptome and proteome profiles of Spongospora subterranea in resistant and susceptible host environments illuminates regulatory principles underlying host–pathogen interaction. Biology, 2021, 10: 840

[18]

Balotf S, Wilson R, Nichols DS, Tegg RS, Wilson CR. Multi-omics reveals mechanisms of resistance to potato root infection by Spongospora subterranea. Sci Rep, 2022, 12: 10804

[19]

Balotf S, Wilson R, Tegg RS, Nichols DS, Wilson CR. Shotgun proteomics as a powerful tool for the study of the proteomes of plants, their pathogens, and plant–pathogen interactions. Proteomes, 2022, 10: 5

[20]

Balotf S, Wilson R, Wilson CR. Transcriptomics is essential but not sufficient to unravel complex plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Cell Rep, 2024, 43: 175

[21]

Bernal-Gallardo JJ, de Folter S. Plant genome information facilitates plant functional genomics. Planta, 2024, 259: 117

[22]

Bindschedler LV, Burgis TA, Mills DJ, Ho JT, Cramer R, Spanu PD. In planta proteomics and proteogenomics of the biotrophic barley fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2009, 8: 2368-2381

[23]

Birch PR, Avrova AO, Duncan JM, Lyon GD, Toth RL. Isolation of potato genes that are induced during an early stage of the hypersensitive response to Phytophthora infestans. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 1999, 12: 356-361

[24]

Bludau I, Aebersold R. Proteomic and interactomic insights into the molecular basis of cell functional diversity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2020, 21: 327-340

[25]

Boulesteix A-L (2004) PLS dimension reduction for classification with microarray data. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 30. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1075

[26]

Brown TA. Genomes 5. CRC Press, 2023

[27]

Camañes G, Scalschi L, Vicedo B, González-Bosch C, García-Agustín P. An untargeted global metabolomic analysis reveals the biochemical changes underlying basal resistance and priming in Solanum lycopersicum, and identifies 1-methyltryptophan as a metabolite involved in plant responses to Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae. Plant J, 2015, 84: 125-139

[28]

Canzler S, Schor J, Busch W, Schubert K, Rolle-Kampczyk UE, Seitz H, Kamp H, von Bergen M, Buesen R, Hackermüller J. Prospects and challenges of multi-omics data integration in toxicology. Arch Toxicol, 2020, 94: 371-388

[29]

Castro-Moretti FR, Gentzel IN, Mackey D, Alonso AP. Metabolomics as an emerging tool for the study of plant–pathogen interactions. Metabolites, 2020, 10: 52

[30]

Cembrowska-Lech D, Krzemińska A, Miller T, Nowakowska A, Adamski C, Radaczyńska M, Mikiciuk G, Mikiciuk M. An integrated multi-omics and artificial intelligence framework for advance plant phenotyping in horticulture. Biology, 2023, 12: 1298

[31]

Cerami EG, Gross BE, Demir E, Rodchenkov I, Babur Ö, Anwar N, Schultz N, Bader GD, Sander C. Pathway commons, a web resource for biological pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res, 2010, 39: D685-D690

[32]

Chen H, King R, Smith D, Bayon C, Ashfield T, Torriani S, Kanyuka K, Hammond-Kosack K, Bieri S, Rudd J. Combined pangenomics and transcriptomics reveals core and redundant virulence processes in a rapidly evolving fungal plant pathogen. BMC Biol, 2023, 21: 24

[33]

Cheng CY, Krishnakumar V, Chan AP, Thibaud-Nissen F, Schobel S, Town CD. Araport11: a complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis thaliana reference genome. Plant J, 2017, 89: 789-804

[34]

Chun H, Keleş S. Sparse partial least squares regression for simultaneous dimension reduction and variable selection. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol, 2010, 72: 3-25

[35]

Coaker GL, Willard B, Kinter M, Stockinger EJ, Francis DM. Proteomic analysis of resistance mediated by Rcm 2.0 and Rcm 5.1, two loci controlling resistance to bacterial canker of tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2004, 17: 1019-1028

[36]

Crandall SG, Gold KM, Jiménez-Gasco MdM, Filgueiras CC, Willett DS. A multi-omics approach to solving problems in plant disease ecology. PLoS One, 2020, 15 e0237975

[37]

Dai T, Chang X, Hu Z, Liang L, Sun M, Liu P, Liu X. Untargeted metabolomics based on GC-MS and chemometrics: a new tool for the early diagnosis of strawberry anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum theobromicola. Plant Dis, 2019, 103: 2541-2547

[38]

Dalio RJ, Magalhaes DM, Rodrigues CM, Arena GD, Oliveira TS, Souza-Neto RR, Picchi SC, Martins PM, Santos PJ, Maximo HJ. PAMPs, PRRs, effectors and R-genes associated with citrus–pathogen interactions. Ann Bot, 2017, 119: 749-774

[39]

Das S, Vera M, Gandin V, Singer RH, Tutucci E. Intracellular mRNA transport and localised translation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2021, 22: 483-504

[40]

De Cremer K, Mathys J, Vos C, Froenicke L, Michelmore RW, Cammue BPA, De Coninck B. RNA seq-based transcriptome analysis of Lactuca sativa infected by the fungal necrotroph Botrytis cinerea. Plant, cell & environment, 2013, 36: 1992-2007

[41]

Dettmer K, Hammock BD. Metabolomics–a new exciting field within the" omics" sciences. Environ Health Perspect, 2004, 112: A396-A397

[42]

Doehlemann G, Wahl R, Horst RJ, Voll LM, Usadel B, Poree F, Stitt M, Pons-Kühnemann J, Sonnewald U, Kahmann R. Reprogramming a maize plant: transcriptional and metabolic changes induced by the fungal biotroph Ustilago maydis. Plant J, 2008, 56: 181-195

[43]

Doni F, Miranti M, Mispan MS, Mohamed Z, Uphoff N. Multi-omics approaches for deciphering the microbial modulation of plants' genetic potentials: what's known and what's next?. Rhizosphere, 2022, 24 100613

[44]

Elmore JM, Griffin BD, Walley JW. Advances in functional proteomics to study plant-pathogen interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2021, 63 102061

[45]

French E, Kim B-S, Rivera-Zuluaga K, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS. Whole root transcriptomic analysis suggests a role for auxin pathways in resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2018, 31: 432-444

[46]

Fu X-D, Ares MJr. Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins. Nat Rev Genet, 2014, 15: 689-701

[47]

Giacomello S. A new era for plant science: spatial single-cell transcriptomics. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2021, 60 102041

[48]

Gil N, Ulitsky I. Regulation of gene expression by cis-acting long non-coding RNAs. Nat Rev Genet, 2020, 21: 102-117

[49]

Goh WWB, Wang W, Wong L. Why batch effects matter in omics data, and how to avoid them. Trends Biotechnol, 2017, 35: 498-507

[50]

Gomez-Cabrero D, Abugessaisa I, Maier D, Teschendorff A, Merkenschlager M, Gisel A, Ballestar E, Bongcam-Rudloff E, Conesa A, Tegnér J. Data integration in the era of omics: current and future challenges. BMC Syst Biol, 2014, 8: 1-10

[51]

González I, Déjean S, Martin PG, Baccini A. CCA: An R package to extend canonical correlation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 2008, 23: 1-14

[52]

Gonzalez-Fernandez R, Jorrin-Novo JV. Contribution of proteomics to the study of plant pathogenic fungi. J Proteome Res, 2012, 11: 3-16

[53]

Goswami RS, Xu J-R, Trail F, Hilburn K, Kistler HC. Genomic analysis of host–pathogen interaction between Fusarium graminearum and wheat during early stages of disease development. Microbiology, 2006, 152: 1877-1890

[54]

Goyal S, Yuan J, Chen T, Rabinowitz JD, Wingreen NS. Achieving optimal growth through product feedback inhibition in metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol, 2010, 6: e1000802

[55]

Greenbaum D, Colangelo C, Williams K, Gerstein M. Comparing protein abundance and mRNA expression levels on a genomic scale. Genome Biol, 2003, 4: 1-8

[56]

Griffin JL. Metabolic profiles to define the genome: can we hear the phenotypes?. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2004, 359: 857-871

[57]

Griss J, Viteri G, Sidiropoulos K, Nguyen V, Fabregat A, Hermjakob H. ReactomeGSA-efficient multi-omics comparative pathway analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2020, 19: 2115-2125

[58]

Gunnaiah R, Kushalappa AC, Duggavathi R, Fox S, Somers DJ. Integrated metabolo-proteomic approach to decipher the mechanisms by which wheat QTL (Fhb1) contributes to resistance against Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e40695

[59]

Gupta R, Lee SE, Agrawal GK, Rakwal R, Park S, Wang Y, Kim ST. Understanding the plant-pathogen interactions in the context of proteomics-generated apoplastic proteins inventory. Front Plant Sci, 2015, 6: 132864

[60]

Gyetvai G, Sønderkær M, Göbel U, Basekow R, Ballvora A, Imhoff M, Kersten B, Nielsen K-L, Gebhardt C. The transcriptome of compatible and incompatible interactions of potato (Solanum tuberosum) with Phytophthora infestans revealed by DeepSAGE analysis. PLoS One, 2012, 7: e31526

[61]

Han W, Ward JL, Kong Y, Li X (2023) Targeted and untargeted metabolomics for the evaluation of plant metabolites in response to the environment. Front Plant Sci 14:1167513. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1167513

[62]

Hayden HL, Savin KW, Wadeson J, Gupta VV, Mele PM. Comparative metatranscriptomics of wheat rhizosphere microbiomes in disease suppressive and non-suppressive soils for Rhizoctonia solani AG8. Front Microbiol, 2018, 9: 859

[63]

Holčapek M, Jirásko R, Lísa M. Recent developments in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and related techniques. J Chromatogr A, 2012, 1259: 3-15

[64]

Hong Y-S, Martinez A, Liger-Belair G, Jeandet P, Nuzillard J-M, Cilindre C. Metabolomics reveals simultaneous influences of plant defence system and fungal growth in Botrytis cinerea-infected Vitis vinifera cv. Chardonnay berries. J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 5773-5785

[65]

House RJ, Soper-Hopper MT, Vincent MP, Ellis AE, Capan CD, Madaj ZB, Wolfrum E, Isaguirre CN, Castello CD, Johnson AB. A diverse proteome is present and enzymatically active in metabolite extracts. Nat Commun, 2024, 15: 5796

[66]

Houterman PM, Speijer D, Dekker HL, de Koster CG, Cornelissen BJ, Rep M. The mixed xylem sap proteome of Fusarium oxysporum-infected tomato plants. Mol Plant Pathol, 2007, 8: 215-221

[67]

Hu W, Pan X, Abbas HMK, Li F, Dong W. Metabolites contributing to Rhizoctonia solani AG-1-IA maturation and sclerotial differentiation revealed by UPLC-QTOF-MS metabolomics. PLoS One, 2017, 12: e0177464

[68]

Hubler SL, Kumar P, Mehta S, Easterly C, Johnson JE, Jagtap PD, Griffin TJ. Challenges in peptide-spectrum matching: a robust and reproducible statistical framework for removing low-accuracy, high-scoring hits. J Proteome Res, 2019, 19: 161-173

[69]

Jan R, Hussain A, Assad A, Khurshid S, Macha MA (2025) Challenges with multi-omics data integration. In: Multi-Omics Technology in Human Health and Diseases. Elsevier, pp 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13595-8.00010-6

[70]

Jayaraman D, Forshey KL, Grimsrud PA, Ané J-M. Leveraging proteomics to understand plant–microbe interactions. Front Plant Sci, 2012, 3: 22605

[71]

Jeon J, Kim K-T, Choi J, Cheong K, Ko J, Choi G, Lee H, Lee G-W, Park S-Y, Kim S. Alternative splicing diversifies the transcriptome and proteome of the rice blast fungus during host infection. RNA Biol, 2022, 19: 373-386

[72]

Jmeian Y, El Rassi Z. Liquid-phase-based separation systems for depletion, prefractionation and enrichment of proteins in biological fluids for in-depth proteomics analysis. Electrophoresis, 2009, 30: 249-261

[73]

Kachroo P, Lee KH, Schwerdel C, Bailey JE, Chattoo BB. Analysis of host-induced response in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea using two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis, 1997, 18: 163-169

[74]

Kahar G, Haxim Y, Waheed A, Bozorov TA, Liu X, Wen X, Zhao M, Zhang D. Multi-omics approaches provide new insights into the identification of putative fungal effectors from Valsa mali. Microorganisms, 2024, 12: 655

[75]

Kamoun S, Hraber P, Sobral B, Nuss D, Govers F. Initial assessment of gene diversity for the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora infestans based on expressed sequences. Fungal Genet Biol, 1999, 28: 94-106

[76]

Kang M, Ko E, Mersha TB. A roadmap for multi-omics data integration using deep learning. Brief Bioinform, 2022, 23: bbab454

[77]

Karimi Jashni M, van der Burgt A, Battaglia E, Mehrabi R, Collemare J, de Wit PJ. Transcriptome and proteome analyses of proteases in biotroph fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum. Journal of Plant Pathology, 2020, 102: 377-386

[78]

Kim ST, Yu S, Kim SG, Kim HJ, Kang SY, Hwang DH, Jang YS, Kang KY. Proteome analysis of rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe grisea) proteome during appressorium formation. Proteomics, 2004, 4: 3579-3587

[79]

Kim S, Jhong J-H, Lee J, Koo J-Y. Meta-analytic support vector machine for integrating multiple omics data. BioData Min, 2017, 10: 1-14

[80]

Kimotho RN, Maina S. Unraveling plant–microbe interactions: can integrated omics approaches offer concrete answers?. J Exp Bot, 2024, 75: 1289-1313

[81]

Koussounadis A, Langdon SP, Um IH, Harrison DJ, Smith VA. Relationship between differentially expressed mRNA and mRNA-protein correlations in a xenograft model system. Sci Rep, 2015, 5: 10775

[82]

Lee S, Yang DS, Uppalapati SR, Sumner LW, Mysore KS. Suppression of plant defense responses by extracellular metabolites from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci in Nicotiana benthamiana. BMC Plant Biol, 2013, 13: 1-13

[83]

Li W, Wang X, Li C, Sun J, Li S, Peng M. Dual species transcript profiling during the interaction between banana (Musa acuminata) and the fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. BMC Genomics, 2019, 20: 1-16

[84]

Li Y, Feng Y, Q, Yan D, Liu Z, Zhang X. Comparative proteomic analysis of plant–pathogen interactions in resistant and susceptible poplar ecotypes infected with Botryosphaeria dothidea. Phytopathology, 2019, 109: 2009-2021

[85]

Li B, Gould J, Yang Y, Sarkizova S, Tabaka M, Ashenberg O, Rosen Y, Slyper M, Kowalczyk MS, Villani A-C. Cumulus provides cloud-based data analysis for large-scale single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq. Nat Methods, 2020, 17: 793-798

[86]

Lin E, Lane H-Y. Machine learning and systems genomics approaches for multi-omics data. Biomark Res, 2017, 5: 1-6

[87]

Liu Y. CWGCNA: an R package to perform causal inference from the WGCNA framework. NAR Genomics Bioinform, 2024, 6 lqae042

[88]

Liu Y, Beyer A, Aebersold R. On the dependency of cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance. Cell, 2016, 165: 535-550

[89]

Liu Y, Lu S, Liu K, Wang S, Huang L, Guo L. Proteomics: a powerful tool to study plant responses to biotic stress. Plant Methods, 2019, 15: 135

[90]

Lowe R, Shirley N, Bleackley M, Dolan S, Shafee T. Transcriptomics technologies. PLoS Comput Biol, 2017, 13: e1005457

[91]

Luo J, Xia W, Cao P, Za X, Zhang Y, Liu M, Zhan C, Wang N. Integrated transcriptome analysis reveals plant hormones jasmonic acid and salicylic acid coordinate growth and defense responses upon fungal infection in poplar. Biomolecules, 2019, 9: 12

[92]

Lv Z, He Z, Hao L, Kang X, Ma B, Li H, Luo Y, Yuan J, He N. Genome sequencing analysis of Scleromitrula shiraiana, a causal agent of mulberry sclerotial disease with narrow host range. Front Microbiol, 2021, 11: 603927

[93]

Makeyev EV, Maniatis T. Multilevel regulation of gene expression by microRNAs. Science, 2008, 319: 1789-1790

[94]

Malapi-Wight M, Salgado-Salazar C, Demers JE, Clement DL, Rane KK, Crouch JA. Sarcococca blight: use of whole-genome sequencing for fungal plant disease diagnosis. Plant Dis, 2016, 100: 1093-1100

[95]

McManus J, Cheng Z, Vogel C. Next-generation analysis of gene expression regulation–comparing the roles of synthesis and degradation. Mol Biosyst, 2015, 11: 2680-2689

[96]

Mehta A, Brasileiro AC, Souza DS, Romano E, Campos MA, Grossi-de-Sá MF, Silva MS, Franco OL, Fragoso RR, Bevitori R. Plant–pathogen interactions: what is proteomics telling us?. FEBS J, 2008, 275: 3731-3746

[97]

Meng H, Sun M, Jiang Z, Liu Y, Sun Y, Liu D, Jiang C, Ren M, Yuan G, Yu W. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals resistant and susceptible genes in tobacco cultivars in response to infection by Phytophthora nicotianae. Sci Rep, 2021, 11: 809

[98]

Mhora T, Ernest E, Wisser R, Evans T, Patzoldt M, Gregory N, Westhafer S, Polson S, Donofrio N. Genotyping-by-sequencing to predict resistance to lima bean downy mildew in a diversity panel. Phytopathology, 2016, 106: 1152-1158

[99]

Millioni R, Tolin S, Puricelli L, Sbrignadello S, Fadini GP, Tessari P, Arrigoni G. High abundance proteins depletion vs low abundance proteins enrichment: comparison of methods to reduce the plasma proteome complexity. PLoS One, 2011, 6: e19603

[100]

Molitor A, Zajic D, Voll LM, Pons-Kühnemann J, Samans B, Kogel K-H, Waller F. Barley leaf transcriptome and metabolite analysis reveals new aspects of compatibility and Piriformospora indica–mediated systemic induced resistance to powdery mildew. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2011, 24: 1427-1439

[101]

Morabito A, De Simone G, Pastorelli R, Brunelli L, Ferrario M. Algorithms and tools for data-driven omics integration to achieve multilayer biological insights: a narrative review. J Transl Med, 2025, 23: 425

[102]

Morris PF, Bone E, Tyler BM. Chemotropic and contact responses of Phytophthora sojae hyphae to soybean isoflavonoids and artificial substrates. Plant Physiol, 1998, 117: 1171-1178

[103]

Muñoz-Hoyos L, Stam R. Metabolomics in plant pathogen defence: from single molecules to large-scale analysis. Phytopathology®, 2023, 113: 760-770

[104]

Murmu S, Sinha D, Chaurasia H, Sharma S, Das R, Jha GK, Archak S. A review of artificial intelligence-assisted omics techniques in plant defence: current trends and future directions. Front Plant Sci, 2024, 15 1292054

[105]

Naidoo S, Visser EA, Zwart L, Du Toit Y, Bhadauria V, Shuey LS. Dual RNA-seq to elucidate the plant–pathogen duel. Current issues in molecular biology, 2018, 27: 127-142

[106]

Nakaminami K, Matsui A, Nakagami H, Minami A, Nomura Y, Tanaka M, Morosawa T, Ishida J, Takahashi S, Uemura M. Analysis of differential expression patterns of mRNA and protein during cold-acclimation and de-acclimation in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2014, 13: 3602-3611

[107]

Naranjo-Ortiz MA, Gabaldón T. Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity. Biol Rev, 2020, 95: 1198-1232

[108]

Naz S, Liu P, Farooq U, Ma H. Insight into de-regulation of amino acid feedback inhibition: a focus on structure analysis method. Microb Cell Fact, 2023, 22: 161

[109]

Negrel L, Halter D, Wiedemann-Merdinoglu S, Rustenholz C, Merdinoglu D, Hugueney P, Baltenweck R. Identification of lipid markers of Plasmopara viticola infection in grapevine using a non-targeted metabolomic approach. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 360

[110]

Ng CCA, Zhou Y, Yao Z-P. Algorithms for de-novo sequencing of peptides by tandem mass spectrometry: a review. Anal Chim Acta, 2023, 1268 341330

[111]

Nicaise V, Roux M, Zipfel C. Recent advances in PAMP-triggered immunity against bacteria: pattern recognition receptors watch over and raise the alarm. Plant Physiol, 2009, 150: 1638-1647

[112]

O'Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem, 1975, 250: 4007-4021

[113]

Ozsolak F, Milos PM. RNA sequencing: advances, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Genet, 2011, 12: 87-98

[114]

Pang Q, Zhang T, Wang Y, Kong W, Guan Q, Yan X, Chen S. Metabolomics of early stage plant cell–microbe interaction using stable isotope labeling. Front Plant Sci, 2018, 9: 760

[115]

Pariyar SR, Dababat AA, Sannemann W, Erginbas-Orakci G, Elashry A, Siddique S, Morgounov A, Leon J, Grundler FM. Genome-wide association study in wheat identifies resistance to the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera filipjevi. Phytopathology, 2016, 106: 1128-1138

[116]

Petitot AS, Dereeper A, Agbessi M, Da Silva C, Guy J, Ardisson M, Fernandez D. Dual RNA-seq reveals Meloidogyne graminicola transcriptome and candidate effectors during the interaction with rice plants. Mol Plant Pathol, 2016, 17: 860-874

[117]

Picard M, Scott-Boyer M-P, Bodein A, Périn O, Droit A. Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 2021, 19: 3735-3746

[118]

Ponnala L, Wang Y, Sun Q, van Wijk KJ. Correlation of mRNA and protein abundance in the developing maize leaf. Plant J, 2014, 78: 424-440

[119]

Qiu M, Tian M, Yong S, Sun Y, Cao J, Li Y, Zhang X, Zhai C, Ye W, Wang M. Phase-specific transcriptional patterns of the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora sojae unravel genes essential for asexual development and pathogenic processes. PLoS Pathog, 2023, 19: e1011256

[120]

Rampitsch C, Bykova NV, McCallum B, Beimcik E, Ens W. Analysis of the wheat and Puccinia triticina (leaf rust) proteomes during a susceptible host-pathogen interaction. Proteomics, 2006, 6: 1897-1907

[121]

Reel PS, Reel S, Pearson E, Trucco E, Jefferson E. Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: a review. Biotechnol Adv, 2021, 49 107739

[122]

Rep M, Van Der Does HC, Meijer M, Van Wijk R, Houterman PM, Dekker HL, De Koster CG, Cornelissen BJ. A small, cysteine-rich protein secreted by Fusarium oxysporum during colonisation of xylem vessels is required for I-3-mediated resistance in tomato. Mol Microbiol, 2004, 53: 1373-1383

[123]

Righetti PG, Boschetti E. Low-abundance plant protein enrichment with peptide libraries to enlarge proteome coverage and related applications. Plant Sci, 2020, 290 110302

[124]

Ritchie MD, Holzinger ER, Li R, Pendergrass SA, Kim D. Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype–phenotype interactions. Nat Rev Genet, 2015, 16: 85-97

[125]

Rivero-Garcia I, Torres M, Sánchez-Cabo F (2024) Deep generative models in single-cell omics. Comput Biol Med 176:108561 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108561

[126]

Rohart F, Gautier B, Singh A, Lê Cao K-A. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration. PLoS Comput Biol, 2017, 13: e1005752

[127]

Rozanova S, Barkovits K, Nikolov M, Schmidt C, Urlaub H, Marcus K (2021) Quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics: an overview. Methods Mol Biol 228:85–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1024-4_8

[128]

Ryan D, Robards K. Metabolomics: the greatest omics of them all?. Anal Chem, 2006, 78: 7954-7958

[129]

Sander T, Farke N, Diehl C, Kuntz M, Glatter T, Link H. Allosteric feedback inhibition enables robust amino acid biosynthesis in E. coli by enforcing enzyme overabundance. Cell systems, 2019, 8: 66-75e68

[130]

Satam H, Joshi K, Mangrolia U, Waghoo S, Zaidi G, Rawool S, Thakare RP, Banday S, Mishra AK, Das G. Next-generation sequencing technology: current trends and advancements. Biology, 2023, 12: 997

[131]

Scandiani MM, Luque AG, Razori MV, Ciancio Casalini L, Aoki T, O'Donnell K, Cervigni GD, Spampinato CP. Metabolic profiles of soybean roots during early stages of Fusarium tucumaniae infection. J Exp Bot, 2015, 66: 391-402

[132]

Schauer N, Fernie AR. Plant metabolomics: towards biological function and mechanism. Trends Plant Sci, 2006, 11: 508-516

[133]

Schenk PM, Carvalhais LC, Kazan K. Unraveling plant–microbe interactions: can multi-species transcriptomics help?. Trends Biotechnol, 2012, 30: 177-184

[134]

Schirawski J, Perlin MH (2018) Plant–microbe interaction 2017—the good, the bad and the diverse. Int J Mol Sci 19(5):1374. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051374

[135]

Schumann Y, Gocke A, Neumann JE. Computational methods for data integration and imputation of missing values in omics datasets. Proteomics, 2025, 25 e202400100

[136]

Ser Z, Liu X, Tang NN, Locasale JW. Extraction parameters for metabolomics from cultured cells. Anal Biochem, 2015, 475: 22-28

[137]

Shah SMA, Khojasteh M, Wang Q, Taghavi SM, Xu Z, Khodaygan P, Zou L, Mohammadikhah S, Chen G, Osdaghi E. Genomics-enabled novel insight into the pathovar-specific population structure of the bacterial leaf streak pathogen Xanthomonas translucens in small grain cereals. Front Microbiol, 2021, 12: 674952

[138]

Shao W, Lam H. Tandem mass spectral libraries of peptides and their roles in proteomics research. Mass Spectrom Rev, 2017, 36: 634-648

[139]

Shendure J, Balasubramanian S, Church GM, Gilbert W, Rogers J, Schloss JA, Waterston RH. DNA sequencing at 40: past, present and future. Nature, 2017, 550: 345-353

[140]

Simpson AJG, Reinach FdC, Arruda P, Abreu Fd, Acencio M, Alvarenga R, Alves LC, Araya JE, Baia GS, Baptista C. The genome sequence of the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa. Nature, 2000, 406: 151-157

[141]

Singh A, Shannon CP, Gautier B, Rohart F, Vacher M, Tebbutt SJ, Lê Cao K-A. DIABLO: an integrative approach for identifying key molecular drivers from multi-omics assays. Bioinformatics, 2019, 35: 3055-3062

[142]

Smoot ME, Ono K, Ruscheinski J, Wang P-L, Ideker T. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualisation. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27: 431-432

[143]

Spanu P, Di Pietro A, Oliver RP (2024) Pathogenicity-How do plant pathogens cause disease? In: Agrios' Plant Pathology. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822429-8.00003-0

[144]

Statello L, Guo C-J, Chen L-L, Huarte M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2021, 22: 96-118

[145]

Subramanian I, Verma S, Kumar S, Jere A, Anamika K (2020) Multi-omics data integration, interpretation, and its application. Bioinformatics Biol Insights 14:1177932219899051. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177932219899051

[146]

Tan KC, Ipcho SV, Trengove RD, Oliver RP, Solomon PS. Assessing the impact of transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics on fungal phytopathology. Mol Plant Pathol, 2009, 10: 703-715

[147]

Urquhart AS, Idnurm A. Limitations of transcriptome-based prediction of pathogenicity genes in the plant pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2019, 366 fnz080

[148]

Valous NA, Popp F, Zörnig I, Jäger D, Charoentong P. Graph machine learning for integrated multi-omics analysis. Br J Cancer, 2024, 131: 205-211

[149]

Vogel C, de Sousa AR, Ko D, Le SY, Shapiro BA, Burns SC, Sandhu D, Boutz DR, Marcotte EM, Penalva LO. Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line. Mol Syst Biol, 2010, 6: 400

[150]

Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10: 57-63

[151]

Wang FX, Ma YP, Yang CL, Zhao PM, Yao Y, Jian GL, Luo YM, Xia GX. Proteomic analysis of the sea-island cotton roots infected by wilt pathogen Verticillium dahliae. Proteomics, 2011, 11: 4296-4309

[152]

Wang K, Abid MA, Rasheed A, Crossa J, Hearne S, Li H. DNNGP, a deep neural network-based method for genomic prediction using multi-omics data in plants. Mol Plant, 2023, 16: 279-293

[153]

Want EJ, O'Maille G, Smith CA, Brandon TR, Uritboonthai W, Qin C, Trauger SA, Siuzdak G. Solvent-dependent metabolite distribution, clustering, and protein extraction for serum profiling with mass spectrometry. Anal Chem, 2006, 78: 743-752

[154]

William Allwood J, Ellis DI, Heald JK, Goodacre R, Mur LA. Metabolomic approaches reveal that phosphatidic and phosphatidyl glycerol phospholipids are major discriminatory non-polar metabolites in responses by Brachypodium distachyon to challenge by Magnaporthe grisea. Plant J, 2006, 46: 351-368

[155]

Xu J, Zheng Y, Pu S, Zhang X, Li Z, Chen J. Third-generation sequencing found LncRNA associated with heat shock protein response to heat stress in Populus qiongdaoensis seedlings. BMC Genomics, 2020, 21: 1-14

[156]

Yadav R, Gupta P, Chhabra R, Thakur K, Dhar H (2024) Transcriptomics of host–pathogen interaction. In: Singh K et al (eds) Biotechnological Advances for Disease Tolerance in Plants. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8874-7_16

[157]

Yajima W, Kav NN. The proteome of the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Proteomics, 2006, 6: 5995-6007

[158]

Yan J, Wang X. Machine learning bridges omics sciences and plant breeding. Trends Plant Sci, 2023, 28: 199-210

[159]

Yan J, Risacher SL, Shen L, Saykin AJ. Network approaches to systems biology analysis of complex disease: integrative methods for multi-omics data. Brief Bioinform, 2018, 19: 1370-1381

[160]

Yanes O, Tautenhahn R, Patti GJ, Siuzdak G. Expanding coverage of the metabolome for global metabolite profiling. Anal Chem, 2011, 83: 2152-2161

[161]

Yin R, Xia K, Xu X. Spatial transcriptomics drives a new era in plant research. Plant J, 2023, 116(6): 1571-1581

[162]

Zhang X, Wang Z, Jiang C, Xu J-R. Regulation of biotic interactions and responses to abiotic stresses by MAP kinase pathways in plant pathogenic fungi. Stress Biol, 2021, 1: 1-19

[163]

Zhou W, Eudes F, Laroche A. Identification of differentially regulated proteins in response to a compatible interaction between the pathogen Fusarium graminearum and its host, Triticum aestivum. Proteomics, 2006, 6: 4599-4609

[164]

Zhu J, Moreno-Pérez A, Coaker G. Understanding plant pathogen interactions using spatial and single-cell technologies. Commun Biol, 2023, 6: 814

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

69

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/